Anis Asma Ahmad Mohtar1, Mohd Talib Latif  1, Doreena Dominick2,3, Maggie Chel Gee Ooi4, Azliyana Azhari5, Nor Hafizah Baharudin1, Norfazrin Mohd Hanif1, Jing Xiang Chung6,7, Liew Juneng This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1 

1 Department of Earth Sciences and Environment, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Malaysia
2 Centre for Atmospheric Chemistry, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
3 School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
4 Institute of Climate Change, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Malaysia
5 Monash Climate Change Communication Research Node, School of Arts and Social Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, 47500 Bandar Sunway, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
Faculty of Science and Marine Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
7 Institute of Oceanography and Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia


Received: March 10, 2022
Revised: June 11, 2022
Accepted: July 4, 2022

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.220124  


Cite this article:

Ahmad Mohtar, A.As., Latif, M.T., Dominick, D., Chel Gee Ooi, M., Azhari, A., Baharudin, N.H., Hanif, N.M., Chung, J.X., Juneng, L. (2022). Spatiotemporal Variations of Particulate Matter and their Association with Criteria Pollutants and Meteorology in Malaysia. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 22, 220124. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.220124


HIGHLIGHTS

  • High PM concentrations and ratios recorded at the most developed region (central).
  • Low PM concentrations and ratios recorded at the least developed region (Sabah).
  • The PM2.5 and PM10 diurnal pattern showed bimodal peak; morning and night peak.
  • Southwest monsoon (dry season) August particularly exhibits high PMs cconcentration.
  • Secondary aerosols and combustion-related sources contribute to the PM formation.
 

ABSTRACT


Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) poses a higher risk to human health than coarse particulate matter (PM10). This study aims to determine the spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 and PM10 in Malaysia and their association with other criteria pollutants and meteorological factors. Hourly data from air quality monitoring stations for the year 2018 were retrieved from the Malaysian Department of Environment and analysed for temporal and spatial scales according to different regions in Malaysia. Further statistical analyses, such as Spearman’s Rank Correlation and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), were conducted to study the associations between PM2.5 and PM10 with other main criteria air pollutants, as well as meteorological parameters. Higher mean concentrations of PM2.5 (23 ± 8 µg m–3, range = 4.6–158 µg m–3) and PM10 (32 ± 10 µg m–3, range = 6.0–181 µg m–3) were observed in the central region of the Malaysian Peninsula. The diurnal patterns of PM2.5 and PM10 were in a bimodal pattern and influenced by traffic emissions. The highest mean PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations were recorded during the southwest monsoon season, notably in the central region. The Spearman’s Rank Correlation shows that NO2 and CO have a moderately positive correlation (p < 0.01) with PM2.5 (r = 0.47) and PM10 (r = 0.48) in the central regions while all meteorological parameters show significantly weak to very weak correlations with PM. The PCA analysis indicates that the major sources leading to the formation of particulate matter are from the contribution of secondary aerosols and combustion-related sources. The ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 ranged between 0.51 and 0.76 nationwide with the highest mean recorded in the central region (0.72). This study indicates that there is a higher abundance of fine particulate in the ambient air of the urbanised environment and thus a greater likely risk to human health in more developed areas.


Keywords: Particulate matter, Spatiotemporal, Atmospheric gases, Principal Component Analysis, Ratio PM2.5 to PM10


1 INTRODUCTION


Particulate matter is one of the major air pollutants in ambient air. Starting from the measurement of total suspended particulate (TSP), the measurement of particulate matter has progressed from particles with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 µm (PM10) to particles with an aerodynamic diameter lower than 2.5 µm (PM2.5) (Marcazzan et al., 2001). Most countries in the world have now started to use PM2.5 as an additional air pollutant when determining the Air Pollution Index (Mukherjee and Agrawal, 2017; Wu et al., 2017). Due to its size, PM2.5 can remain suspended in the atmosphere for a longer period of time and therefore has the capacity to travel a greater distance to downwind areas (Saunders and Waugh, 2015). Several studies have shown that PM2.5 not only induces cardiopulmonary disorders and impairments but also contributes to a variety of adverse health effects, including the initiation and progression of diabetes mellitus and birth complications (Kappos et al., 2004; O'Neill et al., 2005; Brook et al., 2010; Feng et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2020).

Fine particle PM2.5 has different sources and compositions compared to coarse particle PM10 (Marcazzan et al., 2002). Most coarse particles are directly emitted from sources such as crustal matter oxides (soil dust), fine particles, however, can be formed indirectly via the formation of nuclei through the vaporisation of heavy metals or the chemical reactions of gases (Lighty et al., 2000). These nuclei then undergo coagulation or condensation to form fine particulates. Coagulation occurs when particles combine to form larger particles while condensation occurs when gas or vapour molecules condense on the nuclei. The ratio between PM2.5 and PM10 can suggest the sources and the formation process of the PM emissions (Gehrig and Buchmann, 2003; Blanco-Becerra et al., 2015; Munir, 2016; Xu et al., 2016). A higher ratio, for instance, an elevated PM2.5 contribution, is usually suggestive of high levels of secondary aerosols such as nitrates, sulphates and ammonium while a low ratio is representative of dust from on-road vehicles, wind-blown dust as well as dessert sand (Brook et al., 1997; Chan and Yao, 2008; Wang et al., 2014). The study of ratio is hence used to determine whether an emission originates from an anthropogenic source, where the ratio is high, or a natural crustal source, where the ratio is low (Brook et al., 1997; Xu et al., 2016).

Meteorological factors can strongly influence the quality of ambient air through complex interactions between different processes of particulate matter such as transport, emissions, chemical transformation, as well as wet and dry deposition (Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998; Demuzere et al., 2009). Locally, in addition to some chemical processes, biogenic and dust emissions are regulated by local weather elements, such as relative humidity, temperature, solar radiation and cloudiness. Regionally, the short and long-range transport of particulate matter relies on the characteristics of the boundary layer turbulence and synoptic atmospheric circulation (Demuzere et al., 2009; Juneng et al., 2011; Tuygun and Elbir, 2020). In Malaysia, the association between local and regional weather elements with PM10 is commonly reported in studies (Juneng et al., 2011; Dominick et al., 2012b; Afzali et al., 2014; Latif et al., 2014; Rahman et al., 2015; Hassan et al., 2020). A study by Juneng et al. (2011) showed that the three factors influencing PM10 variations are local meteorological aspects, conditions of synoptic weather and the number of fire hotspots that represent regional biomass emissions.

The reported research on PM2.5 in Malaysia has covered both qualitative and quantitative studies undertaken at different background areas, predominantly on the Malaysian Peninsula. A sampling site in the urban-industrial area of the Klang Valley, which is one of the Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW), has attracted the interest of researchers studying the chemical composition of PM2.5, particularly when influenced by Indonesian peatland fires. A study by Amil et al. (2016) in the urban-industrial area of the Klang Valley showed that 43% of the PM2.5 daily mean concentration exceeded the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) guideline value given at the time. Since the middle of 2017 though, the Malaysian Department of Environment has established continuous monitoring of fine particulate matter (or PM2.5) at 65 stations throughout Malaysia. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the level of PM2.5 and its spatiotemporal variations and compare them to PM10. This study also investigates the correlation of both PM2.5 and PM10 to other major air pollutants such as carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulphur dioxide (SO2) as well as meteorological parameters. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method, together with Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO), was used to study the associations based on the pattern of correlation between particulate matter and other gases and meteorological parameters recorded at each station.

 
2 METHODOLOGY


 
2.1 Study Area Description

Malaysia has tropical weather with two monsoon seasons, namely the Northeast Monsoon (NEM, December–February) and the Southwest Monsoon (SWM, June–August) with the Inter-monsoon (ITM) seasons in between (Tangang et al., 2008; Ngai et al., 2017; Tangang et al., 2017; Jamaluddin et al., 2018; Hassan et al., 2020). MetMalaysia reported that in 2018, the NEM occurred from November to March and SWM occurred from May to September. Malaysia consists of two parts which are separated by the South China Sea. These are the Malaysian Peninsula and East Malaysia (otherwise known as Malaysian Borneo). Across these two parts are located 65 continuous air quality monitoring stations which are run by the Malaysia Department of Environment (DOE). These stations are divided into four regions in the Malaysian Peninsula; northern, central, southern and eastern, and two regions in East Malaysia; Sabah and Sarawak. These stations are also categorized as urban, suburban, rural or industrial. The location of the stations and the geography of Malaysia is illustrated in Fig. 1 and Table S1.

Fig. 1. The station location of particulate matter sampling sites over Malaysia separated into six regions, namely northern, central, eastern, southern in Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah and Sarawak in East Malaysia.Fig. 1. The station location of particulate matter sampling sites over Malaysia separated into six regions, namely northern, central, eastern, southern in Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah and Sarawak in East Malaysia.

The northern part of the Malaysian Peninsula is less urbanised. It mainly consists of agriculture land, particularly the production of rice and sugarcane, as the main economic activity. The centre and lower parts of the northern region are more developed with commercial business and industrial activities (DOSM, 2017). The central part of the Malaysian Peninsula is the most developed region in the country and is where the capital city, Kuala Lumpur, is located. According to the DOSM (2018) in the year 2018, the central region was the most densely populated with an estimated population of approximately 9.5 million. The southern region has a rather flat landscape while the northern part of this region has a slight elevation from the peak of Titiwangsa Ridge. The main economic activity in this region is manufacturing, in addition to palm oil plantations, fisheries and wood-based industries (DOSM, 2017). The eastern region is less developed compared to the western region. In the eastern region, fisheries are the main economic activity (DOSM, 2017). The East Malaysia consists of Sabah and Sarawak on the island of Borneo. When it comes to economic activity, these regions are less developed but rich in palm oil plantations and wood-based industries, as well as popular ecotourism destinations (DOSM, 2017).

 
2.2 Data Collection


2.2.1 Air quality data

The hourly data for PM2.5 and PM10 as well as other gas air pollutants such as CO, O3, SO2 and NO2 were retrieved from the DOE Malaysia between January 2018 and December 2018. The hourly PM10 and PM2.5 measurements presented in this study were retrieved using a 1405-DF Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM™) Continuous Dichotomous Ambient Air Monitor which allows for the real time measuring of the mass concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10. Hourly data for CO, O3, SO2 and NO2 were measured using Thermo Scientific 48i (USA), 49i, 43i and 42i, respectively. The air pollutants data went through quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures before being submitted to the DOE.

 
2.2.2 Meteorological data

The meteorological data (relative humidity, temperature, wind speed, and solar radiation) from DOE was recorded using a Climatronics AIO 2 Weather Sensor by the Climatronics Corporation, USA. As for precipitation data, satellite data (Global Precipitation Measurement, GPM) from NASA was used to study the influence of precipitation on air quality in different regions of Malaysia. The GPM data had a spatial scale of 0.1° and a temporal scale of 30 min. It was downloaded and analysed for the year 2018 and for Malaysia alone. In Malaysia’s tropical region, precipitation consists of only rainfall hence in this text, hereafter, the term ‘rainfall’ is used to further discuss the association of rainfall with air quality.

 
2.3 Data Analysis

As this study will focus on the different regions of Malaysia, data from all 65 stations in respective regions were analysed to represent the results of each region. The hourly data for PM2.5 and PM10 were calculated so as to study the overview of diurnal and seasonal patterns of PM2.5 and PM10 as well as the ratio of PM2.5 to PM10. The statistical method used in this study included descriptive analysis such as mean, minimum, maximum, standard deviation and Spearman’s Rank Correlation. The Spearman’s Rank Correlation test is used to measure the association between two variables which in this study are pollutants and meteorological aspects.

In addition to the above, multivariate analysis, such as PCA, was employed in this study using hourly data. The PCA method is used to summarize a set of variables based on their characteristics. It does this by transforming a set of interrelated variables into uncorrelated variables. The transformed variables (also known as principal components, PCs) are correlated to a linear combination of the original set of variables (Abdul-Wahab et al., 2005; Viana et al., 2006; Škrbić and Đurišić-Mladenović, 2007; Sousa et al., 2007; Juneng et al., 2009; Dominick et al., 2012a).

A better relationship between the PCs and the original set of data can be obtained by applying PC varimax rotation. This ensures that each variable is optimally correlated with only one PC and has zero correlation with other PCs (Statheropoulos et al., 1998). Varimax factors (VFs), also known as factor loading, are obtained by running PC varimax rotation with PCs that show eigenvalues greater or equal to 1 (Kim et al., 1978). Variables that have a high factor loading have a high contribution to the variation accounted for by the specific PC (Jolliffe, 1986). Factor loading values which are greater than 0.75 are considered as “strong” (Liu et al., 2003; Azid et al., 2014). In this study, any factor loadings over 0.70 were selected for results interpretation.

Principal components can be expressed as in Eq. (1) below:

 

where, Zij is the component score for component i and for sample j, a is the component loading and x is the measured value of the variable while “n” is the total of the variables. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test also measures the suitability and adequacy of the data sets for PCA and will be acceptable if the value of KMO is greater than 0.5 (Field, 2013).

 
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


 
3.1 Descriptive Analysis of PM2.5 and PM10

The descriptive analysis of PM2.5 and PM10 were compared in six respective regions of Malaysia. Table S2 depicted the overall 24-h mean of PM2.5 and PM10 of each station in the respective region while Fig. 2 presented the mean of hourly data based on each region. The mean concentrations of PM2.5, as seen in Fig. 2 and Table S2, show that the highest mean concentration of PM2.5 (23 ± 8 µg m–3, range = 4.6–158 µg m–3) in Malaysia was recorded in the central region and the lowest mean concentration in the Sabah region (11 ± 5 µg m–3, range = 1.1–60 µg m–3). In contrast to the central region and other regions in Malaysia, the Sabah region is a pristine area. Besides wood-based industry and palm oil plantations, the economic activities in the Sabah region involve ecotourism in the national parks and national marine parks. Contrarily, the central region itself is the economic hub of the country, with a high-density population that is estimated to be approximately 9.5 million (DOSM, 2018) and has high volume of traffic as compared to other regions (MOT, 2019). Therefore, the concentration of PMs is generally high in this region. The study by Ab. Rahman et al. (2022) also denote that Klang Valley is a highly polluted area in Malaysia.

Fig. 2 The box plot of (a) PM2.5 and (b) PM10 concentration based on the mean of hourly data in all stations of each region over Malaysia.Fig. 2 The box plot of (a) PM2.5 and (b) PM10 concentration based on the mean of hourly data in all stations of each region over Malaysia.

In this study, the mean concentrations of PM2.5 for the northern, southern and eastern regions on the Malaysian Peninsula are 17 ± 8 µg m–3 (range = 2.1–120 µg m–3), 17 ± 7 µg m–3 (range = 0.8–112 µg m–3) and 16 ± 8 µg m–3 (range = 1.7–84 µg m–3), respectively. The Sarawak region recorded the second lowest mean concentration of PM2.5 of 13 ± 9 µg m–3 (range = 1.8–178 µg m–3). The Sarawak region on the island of Borneo which has an approximate of 2.8 million population (DOSM, 2018) is less developed compared to the Malaysian Peninsula thus has a lower concentration of PM2.5. Similar with the Sabah region, the main economic activities in the Sarawak region are palm oil plantations and wood-based industries besides ecotourism with several national parks (DOSM, 2017). The economic activities undertaken in the northern and southern regions of the Malaysian Peninsula vary considerably. In the northern region, for example, agriculture, commercial business and industrial activities are common whereas the southern region is known for manufacturing, palm oil plantations, fisheries and wood-based industries (DOSM, 2017). The eastern region recorded the lowest concentration of PM2.5 in the Malaysian Peninsula which can be explained as this region is the least commercially developed compared to other region in Peninsular Malaysia (DOSM, 2017). The western part of this region is a mountainous area which most of it are national parks.

As for the mean concentration of PM10 in Fig. 2 and Table S2, the central region indicates the highest mean concentration of PM10 (32 ± 10 µg m–3, range = 6.0–181 µg m–3) throughout Malaysia, the same is demonstrated by the PM2.5 concentrations. The emissions from shipping (Pandolfi et al., 2011; Bove et al., 2016; Ledoux et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2020), industrial activities (Karar et al., 2006; Park and Dam, 2008; Jamhari et al., 2014; ChooChuay et al., 2020; Flores et al., 2020) and mobile sources (Negral et al., 2008; Kulshrestha et al., 2009; Khan et al., 2015; Azhari et al., 2020; ChooChuay et al., 2020) undoubtedly contribute to the higher concentrations of PMs. For instance, CA21B station, which is located in the Klang Valley area, an urban site near to the country’s busiest shipping port—Port Klang, frequently has the highest concentration of PM10 (Rahman et al., 2015; Mohtar et al., 2018). Port Klang is the central logistical hub of Malaysia and one of the busiest ports in the world and Southeast Asia (Soon and Lam, 2013; Mustaffa et al., 2016).

In addition, the mean 24-h concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were compared to the Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Standard (MAAQS) Interim II (2018). The MAAQS Interim II states that the concentration limit for 24-h averaged PM2.5 and PM10 are 50 µg m–3 and 120 µg m–3, respectively, while, the concentration limits for annual averaged PM2.5 and PM10 are 25 µg m–3 and 45 µg m–3, respectively. Overall, the average concentration of PM2.5 recorded in Malaysia is lower than the value suggested for the 24-h mean concentration in the MAAQS Interim II guideline.

 
3.2 Diurnal and Seasonal Variations of PM2.5 and PM10

The concentration of air pollutants in the lower atmosphere tends to exhibit distinct diurnal variations as the most intense human activity tends to occur during day time as well as the atmospheric mixing height due to solar heating. Diurnal variations of PM2.5 and PM10 are presented in Fig. 3(a) to Fig. 3(f). It was found that the central region generally had the highest daily mean concentrations for all pollutants (Fig. 3(b)) whilst the lowest concentrations were measured in the Sabah region (Fig. 3(e)). From Fig. 3, it can be seen that the diurnal pattern for PM2.5 across Malaysia is the same and in a bimodal pattern. The first PM2.5 and PM10 concentration peak observed occurred in the morning while the second one was at night.

Fig. 3 The diurnal (left panel) and monthly (right panel) mean concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 based on different region in Malaysia. On the right panel, the red solid box indicates the northeast monsoon (NEM) and the red dashes box indicates the southwest monsoon (SWM) in Malaysia.Fig. 3 The diurnal (left panel) and monthly (right panel) mean concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 based on different region in Malaysia. On the right panel, the red solid box indicates the northeast monsoon (NEM) and the red dashes box indicates the southwest monsoon (SWM) in Malaysia.

The peak in the morning indicates that the emission of particulate matter originates from motor vehicle usage by people performing their morning routine of heading out to work and school (Kuttler and Strassburger, 1999; Wang and Christopher, 2003; Jamil et al., 2011; Yoo et al., 2015). The lower concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 in the afternoon, from 1:00 pm to 4:00 pm local time, can be explained by a lower level of outdoor activities and hence lower vehicle emissions (Norazian et al., 2015). Additionally, the reduction of PM2.5 and PM10 could also result from the increased mixing height lowering the concentrations of both PM2.5 and PM10 (Ulke and Mazzeo, 1998; Lal et al., 2000; Langner et al., 2011; Hassan et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021). As for the second peak at night, this could be attributed to the evening rush hour and lower wind speed which results in the slower transportation of PM away from the test area. Besides, the mixing layer begins to get lower in the late evening as the atmosphere starts to cool down, which accounts for the higher concentration of PM at night. However, the concentration of PM recorded in Sabah reduced significantly from 9:00 pm local time. Based on our investigation, most of the air quality monitoring stations in Sabah are located near the sea. It is speculated that the stability condition during night time may be reduced by the land breeze (Ooi et al., 2017). Meteorological conditions, such as atmospheric stability (Juneng et al., 2011; Ooi et al., 2017) and wind speed (Afroz et al., 2003; Radzi Bin Abas et al., 2004), influence the peak concentration of PM in the late evening to night.

The particles which are suspended in the atmosphere travel with the movement of air. Thus, the different monsoon seasons experienced in Malaysia can lead to seasonal fluctuations of PM2.5 and PM10. Generally, there are two seasonal variations which are the Northeast Monsoon (NEM), Southwest Monsoon (SWM) and separated by the Inter-Monsoon (ITM) season (MetMalaysia, 2019). The solid red box in Fig. 3(g) until Fig. 3(l) indicates the NEM (November–March) in Malaysia and the red dashed line box indicates the SWM (May–September). In general, the highest monthly concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were consistently recorded in the central (Fig. 3(h)) region with a PM2.5 range from 18 to 29 µg m–3 and a PM10 range from 26 to 40 µg m–3. The lowest monthly concentrations of particulates were in the Sabah (Fig. 3(k)) region where a range of 5 to 18 µg m–3 for PM2.5 concentrations and 15 to 27 µg m–3 for PM10 concentrations were recorded.

Based on Figs. 3(g–l), the seasonal pattern for PM2.5 and PM10 is identical for all regions, i.e., when the concentration of PM10 is high, so too is the concentration of PM2.5. The SWM season demonstrated the highest concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 throughout the year. During SWM, the dry season occurrence is frequent where the highest count of local, as well as regional, biomass burning occurs (Heil and Goldammer, 2001; Keywood et al., 2003; Tangang et al., 2010; Khan et al., 2015; Kusumaningtyas and Aldrian, 2016; Shannon et al., 2016). Also, the predominantly low-level southwest winds, which dominate the region during this season, have been found to be responsible for transporting these pollutants to Malaysia mainly from Sumatra Island, Indonesia (Juneng et al., 2009; Khan et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2017). Coupled with the fact that haze episodes occurred in August 2018 mainly in the central and northern regions of Peninsular Malaysia as well as in Sarawak, East Malaysia, the highest concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were also recorded in that month (Kawi, 2018; NST Online, 2018; Nufael, 2018; MetMalaysia, 2019; ASMC, 2022b, 2022a). Overall, throughout the NEM season, the concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 fluctuated between January and March and then November until December for all regions. Solar radiation and surface temperature (Fig. S4) both increased indicating the dry season in February and March leading to a high number of local biomass burning events which in turn caused a rise in PM concentrations (Dominick et al., 2015). The ITM season recorded a declining concentration for both PM2.5 and PM10 in April and October for all regions. This is believed to be due to a weaker wind with no clear direction lowering concentrations (Keywood et al., 2003; Mohd Akhir et al., 2014; Ooi et al., 2017; Lolli et al., 2019).

 
3.3 Influence of Other Gases and Meteorological Factors

The association of PM concentrations with meteorological factors (temperature, wind speed, relative humidity, rainfall and solar radiation) and other criteria pollutants (SO2, NO2, O3, CO) is depicted by the Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient (r) in Table 1 and Table S5(a–c), and the PCA analysis summarised in Table 2 and Table S6(a–c). In all regions, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations were found to be significantly associated (p < 0.01) with concentrations of other gas pollutants such as NO2 and CO. Moderately positive correlations were observed in the association between PM10 (PM2.5) and NO2 in the northern, central and southern regions with r = 0.41 (0.42), r = 0.48 (0.47) and r = 0.41 (0.41) respectively. As for the correlation of PM10 (PM2.5) to CO, moderately positive associations were recorded in the northern, central and eastern regions with r = 0.43 (0.44), 0.48 (0.47) and 0.45 (0.45) respectively. From the positive correlations observed between PM with NO2 and CO, it is possible that the PM in the region is emitted simultaneously with NO2 and CO, to which it was closely related to, through combustion processes which include combustion from motor vehicles (Dominick et al., 2012b).

 Table 1. The Spearman’s rank correlation of particulate matters, gases and meteorological parameter based on different region in Malaysia.

Table 2. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) results of PM, criteria gases and meteorological parameter based on region.

Following on from the previous paragraphs on seasonal variations, the concentrations of particulate matter were observed to be high when the temperature was high, there was high solar radiation, low relative humidity and low rainfall (Fig. S4). The high concentrations of particulate matter observed during a low rainfall were caused by the direct effect of rainfall as the washing effect decreases the concentration of pollutants (Kwak et al., 2017; Gao et al., 2019). Hence when there is little rainfall, the washing effect does not occur thus causing PM concentrations to be higher. However, a further analysis of correlations (shown in Table 1 as well as Table S5(a–c) demonstrated a significantly weak correlation (p < 0.01) for all meteorological parameters, such as local wind speed, relative humidity, solar radiation, temperature and rainfall. This applied to all regions in Malaysia during the study period.

The PCA results for all the different regions in Malaysia produced two factors during the annual cycle and three factors during seasonal variations with eigenvalues greater than 1. These were used in PCA interpretation (Table 2 and Table S6(a–c)) for the possible emission sources and/or conditions influencing air pollutants’ concentrations. The first factor (F1) showed a strong negative factor loading with relative humidity (RH) and a strong positive factor loading with ambient temperature (Temp) and O3 for all regions. It is indicated that meteorological conditions, such as temperature as well as relative humidity, strongly influence the efficiency of photochemical processes leading to ozone formation and influencing the formation of secondary aerosols which form particulate matter (Li et al., 2017; Mao et al., 2020). Higher temperatures and lower relative humidity are conducive to O3 formation during ozone episodes (Yang et al., 2020) which can be easily formed in these conditions even though O3 pollution is more dependent on vehicle emissions (Zhao et al., 2018).

The second factor (F2) presented a strong positive factor loading with PM10 and PM2.5 for all regions whereas CO and NO2 showed positive factor loadings for all regions apart from Sabah and Sarawak. This observation can be explained by the location of each region. The northern, central, southern and eastern regions are located on the Malaysian Peninsula whereas the Sabah and Sarawak regions are located on the island of Borneo. The Malaysian Peninsula has experienced more expansion, urbanisation, as well as economic development compared to the island of Borneo. These changes have resulted in rise of anthropogenic emissions, particularly from combustion-related activities on the Malaysian Peninsula, which contribute to the formation of NO2 and CO, along with particulate matter (Azhari et al., 2018; Halim et al., 2020; Latif et al., 2021).

During the NEM and SWM season (Table S6(a–b)), the third factor (F3) observed a strong positive correlation between SO2 and NO2, particularly in the central region, for both NEM and SWM. The sources of SO2 in the region are predominantly emissions from power stations in the central region. These use resources such as coal, gas, steam and biomass (Baruya, 2010; Salahudin et al., 2013). Besides emissions from power stations, industrial sectors as well as heavy-duty vehicle emissions contributed to the higher concentration of SO2 (Pereira et al., 2007; Mohamad et al., 2015). Meanwhile, NO2 levels in the central region were mainly influenced by motor vehicles, followed by power stations and industrial sector emissions (Azmi et al., 2010; Salahudin et al., 2013; Latif et al., 2014; Mohtar et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020). It can be concluded that the third factor (F3) from PCA originated from the emission of anthropogenic activities in the region which influenced the concentrations of SO2 and NO2.

 
3.4 Ratios of PM2.5 to PM10

The overview of spatial ratios of PM2.5 to PM10 is presented in Fig. 4 and Table S2. When comparing the contribution of each region towards the ratio of PM2.5 to PM10, the central region demonstrated the highest mean ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 (0.72, range = 0.68–0.76). For the northern and southern regions, the mean ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 was 0.66 (range = 0.56–0.73) and 0.66 (range = 0.57–0.75), respectively. The mean ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 in the eastern region was recorded as 0.64 (range = 0.58–0.68). The lowest mean ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 nationwide was recorded in Sabah, followed by Sarawak with a value of 0.56 (range = 0.51–0.67) and 0.60 (range = 0.54–0.68), respectively.

Fig. 4. The spatial distribution of PM2.5 to PM10 ratios over six regions in Malaysia which indicated by different symbol in each region.Fig. 4. The spatial distribution of PM2.5 to PM10 ratios over six regions in Malaysia which indicated by different symbol in each region.

The diurnal mean ratios of PM2.5 to PM10 for different regions are depicted in Figs. 5(a–f). Overall, the highest mean diurnal ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 was recorded by the central region and the lowest recorded by Sabah. All regions in Malaysia that recorded the morning peak PM concentrations showed lower PM2.5 to PM10 ratios compared to the night peak which exhibited a slightly higher ratio of PM2.5 to PM10. This indicates that the emissions of PM in the morning were dominated by coarse particulate matter contribution rather than fine particulate matter while the emissions of PM at night were dominated by fine particulate matter contribution rather than coarse particulate matter. The lowest ratio for all regions was recorded between 7:00 am to 8:00 am. This might be due to resuspended coarse particulate matter from road dust and relate to the starting time of daily human activities (Munir et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2016; Coskuner et al., 2018).

Fig. 5. The diurnal (left panel) and monthly (right panel) mean ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 at different regions in Malaysia. On the right panel, the solid box indicates the northeast monsoon (NEM) and the dashes box indicates the southwest monsoon (SWM) in Malaysia.Fig. 5. The diurnal (left panel) and monthly (right panel) mean ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 at different regions in Malaysia. On the right panel, the solid box indicates the northeast monsoon (NEM) and the dashes box indicates the southwest monsoon (SWM) in Malaysia.

The annual cycle of PM2.5 to PM10 ratios is further discussed according to the annual cycle of PM in different regions based on Figs. 3(g–l). In Figs. 5(g–l), the NEM is indicated by the solid box and the SWM is indicated by the dashed line box. The highest concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 observed during the SWM for all regions (Figs. 3(g–l)) also show the highest ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 across Malaysia. The same pattern of PM2.5 to PM10 ratios in Malaysian Borneo (Sabah and Sarawak) with a peak in August, which is the haze period, indicates that the contribution of PMs is mainly from PM2.5. This can be seen in the Malaysian Peninsula regions as well which show a higher PM2.5 to PM10 ratio being recorded during the SWM. This can be explained by the transboundary movement of PM2.5 where the fine particulate matter is more easily transported to Malaysia than the coarse particulate matter (PM10). A higher PM2.5 concentration leads, in effect, to a higher ratio of PM2.5 to PM10. The study by Gao and Ji (2018) also recorded higher PM2.5 to PM10 ratios during the haze period.

In general, the ratios of PM2.5 to PM10 recorded for each region were generally consistent in terms of patterns throughout the days and months of the study (Fig. 5). From Fig. 4, however, note that the ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 for the central region was higher (0.72, range = 0.68–0.75) than other regions (Table S2). The fact that the ratios of PM2.5 to PM10 in the central region were often high indicates two possibilities. Firstly, that the central region potentially constitutes a high magnitude of emissions which tended to release much greater quantities of fine particles rather than coarse particles. The central region is the most densely populated part of the country and is rapidly developing through industrialisation. Therefore, it is likely that industries, surface transportation and burning activities act as the main sources of fine particulate matter (Amil et al., 2016; Sulong et al., 2017). Secondly, the abundance of PM2.5 and PM10, and their ratios, are dependent on the wind profile and the distance of the monitoring sites from the sources (Vu et al., 2015). Sites that are closer to the sources of PM will consequently have much higher levels and ratios of the measured pollutants. The abundance of monitoring stations in the central region, which is located within the urbanised and industrial areas, also influences the ratios of PM and as this study is averaging PM over the region, this will also contribute to higher ratios of PM2.5 to PM10. Overall, the results of our ratio analysis have provided evidence of the higher abundance of fine particulates to coarse particulates in the ambient air.

 
4 CONCLUSION


This study focused on the spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 and PM10 in Malaysia and their relationship with other criteria pollutants and meteorological aspects. Overall, the study revealed that the central region is the most polluted area in Malaysia with the 24-h mean reading for PM2.5 being 23 ± 8 µg m–3 and ranging from 4.6 µg m–3 to 158 µg m–3 and the 24-h mean for PM10 being 32 ± 10 µg m–3 with a range from 6.0 µg m–3 to 181 µg m–3. Regarding the bimodal pattern of diurnal concentrations observed in all regions, the central region recorded the highest diurnal concentration while the Sabah region recorded the lowest. The first peak in the morning indicates that PM emissions originate from motor vehicles while the second peak, occurring in the night, relates to the accumulation of PM as well as meteorological conditions such as atmospheric stability. Seasonal fluctuations of PM2.5 and PM10 indicate that the month of August, which is during the southwest monsoon period (dry season) in Malaysia, recorded the highest reading of PM in the central region and the lowest in the Sabah region.

Further quantitative analysis observed weak to moderately positive correlations between PM and NO2 (ranges from 0.29 to 0.48) as well as CO (ranges from 0.23 to 0.48) in all regions. The second factor loading for both of these gases indicated a strong positive loading in PCA for all regions apart from Sabah and Sarawak, which are the least urbanised regions. This shows that the main pollutants on the Malaysian Peninsula, besides PM, are CO and NO2. The first factor loading indicated a strong negative factor loading with relative humidity and a strong positive factor loading with temperature and O3 for all regions, indicating the potential of secondary aerosols formation. The ratios of PM2.5 to PM10 showed that the central region recorded the highest mean ratio (0.72) while the lowest mean ratio (0.56) was recorded in the Sabah region. These results indicate that there was a higher abundance of fine particulates than coarse particulates in the ambient air, which in effect correlates to their being a greater risk posed to human health. In conclusion, this in-depth study of the spatiotemporal distribution of PM2.5 in Malaysia has suggested that PM2.5 is predominantly concentrated over regions where heavy anthropogenic activities occur and thus implies the potential health risks threatening the populations of these areas. As the suggestion for future studies, it will be good to study the distribution and association of criteria pollutants (SO2, NO2, O3, CO) along with PM2.5 and PM10 to estimate pollutant sources in Malaysia.

 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DECLARATIONS


Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable

 
Consent to Publish

Not applicable

 
Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

 
Funding

The authors would like to thank the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Grants DIP-2019-024 and GUP-2018-109 that have supported the first authour during her PhD study.

 
Authors' Contributions

Conceptualization: Anis Asma Ahmad Mohtar, Mohd Talib Latif; Formal Analysis: Anis Asma Ahmad Mohtar, Doreena Dominick, Jing Xiang Chung; Investigation: Anis Asma Ahmad Mohtar, Doreena Dominick; Writing - Original Draft: Anis Asma Ahmad Mohtar; Writing - Review & Editing: Anis Asma Ahmad Mohtar; Mohd Talib Latif; Maggie Chel Gee Ooi; Azliyana Azhari; Nor Hafizah Baharudin; Norfazrin Mohd Hanif; Liew Juneng; Visualization: Anis Asma Ahmad Mohtar, Doreena Dominick, Jing Xiang Chung; Supervision: Mohd Talib Latif; Liew Juneng; Funding Acquisition: Liew Juneng.

 
Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets analysed during the current study are not publicly available and belong to the Malaysian Department of Environment. The data is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

 
Supplementary Material

Supplementary material for this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/​10.4209/aaqr.220124

 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


The first author is supported by UKM Grant DIP-2019-024 and GUP-2018-109. The authors would like to thank the Malaysian Department of Environment (DOE) for providing air quality and meteorological data for our research. We gratefully thank NASA’s Global Precipitation Measurement for providing precipitation (rainfall) data in our study area. Special thanks to Ms K Alexander for proofreading this manuscript.


REFERENCES


  1. Ab. Rahman, E., Hamzah, F.M., Latif, M.T., Dominick, D. (2022). Assessment of PM2.5 patterns in Malaysia using the clustering method. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 22, 210161. https://doi.org/​10.4209/aaqr.210161

  2. Abdul-Wahab, S.A., Bakheit, C.S., Al-Alawi, S.M. (2005). Principal component and multiple regression analysis in modelling of ground-level ozone and factors affecting its concentrations. Environ. Modell. Software 20, 1263–1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.​2004.09.001

  3. Afroz, R., Hassan, M.N., Ibrahim, N.A. (2003). Review of air pollution and health impacts in Malaysia. Environ. Res. 92, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-9351(02)00059-2

  4. Afzali, A., Rashid, M., Sabariah, B., Ramli, M. (2014). PM10 pollution: Its prediction and meteorological influence in PasirGudang, Johor. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 18, 012100. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/18/1/012100

  5. Amil, N., Latif, M.T., Khan, M.F., Mohamad, M. (2016). Seasonal variability of PM2.5 composition and sources in the Klang Valley urban-industrial environment. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 5357–5381. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5357-2016

  6. ASEAN Specialised Meteorological Centre (ASMC) (2022a). Haze Review: Review of land fires and smoke haze situation for first fortnight of August 2018. (accessed 20 May 2022).

  7. ASEAN Specialised Meteorological Centre (ASMC) ASMC (2022b). Haze Review: Review of land fires and smoke haze situation for second fortnight of August 2018. http://asmc.asean.org/​haze-review-of-land-fires-and-smoke-haze-situation-for-second-fortnight-of-august-2018/ (accessed 20 May 2022).

  8. Azhari, A., Latif, M.T., Mohamed, A.F. (2018). Road traffic as an air pollutant contributor within an industrial park environment. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 9, 680–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.​apr.2018.01.007

  9. Azhari, A., Halim, N.D.A., Othman, M., Latif, M.T., Juneng, L., Sofwan, N.M., Stocker, J., Johnson, K. (2020). Highly spatially resolved emission inventory of selected air pollutants in Kuala Lumpur's urban environment. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 12, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.​2020.10.004

  10. Azid, A., Juahir, H., Toriman, M.E., Kamarudin, M.K.A., Saudi, A.S.M., Hasnam, C.N.C., Aziz, N.A.A., Azaman, F., Latif, M.T., Zainuddin, S.F.M., Osman, M.R., Yamin, M. (2014). Prediction of the level of air pollution using principal component analysis and artificial neural network techniques: A case study in Malaysia. Water Air Soil Pollut. 225, 2063. https://doi.org/10.1007/​s11270-014-2063-1

  11. Azmi, S.Z., Latif, M.T., Ismail, A.S., Juneng, L., Jemain, A.A. (2010). Trend and status of air quality at three different monitoring stations in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. Air Qual. Atmos. Health. 3, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-009-0051-1

  12. Baruya, P. (2010). Prospects for coal and clean coal technologies in Malaysia. IEA Clean Coal Centre, UK.

  13. Blanco-Becerra, L.C., Gáfaro-Rojas, A.I., Rojas-Roa, N.Y. (2015). Influence of precipitation scavenging on the PM2.5/PM10 ratio at the Kennedy locality of Bogota, Colombia. Rev. Fac. Ing. Univ. Antioq. 79, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.n76a07

  14. Bove, M.C., Brotto, P., Calzolai, G., Cassola, F., Cavalli, F., Fermo, P., Hjorth, J., Massabò, D., Nava, S., Piazzalunga, A., Schembari, C., Prati, P. (2016). PM10 source apportionment applying PMF and chemical tracer analysis to ship-borne measurements in the Western Mediterranean. Atmos. Environ. 125, 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.009

  15. Brook, J.R., Dann, T.F., Burnett, R.T. (1997). The relationship among TSP, PM10, PM2.5, and inorganic constituents of atmospheric participate matter at multiple Canadian locations. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 47, 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1997.10464407

  16. Brook, R.D., Rajagopalan, S., Pope, C.A., Brook, J.R., Bhatnagar, A., Diez-Roux, A.V., Holguin, F., Hong, Y., Luepker, R.V., Mittleman, M.A., Peters, A., Siscovick, D., Smith, S.C., Whitsel, L., Kaufman, J.D. (2010). Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation. 121, 2331–2378. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1

  17. Brook, C.K., Yao, X. (2008). Air pollution in mega cities in China. Atmos. Environ. 42, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.003

  18. ChooChuay, C., Pongpiachan, S., Tipmanee, D., Suttinun, O., Deelaman, W., Wang, Q., Xing, L., Li, G., Han, Y., Palakun, J., Cao, J. (2020). Impacts of PM2.5 sources on variations in particulate chemical compounds in ambient air of Bangkok, Thailand. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 11, 1657–1667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.06.030

  19. Coskuner, G., Jassim, M.S., Munir, S. (2018). Characterizing temporal variability of PM2.5/PM10 ratio and its relationship with meteorological parameters in Bahrain. Environ. Forensics 19, 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2018.1519738

  20. Demuzere, M., Trigo, R.M., Vila-Guerau de Arellano, J., van Lipzig, N.P.M. (2009). The impact of weather and atmospheric circulation on O3 and PM10 levels at a rural mid-latitude site. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 2695–2714. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2695-2009

  21. Dominick, D., Juahir, H., Latif, M.T., Zain, S.M., Aris, A.Z. (2012a). Spatial assessment of air quality patterns in Malaysia using multivariate analysis. Atmos. Environ. 60, 172–181. https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.021

  22. Dominick, D., Latif, M.T., Juahir, H., Aris, A.Z., Zain, S.M. (2012b). An assessment of influence of meteorological factors on PM10 and NO2 at selected stations in Malaysia. Sustain. Environ. Res. 22, 305–315.

  23. Dominick, D., Latif, M.T., Juneng, L., Khan, M.F., Amil, N., Mead, M.I., Nadzir, M.S.M., Moi, P.S., Samah, A.A., Ashfold, M.J., Sturges, W.T., Harris, N.R.P., Robinson, A.D., Pyle, J.A. (2015). Characterisation of particle mass and number concentration on the east coast of the Malaysian Peninsula during the northeast monsoon. Atmos. Environ. 117, 187–199. https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.07.018

  24. Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM) (2017). Labour Force Survey Report, Malaysia, 2016. Department of Statistics, Malaysia.

  25. Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM) (2018). Malaysia @ a Glance. (accessed 17 September 2020).

  26. Feng, S., Gao, D., Liao, F., Zhou, F., Wang, X. (2016). The health effects of ambient PM2.5 and potential mechanisms. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 128, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.​2016.01.030

  27. Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications Ltd.

  28. Flores, R.M., Özdemir, H., Akkoyunlu, B.O., Ünal, A., Tayanç, M. (2020). Seasonal variation of carbonaceous PM2.5 in an Istanbul traffic site. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 11, 2110–2118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.06.022

  29. Gao, B., Ouyang, W., Cheng, H., Xu, Y., Lin, C., Chen, J. (2019). Interactions between rainfall and fine particulate matter investigated by simultaneous chemical composition measurements in downtown Beijing. Atmos. Environ. 218, 117000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.​117000

  30. Gao, Y., Ji, H. (2018). Microscopic morphology and seasonal variation of health effect arising from heavy metals in PM2.5 and PM10: One-year measurement in a densely populated area of urban Beijing. Atmos. Res. 212, 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.04.027

  31. Gehrig, R., Buchmann, B. (2003). Characterising seasonal variations and spatial distribution of ambient PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations based on long-term Swiss monitoring data. Atmos. Environ. 37, 2571–2580. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00221-8

  32. Halim, N.D.A., Latif, M.T., Mohamed, A.F., Maulud, K.N.A., Idrus, S., Azhari, A., Othman, M., Sofwan, N.M. (2020). Spatial assessment of land use impact on air quality in mega urban regions, Malaysia. Sustain. Cities Soc. 63, 102436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102436

  33. Hassan, H., Latif, M.T., Juneng, L., Amil, N., Khan, M.F., Yik, D.J., Abdullah, N.A. (2020). Interaction of PM10 concentrations with local and synoptic meteorological conditions at different temporal scales. Atmos. Res. 241, 104975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104975

  34. Heil, A., Goldammer, J. (2001). Smoke-haze pollution: A review of the 1997 episode in Southeast Asia. Reg. Environ. Change. 2, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101130100021

  35. Huang, Y., Ji, Y., Zhu, Z., Zhang, T., Gong, W., Xia, X., Sun, H., Zhong, X., Zhou, X., Chen, D. (2020). Satellite-based spatiotemporal trends of ambient PM2.5 concentrations and influential factors in Hubei, Central China. Atmos. Res. 241, 104929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.​104929

  36. Jamaluddin, A.F., Tangang, F., Chung, J.X., Juneng, L., Sasaki, H., Takayabu, I. (2018). Investigating the mechanisms of diurnal rainfall variability over Peninsular Malaysia using the non-hydrostatic regional climate model. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 130, 611–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/​s00703-017-0541-x

  37. Jamhari, A.A., Sahani, M., Latif, M.T., Chan, K.M., Tan, H.S., Khan, M.F., Mohd Tahir, N. (2014). Concentration and source identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in PM10 of urban, industrial and semi-urban areas in Malaysia. Atmos. Environ. 86, 16–27.  ttps://doi.org/​10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.019

  38. Jamil, A., Makmom, A.A., Saeid, P., Firuz, R.M., Prinaz, R. (2011). PM10 monitoring using MODIS AOT and GIS, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Res. J. Chem. Environ 15, 1–5.

  39. Jolliffe, I.T. (1986). Principal components in regression analysis, Principal component analysis. Springer, New York, pp. 129–155.

  40. Juneng, L., Latif, M.T., Tangang, F.T., Mansor, H. (2009). Spatio-temporal characteristics of PM10 concentration across Malaysia. Atmos. Environ. 43, 4584–4594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.​atmosenv.2009.06.018

  41. Juneng, L., Latif, M.T., Tangang, F. (2011). Factors influencing the variations of PM10 aerosol dust in Klang Valley, Malaysia during the summer. Atmos. Environ. 45, 4370–4378. https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.045

  42. Kappos, A.D., Bruckmann, P., Eikmann, T., Englert, N., Heinrich, U., Höppe, P., Koch, E., Krause, G.H.M., Kreyling, W.G., Rauchfuss, K., Rombout, P., Schulz-Klemp, V., Thiel, W.R., Wichmann, H.E. (2004). Health effects of particles in ambient air. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 207, 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00306

  43. Karar, K., Gupta, A.K., Kumar, A., Biswas, A.K. (2006). Characterization and identification of the sources of chromium, zinc, lead, cadmium, nickel, manganese and iron in PM10 particulates at the two sites of Kolkata, India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 120, 347–360. https://doi.org/​10.1007/s10661-005-9067-7

  44. Kawi, M.R. (2018). Jerebu datang lagi? Harian Metro, Malaysia.

  45. Keywood, M., Ayers, G., Gras, J., Boers, C. (2003). Haze in the Klang valley of Malaysia. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 3, 591–605. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-591-2003

  46. Khan, F., Latif, M.T., Juneng, L., Amil, N., Mohd Nadzir, M.S., Syedul Hoque, H.M. (2015). Physicochemical factors and sources of particulate matter at residential urban environment in Kuala Lumpur. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 65, 958–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.​2015.1042094

  47. Kim, J.O., Ahtola, O., Spector, P.E., Mueller, C.W. (1978). Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it. SAGE Publications, Inc., USA.

  48. Kulshrestha, A., Satsangi, P.G., Masih, J., Taneja, A. (2009). Metal concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 particles and seasonal variations in urban and rural environment of Agra, India. Sci. Total Environ. 407, 6196–6204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.050

  49. Kusumaningtyas, S.D.A., Aldrian, E. (2016). Impact of the June 2013 Riau province Sumatera smoke haze event on regional air pollution. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 075007. https://doi.org/​10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/075007

  50. Kuttler, W., Strassburger, A. (1999). Air quality measurements in urban green areas–A case study. Atmos. Environ. 33, 4101–4108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00151-X

  51. Kwak, H.Y., Ko, J., Lee, S., Joh, C.H. (2017). Identifying the correlation between rainfall, traffic flow performance and air pollution concentration in Seoul using a path analysis. Transp. Res. Procedia. 25, 11, 3552–3563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.288

  52. Lal, S., Naja, M., Subbaraya, B. (2000). Seasonal variations in surface ozone and its precursors over an urban site in India. Atmos. Environ. 34, 2713–2724. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00510-5

  53. Langner, M., Draheim, T., Endlicher, W. (2011). Particulate Matter in the Urban Atmosphere: Concentration, Distribution, Reduction – Results of Studies in the Berlin Metropolitan Area. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 15–41.

  54. Latif, M.T., Dominick, D., Ahamad, F., Khan, M.F., Juneng, L., Hamzah, F.M., Nadzir, M.S.M. (2014). Long term assessment of air quality from a background station on the Malaysian Peninsula. Sci. Total Environ. 482, 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.132

  55. Latif, M.T., Dominick, D., Hawari, N.S.S.L., Mohtar, A.A.A., Othman, M. (2021). The concentration of major air pollutants during the movement control order due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. Sustain. Cities Soc. 66, 102660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.​2020.102660

  56. Ledoux, F., Roche, C., Cazier, F., Beaugard, C., Courcot, D. (2018). Influence of ship emissions on NOx, SO2, O3 and PM concentrations in a North-Sea harbor in France. J. Environ. Sci. 71, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.03.030

  57. Lee, H.H., Bar-Or, R.Z., Wang, C. (2017). Biomass burning aerosols and the low-visibility events in Southeast Asia. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 965–980. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-965-2017

  58. Li, K., Chen, L., Ying, F., White, S.J., Jang, C., Wu, X., Gao, X., Hong, S., Shen, J., Azzi, M. (2017). Meteorological and chemical impacts on ozone formation: A case study in Hangzhou, China. Atmos. Res. 196, 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.003

  59. Lighty, J.S., Veranth, J.M., Sarofim, A.F. (2000). Combustion aerosols: Factors governing their size and composition and implications to human health. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 50, 1565–1618. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2000.10464197

  60. Liu, C.W., Lin, K.H., Kuo, Y.M. (2003). Application of factor analysis in the assessment of groundwater quality in a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan. Sci. Total Environ. 313, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00683-6

  61. Liu, Y., Tang, G., Huang, X., Wei, K., Wu, S., Wang, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, Y. (2021). Unexpected deep mixing layer in the Sichuan Basin, China. Atmos. Res. 249, 105300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105300

  62. Lolli, S., Khor, W.Y., Matjafri, M.Z., Lim, H.S. (2019). Monsoon season quantitative assessment of biomass burning clear-sky aerosol radiative effect at surface by ground-based lidar observations in Pulau Pinang, Malaysia in 2014. Remote Sens. 11, 2660. https://doi.org/​10.3390/rs11222660

  63. Mao, J., Wang, L., Lu, C., Liu, J., Li, M., Tang, G., Ji, D., Zhang, N., Wang, Y. (2020). Meteorological mechanism for a large-scale persistent severe ozone pollution event over eastern China in 2017. J. Environ. Sci. 92, 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.02.019

  64. Marcazzan, G.M., Valli, G., Vecchi, R. (2001). Composition of coarse and fine fractions of particulate matter at an urban and a conurban site in Northern Italy. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 47, 243–252. 

  65. Marcazzan, G.M., Valli, G., Vecchi, R. (2002). Factors influencing mass concentration and chemical composition of fine aerosols during a PM high pollution episode. Sci. Total Environ. 298, 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00171-7

  66. MetMalaysia (2019). Annual Report 2018. Malaysia.Malaysian Meteorological Department, Malaysia

  67. Mohamad, N.D., Ash’aari, Z.H., Othman, M. (2015). Preliminary assessment of air pollutant sources identification at selected monitoring stations in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Procedia Environ. Sci. 30, 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.021

  68. Mohd Akhir, M.F., Zakaria, N.Z., Tangang, F. (2014). Intermonsoon variation of physical characteristics and current circulation along the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Int. J. Oceanogr. 2014, 527587. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/527587

  69. Mohtar, A.A.A., Latif, M.T., Baharudin, N.H., Ahamad, F., Chung, J.X., Othman, M., Juneng, L. (2018). Variation of major air pollutants in different seasonal conditions in an urban environment in Malaysia. Geosci. Lett. 5, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-018-0122-y

  70. Ministry of Transport (MOT) (2019). Transport Statistics Malaysia. Ministry of Transport, Malaysia.

  71. Mukherjee, A., Agrawal, M. (2017). A global perspective of fine particulate matter pollution and its health effects, reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. Springer, pp. 5–51.

  72. Munir, S., Chen, H., Ropkins, K. (2013). Quantifying temporal trends in ground level ozone concentration in the UK. Sci. Total Environ. 458, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.​2013.04.045

  73. Munir, S. (2016). Analysing temporal trends in the ratios of PM2.5/PM10 in the UK. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 17, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.02.0081

  74. Mustaffa, M., Abas, M., Ahmad, S., Ahmad Aini, N., Abbas, W.F., Che Abdullah, S.A., Darus, M.Y. (2016). Marine traffic density over Port Klang, Malaysia using statistical analysis of AIS Data: A preliminary study. J. ETA Maritime Sci. 4, 333–341. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2016.60352

  75. Negral, L., Moreno-Grau, S., Moreno, J., Querol, X., Viana, M.M., Alastuey, A. (2008). Natural and anthropogenic contributions to PM10 and PM2.5 in an urban area in the Western Mediterranean Coast. Water Air Soil Pollut. 192, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9650-y

  76. Ngai, S.T., Tangang, F., Juneng, L. (2017). Bias correction of global and regional simulated daily precipitation and surface mean temperature over Southeast Asia using quantile mapping method. Glob. Planet Change 149, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.12.009

  77. Norazian, M.N., Ahmad Shukri, Y., Nor Azam, R., Luca, F.A., Mohd Mustafa, A.B.A., Sandu, A.V. (2015). Variation of air pollutant (particulate matter-PM10) in Peninsular Malaysia: Study in the southwest coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Rev. de Chim. 66, 1443–1447.

  78. CNST Online (2018). Haze descends on large parts of Malaysia, raising alarm. New Straits Times, Malaysia. 

  79. Nufael, A. (2018). Malaysia Alami Jerebu Akibat Pembakaran Terbuka di Kalimantan. Benar News Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 

  80. O'Neill, M.S., Veves, A., Zanobetti, A., Sarnat, J.A., Gold, D.R., Economides, P.A., Horton, E.S., Schwartz, J. (2005). Diabetes enhances vulnerability to particulate air pollution-associated impairment in vascular reactivity and endothelial function. Circulation 111, 2913–2920. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.517110

  81. Ooi, M., Chan, A., Subramaniam, K., Morris, K., Oozeer, M. (2017). Interaction of urban heating and local winds during the calm intermonsoon seasons in the tropics. J. Geophys. Res. 122, 11499–411523. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026690

  82. Pandolfi, M., Gonzalez-Castanedo, Y., Alastuey, A., de la Rosa, J.D., Mantilla, E., de la Campa, A.S., Querol, X., Pey, J., Amato, F., Moreno, T. (2011). Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 at multiple sites in the strait of Gibraltar by PMF: Impact of shipping emissions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 18, 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0373-4

  83. Park, K., Dam, H.D. (2008). Characterization of metal aerosols in PM10 from urban, industrial, and Asian Dust sources. Environ. Monit. Assess. 160, 289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0695-6

  84. Pereira, M., Santos, R., Alvim-Ferraz, M. (2007). Air quality improvements using European environment policies: A case study of SO2 in a coastal region in Portugal. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A. 70, 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390600884990

  85. Radzi Bin Abas, M., Rahman, N.A., Omar, N.Y.M.J., Maah, M.J., Abu Samah, A., Oros, D.R., Otto, A., Simoneit, B.R.T. (2004). Organic composition of aerosol particulate matter during a haze episode in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Atmos. Environ. 38, 4223–4241. https://doi.org/10.1016/​j.atmosenv.2004.01.048

  86. Rahman, S.R.A., Ismail, S.N.S., Raml, M.F., Latif, M.T., Abidin, E.Z., Praveena, S.M. (2015). The assessment of ambient air pollution trend in Klang Valley, Malaysia. World Environment. 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.env.20150501.01

  87. Salahudin, S.N., Abdullah, M.M., Newaz, N.A. (2013). Emissions: Sources, policies and development in Malaysia. Int. J. Educ. Res. 1, 1–12.

  88. Saunders, R.O., Waugh, D.W. (2015). Variability and potential sources of summer PM2.5 in the Northeastern United States. Atmos. Environ. 117, 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.​2015.07.007

  89. Seinfeld, J.H., Pandis, S.N. (1998). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

  90. Shannon, N.K., Loretta, J.M., Miriam, E.M., Jonathan, J.B., Patrick, S.K., Tianjia, L., Melissa, P.S., Ruth, S.D., Daniel, J.J., Joel, S., Montira, P., Samuel, S.M. (2016). Public health impacts of the severe haze in Equatorial Asia in September–October 2015: Demonstration of a new framework for informing fire management strategies to reduce downwind smoke exposure. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 094023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094023

  91. Škrbić, B., Đurišić-Mladenović, N. (2007). Principal component analysis for soil contamination with organochlorine compounds. Chemosphere. 68, 2144–2152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.​chemosphere.2007.01.083

  92. Soon, C., Lam, W.H. (2013). The growth of seaports in Peninsular Malaysia and East Malaysia for 2007–2011. Ocean Coast. Manage. 78, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.03.​007

  93. Sousa, S., Martins, F.G., Alvim-Ferraz, M., Pereira, M.C. (2007). Multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks based on principal components to predict ozone concentrations. Environ. Modell. Software 22, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.002

  94. Statheropoulos, M., Vassiliadis, N., Pappa, A. (1998). Principal component and canonical correlation analysis for examining air pollution and meteorological data. Atmos. Environ. 32, 1087–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00377-4

  95. Sulong, N.A., Latif, M.T., Khan, M.F., Amil, N., Ashfold, M.J., Wahab, M.I.A., Chan, K.M., Sahani, M. (2017). Source apportionment and health risk assessment among specific age groups during haze and non-haze episodes in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Sci. Total Environ. 601, 556–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.153

  96. Tangang, F.T., Juneng, L., Salimun, E., Vinayachandran, P., Seng, Y.K., Reason, C., Behera, S.K., Yasunari, T. (2008). On the roles of the northeast cold surge, the Borneo vortex, the Madden‐Julian Oscillation, and the Indian Ocean Dipole during the extreme 2006/2007 flood in southern Peninsular Malaysia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L14S07. https://doi.org/10.1029/​2008GL033429

  97. Tangang, F., Latif, M., Juneng, L. (2010). Climate change: is Southeast Asia up to the challenge?: The roles of climate variability and climate change on smoke haze occurrences in Southeast Asia region. IDEAS reports - special reports, Kitchen, Nicholas (ed.) (SR004).  LSE IDEAS, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

  98. Tangang, F., Farzanmanesh, R., Mirzaei, A., Salimun, E., Jamaluddin, A.F., Juneng, L. (2017). Characteristics of precipitation extremes in Malaysia associated with El Niño and La Niña events. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 696–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5032

  99. Tuygun, G.T., Elbir, T. (2020). Long-term temporal analysis of the columnar and surface aerosol relationship with planetary boundary layer height at a southern coastal site of Turkey. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 11, 2259–2269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.09.008

  100. Ulke, A.G., Mazzeo, N.A. (1998). Climatological aspects of the daytime mixing height in Buenos Aires city, Argentina. Atmos. Environ. 32, 1615–1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00396-8

  101. Viana, M., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Gil, J., Menéndez, M. (2006). Identification of PM sources by principal component analysis (PCA) coupled with wind direction data. Chemosphere 65, 2411–2418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.060

  102. Vu, T.V., Delgado-Saborit, J.M., Harrison, R.M. (2015). Particle number size distributions from seven major sources and implications for source apportionment studies. Atmos. Environ. 122, 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.027

  103. Wang, J., Christopher, S.A. (2003). Intercomparison between satellite‐derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: Implications for air quality studies. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2095. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018174

  104. Wang, W., Maenhaut, W., Yang, W., Liu, X., Bai, Z., Zhang, T., Claeys, M., Cachier, H., Dong, S., Wang, Y. (2014). One–year aerosol characterization study for PM2.5 and PM10 in Beijing. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 5, 554–562. https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2014.064

  105. Wang, Y., Yuan, Y., Wang, Q., Liu, C., Zhi, Q., Cao, J. (2020). Changes in air quality related to the control of coronavirus in China: Implications for traffic and industrial emissions. Sci. Total Environ. 731, 139133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139133

  106. Wu, C.F., Woodward, A., Li, Y.R., Kan, H., Balasubramanian, R., Latif, M.T., Sahani, M., Cheng, T.J., Chio, C.P., Taneepanichskul, N. (2017). Regulation of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the Pacific Rim: Perspectives from the APRU Global Health Program. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 10, 1039–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0492-x

  107. Wu, S.P., Cai, M.J., Xu, C., Zhang, N., Zhou, J.-B., Yan, J.P., Schwab, J.J., Yuan, C.S. (2020). Chemical nature of PM2.5 and PM10 in the coastal urban Xiamen, China: Insights into the impacts of shipping emissions and health risk. Atmos. Environ. 227, 117383. https://doi.org/10.1016/​j.atmosenv.2020.117383

  108. Xu, G., Jiao, L., Zhang, B., Zhao, S., Yuan, M., Gu, Y., Liu, J., Tang, X. (2016). Spatial and temporal variability of the PM2.5/PM10 ratio in Wuhan, Central China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 17, 741–751. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.09.0406

  109. Yang, X., Wu, K., Wang, H., Liu, Y., Gu, S., Lu, Y., Zhang, X., Hu, Y., Ou, Y., Wang, S. (2020). Summertime ozone pollution in Sichuan Basin, China: Meteorological conditions, sources and process analysis. Atmos. Environ. 226, 117392. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.09.0406

  110. Yoo, J.M., Jeong, M.J., Kim, D., Stockwell, W.R., Yang, J.H., Shin, H.W., Lee, M.I., Song, C.K., Lee, S.D. (2015). Spatiotemporal variations of air pollutants (O3, NO2, SO2, CO, PM10, and VOCs) with land-use types. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 10857. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10857-2015

  111. Zhang, Y., Li, T., Ma, R., Yin, Z., Wang, J., He, M.Z., Xu, D., Gao, X., Wang, Q., Kraus, V.B., Lv, Y., Zhong, Y., Kinney, P.L., Shi, X. (2020). Long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter and fasting blood glucose level in a Chinese elderly cohort. Sci. Total Environ. 717, 137191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137191

  112. Zhao, S., Yu, Y., Yin, D., Qin, D., He, J., Dong, L. (2018). Spatial patterns and temporal variations of six criteria air pollutants during 2015 to 2017 in the city clusters of Sichuan Basin, China. Sci. Total Environ. 624, 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.172


Share this article with your colleagues 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

6.5
2021CiteScore
 
 
77st percentile
Powered by
Scopus
 
   SCImago Journal & Country Rank

2021 Impact Factor: 4.53
5-Year Impact Factor: 3.668

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit
CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal that promotes submissions of high-quality research and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world. We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.