Chenyang Bi1, Clara M.A. Eichler1,2, Chunyi Wang1, John C. Little This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1 

1 Virginia Tech, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
2 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA


Received: July 6, 2023
Revised: November 10, 2023
Accepted: November 19, 2023

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230163  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:

Bi, C., Eichler, C.M.A., Wang, C., Little, J.C. (2024). Association between Emission Parameters and Material-phase Concentrations of Phthalate Plasticizers and their Alternatives. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 24, 230163. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230163


HIGHLIGHTS

  • We measured the emission parameters of plasticizers in vinyl sheets.
  • The emission rate of plasticizers may plateau at high material-phase levels.
  • The emissions of plasticizers in a material are independent of each other.
 

ABSTRACT


Plasticizers are frequently used in building materials and consumer products and many are semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs). Understanding the emission rate of plasticizers in indoor environments is critical for subsequent exposure and health risk assessments. While concerns have been increasing regarding the use of phthalate plasticizers in products and the emission of phthalates has been characterized in previous studies, the emission characteristics of compounds that are now being used as alternatives for phthalates remain poorly understood. In this work, we measured key parameters governing the emission of several phthalates and also their most recent emerging alternatives. Measurements include the gas-phase concentration in equilibrium with the material, y0, and the vapor pressure, p*, using polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sheets with relatively high, but accurately known levels of the material-phase concentration, C0, of the target plasticizers. We found that the PVC sheets containing different plasticizers show varying levels of y0 (0.05–184 µg m-3) despite having the same material-phase concentrations (C0 = 32.9%). We further examined the influence of high material-phase concentrations on y0 and found that the measured concentrations of y0 of diisononyl phthalate (DINP) (i.e., 0.12, 0.13, and 0.13 µg m-3) for three PVC sheets were almost the same despite having significantly different material-phase levels (i.e., 39%, 33%, and 26% w/w, respectively). The deviation from the previously reported linear relationship between y0 and C0 can be attributed to the assumption that the material with plasticizers is a ‘dilute solution’ at high material-phase concentrations, which likely becomes invalid at these high levels. Preliminary results also show that the plasticizers are ideally mixed in the polymer and that their simultaneous presence does not affect the y0 of individual compounds, even at relatively high material-phase concentrations.


Keywords: SVOCs, Emission, PVC, Phthalate alternatives


1 INTRODUCTION


Plasticizers, many of which are semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) as defined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), are commonly used in a wide range of building materials and consumer products. Since they are not chemically bonded to the polymer matrix, they can be slowly emitted from the source products into the indoor air (Lucattini et al., 2018). Due to their relatively low vapor pressure, gas-phase SVOCs may accumulate in indoor aerosol because of gas-particle partitioning (Liu et al., 2010) and SVOCs may further sorb to a variety of indoor surfaces such as windows, dishes, clothing, and furniture (Bi et al., 2015). Those surfaces may serve as strong reservoirs of SVOCs and substantially increase their residence time in indoor environments for months or years even after the sources are removed (Xu and Little, 2006). Exposure to potentially harmful plasticizers may create significant health risks such as asthma, endocrine-disrupting effects, or even cancer (Latini et al., 2006; Bornehag and Nanberg, 2010Fajersztajn et al., 2013; Kay et al., 2014; Ait Bamai et al., 2016) due to their extended presence in indoor environments. In particular, phthalate plasticizers have been associated with negative health impacts, resulting in the ban or restriction of several phthalates, for example, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), in the U.S., Canada, Europe, and Australia (Eichler et al., 2019). These restrictions lead to increased use of phthalate alternatives, many of which have poorly understood emission characteristics and indoor partitioning behavior. The plasticizers diisononyl phthalate (DINP), diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP), and bis(2-propylheptyl) phthalate (DPHP) are commonly used and therefore included in this work, although they do not meet the U.S. EPA criteria for defining SVOCs, as their boiling points at ambient pressure are above 400°C (U.S. EPA, 2023). However, it is crucial to understand the emission of these emerging plasticizers from indoor source materials and their transport in indoor environments to assess potential risks.

Xu and Little (2006) demonstrated that the emission rate of SVOCs is a function of the critical parameter, y0, which is the gas-phase concentration in equilibrium with the source material. Since then, chamber studies have been developed to measure y0 values of a range of SVOCs, mostly phthalate plasticizers, in different source materials such as building materials and consumer products (Liang and Xu, 2014; Wu et al., 2016a; Cao et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2023). Of those source materials, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) flooring has been frequently tested due to its common use in indoor environments and often high plasticizer concentrations. Liang and Xu (2014) found a linear relationship between the material-phase concentration of DEHP in PVC materials, C0, and y0 for C0 ≤ 13%. Liu and Zhang (2016) suggested a polymer-solvent interaction for characterizing SVOC emissions and showed that C0 is correlated with the ratio of y0 and the vapor pressure of the SVOC, p*. Eichler et al. (2018) summarized previous measurement results and demonstrated that the assumption of an ideal solution is invalid and that instead Henry’s law can be applied to associate C0 with a constant activity coefficient (i.e., y0/p*). This observation was also confirmed by Liang et al. (2018) for a broader range of SVOCs and materials. More recently, a modeling study indicated that the activity coefficients may change with C0 and that they may differ significantly depending on the plasticizer class (Addington et al., 2020). However, the modeling results were not validated experimentally and all previous measurements were limited to materials with relatively low C0 (less than 30% by weight). It is still unknown if the Henry’s law-based linear relationship holds for higher material-phase plasticizer concentrations and for emerging phthalate alternatives that are now more frequently used in PVC flooring due to the bans and restrictions of some historically used phthalate plasticizers.

Additionally, the vapor pressures of several plasticizers typically used indoors are only loosely constrained. Vapor pressure measurements vary by orders of magnitude. For example, DEHP vapor pressure data are found to vary by two orders of magnitude as reported in the literature (Wu et al., 2016b). Since many plasticizers investigated in this study are relatively new on the market, it is necessary to measure their vapor pressure to enable the development of reliable predictive relationships and to reduce reported uncertainties of p* in the literature. Additionally, the vapor pressure is a critical parameter that drives chemical behavior and can be used to predict the partitioning of SVOCs in the indoor environment (Liang et al., 2019; Eichler et al., 2021).

Therefore, there is a critical need to improve the understanding of the correlation between y0 and C0 and to better manage uncertainties of vapor pressure measurements of emerging phthalate alternatives. To address these knowledge gaps, the objectives of this study are to 1) measure and report y0 and p* of phthalates and their emerging alternatives present in a variety of vinyl sheets with accurately known material-phase concentrations and 2) investigate the change of y0 with varying levels of C0 for the same plasticizer and with the simultaneous presence of multiple plasticizers.

 
2 METHODS


 
2.1 Chemicals

Details of phthalates and their alternatives used in this study are summarized in Table 1. Deuterium-labeled DEHP (D4-DEHP) was used as an internal standard and was obtained from AccuStandard. Methanol (anhydrous, purity > 99%, Sigma-Aldrich) was used for cleaning glassware and preparing solutions. Dichloromethane (purity > 99.5%, VWR) was used for extractions. The solvents were analyzed regularly to monitor for potential contamination.

Table 1. Chemical name, abbreviation, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry number, and molecular weight (MW) of compounds analyzed in this study.

 
2.2 Source Materials

We used 14 PVC sheets with predetermined, gravimetrically-verified material-phase concentrations of plasticizers that were prepared and provided by European Plasticisers, a sector group of the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic). Details regarding the composition of each source material sheet are summarized in Table 2. The PVC sheets were intentionally selected so that sheets #1–9 had the same plasticizer material-phase concentrations to allow direct comparison of y0 independently of the material-phase concentration. Additional PVC sheets with varying material-phase concentrations of DINP (i.e., sheets #10–12) were chosen to investigate the influence of varying material-phase concentrations on y0. Finally, the simultaneous presence of multiple plasticizers in the same material and their joint effects on y0 were studied by using PVC sheets containing a mixture of different plasticizers yet having the same total material-phase concentration (i.e., sheets #13–15). The source material sheets were each cut into two round pieces with a diameter of 11 cm for the y0 chamber experiments.

Table 2. Summary of material-phase concentrations (C0) in PVC sheets and of measured gas-phase concentrations in equilibrium with the material (y0) and vapor pressures (p*) of target analytes.

 
2.3 y0 Measurements

A previously-developed micro chamber method was used to measure y0 of the phthalates and phthalate alternatives in the PVC source materials (Wang et al., 2023). While a detailed description can be found in Wang et al. (2023), we briefly summarize the method here. An aluminum micro chamber with a ‘sandwich-like’ configuration was used. The chamber consists of two round aluminum plates, one at the bottom and one at the top of the chamber, with an aluminum ring in between. Source material sheets are placed in between the plates and the ring to maximize the emission area and minimize the area available for wall loss inside the chamber. Clean air was supplied to the chamber at 300 mL min1 via the inlet on one side of the ring and gas-phase samples were collected using Tenax TA sorbent tubes at 75 mL min1 using a sampling port located on the ring at an angle of about 135° to the inlet. Prior to the sampling, sorbent tubes were cleaned by conditioning them at 320°C for 30 minutes while purging them with nitrogen. Before each experiment, the metal surfaces of the micro chamber were rinsed multiple times with methanol. Blank air samples were collected before experiments to make sure that no contamination remained in the chamber.

 
2.4 p* Measurement

We used a partial saturator tube method that was previously described by Wu et al. (2016b) to measure the vapor pressure of the phthalates and phthalate alternatives included in this study. In brief, we coated the inner surface of a 30 cm stainless steel tube with the target SVOC as a pure liquid and supplied clean air at the inlet of the partial saturator tube. The air then becomes saturated or near-saturated with the SVOC while flowing through the tube. Samples of the SVOC in the gas phase were collected at the partial saturator tube outlet with Tenax TA sorbent tubes. Based on the measured gas-phase concentration, the vapor pressure can then be calculated (Wu et al., 2016b).

 
2.5 Chemical Analysis

The sorbent tubes were thermally desorbed in a thermal desorber (Turbomatrix 100 TD) and target SVOCs were analyzed by a gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID) system (Agilent 6890). For DINP and DINCH, which cannot be accurately quantified via the GC-FID system, a GC-MS system (Thermo Scientific DSQII) coupled with a Markes TD-100 thermal desorber was used for analysis. The sorbent tubes were desorbed for 30 mins at 300°C with a helium flow rate of 50 mL min1, and a cold trap temperature of 5°C. Flash heating of the cold trap to 320°C transferred the analyte through the valves at 250°C and through the transfer line at 255°C to the GC. The temperature cycle of the GC-FID, using a 0.53 mm × 30 m RXT-5 column (Restek Inc.), was as follows: The temperature was held at 50°C for 1 min, ramped at 10°C min1 until reaching 280°C, then ramped at 20°C min1 to reach 320°C, and finally held at 320°C for 5 min. The oven temperature of the GC-MS with a 0.25 mm × 30 m RXT-5 column (Restek Inc.) was held at 50°C for 1 min, ramped at 35°C min1 to 320°C, and held at 320°C for 10 min.

Multi-point calibration curves for each analyte were developed for both the GC-MS and GC-FID methods by injecting five levels of diluted liquid standards of analytes into the sorbent tube covering the concentration ranges in the samples. Before GC-MS analysis, 1 µL of D4-DEHP solution (20 µg mL–1) in methanol was injected into each Tenax TA sorbent tube as an internal standard. For GC-FID analysis, the sorbent tubes were desorbed directly without using an internal standard. All tubes were analyzed in two successive runs to ensure complete desorption of the plasticizers from the tubes and the GC-MS or -FID system. The second run showed concentrations below the detection limit in all cases.

 
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


As shown in Table 2, y0 levels of plasticizers including DPHP, DIDP, PETV, EIAS, and DBT were measured and reported for the first time alongside their vapor pressures in this study. We found that the PVC sheets containing different plasticizers show varying levels of y0 (0.05–184 µg m–3) despite having the same material-phase concentrations (C0 = 32.9% w/w). According to Eichler et al. (2018), y0 values of SVOCs are a function of their vapor pressures and the material-phase concentration. If the material-phase concentrations are the same, which is the case for PVC sheets # 1–9, 11, and 13 in Table 2, the ratio between y0 and p* (y0/p*) should be similar between SVOCs. This conclusion roughly agrees with our measurements of y0/p* for DINCH, DIDP, ATBC, PETV, EIAS, DEHT, DINP, and DBT, which are 0.85. 0.72, 0.52, 0.46, 0.64, 0.57, 0.33, and 0.34, respectively. However, DEHA and DPHP have substantially lower and higher results for y0/p*, which are 0.01 and 1.80, respectively. The lower y0/p* of DEHA is probably due to its orders of magnitude higher vapor pressure, which makes it the most volatile compound on the list. In contrast, the reason for the higher y0/p* of DPHP, although not substantial, is unknown. Since DPHP is the least volatile compound in this study, it is possible that its low volatility can result in slight deviations from the mean y0/p* (0.57) of other analytes. However, we note that the material-phase concentrations of most PVC sheets, 32.9% w/w, are higher than all previous measurements summarized by Eichler et al. (2018). Whether the linear relationship between y0 and C0 for a given SVOC holds at very high material-phase concentrations has not been investigated in the past.

To probe this dependency at high material-phase concentrations, we selected three PVC sheets that contained different levels of DINP, ranging from 26% to 39%, in the materials manufactured by the same vendor (i.e., PVC sheets #10–12). As shown in Fig. 1(a), the measured gas-phase concentrations of DINP in the micro chamber are similar even though the DINP material-phase concentrations in the three materials differ significantly. The negligible influence of the material-phase concentrations on the chamber gas-phase concentrations, which is directly used for calculating y0 in Fig. 1(b), indicates that the linear relationship, reported and summarized by Eichler et al. (2018), may no longer exist after the material-phase concentration exceeds 25%–30% w/w for DINP. While this study has limited data to quantify this threshold for all target plasticizers, this deviation from the Henry's law-based relationship can be attributed to the high material-phase concentrations in our experiment, which were not accounted for in previously developed linear correlations assuming a dilute solution (i.e., the mass fraction of plasticizers is substantially lower than the total mass of the material). The findings agree with a previous modeling study suggesting that the activity coefficient (y0/p*) for phthalates and terephthalates may plateau when C0 is higher than 30% w/w (Addington et al., 2020). These results may further contribute to explaining the discrepancy of y0/p* for DEHA and DPHP since their volatility differences can cause them to deviate from Henry’s law dependency at lower material-phase concentrations. The finding raises an important and urgent need for accurate measurements of material-phase concentrations of plasticizers in materials and products on the consumer market. The measurements of SVOCs in source materials have been limited to a narrow range of products (i.e., vinyl flooring, polyurethane foam, crib mattresses, backpacks, toys, and vehicle cabin materials) for a limited number of SVOCs (Liang and Xu, 2014; Xie et al., 2015; Cao et al., 2017; Pei et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2019; Plaisance et al., 2022). Note that the measurement accuracy of plasticizer material-phase concentrations in polymers may also vary significantly and depends on the choice of extraction method such as accelerated solvent extraction, ultrasonic assisted extraction, Soxhlet extraction, and solvent dissolution (Vandenburg et al., 1997; Gimeno et al., 2014; Nhlapo et al., 2018). Therefore, it is important to perform strict quality control of the extraction procedures when adapting for more efficient methods, particularly for less soluble plasticizers with low volatility. The uncertainty caused by material-phase extractions, which may result in discrepancies from manufacture-added concentrations, further increases the need to investigate a broader range of materials and to use optimized methods to measure C0, y0, and p*.

Fig. 1. The influence of material-phase concentrations on (a) the gas-phase concentrations of DINP in the chamber and (b) y0 of DINP.Fig. 1. The influence of material-phase concentrations on (a) the gas-phase concentrations of DINP in the chamber and (b) y0 of DINP.

We further investigated the impact of the simultaneous presence of plasticizers on y0 by using three PVC sheets containing equal amounts of total plasticizers yet different individual concentrations. DBT was present as the only plasticizer in PVC sheet #13 (containing 33% w/w DBT) and also in combination with either DEHT in PVC sheet #14 (containing 26% and 6.6% w/w of DEHT and DBT, respectively) or DINCH in PVC sheet #15 (containing 26% and 6.6% w/w of DINCH and DBT, respectively). As shown in Fig. 2, the gas-phase concentrations of DBT in the chamber are relatively similar even in the presence of either DEHT or DINCH. The results suggest that the plasticizers are ideally-mixed in the polymer and their simultaneous presence, even at relatively high material-phase concentrations, does not affect the y0 of individual compounds. The conclusion can be further strengthened by calculating the steady-state gas-phase concentrations of DBT at 6.6% and 33% w/w, which are 35 µg m–3 and 180 µg m–3, respectively. The ratio of these two gas-phase concentrations is 0.19, which agrees with the ratio of their respective material-phase concentrations, 0.20 (i.e., 6.6%/33%). We acknowledge that more comprehensive studies for a broader range of compounds and materials are needed to solidify this conclusion. However, such efforts will require specially prepared source materials and consequently need stronger ties between industry and academic institutions.

Fig. 2. The effects of the simultaneous presence of multiple SVOCs on y0, shown here on the example of DBT in the presence of either DEHT or DINCH.Fig. 2. The effects of the simultaneous presence of multiple SVOCs on y0, shown here on the example of DBT in the presence of either DEHT or DINCH.

 
4 CONCLUSIONS


In this study, we reported for the first time the gas-phase concentration in equilibrium with the material, y0, and the vapor pressure, p*, of a wide range of plasticizers that are now being used as alternatives for traditional phthalates such as BBzP and DEHP, for a variety of PVC sheets with a known and verified material-phase concentration, C0. We found that the PVC sheets containing different plasticizers show varying levels of y0 (0.05–184 µg m–3) despite having the same material-phase concentrations (C0 = 32.9% w/w). The reported data have strong practical implications for predicting the emission and concentrations of plasticizers in indoor environments and assessing the subsequent impacts on aerosol formation and human health. As pointed out in previous work (Xu and Hubal, 2009), y0 is the most critical parameter for estimating SVOC emission rates and understanding the consequent human exposure. Additionally, the vapor pressures of emerging plasticizers measured in this study can contribute to more accurate predictions of gas-particle partitioning and enhance the accuracy in the estimation of aerosol formation in indoor environments.

We also investigated the relationship of three critical parameters at high material-phase plasticizer concentrations. The measured concentrations of y0 of DINP (i.e., 0.12, 0.13, and 0.13 µg m–3) for three PVC sheets were almost the same despite having different material-phase levels of 39%, 33%, and 26% w/w, respectively. We found that the previously reported Henry’s law-based linear relationship between C0 and y0 may no longer exist after the material-phase concentration exceeds a certain threshold (e.g., about 30% w/w for DINP). This deviation from Henry's law can be attributed to the invalid assumption at high material-phase concentrations that the material with plasticizers is a ‘dilute solution’. Preliminary results showed that the plasticizers are ideally-mixed in the polymer and their simultaneous presence, even at relatively high material-phase concentrations, does not affect the y0 of individual compounds.

 
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


We thank Dr. Rainer Otter, Oscar Vandevelde, Dr. Michael Grass, and Dr. Matthias Pfeiffer for providing the PVC sheets used in this study. This work was supported by European Plasticisers, a sector group of the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic), and VinylPlus®, the voluntary sustainable development program of the European PVC industry.

 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DECLARATIONS



Disclaimer

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 
Author Contributions

CB wrote the manuscript and contributed to the experimental work, data analysis and interpretation. CMAE contributed to the experimental work, data interpretation, and manuscript writing. CW conducted the experimental work, performed data analysis and interpretation, and contributed to the manuscript. JCL contributed to all aspects of the research and manuscript preparation and devised and supported the research.


REFERENCES


  1. Addington, C.K., Phillips, K.A., Isaacs, K.K. (2020). Estimation of the emission characteristics of SVOCs from household articles using group contribution methods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06118

  2. Ait Bamai, Y., Araki, A., Kawai, T., Tsuboi, T., Saito, I., Yoshioka, E., Cong, S., Kishi, R. (2016). Exposure to phthalates in house dust and associated allergies in children aged 6–12 years. Environ. Int. 96, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.08.025

  3. Bi, C., Liang, Y., Xu, Y. (2015). Fate and transport of phthalates in indoor environments and the influence of temperature: a case study in a test house. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 9674–9681. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02787

  4. Bornehag, C.G., Nanberg, E. (2010). Phthalate exposure and asthma in children. Int. J. Androl. 33, 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01023.x

  5. Cao, J., Zhang, X., Little, J.C., Zhang, Y. (2017). A SPME-based method for rapidly and accurately measuring the characteristic parameter for DEHP emitted from PVC floorings. Indoor Air 27, 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12312

  6. Eichler, C.M.A., Wu, Y., Cao, J., Shi, S., Little, J.C. (2018). Equilibrium relationship between SVOCs in PVC products and the air in contact with the product. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 2918–2925. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06253

  7. Eichler, C.M.A., Cohen Hubal, E.A., Little, J.C. (2019). Assessing human exposure to chemicals in materials, products and articles: the international risk management landscape for phthalates. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 13583–13597. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03794

  8. Eichler, C.M.A., Hubal, E.A.C., Xu, Y., Cao, J., Bi, C., Weschler, C.J., Salthammer, T., Morrison, G.C., Koivisto, A.J., Zhang, Y., Mandin, C., Wei, W., Blondeau, P., Poppendieck, D., Liu, X., Delmaar, C.J.E., Fantke, P., Jolliet, O., Shin, H.-M., Diamond, M.L., et al. (2021). Assessing human exposure to SVOCs in materials, products, and articles: a modular mechanistic framework. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02329

  9. Fajersztajn, L., Veras, M., Barrozo, L.V., Saldiva, P. (2013). Air pollution: a potentially modifiable risk factor for lung cancer. Nature reviews. Cancer 13, 674–678. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3572

  10. Gimeno, P., Thomas, S., Bousquet, C., Maggio, A.F., Civade, C., Brenier, C., Bonnet, P.A. (2014). Identification and quantification of 14 phthalates and 5 non-phthalate plasticizers in PVC medical devices by GC-MS. J. Chromatogr. B 949–950, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.j​chromb.2013.12.037

  11. Kay, V.R., Bloom, M.S., Foster, W.G. (2014). Reproductive and developmental effects of phthalate diesters in males. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 44, 467–498. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2013.​875983

  12. Latini, G., Del Vecchio, A., Massaro, M., Verrotti, A., De Felice, C. (2006). Phthalate exposure and male infertility. Toxicology 226, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2006.07.011

  13. Liang, Y., Xu, Y. (2014). Improved method for measuring and characterizing phthalate emissions from building materials and its application to exposure assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 4475–4484. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405809r

  14. Liang, Y., Liu, X., Allen, M.R. (2018). Measurements of parameters controlling the emissions of organophosphate flame retardants in indoor environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 5821–5829. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00224

  15. Liang, Y., Bi, C., Wang, X., Xu, Y. (2019). A general mechanistic model for predicting the fate and transport of phthalates in indoor environments. Indoor Air 29, 55–69. https://doi.org/​10.1111/ina.12514

  16. Liu, C., Zhao, B., Zhang, Y. (2010). The influence of aerosol dynamics on indoor exposure to airborne DEHP. Atmos. Environ. 44, 1952–1959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.002

  17. Liu, C., Zhang, Y. (2016). Characterizing the equilibrium relationship between DEHP in PVC flooring and air using a closed-chamber SPME method. Build. Environ. 95, 283–290. https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.09.028

  18. Lucattini, L., Poma, G., Covaci, A., de Boer, J., Lamoree, M.H., Leonards, P.E.G. (2018). A review of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in the indoor environment: occurrence in consumer products, indoor air and dust. Chemosphere 201, 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/​j.chemosphere.2018.02.161

  19. Nhlapo, N., Prevoo-franzsen, D., Whaley, M.F. (2018). Validation of ultrasonic extraction method for the quantification of phthalates in poly (vinyl chloride) and polypropylene matrices at low concentrations by gas-chromatography time of flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOFMS). J. Chem. Metrol. 12, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.25135/jcm.18.12.1094

  20. Pei, J., Yin, Y., Cao, J., Sun, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, Y. (2017). Time dependence of characteristic parameter for semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) emitted from indoor materials. Build. Environ. 125, 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.08.052

  21. Plaisance, H., Raffy, G., Le Bot, B., Bossanne, E., Rawas, C., Cardin, P., Desauziers, V. (2022). Characteristics of Tris(chloropropyl)phosphate (TCPP) emission from upholstered furniture in offices and consequence on indoor air quality. Build. Environ. 219, 109156. https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109156

  22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2023). Technical Overview of Volatile Organic Compounds. (accessed 11 December 2023)

  23. Vandenburg, H.J., Clifford, A.A., Bartle, K.D., Carroll, J., Newton, I., Garden, L.M., Dean, J.R., Costley, C.T. (1997). Critical review: analytical extraction of additives from polymers. Analyst 122, 101R–116R. https://doi.org/10.1039/A704052K

  24. Wang, C., Eichler, C.M.A., Bi, C., Delmaar, C.J.E., Xu, Y., Little, J.C. (2023). A rapid micro chamber method to measure SVOC emission and transport model parameters. Environ. Sci. Processes Impacts 25, 818–831. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EM00507G

  25. Wu, Y., Cox, S.S., Xu, Y., Liang, Y., Won, D., Liu, X., Clausen, P.A., Rosell, L., Benning, J.L., Zhang, Y., Little, J.C. (2016a). A reference method for measuring emissions of SVOCs in small chambers. Build. Environ. 95, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.08.025

  26. Wu, Y., Eichler, C.M.A., Chen, S., Little, J.C. (2016b). Simple method to measure the vapor pressure of phthalates and their alternatives. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 10082–10088. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02643

  27. Xie, M., Wu, Y., Little, J.C., Marr, L.C. (2015). Phthalates and alternative plasticizers and potential for contact exposure from children's backpacks and toys. J. Exposure Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 26, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2015.71

  28. Xu, Y., Little, J.C. (2006). Predicting emissions of SVOCs from polymeric materials and their interaction with airborne particles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 456–461. https://doi.org/10.1021/​es051517j

  29. Xu, Y., Hubal, E.A.C. (2009). Predicting residential exposure to phthalate plasticizer emitted from vinyl flooring: a mechanistic analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 2374–2380. https://doi.org/​10.1021/es801354f

  30. Yang, T., He, Z., Zhang, S., Tong, L., Cao, J., Xiong, J. (2019). Emissions of DEHP from vehicle cabin materials: parameter determination, impact factors and exposure analysis. Environ. Sci. Processes Impacts 21, 1323–1333. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9em00200f 


Share this article with your colleagues 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

7.3
2022CiteScore
 
 
77st percentile
Powered by
Scopus
 
   SCImago Journal & Country Rank

2022 Impact Factor: 4.0
5-Year Impact Factor: 3.4

Call for Papers for the special issue on: "Carbonaceous Aerosols in the Atmosphere"

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit
CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal that promotes submissions of high-quality research and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world. We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.