Hsin-Chieh Kung1,2,7, Yen-Kung Hsieh5,6, Bo-Wun Huang4, Nicholas Kiprotich Cheruiyot This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.2,3, Guo-Ping Chang-Chien This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1,2,3

1 Institute of Environmental Toxin and Emerging-Contaminant Research, Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung 833301, Taiwan
2 Center for Environmental Toxin and Emerging-Contaminant Research, Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung 833301, Taiwan
3 Super Micro Mass Research and Technology Center, Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung 833301, Taiwan
4 Department of Mechanical and Institute of Mechatronic Engineering, Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung 833301, Taiwan
5 Department of Environmental Science and Occupational Safety and Health, Tajen University, Pingtung 90703, Taiwan
6 Marine Ecology and Conservation Research Center, National Academy of Marine Research, Kaohsiung 806614, Taiwan
7 Department of Tourism and Recreation, Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung 833301, Taiwan

Received: March 28, 2022
Revised: June 7, 2022
Accepted: June 12, 2022

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.220148  

Cite this article:

Kung, H.C., Hsieh, Y.K., Huang, B.W., Cheruiyot, N.K., Chang-Chien, G.P. (2022). An Overview: Organophosphate Flame Retardants in the Atmosphere. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 22, 220148. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.220148


  • OPFRs have been measured in remote areas implying long-range transport potential.
  • Some OPFR transformation products are more persistent and toxic than parent compounds.
  • There is no consensus among researchers on targeted OPFRs for analysis.
  • Most studies conclude OPFR partition in the particulate-phase.
  • Gas-phase OPFR might be underestimated due to sampling artifacts.


Organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) have been adopted as safer alternatives to polybrominated biphenyl ether flame retardants. However, because of their ubiquitous presence in the environment and the growing evidence of health risks, there has been growing research interest in understanding the fate and effects of these compounds in the environment. This review focuses on the current knowledge of OPFRs in the atmosphere. There is no consensus on the target OPFR for analysis, making comparisons challenging. However, we can still conclude that OPFRs partition mainly in the particulate phase, and chlorinated-OPFRs are the main compounds in the atmosphere. The general concentration trends from the literature were: PM2.5 > TSP > air. However, the gas-phase OPFRs in the published studies might be significantly underestimated because of sampling artifacts. OPFRs were also found in remote environments in Antarctica, the Arctic, and high mountains, suggesting long-range transport potential. For example, concentrations up to 92.3 ± 13.8 pg m–3 in the air have been measured in the Antarctic. Lastly, atmospheric transformations of some OPFRs have been reported as more toxic and persistent than parent compounds, indicating additional risk. However, they are currently not measured or included during risk assessment.

Keywords: Atmospheric particle-bound contaminants, Emerging contaminants, Organophosphate esters, PM2.5, Long-range transport


Fire retardants are essential in meeting fire safety requirements by reducing the risk of fire breakouts. They are added to numerous materials, including wood products, textiles, and plastics used in construction, electrical equipment, furniture, and vehicles. Fire retardants work by either abstracting the reactive ·H and ·OH radicals, endothermically reacting, or forming a barrier between the fire and the material (DeArmitt, 2011; Salmeia et al., 2015). These compounds are ubiquitous in the environment and are of great interest to environmentalists.

Organophosphate ester flame retardants (OPFRs) have become widely used as alternatives to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). Penta-, octa-, and deca-brominated diphenyl ethers (penta-BDEs, octa-BDEs, and deca-BDEs) were once widely used halogenated organic flame retardants and are now listed in Annex A of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) because of their environmental persistency and toxicity (Blum et al., 2019; Sharkey et al., 2020). Furthermore, PBDE flame retardants also contain dioxin and furan contaminants, and they are also precursors for the formation of brominated dioxins and furans during combustion (Altarawneh and Dlugogorski, 2013; Yang et al., 2022). OPFRs replaced PBDE largely on the presumption that they were less persistent (Blum et al., 2019). However, Zhang et al. (2016a) estimated that some OPFRs have medium to high persistency. In addition, the environmental safety of OPFRs has come under question since there is increasing evidence of their negative impact on human and ecological health (Kojima et al., 2013; Du et al., 2015; Blum et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019a).

Organophosphate ester flame retardants consist of straight (alkyl) or aromatic (aryl) chains attached to a phosphate moiety. Some OPFRs, e.g., Tris(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TCPP), are also chlorinated. OPFRs are mainly used as flame retardant plasticizers in engineering plastics (Brandsma et al., 2013). Non-chlorinated OPFRs retard flames through reaction in the solid phase, where they build up a char layer providing a barrier between the flame and the material (Mihajlović, 2015). In addition to this action, chlorinated-OPFRs also retard flames via the gas phase, whereby the chlorine abstracts the reactive ·H and ·OH radicals (Mihajlović, 2015). Chlorinated-OPFRs also have longer lifetimes in the end product because of the stronger binding of chlorine to the polymer. OPFRs are incorporated into materials physically and thus could easily be released into the environment through abrasion or during hot conditions (Brandsma et al., 2013). Blum et al. (2019) argued that the current information on the toxicity and ubiquity of organophosphate ester flame retardants indicates that they might not be a risk-free alternative to PBDE flame retardants, and safer alternatives should be developed since it will still take longer for sufficient scientific evidence to guide regulations. 

Several useful reviews, perspective papers, and letters have been published on OPFRs: in microenvironments (Chupeau et al., 2020; Hou et al., 2021), soil (Zhang et al., 2022b), biota (Pantelaki and Voutsa, 2020), oceans (Xie et al., 2022), exposure and health risk assessment (Blum et al., 2019), and industrial production (Huang et al., 2022). Wang et al. (2020c) ambitiously covered the presence of OPFRs in air, water, sediment, and sludge and included human exposure and human and ecological risk assessment. However, what is missing in these reviews is the presence of OPFRs in atmospheric particles. This is an essential aspect that has not been given adequate attention. According to Li et al. (2019b), the median OPFR concentration in the particulate phase in the air accounted for ~90% of the total concentrations, with the rest partitioning in the gas phase. Particle-bound OPFRs would be more persistent and would be able to be transported to pristine environments (Shi et al., 2021). Atmospheric PM2.5-bound OPFRs would also present additional health risks.

Therefore, this review paper aims to collate and discuss recently published articles on organophosphate flame retardants in atmospheric air and particles. The manuscript will also include the production, consumption, physicochemical properties, and environmental effects of OPFRs. The sampling and analysis methods used by various studies and the challenges and potential solutions during these procedures. This review would be a valuable resource to researchers on emerging organic contaminants and air pollution interested in understanding the current literature on organophosphate ester flame retardants.


Recently published articles were sourced from the Web of Science database using “organophosphate flame retardants”, “PM2.5”, atmospheric particle-bound”, “air”, and “atmosphere” as search words. The results were further screened to include only Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) original and review publications in the past fifteen years. The cumulative number of publications during the period is shown in Fig. 1. For the past 15 years, 390 research articles and research papers on organophosphate flame retardants in the air were published, as shown in Fig. 1. The data was accessed on May 26th, 2022. It is clear that the research interest in OPFRs has been increasing over the years. The majority of the published articles have been on OPFRs in indoor air.

 Fig. 1. The cumulative number of publications on organophosphate flame retardants published in the past 15 years. The publications are all in the Science Citation Index Expanded and consist of research articles and review papers. The data was sourced from the Web of Science. Accessed on May 26th, 2022.Fig. 1. The cumulative number of publications on organophosphate flame retardants published in the past 15 years. The publications are all in the Science Citation Index Expanded and consist of research articles and review papers. The data was sourced from the Web of Science. Accessed on May 26th, 2022.

However, research on outdoor air and particle-bound OPFR has been steadily growing over the years. A total of 119 articles were used in this review, with OPFR concentrations from 24 articles extracted and interpreted.


The production and consumption information of organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) would be useful in understanding their presence in the environment. Several OPFRs are listed as High Production Volume Chemicals, defined by Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries as chemicals produced or imported at > 1,000 metric tons year1. However, there is inadequate information about the production and uses of these compounds. Some outdated information include Van der Veen and de Boer (2012) that reported OPFR consumption in Europe in 2006 was 93,000 metric tons. The marketing research company, ResearchInChina, puts the global market volume of OPFR in 2013 at 690,000 metric tons (ResearchInChina, 2014). Blum et al. (2019) included the US production volume estimations of a few OPFRs in 2015 retrieved from the NIH PubChem database and showed that TCPP and TDCPP were produced at a volume of 22,600–45,000 and 4,500–22,600 metric tons, respectively, and TPhP, TCP, and TnBP at 450–4,500 metric tons each (converted from pounds).

The most recent and detailed publication on OPFR production is Huang et al. (2022), which reported 367 factories globally manufacture OPFRs as of 2020, 201 of which are in China. A little over 431,000 metric tons of these flame retardants were produced from the 201 factories, 84.2% being organophosphate esters. Fig. 2 shows the most produced OPFRs in 2020, with the top five OPFRs being TEP (~18%), TCPP (12%), and TiBP, BADP, and TCEP with 9% each. However, whether the production of these compounds reflects consumption in the flame retardant application cannot yet be drawn since some of these compounds have other industrial applications, as shown in Table 1. For example, TnBP is also used as a dielectric fluid in motor oils and lubricants (Gao et al., 2021); TBEP as an antifoaming agent (Mihajlović, 2015); and TPhP as a lubricant and hydraulic fluid (Wang et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019b). In addition, since the information comes from only one region and represents 55% of global OPFR-manufacturing factories, it is not certain that the same conclusions can be drawn from the other regions where the factories are located.

Fig. 2. Production of organophosphate ester flame retardants in 2020. The data is retrieved from Huang et al. (2022). The production data is from Mainland China which houses 55% of global OPFR factories. The others category consists of thirteen compounds with < 0.8% of the total production. TEP: Triethyl phosphate; TCPP: Tris(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate; TiBP: Tri-iso-butyl phosphate; BADP: Bisphenol-A bis(diphenyl phosphate); TCEP: Tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate; IPPP: Isopropylated triphenyl phosphate; TBEP: Tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate; TMP: Trimethyl phosphate; TnBP: Tri-n-butyl phosphate; TPhP: Triphenyl phosphate; TDCPP: Tris (1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate; TCP: Tricresyl phosphate, CDPP: Cresyl diphenyl phosphate, TXP: Trixylenyl phosphate, TBPHPP: Tris(p-tert-butylphenyl) phosphate, TEHP: Tris(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate. 
Fig. 2. Production of organophosphate ester flame retardants in 2020. The data is retrieved from Huang et al. (2022). The production data is from Mainland China which houses 55% of global OPFR factories. The others category consists of thirteen compounds with < 0.8% of the total production. TEP: Triethyl phosphate; TCPP: Tris(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate; TiBP: Tri-iso-butyl phosphate; BADP: Bisphenol-A bis(diphenyl phosphate); TCEP: Tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate; IPPP: Isopropylated triphenyl phosphate; TBEP: Tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate; TMP: Trimethyl phosphate; TnBP: Tri-n-butyl phosphate; TPhP: Triphenyl phosphate; TDCPP: Tris (1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate; TCP: Tricresyl phosphate, CDPP: Cresyl diphenyl phosphate, TXP: Trixylenyl phosphate, TBPHPP: Tris(p-tert-butylphenyl) phosphate, TEHP: Tris(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate.

Table 1. The chemical structure, physicochemical properties, and application of commonly studied organophosphate ester flame retardanst.

Table 1. (continued).

Table 1. (continued).

Table 1. (continued).

In the market, commercial OPFR products come as single OPFR compounds, e.g., Reofos® 50 which only consists of IPPP, or as a mixture of organophosphate ester compounds, e.g., ANTIBLAZE® V-500, which has chloroalkyl, aryl, and triaryl phosphates. In addition, some commercial OPFR products consist of proprietary OPFR compounds, e.g., SAYTEX® RZ-243, which contains proprietary aryl-OPFRs, and as mixtures of OPFRs and other flame retardants, e.g., Firemaster 550®, which is a formulation of aryl-OPFRs and brominated flame retardants. These formulations further complicate associating OPFR levels in the environment with production and consumption.


Organophosphate flame retardants consist of organic moieties attached to the phosphate molecule, as shown in Table 1. These organic moieties can be alkyl or aryl, and some alkyl-OPFRs are also halogenated. Therefore, because of the significant variation in the chemical structures, there is no general trend in the physicochemical properties of this class of compounds, unlike PBDEs which only vary in the number of bromines attached to the parent diphenyl ether molecule.

The physicochemical properties of OPFRs, shown in Table 1, can help us predict the occurrence and presence of these compounds in the environment. For example, Li et al. (2019b) found that OPFRs with low vapor pressure and high Log KOA (aryl-OPFRs, TBEP, TEHP) were frequently present in the soil (> 75% of the samples), while straight-chain alkyl-OPFRs were often in the air. In the atmosphere, aryl-OPFRs, TBEP, and TEHP are more in the particulate phase than the gas phase, while non-chlorinated alkyl-OPFRs are more in the gas phase (Ma et al., 2022). Okeme et al. (2018) concluded that > 50% of OPFRs, such as TCP and TEHP, with log KOA ≥ 10.53 and Log PL (sub-cooled liquid vapor pressure) ≤ –3.73, are expected to partition in the particle phase, while more volatile compounds, e.g., TCEP and TCPP, are expected to be primarily in the gas phase. Furthermore, high molecular mass OPFRs with high KOW (> 5), such as EHDP and TCP, can biomagnify in the aquatic food chain (Bekele et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019b). Suhring et al. (2016) used the physical properties estimated by the EPI Suite and the OECD POV and long-range transport potential (LRTP) screening tool to predict the persistence and characteristic travel distance of OPFRs in air and water. In the air, the characteristic travel distance, a predictor of long-range transport potential, was in the order: aryl-OFRs and high molecular weight alkyl-OFRs > chloroalkyl-OPFRs > alkyl-OFRs. The same trend was observed for POV, an estimator of persistency, with the exception of TDCPP and TBEP, which had higher values than members of their respective groups. In conclusion, the physicochemical properties, together with the production and consumption information of OPFRs, can be useful in explaining their presence in the environment.

The wide application of OPFRs has resulted in their prevalence in the environment, including alarming concentrations in biota (Yao et al., 2021). Greaves and Letcher (2014) found that OPFRs (∑16) mainly accumulated in the fat and muscle tissues of birds. OPFRs and their metabolites have been detected in human urine, hair, breast milk, placenta, and blood and seminal plasma (Zhang et al., 2016b; Wang et al., 2020a). This has raised further health risk concerns about these groups of compounds.

The effects of most of the OPFRs on humans and the environment have been studied using model organisms, e.g., zebrafish, Japanese medaka, and Caenorhabditis elegans, and in vitro investigations. Sun et al. (2016) found that TPhP, TnBP, TBEP, and TCEP caused embryotoxicity to Japanese medaka, decreasing hatchability, delaying hatching, and causing developmental problems. Although there are few studies on the health impact of these compounds on human beings, there has been a growing list of in vitro publications that show some OPFRs (TCPP, TCEP, and TPhP) have immunotoxicity (Butt et al., 2014; Canbaz et al., 2017; Li et al., 2020a), developmental impairment (Noyes et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2016; Li et al., 2019a; Hu et al., 2021), endocrine disruption (Kojima et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2017), and cardiotoxicity (Du et al., 2015) potential. Blum et al. (2019) concluded from in vitro studies that OPFRs had similar developmental and neurodevelopment toxicity potential as PBDEs. Because of the differences among OPFRs, a presentation of physicochemical characteristics and effects of selected individual OPFRs was included in this review as follows:

4.1 Alkyl-OPFRs

4.1.1 Triethyl phosphate (TEP)

TEP has high vapor pressure, Henry’s law constant, low partition coefficients, and high solubility in water, as shown in Table 1. Therefore, TEP is expected to partition mostly in the gas phase and water bodies. Although it is produced at a much higher volume compared to other OPFRs, as shown in Fig. 2, TEP is primarily used as an intermediate in manufacturing (Liu et al., 2021c). TEP is also considered to be less toxic than other OPFRs. Based on the current evidence (no-observed-affect level of 1000 mg kg–1 bw day–1 for subacute toxicity), the OECD Screening Information Data Set (SIDS) regards TEP as of low concern for risk to human beings or the environment.

4.1.2 Tri-n-butyl phosphate (TnBP)

As shown in Table 1, TnBP has low solubility in water and moderately low volatility. TnBP has additional applications including as an anti-foam agent and plasticizer (Wei et al., 2015). Zhang et al. (2021) reported that TnBP damaged the reproductive capacity of gonad development, and induced DNA damage and oxidative stress in C. elagans. After 24 h exposure, TnBP inhibited acetylcholinesterase, a marker of neuronal damage, in rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cells, implying that it is likely to be neurotoxic (Chang et al., 2020).

4.1.3 Tris(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (TEHP)

Apart from being a fire retardant, TEHP is also used as a plasticizer and solvent (Wei et al., 2015). It has high partitioning coefficients and low volatility similar to aryl-OPFRs and is therefore expected to partition in the particulate phase in the atmosphere. Pelletier et al. (2020) reported that TEHP at high concentrations of 3000 mg kg bw–1 day–1 for 28 days impaired body and organ weights and caused testicular toxicity in male rats. The study estimated that the no-observed-affect level for TEHP was 1000 mg kg bw–1 day–1.

4.1.4 Tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBEP)

With low volatility, high partitioning coefficients, and moderate water solubility. TBEP is expected to partition in particulates. TBEP is also used as a plasticizer and an anti-foam agent in paints and floor finishes (Wei et al., 2015). Several studies on TBEP on model organisms and cells have shown that it causes neurotoxicity and developmental problems (Kwon et al., 2016; Ma et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2019). For example, TBEP decreased body length, heart rate, survival rate, and hatching rate (Xiong et al., 2021) and altered motor behavior, and caused oxidative stress in zebrafish (Jiang et al., 2018).

4.2 Aryl-OPFRs

4.2.1 2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate (EHDP)

EHDP has low solubility in water, low volatility, and high partition coefficients, as shown in Table 1. In the atmosphere, it is expected to partition mostly in the particulate phase. EHDP is neurotoxic and hepatoxic in zebrafish (Jarema et al., 2015), and also causes reproductive toxicity in Japanese medaka fish (Li et al., 2020b). Liu et al. (2021d) found that EHDP concentration in the plasma of women diagnosed with four female-specific tumors (benign breast cancer, breast cancer, benign cancer of the uterus, and cervical cancer) was associated with an elevated risk of breast and cervical cancers (P < 0.05).

4.2.2 Triphenyl phosphate (TPhP)

TPhP has low vapor pressure, Henry’s law constants, and high partition coefficients and is expected to partition in the particulate phase. It is used as a fire retardant in a wide range of plastics, as shown in Table 1. Behl et al. (2016) found TPhP had comparable reproductive effects on C. elegans to commercial PBDE, DE-71 mixture (mostly comprising of penta-BDEs: BDE-47 and BDE-99). Sun et al. (2016) found that TPhP caused embryotoxicity to Japanese medaka, decreasing hatchability, delaying hatching, and causing developmental problems. Low concentrations of TPhP were shown to disturb the natural metabolism and DNA repair system in zebrafish (Du et al., 2016). Toxicity in mice has also been shown, with Chen et al. (2015) reporting that TPhP and TCEP induced oxidative stress and endocrine disruption in mice at high concentrations of 300 mg kg bw–1 for 35 days. Based on the effects on human nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, Hendriks et al. (2012) classified TPhP as a highly potent neurotoxic compound.

4.2.3 Tricresyl phosphate (TCP)

TCP comprises ten isomers with differing methyl group positioning. Apart from its use as a flame retardant and a plasticizer, it is widely used in aviation as an anti-wear lubricant additive (Guan et al., 2016). TCP is highly hydrophobic and has a high bioaccumulation factor of 8.56 × 103 (Liu et al., 2020). Because of its low volatility, TCP in the atmosphere is expected to partition mostly in the particulate phase. Tri-ortho-CP (ToCP) is thought to be more toxic than the meta and para isomers. The neurotoxicity of ToCP in humans has been long known since it was a common cooking oil adulterant (Craig and Barth, 1999; Paul, 2019). For example, the consumption of adulterated rape seed oil by ToCP leads to motor paralysis and permanent disability in victims in Kolkata, India (Paul, 2019). TCP in jet fuel has also been linked to aerotoxic syndrome observed in pilots and cabin crew (de Boer et al., 2015).

4.3 Chloroalkyl-OPFRs

The EU region and parts of the United States have already responded to the growing evidence of the health risks associated with OPFRs by restricting the use of TCEP and TDCPP (Negev et al., 2018). The EU placed TCEP on the Annex XVI authorization list, effectively banning its application in the region. Some states, including New York and Vermont, prohibited using the two chemicals in children’s toys and furniture (Negev et al., 2018). It is expected for more countries to adopt similar measures.

4.3.1 Tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP)

TCEP has been used as a fire retardant and plasticizer in different types of plastics including polyurethanes and resins. According to Table 1, TCEP is volatile and highly soluble in water, and therefore it is expected to be found in water bodies and in the gas phase in the atmosphere. TCEP is toxic to aquatic life (Wu et al., 2017), mammals (Chen et al., 2015), and the EU considers TCEP a potential carcinogen to humans. As a result, it is restricted in the EU and also some parts of the US, as previously mentioned (Negev et al., 2018).

4.3.2 Tris(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TCPP)

Similar to TCEP, TCPP is volatile and soluble in water, and therefore it is expected to behave in a similar manner to TCEP in the environment. TCPP has been shown to affect hormone synthesis, development, and gene transcription in zebrafish (Liu et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2022) and chicken embryos (Farhat et al., 2013). TCPP caused oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (Saquib et al., 2021).

4.3.3 Tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCPP)

Unlike TCEP and TCPP, TDCPP has lower water solubility and a higher Log KOW, as shown in Table 1. Because it has high volatility, TDCPP in the atmosphere is also expected to partition mostly in the gas phase. TDCPP replaced penta-BDE and is commonly used as a fire retardant in polyurethane foam plastics. Dishaw et al. (2014) found that developmental exposure to TDCPP elicited teratogenic and neurobehavioral effects on zebrafish. Urinary TDCPP metabolite, bis(1,3-dichloro-s-propyl) phosphate, measured in pregnant women’s urine during their second and third trimesters was associated with decreased thyroid hormones, T3 and T4, levels, and increased thyroid-stimulating hormone levels in infants (Percy et al., 2021). TDCPP is listed as a known carcinogen by the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (Babich, 2006).

4.4 Transformation products

In biota, OPFRs are quickly metabolized primarily as organophosphate diesters and hydroxylated products (Su et al., 2014; Greaves et al., 2016; Greaves and Letcher, 2017; Fu et al., 2020). OPFRs also undergo atmospheric transformations, including photodegradation and oxidation. These transformation products might exhibit different properties and can cause additional risk. For instance, Su et al. (2014) found evidence to support that the diester metabolite of TPhP was more toxic than TPhP since it altered more toxicologically relevant genes. Zhang et al. (2020a) came to the same conclusion after investigating the endocrine disruption of TCPP, TDCPP, and TPhP metabolites. However, OPFR metabolites are currently not monitored and considered in health risk assessments.

Liu et al. (2021a) found 10 atmospheric transformation products (from 6 chlorinated- and 4 non-chlorinated-OPFRs), with a 94–100% detection frequency in 18 megacities globally, which uncovers a previously unrecognized exposure risk. In addition, they showed that the overall persistency of the transformation products of chlorinated OPFRs was on average 2.5 times higher than the parent compounds in all environmental media. On the other hand, non-chlorinated OPFRs were on average 25% less persistent than the parent compounds. Therefore, including the monitoring of atmospheric transformation products would present a more informed risk to the exposure of OPFR.


The section presents the sampling, extraction, purification, and analysis of OPFRs in the atmosphere that have been used in recent publications. The merits and disadvantages of the procedures are also included to guide researchers in selecting appropriate procedures.

5.1 Sampling and Extraction

The simultaneous sampling of atmospheric air and particles (TSP or PM2.5) has been carried out by equipping the samplers with quartz or glass fiber filter for particle-bound OPFRs and adsorbent, e.g., polyurethane foam (PUF), sorbent-infused PUF and styrene divinylbenzene copolymer (XAD) resin, for the gas-phase OPFRs. Medium and high-volume active air samplers have been used to continuously collect air samples, as shown in Table 2. The design flow rate is usually provided by the sampler manufacturer, but it appears most studies used similar flow rates to the one recommended (1.1–1.7 m3 min–1) by the U.S. EPA Compendium Method IO-2.1 on the sampling of particulate matter in the air using high-volume samplers. The flow rate is dependent on the analyte and the expected concentration in the air.

Table 2. The sampling and extraction techniques used in collecting organophosphate flame retardants in the atmosphere.

Active air samplers can give information about concentrations in both gas and particle phases; however, they need a power supply (Ahrens et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2016b). Passive air samplers have also been used to sample OPFRs in the air (Rauert et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020e; Zhang et al., 2020c). Passive air samplers are low cost, do not require a power supply, and are suitable for spatial and long-term temporal investigations (Ahrens et al., 2013; Okeme et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2018). However, passive samplers cannot capture the distribution of OPFRs in the gas and particle phase and are prone to considerable human error and uncertainty in interpretation. These challenges are often associated with determining sampling rates and effective sampling volumes (Herkert and Hornbuckle, 2018).

Because OPFRs are ubiquitous in the environment and at very low concentrations, background contamination during the sampling, transport, storage, and treatment is quite common (Wang et al., 2020c). Therefore, blank tests are vital during the investigation of OPFRs in the environment. Also, all sampling materials should be pretreated and appropriately stored before and after sampling.

The extraction methods commonly used in studies are ultrasonic, Soxhlet, and accelerated solvent extractions, as shown in Table 2. Accelerated solvent extraction is the more modern extraction technique and reduces the extraction time and solvent consumption compared to Soxhlet and ultrasonic extractions (Clark et al., 2015). Microwave-assisted solvent extraction (MASE) is also a fast and cost-effective extraction technique that uses less solvent than Soxhlet and ultrasonic extraction. It is also easy to operate compared to ASE which requires tedious sample preparation and the assembly of complex sample holders. Naccarato et al. (2018) successfully used MASE to extract OPFRs from atmospheric particulate matter (PM10) with a water and ethanol solution. OPFRs have been extracted using a single or combination of polar and non-polar solvents. Clark et al. (2015) investigated fifteen different solvent compositions (dichloromethane, methanol, and acetone) to determine the optimal solvent ratio and temperature for extracting OPFRs using accelerated solvent extraction. The optimal parameters were based on the analyte and surrogate recoveries. They found that a 2:1 ratio of dichloromethane to acetone and 100°C had the best average recoveries (77 ± 15%). Extracts undergo cleanup to remove impurities before analysis.

5.1.1 Sampling artifacts

Sampling artifacts are common in filter-sorbent samplers of SVOCs, and occur when particles are blown off the filter, gas-phase compounds sorb to the filter, particle-sorbed compounds are stripped off the filter and onto the sorbent, and breakthrough occurs in the sorbent (Arp et al., 2007; Melymuk et al., 2016; Okeme et al., 2018). The artifacts are affected by the operation of samplers (flow rate and air volume), meteorological conditions (temperature and relative humidity), and filter characteristics (Lohmann and Lammel, 2004; Cheruiyot et al., 2015; Okeme et al., 2018). Therefore, sampling artifacts influence the measurement of gas-particle partitioning, which is a crucial factor in determining the fate of a compound in the environment, including phase distribution, transportation, and deposition. However, the sampling artifacts during the sampling of OPFRs are still understudied. Studies have suggested that because of their polarity, gas-phase OPFRs will be sorbed on quartz and glass fiber filters which are also polar (Okeme et al., 2018). At high relative humidity, water films can also form on the fiber filters resulting in the absorption of OPFRs. These occurrences would lead to an underestimation of gas-phase OPFRs. Okeme et al. (2018) concluded glass fiber filter is better than a quartz fiber filter in sampling OPFRs because it has a lower predisposition to gas-phase sorption.

5.2 Instrumental Analysis

As shown in Table 3, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS), and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) have been used by different research groups in analyzing OPFR from atmospheric samples. All these analytical instruments have distinctive merits. GC has good separation capacity for most OPFRs except higher molecular ones where UPLC is more suitable.

Table 3. The instrumental analysis techniques and QA/QC parameters were used to analyze organophosphate flame retardants.

After the compounds are separated and eluted from the GC column, they are subjected to ionization. The resulting fragmentations are used to identify the compounds by the MS or MS/MS. These mass detectors have replaced nitrogen and phosphorus nitrogen detectors in OPFR analysis due to their higher selectivity (Pantelaki and Voutsa, 2019). The MS uses the primary and secondary ions and the retention time to identify OPFRs. In contrast, MS/MS uses the transitions of the primary and secondary ions and retention times for identification. Therefore, MS/MS is more sensitive than MS and can be used to detect complex sample matrices (Wolschke et al., 2016). Currently, a triple quadrupole MS detector with the multiple reaction monitoring mode provides the highest sensitivity for the structural identification of the compounds (Ma et al., 2022).

Electron impact ionization (EI) has been used for GC-MS and GC-MS/MS for the fragmentation of OPFRs. However, the high energies of EI might lead to undesirable fragmentation. This is because OPFR yields low-mass fragments under high energies. Chemical ionization techniques such as electron spray ionization, used alongside UPLC, provide a more controllable fragmentation of OPFRs (Björklund et al., 2004).

Helium gas, at a flow rate of 1.0–1.5 mL min–1, has been used as a carrier gas in GC-MS and GC-MS/MS instruments. Nonpolar polyphenylmethylsiloxane capillary columns of 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm dimensions have been used to separate the compounds. The nonpolar stationary phase coatings are preferred over polar ones because polarity reduces the thermal stability of columns (Patnaik, 2017).

The efficiency of the column to separate compounds is determined by the stationary phase and the polarity of the target compounds. The more polar OPFRs such as TEP will have shorter retention times in the nonpolar columns compared to less polar OPFRs. The ion source temperature for the GC ranged from 230–290°C, and the temperature program started at 60–90°C and ramped up to 300–320°C (Salamova et al., 2014b; Clark et al., 2015; Castro-Jiménez and Sempéré, 2018; Wang et al., 2018a; Chen et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020b; Wang et al., 2020d; Zeng et al., 2020; Prats et al., 2022).


OPFR concentrations in atmospheric air, total suspended solids, and PM2.5 published in recent articles are presented in Table 4. The main challenge in comparing the concentrations published in previous papers is that there are differences in the number of targeted OPFRs. For example, Li et al. (2021) targeted only 7 OPFRs while Zeng et al. (2021) studied 13 OPFRs and Li et al. (2019b) targeted 20 OPFRs. However, comparing the studies can still provide insights into how these compounds behave in the atmosphere.

Table 4. Organophosphate flame retardant concentrations in the atmosphere published in recent studies.

Table 4. (continued).

From Table 4, we can deduce that OPFR concentrations in PM2.5 are higher than in TSP and air. This observation is supported by Cao et al. (2022) that reported fine particles (< 3.3 µm) had the highest OPFRs (∑9) at 42 ± 6%, followed by coarse particles (> 3.3 µm) then gas phase at 37 ± 9% and 16 ± 12%, respectively. The highest median concentration in PM2.5, 19,400 pg m–3 (∑11), was measured in an urban area in China by Chen et al. (2020), while the highest concentration in TSP, with almost the same number of analyzed OPFR, was measured at an integrated atmospheric deposition network sampling site in Chicago, US, at 1,390 pg m–3 (∑12). The higher concentrations in PM2.5 than in TSP could be related to the larger surface area of PM2.5. The highest median concentration in air was measured in Dalian, China, at 1,316 pg m–3 (∑10); however, higher concentrations have been reported in outdoor air outside buildings in Rhine, Germany and Stockholm, Sweden, as shown in the table.

Li et al. (2021) studied the concentration of OPFR in coarse (1.8 < Dp ≤ 10 µm), fine (0.10 < Dp < 1.8 µm), and ultrafine (Dp < 0.10 µm) atmospheric particles and found that the highest

concentration was in fine particles with a mean concentration of 4,730 ± 2,520 pg m–3 followed by concentrations in coarse (2850 ± 1510 pg m–3) and then ultrafine (2360 ± 1040 pg m–3) particles. This was because OPFRs with higher concentrations, e.g., TCPP and TBEP, were predominantly adsorbed on fine particles and TCEP on coarse particles.

OPFR concentrations correlated well with proximity to pollution sources. Highly populated and industrial areas generally have higher OPFR concentrations in the atmosphere. For instance, the median concentration in rural Beijing (355 pg m–3) was two to three times lower than in urban Beijing (Zhang et al., 2020b). OPFRs have also been detected in remote locations in Antarctic and Arctic regions (Möller et al., 2011; Salamova et al., 2014a; Suhring et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017; Han et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020b) and high mountains (Prats et al., 2022). The presence of these compounds in remote regions with limited potential sources suggests the long-range transport and persistency of these compounds (Liu et al., 2016a; Fu et al., 2021).

Based on the total mean and median concentrations (Table 4), OPFRs tend to partition mainly in the particulate phase (Salamova et al., 2014b; Shoeib et al., 2014; Lai et al., 2015; Ren et al., 2016). Contrarily, Wolschke et al. (2016), Wang et al. (2020b), Ma et al. (2022), and Zhang et al. (2022a) concluded that OPFRs are mainly partitioned in the gas than particulate (TSP) phases. The contradictory conclusions would require further investigation. However, it appears the conclusion is dependent on which OPFRs were analyzed and their concentrations. Therefore, using the total mean concentration to draw a conclusion might not be suitable, and researchers should instead compare the gas-particle partitioning based on chemical structure: alkyl-, chloroalkyl-, and aryl-OPFRs. Another critical point is the underestimated gas-phase OPFRs due to sampling artifacts. Okeme et al. (2018) suggested that gas-phase OPFRs are sorbed on quartz and glass fiber filters because of high polarity.

Fig. 3 shows the stacked median concentrations of individual OPFRs published in recent publications. A comprehensive comparison is also limited because the publications did not analyze the same OPFRs. However, chloroalkyl-OPFRs, TCPP and TCEP, appear to be the dominant OPFRs in the atmosphere. Aryl-OPFRs, TPhP, and TCP, were mainly in atmospheric PM2.5 (Fig. 3(a)), and alkyl-OPFRs, TiBP, and TnBP were in the air (Fig. 3(c)). Higher molecular weight alkyl-OPFRs, e.g., TEHP, were also in high concentrations in particulate matter. The gas-particle partition of individual OPFRs is dependent on their physicochemical properties, e.g., vapor pressure and Log KOA, and environmental factors such as temperature and relative humidity. The partitioning of OPFRs will also affect the fate of the compounds in the atmosphere. Particle-bound OPFRs are more susceptible to wet and dry deposition than OPFRs in the gas phase, however, they are more resistant to atmospheric transformation, e.g., oxidation by atmospheric radicals (Liu et al., 2014). Therefore, particle-bound OPFRs persist more in the environment.

Fig. 3(a). The median concentrations of atmospheric PM2.5-bound organophosphate flame retardants from recent publications: (a) Wang et al. (2020d); (b) Zhang et al. (2020b); (c) Wang et al. (2018a); (d) Zeng et al. (2020); and (e) Zeng et al. (2021). The publications analyzed 8, 12, 12, and 13 OPFRs, respectively. The details are presented in Excel Table S1.Fig. 3(a). The median concentrations of atmospheric PM2.5-bound organophosphate flame retardants from recent publications: (a) Wang et al. (2020d); (b) Zhang et al. (2020b); (c) Wang et al. (2018a); (d) Zeng et al. (2020); and (e) Zeng et al. (2021). The publications analyzed 8, 12, 12, and 13 OPFRs, respectively. The details are presented in Excel Table S1.

Fig. 3(b). Median concentrations of atmospheric total suspended solids- (TSP-)bound OPFRs from recent publications: (a) Castro-Jiménez and Sempéré (2018); (b) Lai et al. (2015); (c) Li et al. (2019b); (d) Pang et al. (2019); (e) Ma et al. (2022); (f) Salamova et al. (2014b). The publications analyzed 9, 8, 20, 6, 13, and 12 OPFRs, respectively. The details are presented in Excel Table S2.  Fig. 3(b). Median concentrations of atmospheric total suspended solids- (TSP-)bound OPFRs from recent publications: (a) Castro-Jiménez and Sempéré (2018); (b) Lai et al. (2015); (c) Li et al. (2019b); (d) Pang et al. (2019); (e) Ma et al. (2022); (f) Salamova et al. (2014b). The publications analyzed 9, 8, 20, 6, 13, and 12 OPFRs, respectively. The details are presented in Excel Table S2.

 Fig. 3(c). Concentrations of organophosphate flame retardants in atmospheric air from recent publications: (a) Wang et al. (2020d); (b) Li et al. (2019b); (c) Ma et al. (2022); (d) Saini et al. (2019); (e) Zhou et al. (2017); (f) Wang et al. (2020e); and (g) Zhang et al. (2020c). The publications analyzed 9, 20, 13, 16, 9, 10, and 11 OPFRs, respectively. The mean concentrations from Saini et al. (2019) were used. Zhou et al. (2017) sampled outside buildings explaining the high concentrations. The details are presented in Excel Table S3.Fig. 3(c). Concentrations of organophosphate flame retardants in atmospheric air from recent publications: (a) Wang et al. (2020d); (b) Li et al. (2019b); (c) Ma et al. (2022); (d) Saini et al. (2019); (e) Zhou et al. (2017); (f) Wang et al. (2020e); and (g) Zhang et al. (2020c). The publications analyzed 9, 20, 13, 16, 9, 10, and 11 OPFRs, respectively. The mean concentrations from Saini et al. (2019) were used. Zhou et al. (2017) sampled outside buildings explaining the high concentrations. The details are presented in Excel Table S3.

In summary, the presence of OPFRs in the atmosphere could be viewed as a combination of production and consumption of the OPFRs, physicochemical properties of the OPFR, and meteorological conditions. Atmospheric processes including photodegradation, photocatalysis, gas-particle partitioning, transportation, and deposition are influenced by meteorological conditions including temperature, relative humidity, wind, atmospheric pressure, and solar radiation (Bu et al., 2021; Tian et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2021; Salvador et al., 2022). Temperature would influence OPFR volatilization into the atmosphere and the partitioning of OPFRs into the gas phase. Atmospheric pressure and wind influence dispersion, dilution, and transportation of OPFRs. Solar radiation influences the transformation of OPFRs in the atmosphere. Wang et al. (2018a) studied the influence of temperature, humidity, solar radiation, atmospheric pressure, and wind speed on PM2.5-bound and gas-phase OPFRs. They found that temperature (0.789, p < 0.01), humidity (0.525, p < 0.01), and solar radiation (0.429, p < 0.01) were positively correlated with the overall gas-phase OPFRs, especially TCEP, TCPP, and TPhP, while wind speed (–0.456, p < 0.01), and atmospheric pressure (–0.634, p < 0.01) were negatively correlated. Generally, the correlations between the overall PM2.5-bound OPFR and the meteorological parameters were weak and statistically insignificant.


Organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) are a group of diverse compounds of interest to environmental science researchers due to their high-volume production, use, and ubiquitous presence in the environment. This review collated and assessed the current knowledge on OPFRs in the atmosphere. In the atmosphere, OPFRs tend to partition more in the particulate phase, and the concentrations correlated well with proximity to pollution sources. Chloroalkyl-OPFRs, TCPP and TCEP, appear to be the dominant OPFRs in the atmosphere. Aryl-OPFRs, TPhP and TCP, were mainly in atmospheric PM2.5, and Alkyl-OPFRs, TiBP and TnBP, were in the air. Higher molecular weight alkyl-OPFRs, e.g., TEHP, are partitioned mostly in particulate matter. The gas-particle partition of individual OPFR depends on physicochemical properties, e.g., vapor pressure and Log KOA, and environmental factors such as temperature and humidity. The gas-phase OPFRs, especially chloroalkyl-OPFR and low molecular alkyl-OPFR, might be underestimated because of sampling artifacts. Transformation products of OPFR should be measured and considered in risk assessment because they represent additional exposure risks. For example, some diester metabolites of TPhP, TCPP, and TDCPP are reported to be more toxic than the parent compounds. Chloroalkyl-OPFR atmospheric transformation products were also more toxic and persistent in the atmosphere. There should be a consensus on the target compounds for analysis in the future to make comparisons between studies easier. Adequate information about the production and use of OPFRs would make it easier to link the concentration levels with use. In addition, researchers could also include the effect of meteorological parameters on the fate of these compounds in the atmosphere.


BADP Bisphenol-A bis(diphenyl phosphate)
CDPP cresyl diphenyl phosphate
Dp   Aerodynamic diameter
EHDP  2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate
IPPP   isopropylated triphenyl phosphate
OPFRs   Organophosphate flame retardants
PBDEs    Polybrominated diphenyl ethers
RDP    Resorcinol bis(diphenyl phosphate)
TBEP Tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate
TBPHPP  Tris(p-tert-butylphenyl) phosphate
TCEP    Tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate
TCP   Tricresyl phosphate
TCPP   Tris(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate
TDCPP  Tris (1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate
TEHP     Tris(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate
TEP Triethyl phosphate
TiBP  Tri-iso-butyl phosphate
TMP  Trimethyl phosphate
TnBP   Tri-n-butyl phosphate
TPhP   Triphenyl phosphate
TPP   Tripropyl phosphate
TXP  Trixylenyl phosphate



  1. Ahrens, L., Harner, T., Shoeib, M., Koblizkova, M., Reiner, E. (2013). Characterization of two passive air samplers for per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 14024–14033. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4048945

  2. Altarawneh, M., Dlugogorski, B.Z. (2013). A mechanistic and kinetic study on the formation of PBDD/Fs from PBDEs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 5118–5127. https://doi.org/10.1021/​es305081j

  3. Arp, H.P.H., Schwarzenbach, R.P., Goss, K.U. (2007). Equilibrium sorption of gaseous organic chemicals to fiber filters used for aerosol studies. Atmos. Environ. 41, 8241–8252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.026

  4. Babich, M.A. (2006). CPSC staff preliminary risk assessment of flame retardant (FR) chemicals in upholstered furniture foam, US Consumer Product Safety Commission.

  5. Behl, M., Rice, J.R., Smith, M.V., Co, C.A., Bridge, M.F., Hsieh, J.H., Freedman, J.H., Boyd, W.A. (2016). Editor’s highlight: Comparative toxicity of organophosphate flame retardants and polybrominated diphenyl ethers to Caenorhabditis elegans. Toxicol. Sci. 154, 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfw162

  6. Bekele, T.G., Zhao, H., Wang, Q., Chen, J. (2019). Bioaccumulation and trophic transfer of emerging organophosphate flame retardants in the marine food webs of Laizhou Bay, North China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 13417–13426. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03687

  7. Björklund, J., Isetun, S., Nilsson, U. (2004). Selective determination of organophosphate flame retardants and plasticizers in indoor air by gas chromatography, positive‐ion chemical ionization and collision‐induced dissociation mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 18, 3079–3083. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1721

  8. Blum, A., Behl, M., Birnbaum, L.S., Diamond, M.L., Phillips, A., Singla, V., Sipes, N.S., Stapleton, H.M., Venier, M. (2019). Organophosphate ester flame retardants: Are they a regrettable substitution for polybrominated diphenyl ethers? Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 6, 638–649. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582

  9. Brandsma, S.H., de Boer, J., Leonards, P.E.G., Cofino, W.P., Covaci, A., Leonards, P.E.G. (2013). Organophosphorus flame-retardant and plasticizer analysis, including recommendations from the first worldwide interlaboratory study. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 43, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2012.12.004

  10. Bu, Q., Hong, Y., Tan, H., Liu, L., Wang, C., Zhu, J., Chan, P., Chen, C. (2021). The Modulation of meteorological parameters on surface PM2.5 and O3 concentrations in Guangzhou, China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 21, 200084. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.03.0084

  11. Butt, C.M., Congleton, J., Hoffman, K., Fang, M., Stapleton, H.M. (2014). Metabolites of organophosphate flame retardants and 2-ethylhexyl tetrabromobenzoate in urine from paired mothers and toddlers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 10432–10438. https://doi.org/10.1021/​es5025299

  12. Canbaz, D., Logiantara, A., van Ree, R., van Rijt, L.S. (2017). Immunotoxicity of organophosphate flame retardants TPHP and TDCIPP on murine dendritic cells in vitro. Chemosphere 177, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.149

  13. Cao, Z., Xu, X., Zhao, Y., Du, R., Fan, Y., Wei, P., Ma, K., Zhu, Y., Huang, X., Hu, F. (2022). Gas-particle partition and size-segregated distribution of flame retardants in indoor and outdoor air: Reevaluation on the role of fine particles in human exposure. Chemosphere 292, 133414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133414

  14. Castro-Jiménez, J., Sempéré, R. (2018). Atmospheric particle-bound organophosphate ester flame retardants and plasticizers in a North African Mediterranean coastal city (Bizerte, Tunisia). Sci. Total Environ. 642, 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.010

  15. Chang, Y., Cui, H., Jiang, X., Li, M. (2020). Comparative assessment of neurotoxicity impacts induced by alkyl tri‐n‐butyl phosphate and aromatic tricresyl phosphate in PC12 cells. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 35, 1326–1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.22997

  16. Chen, G., Jin, Y., Wu, Y., Liu, L., Fu, Z. (2015). Exposure of male mice to two kinds of organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) induced oxidative stress and endocrine disruption. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 40, 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2015.06.021

  17. Chen, Y.Y., Chen, Y.J., Zhang, Y.H., Li, R.J., Chen, W., Yan, S.C., Qi, Z.H., Chen, Z.F., Cai, Z.W. (2019). Determination of HFRs and OPFRs in PM2.5 by ultrasonic-assisted extraction combined with multi-segment column purification and GC-MS/MS. Talanta 194, 320–328. https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.talanta.2018.10.025

  18. Chen, Y.Y., Song, Y.Y., Chen, Y.J., Zhang, Y.H., Li, R.J., Wang, Y.J., Qi, Z.H., Chen, Z.F., Cai, Z.W. (2020). Contamination profiles and potential health risks of organophosphate flame retardants in PM2.5 from Guangzhou and Taiyuan, China. Environ. Int. 134, 105343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.​envint.2019.105343

  19. Cheruiyot, N.K., Lee, W.J., Mwangi, J.K., Wang, L.C., Lin, N.H., Lin, Y.C., Cao, J., Zhang, R., Chang-Chien, G.P. (2015). An overview: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions from the stationary and mobile sources and in the ambient air. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 15, 2730–2762. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.11.0627

  20. Chupeau, Z., Bonvallot, N., Mercier, F., Le Bot, B., Chevrier, C., Glorennec, P. (2020). Organophosphorus flame retardants: A global review of indoor contamination and human exposure in Europe and epidemiological evidence. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 6713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186713

  21. Clark, A.E., Yoon, S., Sheesley, R.J., Usenko, S. (2015). Pressurized liquid extraction technique for the analysis of pesticides, PCBs, PBDEs, OPEs, PAHs, alkanes, hopanes, and steranes in atmospheric particulate matter. Chemosphere 137, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.​04.051

  22. Clark, A.E., Yoon, S., Sheesley, R.J., Usenko, S. (2017). Spatial and temporal distributions of organophosphate ester concentrations from atmospheric particulate matter samples collected across Houston, TX. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 4239–4247. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00115
  23. Craig, P.H., Barth, M.L. (1999). Evaluation of the hazards of industrial exposure to tricresyl phosphate: A review and interpretation of the literature. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B 2, 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/109374099281142

  24. de Boer, J., Antelo, A., van der Veen, I., Brandsma, S., Lammertse, N. (2015). Tricresyl phosphate and the aerotoxic syndrome of flight crew members–current gaps in knowledge. Chemosphere 119, S58–S61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.015

  25. DeArmitt, C. (2011). Functional Fillers for Plastics, in: Applied Plastics Engineering Handbook, Elsevier, pp. 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4377-3514-7.10026-1

  26. Dishaw, L.V., Hunter, D.L., Padnos, B., Padilla, S., Stapleton, H.M. (2014). Developmental exposure to organophosphate flame retardants elicits overt toxicity and alters behavior in early life stage zebrafish (Danio rerio). Toxicol. Sci. 142, 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfu194

  27. Du, Z., Wang, G., Gao, S., Wang, Z. (2015). Aryl organophosphate flame retardants induced cardiotoxicity during zebrafish embryogenesis: by disturbing expression of the transcriptional regulators. Aquat. Toxicol. 161, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.01.027

  28. Du, Z., Zhang, Y., Wang, G., Peng, J., Wang, Z., Gao, S. (2016). TPhP exposure disturbs carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism, and the DNA damage repair system in zebrafish liver. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21827

  29. Farhat, A., Crump, D., Chiu, S., Williams, K.L., Letcher, R.J., Gauthier, L.T., Kennedy, S.W. (2013). In ovo effects of two organophosphate flame retardants—TCPP and TDCPP—on pipping success, development, mRNA expression, and thyroid hormone levels in chicken embryos. Toxicol. Sci. 134, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kft100

  30. Fu, J., Fu, K., Gao, K., Li, H., Xue, Q., Chen, Y., Wang, L., Shi, J., Fu, J., Zhang, Q. (2020). Occurrence and trophic magnification of organophosphate esters in an antarctic ecosystem: Insights into the shift from legacy to emerging pollutants. J. Hazard. Mater. 396, 122742. https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122742

  31. Fu, J., Fu, K., Chen, Y., Li, X., Ye, T., Gao, K., Pan, W., Zhang, A., Fu, J. (2021). Long-range transport, trophic transfer, and ecological risks of organophosphate esters in remote areas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 10192–10209. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08822

  32. Gao, X., Lin, Y., Li, J., Xu, Y., Qian, Z., Lin, W. (2021). Spatial pattern analysis reveals multiple sources of organophosphorus flame retardants in coastal waters. J. Hazard. Mater. 417, 125882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125882

  33. Greaves, A.K., Letcher, R.J. (2014). Comparative body compartment composition and in ovo transfer of organophosphate flame retardants in North American Great Lakes herring gulls. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 7942–7950. https://doi.org/10.1021/es501334w

  34. Greaves, A.K., Su, G., Letcher, R.J. (2016). Environmentally relevant organophosphate triesters in herring gulls: In vitro biotransformation and kinetics and diester metabolite formation using a hepatic microsomal assay. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 308, 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.​taap.2016.08.007

  35. Greaves, A.K., Letcher, R.J. (2017). A review of organophosphate esters in the environment from biological effects to distribution and fate. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 98, 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-016-1898-0

  36. Guan, B., Pochopien, B.A., Wright, D.S. (2016). The chemistry, mechanism and function of tricresyl phosphate (TCP) as an anti‐wear lubricant additive. Lubr. Sci. 28, 257–265. https://doi.org/​10.1002/ls.1327

  37. Han, X., Hao, Y., Li, Y., Yang, R., Wang, P., Zhang, G., Zhang, Q., Jiang, G. (2020). Occurrence and distribution of organophosphate esters in the air and soils of Ny-Ålesund and London Island, Svalbard, Arctic. Environ. Pollut. 263, 114495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114495

  38. Hendriks, H.S., van Kleef, R.G., Westerink, R.H. (2012). Modulation of human α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by brominated and halogen-free flame retardants as a measure for in vitro neurotoxicity. Toxicol. Lett. 213, 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.06.013

  39. Herkert, N.J., Hornbuckle, K.C. (2018). Effects of room airflow on accurate determination of PUF-PAS sampling rates in the indoor environment. Environ. Sci. Process Impacts 20, 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EM00082D

  40. Hou, M., Shi, Y., Na, G., Cai, Y. (2021). A review of organophosphate esters in indoor dust, air, hand wipes and silicone wristbands: Implications for human exposure. Environ. Int. 146, 106261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106261

  41. Hu, F., Zhao, Y., Yuan, Y., Yin, L., Dong, F., Zhang, W., Chen, X. (2021). Effects of environmentally relevant concentrations of tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) on early life stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 83, 103600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2021.​103600

  42. Huang, C., Shan, W., Xiao, H. (2018). Recent advances in passive air sampling of volatile organic compounds. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 18, 602–622. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.12.0556

  43. Huang, J., Ye, L., Fang, M., Su, G. (2022). Industrial production of organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs): Big knowledge gaps need to be filled? Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 108, 809–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-021-03454-7

  44. Huang, Y., Liu, J., Yu, L., Liu, C., Wang, J. (2019). Gonadal impairment and parental transfer of tris (2-butoxyethyl) phosphate in zebrafish after long-term exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations. Chemosphere 218, 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.​11.139

  45. Jarema, K.A., Hunter, D.L., Shaffer, R.M., Behl, M., Padilla, S. (2015). Acute and developmental behavioral effects of flame retardants and related chemicals in zebrafish. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 52, 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2015.08.010

  46. Jiang, F., Liu, J., Zeng, X., Yu, L., Liu, C., Wang, J. (2018). Tris (2-butoxyethyl) phosphate affects motor behavior and axonal growth in zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae. Aquat. Toxicol. 198, 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2018.03.012

  47. Kojima, H., Takeuchi, S., Itoh, T., Iida, M., Kobayashi, S., Yoshida, T. (2013). In vitro endocrine disruption potential of organophosphate flame retardants via human nuclear receptors. Toxicology 314, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2013.09.004

  48. Kurt-Karakus, P., Alegria, H., Birgul, A., Gungormus, E., Jantunen, L. (2018). Organophosphate ester (OPEs) flame retardants and plasticizers in air and soil from a highly industrialized city in Turkey. Sci. Total Environ. 625, 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.307

  49. Kwon, B., Shin, H., Moon, H.B., Ji, K., Kim, K.T. (2016). Effects of tris (2-butoxyethyl) phosphate exposure on endocrine systems and reproduction of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ. Pollut. 214, 568–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.049

  50. Lai, S., Xie, Z., Song, T., Tang, J., Zhang, Y., Mi, W., Peng, J., Zhao, Y., Zou, S., Ebinghaus, R. (2015). Occurrence and dry deposition of organophosphate esters in atmospheric particles over the northern South China Sea. Chemosphere 127, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.​2015.02.015

  51. Li, J., Xie, Z., Mi, W., Lai, S., Tian, C., Emeis, K.C., Ebinghaus, R. (2017). Organophosphate esters in air, snow, and seawater in the North Atlantic and the Arctic. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 6887–6896. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01289

  52. Li, Q., Guo, M., Song, H., Cui, J., Zhan, M., Zou, Y., Li, J., Zhang, G. (2021). Size distribution and inhalation exposure of airborne particle-bound polybrominated diphenyl ethers, new brominated flame retardants, organophosphate esters, and chlorinated paraffins at urban open consumption place. Sci. Total Environ. 794, 148695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.​2021.148695

  53. Li, R., Wang, H., Mi, C., Feng, C., Zhang, L., Yang, L., Zhou, B. (2019a). The adverse effect of TCIPP and TCEP on neurodevelopment of zebrafish embryos/larvae. Chemosphere 220, 811–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.198

  54. Li, W., Wang, Y., Kannan, K. (2019b). Occurrence, distribution and human exposure to 20 organophosphate esters in air, soil, pine needles, river water, and dust samples collected around an airport in New York state, United States. Environ. Int. 131, 105054. https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.envint.2019.105054

  55. Li, X., Li, N., Rao, K., Huang, Q., Ma, M. (2020a). In vitro immunotoxicity of organophosphate flame retardants in human THP-1-derived macrophages. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 8900–8908. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01152

  56. Li, Y., Kang, Q., Chen, R., He, J., Liu, L., Wang, L., Hu, J. (2020b). 2-Ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate and its hydroxylated metabolites are anti-androgenic and cause adverse reproductive outcomes in male Japanese Medaka (Oryzias latipes). Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 8919–8925. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02775

  57. Liu, D., Lin, T., Shen, K., Li, J., Yu, Z., Zhang, G. (2016a). Occurrence and concentrations of halogenated flame retardants in the atmospheric fine particles in Chinese cities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 9846–9854. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01685

  58. Liu, Q., Li, L., Zhang, X., Saini, A., Li, W., Hung, H., Hao, C., Li, K., Lee, P., Wentzell, J.J. (2021a). Uncovering global-scale risks from commercial chemicals in air. Nature 600, 456–461. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04134-6

  59. Liu, R., Lin, Y., Liu, R., Hu, F., Ruan, T., Jiang, G. (2016b). Evaluation of two passive samplers for the analysis of organophosphate esters in the ambient air. Talanta 147, 69–75. https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.talanta.2015.09.034

  60. Liu, T., Lu, S., Wang, R., Xu, S., Qin, P., Gao, Y. (2020). Behavior of selected organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) and their influence on rhizospheric microorganisms after short-term exposure in integrated vertical-flow constructed wetlands (IVCWs). Sci. Total Environ. 710, 136403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136403

  61. Liu, X., Ji, K., Choi, K. (2012). Endocrine disruption potentials of organophosphate flame retardants and related mechanisms in H295R and MVLN cell lines and in zebrafish. Aquat. Toxicol. 114, 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2012.02.019

  62. Liu, X.T., Zeng, X.W., Dong, G.H., Venier, M., Xie, Q.T., Yang, M., Wu, Q.Z., Zhao, F.R., Chen, D. (2021b). Plastic additives in ambient fine particulate matter in the Pearl River Delta, China: High-throughput characterization and health implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 4474–4482. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08578

  63. Liu, Y., Liggio, J., Harner, T., Jantunen, L., Shoeib, M., Li, S.M. (2014). Heterogeneous OH initiated oxidation: A possible explanation for the persistence of organophosphate flame retardants in air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 1041–1048. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404515k

  64. Liu, Y., Gong, S., Ye, L., Li, J., Liu, C., Chen, D., Fang, M., Letcher, R.J., Su, G. (2021c). Organophosphate (OP) diesters and a review of sources, chemical properties, environmental occurrence, adverse effects, and future directions. Environ. Int. 155, 106691. https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.envint.2021.106691

  65. Liu, Y., Li, Y., Dong, S., Han, L., Guo, R., Fu, Y., Zhang, S., Chen, J. (2021d). The risk and impact of organophosphate esters on the development of female-specific cancers: Comparative analysis of patients with benign and malignant tumors. J. Hazard. Mater. 404, 124020. https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124020

  66. Lohmann, R., Lammel, G. (2004). Adsorptive and absorptive contributions to the gas-particle partitioning of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: State of knowledge and recommended parametrization for modeling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 3793–3803. https://doi.org/10.1021/​es035337q

  67. Ma, Y., Luo, Y., Zhu, J., Zhang, J., Gao, G., Mi, W., Xie, Z., Lohmann, R. (2022). Seasonal variation and deposition of atmospheric organophosphate esters in the coastal region of Shanghai, China. Environ. Pollut. 300, 118930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118930

  68. Ma, Z., Tang, S., Su, G., Miao, Y., Liu, H., Xie, Y., Giesy, J.P., Saunders, D.M., Hecker, M., Yu, H. (2016). Effects of tris (2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBOEP) on endocrine axes during development of early life stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Chemosphere 144, 1920–1927. https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.049

  69. Melymuk, L., Bohlin-Nizzetto, P., Prokeš, R., Kukučka, P., Klánová, J. (2016). Sampling artifacts in active air sampling of semivolatile organic contaminants: Comparing theoretical and measured artifacts and evaluating implications for monitoring networks. Environ. Pollut. 217, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.015

  70. Mihajlović, I. (2015). Recent Development of Phosphorus Flame Retardants in Thermoplastic Blends and Nanocomposites, in: Visakh, P.M., Arao, Y. (Eds.), Flame Retardants, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 79–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03467-6_4

  71. Möller, A., Xie, Z., Caba, A., Sturm, R., Ebinghaus, R. (2011). Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in the atmosphere of the North Sea. Environ. Pollut. 159, 3660–3665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.07.022

  72. Naccarato, A., Tassone, A., Moretti, S., Elliani, R., Sprovieri, F., Pirrone, N., Tagarelli, A. (2018). A green approach for organophosphate ester determination in airborne particulate matter: Microwave-assisted extraction using hydroalcoholic mixture coupled with solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta 189, 657–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.07.077

  73. Negev, M., Berman, T., Reicher, S., Balan, S., Soehl, A., Goulden, S., Ardi, R., Shammai, Y., Hadar, L., Blum, A. (2018). Regulation of chemicals in children's products: How US and EU regulation impacts small markets. Sci. Total Environ. 616, 462–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.​2017.10.198

  74. Noyes, P.D., Haggard, D.E., Gonnerman, G.D., Tanguay, R.L. (2015). Advanced morphological—behavioral test platform reveals neurodevelopmental defects in embryonic zebrafish exposed to comprehensive suite of halogenated and organophosphate flame retardants. Toxicol. Sci. 145, 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfv044

  75. Okeme, J.O., Saini, A., Yang, C., Zhu, J., Smedes, F., Klánová, J., Diamond, M.L. (2016). Calibration of polydimethylsiloxane and XAD-Pocket passive air samplers (PAS) for measuring gas-and particle-phase SVOCs. Atmos. Environ. 143, 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.​2016.08.023

  76. Okeme, J.O., Rodgers, T.F., Jantunen, L.M., Diamond, M.L. (2018). Examining the gas-particle partitioning of organophosphate esters: How reliable are air measurements? Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 13834–13844. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04588

  77. Pang, L., Yang, H., Wang, Y., Luo, X., Liu, S., Xiao, J. (2019). Organophosphate flame retardants in total suspended particulates from an urban area of zhengzhou, China: Temporal variations, potential affecting factors, and health risk assessment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 176, 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.092

  78. Pantelaki, I., Voutsa, D. (2019). Organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs): A review on analytical methods and occurrence in wastewater and aquatic environment. Sci. Total Environ. 649, 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.286

  79. Pantelaki, I., Voutsa, D. (2020). Occurrence, analysis and risk assessment of organophosphate esters (OPEs) in biota: A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 160, 111547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.​marpolbul.2020.111547

  80. Patnaik, P. (2017). Handbook of environmental analysis: Chemical pollutants in air, water, soil, and solid wastes (3rd ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315151946

  81. Paul, R. (2019). Poison in the frying pan. Bengal Physician J. 6, 72–73. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10070-6120

  82. Pelletier, G., Rigden, M., Wang, G.S., Caldwell, D., Siddique, S., Leingartner, K., Kosarac, I., Cakmak, S., Kubwabo, C. (2020). Comparison of tris (2‐ethylhexyl) phosphate and di (2‐ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid toxicities in a rat 28‐day oral exposure study. J. Appl. Toxicol. 40, 600–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3930

  83. Percy, Z., Vuong, A.M., Xu, Y., Xie, C., Ospina, M., Calafat, A.M., Hoofnagle, A., Lanphear, B.P., Braun, J.M., Cecil, K.M. (2021). Maternal urinary organophosphate esters and alterations in maternal and neonatal thyroid hormones. Am. J. Epidemiol. 190, 1793–1802. https://doi.org/​10.1093/aje/kwab086

  84. Prats, R.M., Van Drooge, B.L., Fernández, P., Grimalt, J.O. (2022). Occurrence and temperature dependence of atmospheric gas-phase organophosphate esters in high-mountain areas (Pyrenees). Chemosphere 292, 133467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133467

  85. Rauert, C., Schuster, J.K., Eng, A., Harner, T. (2018). Global atmospheric concentrations of brominated and chlorinated flame retardants and organophosphate esters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 2777–2789. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06239

  86. Ren, G., Chen, Z., Feng, J., Ji, W., Zhang, J., Zheng, K., Yu, Z., Zeng, X. (2016). Organophosphate esters in total suspended particulates of an urban city in East China. Chemosphere 164, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.090

  87. ResearchInChina (2014). Global and China flame retardant industry report, 2014-2016. http://www.researchinchina.com/Htmls/Report/2014/7904.html (accessed 23 March 2022).

  88. Saini, A., Clarke, J., Jariyasopit, N., Rauert, C., Schuster, J.K., Halappanavar, S., Evans, G.J., Su, Y., Harner, T. (2019). Flame retardants in urban air: A case study in Toronto targeting distinct source sectors. Environ. Pollut. 247, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.027

  89. Salamova, A., Hermanson, M.H., Hites, R.A. (2014a). Organophosphate and halogenated flame retardants in atmospheric particles from a European Arctic site. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 6133–6140. https://doi.org/10.1021/es500911d

  90. Salamova, A., Ma, Y., Venier, M., Hites, R.A. (2014b). High levels of organophosphate flame retardants in the Great Lakes atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 1, 8-14. https://doi.org/​10.1021/ez400034n

  91. Salmeia, K.A., Fage, J., Liang, S., Gaan, S. (2015). An overview of mode of action and analytical methods for evaluation of gas phase activities of flame retardants. Polymers 7, 504–526. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7030504

  92. Salvador, C.M., Alindajao, A.D., Burdeos, K.B., Lavapiez, M.A., Yee, J.R., VII, A.T.B., Pabroa, P.C.B., Capangpangan, R.Y. (2022). Assessment of impact of meteorology and precursor in long-term trends of PM and ozone in a tropical city. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 22, 210269. https://doi.org/​10.4209/aaqr.210269

  93. Saquib, Q., Siddiqui, M., Al‐Khedhairy, A. (2021). Organophosphorus flame‐retardant tris (1‐chloro‐2‐propyl) phosphate is genotoxic and apoptotic inducer in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. J. Appl. Toxicol. 41, 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.4158

  94. Sharkey, M., Harrad, S., Abdallah, M.A.E., Drage, D.S., Berresheim, H. (2020). Phasing-out of legacy brominated flame retardants: The UNEP Stockholm Convention and other legislative action worldwide. Environ. Int. 144, 106041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106041

  95. Shi, M., Hu, T., Mao, Y., Cheng, C., Liu, W., Tian, Q., Chen, Z., Xing, X., Qi, S. (2021). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric PM2.5 during winter haze in Huang-gang, Central China: Characteristics, sources and health risk assessment. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 21, 200337. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.06.0337

  96. Shoeib, M., Ahrens, L., Jantunen, L., Harner, T. (2014). Concentrations in air of organobromine, organochlorine and organophosphate flame retardants in Toronto, Canada. Atmos. Environ. 99, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.040

  97. Su, G., Crump, D., Letcher, R.J., Kennedy, S.W. (2014). Rapid in vitro metabolism of the flame retardant triphenyl phosphate and effects on cytotoxicity and mRNA expression in chicken embryonic hepatocytes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 13511–13519. https://doi.org/10.1021/​es5039547

  98. Suhring, R., Diamond, M.L., Scheringer, M., Wong, F., Pucko, M., Stern, G., Burt, A., Hung, H., Fellin, P., Li, H. (2016). Organophosphate esters in Canadian Arctic air: Occurrence, levels and trends. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 7409–7415. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00365

  99. Sun, L., Tan, H., Peng, T., Wang, S., Xu, W., Qian, H., Jin, Y., Fu, Z. (2016). Developmental neurotoxicity of organophosphate flame retardants in early life stages of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 35, 2931–2940. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3477

  100. Tian, X., Cui, K., Sheu, H.L., Hsieh, Y.K., Yu, F. (2021). Effects of rain and snow on the air quality index, PM2.5 levels, and dry deposition flux of PCDD/Fs. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 21, 210158. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210158

  101. Van der Veen, I., de Boer, J. (2012). Phosphorus flame retardants: Properties, production, environmental occurrence, toxicity and analysis. Chemosphere 88, 1119–1153. https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.067

  102. Wang, C., Chen, H., Li, H., Yu, J., Wang, X., Liu, Y. (2020a). Review of emerging contaminant tris (1, 3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate: Environmental occurrence, exposure, and risks to organisms and human health. Environ. Int. 143, 105946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105946

  103. Wang, C., Wang, P., Zhao, J., Fu, M., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Yang, R., Zhu, Y., Fu, J., Zhang, Q. (2020b). Atmospheric organophosphate esters in the Western Antarctic Peninsula over 2014–2018: Occurrence, temporal trend and source implication. Environ. Pollut. 267, 115428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115428

  104. Wang, S., Steiniche, T., Romanak, K.A., Johnson, E., Quirós, R., Mutegeki, R., Wasserman, M.D., Venier, M. (2019a). Atmospheric occurrence of legacy pesticides, current use pesticides, and flame retardants in and around protected areas in Costa Rica and Uganda. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 6171–6181. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00649

  105. Wang, T., Ding, N., Wang, T., Chen, S.J., Luo, X.J., Mai, B.X. (2018a). Organophosphorus esters (OPEs) in PM2.5 in urban and e-waste recycling regions in southern China: Concentrations, sources, and emissions. Environ. Res. 167, 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.08.015

  106. Wang, T., Tian, M., Ding, N., Yan, X., Chen, S.J., Mo, Y.Z., Yang, W.Q., Bi, X.H., Wang, X.M., Mai, B.X. (2018b). Semivolatile organic compounds (SOCs) in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) during clear, fog, and haze episodes in winter in Beijing, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 5199–5207. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06650

  107. Wang, X., Zhong, W., Xiao, B., Liu, Q., Yang, L., Covaci, A., Zhu, L. (2019b). Bioavailability and biomagnification of organophosphate esters in the food web of Taihu Lake, China: Impacts of chemical properties and metabolism. Environ. Int. 125, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.​envint.2019.01.018

  108. Wang, X., Zhu, Q., Yan, X., Wang, Y., Liao, C., Jiang, G. (2020c). A review of organophosphate flame retardants and plasticizers in the environment: Analysis, occurrence and risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 731, 139071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139071

  109. Wang, Y., Hou, M., Zhang, Q., Wu, X., Zhao, H., Xie, Q., Chen, J. (2017). Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in building and decoration materials and their potential burdens in newly decorated houses in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 10991–10999. https://doi.org/​10.1021/acs.est.7b03367

  110. Wang, Y., Bao, M., Tan, F., Qu, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, J. (2020d). Distribution of organophosphate esters between the gas phase and PM2.5 in urban Dalian, China. Environ. Pollut. 259, 113882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113882

  111. Wang, Y., Li, Z., Tan, F., Xu, Y., Zhao, H., Chen, J. (2020e). Occurrence and air-soil exchange of organophosphate flame retardants in the air and soil of Dalian, China. Environ. Pollut. 265, 114850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114850

  112. Wei, G.L., Li, D.Q., Zhuo, M.N., Liao, Y.S., Xie, Z.Y., Guo, T.L., Li, J.J., Zhang, S.Y., Liang, Z.Q. (2015). Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers: sources, occurrence, toxicity and human exposure. Environ. Pollut. 196, 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.09.012

  113. Wolschke, H., Sühring, R., Mi, W., Möller, A., Xie, Z., Ebinghaus, R. (2016). Atmospheric occurrence and fate of organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizer at the German coast. Atmos. Environ. 137, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.028

  114. Wong, F., de Wit, C.A., Newton, S.R. (2018). Concentrations and variability of organophosphate esters, halogenated flame retardants, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in indoor and outdoor air in Stockholm, Sweden. Environ. Pollut. 240, 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/​j.envpol.2018.04.086

  115. Wu, Y., Su, G., Tang, S., Liu, W., Ma, Z., Zheng, X., Liu, H., Yu, H. (2017). The combination of in silico and in vivo approaches for the investigation of disrupting effects of tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) toward core receptors of zebrafish. Chemosphere 168, 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.038

  116. Xie, Z., Wang, P., Wang, X., Castro-Jiménez, J., Kallenborn, R., Liao, C., Mi, W., Lohmann, R., Vila-Costa, M., Dachs, J. (2022). Organophosphate ester pollution in the oceans. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00277-w

  117. Xiong, H., Huang, Y., Mao, Y., Liu, C., Wang, J. (2021). Inhibition in growth and cardiotoxicity of tris (2-butoxyethyl) phosphate through down-regulating Wnt signaling pathway in early developmental stage of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 208, 111431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111431

  118. Yan, J., Zhao, Z., Xia, M., Chen, S., Wan, X., He, A., Sheng, G.D., Wang, X., Qian, Q., Wang, H. (2022). Induction of lipid metabolism dysfunction, oxidative stress and inflammation response by tris (1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate in larval/adult zebrafish. Environ. Int. 160, 107081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107081

  119. Yang, H.H., Cheruiyot, N.K., Lin, C., Wang, L.C. (2022). Control of extreme brominated persistent organic pollutant emissions from start-ups of waste-to-energy incinerators. J. Cleaner Prod. 345, 131108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131108

  120. Yang, K., Li, Q.L., Yuan, M., Guo, M.R., Wang, Y.Q., Li, S.Y., Tian, C.G., Tang, J.H., Sun, J.H., Li, J., Zhang, G. (2019). Temporal variations and potential sources of organophosphate esters in PM2.5 in Xinxiang, North China. Chemosphere 215, 500–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.​2018.10.063

  121. Yao, C., Yang, H., Li, Y.J. (2021). A review on organophosphate flame retardants in the environment: Occurrence, accumulation, metabolism and toxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 795, 148837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148837

  122. Yu, F., Cui, K., Sheu, H.L., Hsieh, Y.K., Tian, X. (2021). Sensitivity analysis for dry deposition and PM2.5-bound content of PCDD/Fs in the ambient air. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 21, 210118. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210118

  123. Zeng, Y., Ding, N., Wang, T., Tian, M., Fan, Y., Wang, T., Chen, S.J., Mai, B.X. (2020). Organophosphate esters esters (OPEs) in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in urban, e-waste, and background regions of South China. J. Hazard. Mater. 385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.​2019.121583

  124. Zeng, Y., Chen, S.J., Liang, Y.H., Zhu, C.Y., Liu, Z., Guan, Y.F., Ma, H.M., Mai, B.X. (2021). Traditional and novel organophosphate esters (OPEs) in PM2.5 of a megacity, southern China: Spatioseasonal variations, sources, and influencing factors. Environ. Pollut. 284. https://doi.org/10.1016/​j.envpol.2021.117208

  125. Zhang, H., Liu, T., Song, X., Zhou, Q., Tang, J., Sun, Q., Pu, Y., Yin, L., Zhang, J. (2021). Study on the reproductive toxicity and mechanism of tri-n-butyl phosphate (TnBP) in Caenorhabditis elegans. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 227, 112896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112896

  126. Zhang, L., Xu, W., Mi, W., Yan, W., Guo, T., Zhou, F., Miao, L., Xie, Z. (2022a). Atmospheric deposition, seasonal variation, and long-range transport of organophosphate esters on Yongxing Island, South China Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 806, 150673. https://doi.org/10.1016/​j.scitotenv.2021.150673

  127. Zhang, Q., Wang, J., Zhu, J., Liu, J., Zhao, M. (2017). Potential glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid effects of nine organophosphate flame retardants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 5803–5810. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01237

  128. Zhang, Q., Yu, C., Fu, L., Gu, S., Wang, C. (2020a). New insights in the endocrine disrupting effects of three primary metabolites of organophosphate flame retardants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 4465–4474. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07874

  129. Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Yao, Y., Wang, L., Sun, H. (2022b). A review of organophosphate esters in soil: Implications for the potential source, transfer, and transformation mechanism. Environ. Res. 204, 112122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112122

  130. Zhang, W.W., Wang, P., Zhu, Y., Wang, D., Yang, R.Q., Li, Y.M., Matsiko, J., Zuo, P.J., Qin, L., Yang, X., Zhang, Q.H., Jiang, G.B. (2020b). Occurrence and human exposure assessment of organophosphate esters in atmospheric PM2.5 in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 206, 111399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111399

  131. Zhang, X., Sühring, R., Serodio, D., Bonnell, M., Sundin, N., Diamond, M.L. (2016a). Novel flame retardants: Estimating the physical–chemical properties and environmental fate of 94 halogenated and organophosphate PBDE replacements. Chemosphere 144, 2401–2407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.017

  132. Zhang, X., Zou, W., Mu, L., Chen, Y., Ren, C., Hu, X., Zhou, Q. (2016b). Rice ingestion is a major pathway for human exposure to organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) in China. J. Hazard. Mater. 318, 686–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.07.055

  133. Zhang, Z., Lin, G., Lin, T., Zhang, R., Jin, L., Di, Y. (2020c). Occurrence, behavior, and fate of organophosphate esters (OPEs) in subtropical paddy field environment: A case study in Nanning City of South China. Environ. Pollut. 267, 115675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.​2020.115675

  134. Zhao, S.Z., Tian, L.L., Zou, Z.H., Liu, X., Zhong, G.C., Mo, Y.Z., Wang, Y., Tian, Y.K., Li, J., Guo, H., Zhang, G. (2021). Probing legacy and alternative flame retardants in the air of Chinese cities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 9450–9459. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07367

  135. Zhou, L., Hiltscher, M., Gruber, D., Püttmann, W. (2017). Organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) in indoor and outdoor air in the Rhine/Main area, Germany: Comparison of concentrations and distribution profiles in different microenvironments. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24, 10992–11005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6902-z  

Share this article with your colleagues 


Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

77st percentile
Powered by
   SCImago Journal & Country Rank

2022 Impact Factor: 4.0
5-Year Impact Factor: 3.4

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit
CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal that promotes submissions of high-quality research and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world. We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.