Yongliang Chen1,  Meiqing Yu1,2, Rui Wang This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1  

1 School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jimo, Qingdao 266237, China
2 Undergraduate School, Shandong University, Jinan 250199, China

Received: August 14, 2021
Revised: September 10, 2021
Accepted: September 14, 2021

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210201  

  • Download: PDF

Cite this article:

Chen, Y., Yu, M., Wang, R. (2021). Porous Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework Loaded Mn as an Efficient Catalyst for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 21, 210201. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210201


  • Mn@ZIF-8 was synthesized with Mn species highly dispersed on ZIF-8.
  • Mn@ZIF-8 showed an over 90% NO conversion at 225–400°C.
  • Ideal activity and stability of Mn@ZIF-8 was prove after 12 hours' test.
  • Mn@ZIF-8 exhibited high resistance to SO2 without H2O.
  • The use of Mn@ZIF-8 as a novel catalyst for SCR reaction is feasible.


Zinc 2-methylimidazolate (Zn(Me-Im)2, ZIF-8) was synthesized through solvothermal method, and the Mn@ZIF-8 was synthesized by loading the Mn species onto the prepared ZIF-8 through impregnation. The effect of the addition amount of Mn species on the activity in selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 (NH3-SCR), the stability of catalysts at ideal temperatures and the resistance to H2O and SO2 were investigated. Moreover, the characterizations of the catalysts including XRD, SEM, EDS, XPS, BET, TGA and H2-TPR were carried out. The results indicated that SCR activity of the catalysts was related to the addition amount of Mn species, the Mn@ZIF-8(0.8) showed the best NO conversion of over 90% ranging from 225°C–400°C with good stability in a long-time test. Besides, the Mn@ZIF-8 showed a high resistance to SO2. The ZIF-8 has a great potential to be an excellent support, and Mn@ZIF-8 is promising catalyst in SCR reaction.

Keywords: Nitrogen oxides, SCR, Zeolitic imidazolate framework, ZIF-8


Nitrogen oxides (NOx), mainly NO and NO2, is a kind of common gaseous pollutant, and the removal of NOx has long been a difficult problem in air pollution control. The sources of NOx can be divided into two categories, one is the mobile sources and the other is the fixed sources. The fixed sources mainly refer to the flue gas emitted from the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal and oil in the process of industrial production, and the mobile sources are generally thought to be the exhaust gas emitted from automobile engine. With the rapid development of modern industrialization, a large amount of fossil fuels have been exploited and consumed, making the NOx emitted into the atmosphere far exceed the carrying capacity and self-purification capacity of the atmospheric environment. NOx brought severe harm to environment, such as the photochemical smog, acid rain and ozone holes. All these environmental pollution phenomena are related to the emission of NOx, and have a serious threat to our human beings. Consequently, it is essential to control the NOx in the atmosphere (Brandenberger et al., 2008; Busca et al., 2008; Forzatti, 2001; Twigg, 2007).

NH3-SCR has been proven to be the most effective technique for abatement of NOx (Chen et al., 2016). And the catalyst with high denitrification efficiency is the key of the SCR technique. So far, the SCR catalysts can be divided into the following categories according to their active components: noble metal catalysts (Li et al., 2010; Qi et al., 2004), metal oxides catalysts (Qi et al., 2003a; Wei et al., 2018; Shen et al., 2016) and molecular sieve catalysts (Brandenberger et al., 2008; Delahay et al., 2005; Gao et al., 2017). Though the commercial catalysts V2O5-WO3(MoO3)/TiO2 have been widely used, the defects like narrow temperature window and toxicity of vanadium pentoxide still exist (Yi et al., 2016). Hence, the novel catalysts with wide temperature window and environment-friendly properties is desirable.

Manganese oxide (MnOx), a kind of transition metal oxide, has attracted great attentions due to its various labile oxygen species and high activity in NH3-SCR reaction (Wu et al., 2007). Min et al. (2007) prepared different types of MnOx catalysts through a precipitation method, and got a high NOx conversion for the SCR of NOx with NH3. To enhance the performance of MnOx catalyst, a series of doping species and supporter was applied. Peng et al. (2016) used Eu to modify MnOx catalyst to promote SCR activity, and the results showed that MnEuOx exhibited a high NOx conversion in a wide temperature range of 150–400°C. CeO2 was a another metal species used to improve the SCR activity of MnOx. Qi et al. (2003b, 2004) prepared mixed manganese and cerium oxides, and the MnOx-CeO2 was highly active in SCR reaction obtaining almost 95% NO conversion at 150°C. Singoredjo et al. (2010) prepared the alumina supported MnOx exhibiting a high NOx conversion during 120–300°C. TiO2 is another kind of support commonly used to facilitate the SCR activity of MnOx, Park et al. (2013) loaded Mn on synthesized TiO2 through impregnation method, exhibiting a high NO conversion of almost 100% at 150°C. Besides, a series of metal species such as Fe, Ce, V, Sm, Zr, were used to modify the MnOx/TiO2 to avoid poor resistance to SO2 of MnOx. Yet, the result could not meet the requirements of industrialization, further investigation is still needed (Yang et al., 2016; Niu et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2018).

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs), the porous crystalline materials, have drawn extensive research interests due to their higher specific surface area, higher porosity, and more stable porous structure compared to the metal oxides (Lee et al., 2009). It is advantageous for them to adsorb the reactants and provide great gas storage, separation and catalysis, besides, the high specific surface, well ordered porous structure, and regular crystal structure have proven the MOFs to be ideal support (Zhang et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017). Zhang et al. (2017) loaded Mn and Ce onto MOFs through in situ and impregnation methods, and studied their catalytic activities in SCR reaction, the results showed that MnCe@MOF had a high NOx conversion in a wide temperature range. Wang et al. (2016) prepared the CeO2/MIL-100(Fe) catalysts by encapsulating ceria nanoparticles into MIL-100(Fe) through impregnation, the CeO2/MIL-100(Fe) catalyst showed a high NH3-SCR activity and great resistance to SO2 at 196–300°C. Zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIFs), a sort of MOFs, has higher specific surface area and better thermal stability than ordinary MOFs (Huang et al., 2010; Park et al., 2006). Among them, ZIF-8 is the most widely studied ZIFs with a specific surface area of 1400 m2 g–1 and great thermal stability (Park et al., 2006; Venna et al., 2010), and has been widely used in gas adsorption, hydrogen storage and catalysis. However, few researchers have applied ZIF-8 in NH3-SCR reaction (Banerjee et al., 2008; Küsgens et al., 2009; Nguyen et al., 2012).

In this work, ZIF-8 was synthesized through a solvothermal method, and MnOx was firstly loaded on ZIF-8 by impregnation. The activity of the catalysts in NH3-SCR reaction, the stability of the catalysts, the effect of the addition amount of Mn species on catalytic activity as well as the resistance to H2O and SO2 were investigated. Besides, the characterization of the catalysts including XRD, SEM, EDS Mapping, XPS, BET, and H2-TPR, TGA was carried out to research the catalysts for further information.


2.1 Materials

All the chemicals were available commercially and used without further purification. 2-methylimidazole (2-HMelM, 99%) Zinc nitrate Hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, 99%) were purchased from Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF 99.5%) and 50% Manganese nitrate water solution (Mn(NO3)2 50%) were purchased from Tianjin Fuchen Chemical reagents factory.

2.2 Synthesis of Catalyst

2.2.1 Synthesis of ZIF-8 particles

ZIF-8 was synthesized by solvothermal method according to the following procedure (Gee et al., 2013; Tran et al., 2011): A solid mixture of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (0.717 g, 2.41 mmol) and 2-methylimidazole (H-MeIM) (0.18 g, 2.19 mmol) was dissolved in 50 mL DMF, the solution was transferred into a teflon-line stainless steel autoclave, and heated to 140°C at a rate of 5°C min–1 in a temperature-programmed oven and maintained for 24 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, the crystal was collected and washed with DMF for three times. Finally, these samples were dried at 60°C overnight to remove the residual solvents.

2.2.2 Synthesis of Mn@ZIF-8

The Mn was loaded on ZIF-8 via impregnation method reported by Zhang et al. (2017). Adding 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1 mL of Mn(NO3)2 respectively into 20 mL methanol to get Mn solutions, and dispersing 1 g of ZIF-8 into 30 mL methanol under ultrasonication for 15 min to get a ZIF-8 solution. Then, the Mn solution was slowly dropped into ZIF-8 solution under vigorous stirring for 4 h, followed by filtration to get the precipitate, after that, the precipitate was dried overnight at 60°C. Finally, the precipitate was heated at 300°C for 5 h. The obtained samples were denoted as Mn@ZIF-8(0.4), Mn@ZIF-8(0.6), Mn@ZIF-8(0.8) and Mn@ZIF-8(1), respectively. For convenience, the Mn@ZIF-8 without note represents the Mn@ZIF-8(0.8).

2.3 Characterizations of the Catalysts

The XRD patterns were obtained on a Bruker D8 diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation between 2θ = 5° and 45°. The micro-morphology of Mn@ZIF-8 was investigated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) (SU 8010), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping images were obtained on the same device. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was carried on a Thermo Fisher Scientific ESCALAB 250 spectrometer, the correction of binding energy shift was referenced to C 1s line at 284.6 eV, and the spectra of the Mn 2p and O 1s were recorded. The specific surface area analysis was conducted on Micromeritics Tri StarII 3020 Surface Arae and Porosity Analyzer with a N2 adsorption, and the results were calculated with the multi-point Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) approach. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried on a TGA SDT Q600 thermogravimetric analyzer with a heating rate of 10°C min–1 from 25°C to 600°C under nitrogen atmosphere. The hydrogen temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR) analysis was performed in which 100 mg of the samples were preheated to 450°C with a ramp rate of 10°C min–1 under N2 atmosphere. After cooling to the ambient temperature, the samples were heated up to 800°C at a ramp rate of 8°C min–1 with a flow of H2, and the consumption of H2 was continuously recorded using the TCD detector.

2.4 Activity Tests

The tests of NH3-SCR activity were carried out in a fix-bed quartz reactor (8 mm in diameter) heated by a tube furnace. The simulated flue gas contained 500 ppm NO, 500 ppm NH3, 5% O2, 3% H2O (when used), 200 ppm SO2 (when used) and balance N2, which were regulated by mass flow controllers respectively. In each run of SCR test, 0.2 g of Mn@ZIF-8 was used and the total flow rate was controlled at 100 mL min–1 corresponding to a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of approximately 240000 h–1. The catalyst was heated to the temperature ranging from 100°C to 450°C at a rate of 10°C min–1, and held at each temperature spots for 50 min. Concentrations of NO and NO2 were simultaneously monitored by the NO and NO2 analyzers (TH-9905), and N2O in the outlet gas was measured by an Antaris™ IGS Gas Analyzer from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. The NOx conversion rate and the N2 selectivity were calculated as follows:


where the subscripts “in” and “out” refers to the inlet concentration and outlet concentration at steady state, respectively.


3.1 Characterizations of the Catalysts

3.1.1 XRD

To determine the crystal structure of the catalysts, the XRD analysis of the synthesized ZIF-8 and Mn@ZIF-8 was carried out. It could be easily seen from Fig. 1 that the characteristic peak of synthesized ZIF-8 was in accordance with the simulated ZIF-8, which approved the ZIF-8 was successfully synthesized. As for the XRD pattern of Mn@ZIF-8, no apparent difference was found after the impregnation, indicating that the crystalline structure of ZIF-8 retained well. Yet, the characteristic peaks of Mn species were not observed which may be interpreted by that the Mn species were in amorphous phase (Li et al., 2017).

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of the catalysts.
Fig. 1. 
XRD patterns of the catalysts.

3.1.2 SEM and EDS Mapping

SEM was carried to investigate the structure of Mn@ZIF-8. It can be seen from Fig. 2 that the synthesized catalysts still retained its dodecahedral shape, which matched well with the results of XRD analysis. Moreover, EDS Mapping was performed to demonstrate the distribution of Mn, Zn species, and it could be seen that the elements of Mn and Zn are uniformly distributed on the whole surface of the catalysts, which was beneficial for adsorption and activation of the reactants, and was conducive to the NH3-SCR catalytic activity.

Fig. 2. SEM image and EDS Mapping of Mn@ZIF-8.
Fig. 2. SEM image and EDS Mapping of Mn@ZIF-8.

3.1.3 XPS spectra

To further investigate the chemical state of Mn elements in the catalysts, XPS spectra were recorded and displayed in Fig. 3(a), from which it could be seen obviously that two prominent peaks at 642.89, 654.73 eV accompanied by two satellite peaks at 641.53, 653.46 eV were gained after fitting by Gaussian components. The peaks at 641.53 eV, 653.46 eV could be attributed to Mn2+ species, while the peaks at 642.89 eV and 654.73eV could be assigned to Mn3+ (Becerra et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2016). According to previous reports, the co-existence of Mn2+ and Mn3+ on the catalysts could facilitate the formation of oxygen vacancies, which played an important role in low temperature oxidation property (Liu et al., 2012). Besides, the high valence state of Mn3+ species would improve the reducibility of the sample (Cheng et al., 2017).

Fig. 3. XPS spectra of (a) Mn 2p and (b) O 1s for Mn@ZIF-8.
Fig. 3. XPS spectra of (a) Mn 2p and (b) O 1s for Mn@ZIF-8.

The O 1s XPS spectra of the Mn@ZIF-8 were shown in Fig. 3(b), two asymmetric peaks could be observed, indicating there were two distinct types of oxygen species. The lower binding energy peak at 530.27 eV was ascribed to the lattice oxygen species O2 in the catalysts, and the sub-bands at 531.71 ev was attributed to surface chemisorbed oxygen species, such as O2 or O (Atribak et al., 2011).

3.1.4 H2-TPR

To investigate the redox behavior of Mn@ZIF-8, the H2-TPR analysis was performed, and the results were presented in Fig. 4, from which it could be seen that there are two main reduction peaks. The first peak located at around 250°C could be assigned to the reduction of MnO2 to Mn2O3 and the following peak around 520°C could be attributed to the further reduction of Mn2O3 to MnO (Zhao et al., 2016; Du et al., 2018). Normally, the operational temperature should be lower than 450°C. This prominent peak could be caused by the reduction of Mn3+ → Mn2+and the decomposition of ZIFs based on the TGA curves. Then, it could be speculated that the doping of Mn species prompted the catalysts to have the stronger redox behavior and oxygen storage capacity of the catalyst, which played an important role in the SCR activities (Li et al., 2016).

Fig. 4. H2-TPR profiles of the catalysts.
Fig. 4.
 H2-TPR profiles of the catalysts.

3.1.5 BET analysis

The BET surface area of a catalyst support plays a significant role in the NH3-SCR reaction. Besides, the high BET surface area of the support can improve the catalytic activity considerably by means of enhancing the dispersion of active components to avoid aggregation, as well as the transfer of charge (Han et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2013). The BET surface areas of all the samples were listed in Table 1. It can be seen that the high surface area of ZIF-8 would be beneficial to the high NOx conversion and the surface area of the samples was increased with the increase of the addition of Mn species, however, when the addition amount of Mn species reached 1 mL (in Mn(NO3)2 solution volume), the surface area began to decline. The decrease in specific surface area may be due to the excessive Mn loading caused formation of large solids and pores clogging of the ZIFs materials. The variation trend of the surface area was in accordance with the SCR activities, which indicated that the BET surface area was an important factor that influenced the SCR activities of the samples.

Table 1. BET surface area of the catalysts.

3.1.6 Thermogravimetric analysis of Mn@ZIF-8

As was well known, the MOFs usually have relatively poor thermal stability, yet, the thermal stability of the catalysts has a great impact on the SCR reaction. To investigate the stability of Mn@ZIF-8, the thermal gravimetric analysis was conducted, and the result shown in Fig. 5 exhibited a slightly weight loss of 5% from room temperature to 450°C, corresponding to the depletion of guest molecules, mainly H2O, indicating the structure of Mn@ZIF-8 maintained well under 450°C, and Mn@ZIF-8 has a high thermal stability. When the temperature was higher than 450°C, a sharp weight loss of the sample appeared, which could be ascribed to the oxidation of organic ligands and the collapse of the structure of Mn@ZIF-8, which may account for the decrease in activity of the catalysts.

Fig. 5. The TGA curves obtained for the Mn@ZIF-8.
Fig. 5. The TGA curves obtained for the Mn@ZIF-8.

3.2 The Effect of Loading Amount of Mn Species

The NOx conversion of all the catalysts in the range of 200–450°C was shown in Fig. 6, from which it could be seen that more Mn species leaded to higher catalytic activity of the samples till the Mn@MOF(0.8) which presented the highest deNOx efficiency compared with the rest Mn loadings. The NOx conversion of Mn@ZIF-8(0.8) was over 90% in the range of 225–400°C, and reached 100% at 350°C. However, when the loading amount of Mn species exceeded 1 mL (in Mn(NO3)2 solution volume), the catalytic activity began to decline, which may be caused by the severe decrease of BET surface area. On the other hand, the NOx conversion of all the samples increased with the rising of temperature within 200–350°C, and when the temperature went up to 400°C, the NOx conversion began to decrease, which may be inferred from the TGA analysis that this decreased activity may be caused by the collapse of ZIF-8 framework.

Fig. 6. (a) Catalytic SCR activities and (b) N2 selectivity of the catalysts. Reaction conditions: [NH3] =500 ppm, [NO] =500 ppm, [O2] = 3%, N2 = balance and total flow rate =100 mL min–1.Fig. 6. (a) Catalytic SCR activities and (b) N2 selectivity of the catalysts. Reaction conditions: [NH3] =500 ppm, [NO] =500 ppm, [O2] = 3%, N2 = balance and total flow rate =100 mL min1.

N2O is also an important pollutant in the air. Using traditional Mn-based catalysts, a large amount of N2O was produced by side reaction and therefore limited its application. In view of this, the formation of N2O in the SCR reaction was tested, and the N2 selectivity of catalysts with different loadings was studied. As shown in Fig. 6(b), the N2O was formed in all catalysts. With the increase of temperature, ammonia was oxidized to N2O gradually, and the nitrogen selectivity of the catalyst decreased continuously. Besides, the nitrogen selectivity of the catalyst decreased when the loading amount of Mn species increased. Yet the nitrogen selectivity was still over 70% with higher catalyst activity in the temperature window of 250–350°C.

3.3 Stability Test of Mn@ZIF-8

Besides, the stability tests of the catalysts at 350°C was carried out, and as illustrated in Fig. 7, the NOx conversion of Mn@ZIF-8 maintained high level after 12 h, presenting a good stability under the identical temperature, which may be ascribed to the porous structures of ZIF-8 and the strong interaction between Mn species and ZIF-8 (Zhang et al., 2014).

Fig. 7. The catalytic activity of Mn@ZIF-8. Reaction conditions: [NH3] =500 ppm, [NO] =500 ppm, [O2] = 5%, N2 = balance and total flowrate =100 mL min–1, T = 350°C.Fig. 7. The catalytic activity of Mn@ZIF-8. Reaction conditions: [NH3] =500 ppm, [NO] =500 ppm, [O2] = 5%, N2 = balance and total flowrate =100 mL min1, T = 350°C.

3.4 Effect of SO2 and H2O on Mn@ZIF-8

As the existence of H2O and SO2 is unavoidable in the exhaust, even after desulfurization, the residual H2O and SO2 still exert a notable impact on SCR performance. Therefore, the effects of SO2 and H2O on the NOx conversion of Mn@ZIF-8 were investigated. The results shown in Fig. 8 revealed that the NOx conversion decreased slightly after introducing 200 ppm of SO2, and then reached a relatively steady state. After cutting off the input of SO2, the conversion of NOx was gradually restored its original level and remained stable. Hence, it could be concluded that the Mn@ZIF-8 had a great resistance to SO2, and the process of SO2 inhibition is reversible. Besides, the negative effect of SO2 on SCR reaction could be attributed to the following aspects: on one hand, the SO2 would compete with the reactants for the active sites, on the other hand, the formed sulfate depositing (ammonium sulfate and ammonium bisulfate species) would block the active sites (Lu et al., 2015). Yu et al. (2010) proposed that the porous structure was in favor of the great SO2 resistance. The high sulfur resistance of Mn based catalysts was related to porous silica support (Huang et al., 2008). Thus, it could be inferred that the great SO2 resistance of Mn@ZIF-8 may be ascribed to the porous structure of ZIF-8.

Fig. 8. The effect of SO2 on the SCR activities of Mn@ZIF-8. Reaction conditions: [NH3] = 500 ppm, [NO] = 500 ppm, [SO2] =200 ppm, [O2] = 5%, N2 = balance and total flowrate =100 mL min–1, T = 350°C.Fig. 8. The effect of SO2 on the SCR activities of Mn@ZIF-8. Reaction conditions: [NH3] = 500 ppm, [NO] = 500 ppm, [SO2] =200 ppm, [O2] = 5%, N2 = balance and total flowrate =100 mL min1, T = 350°C.

The impact of H2O and SO2 was also investigated. The NOx conversion decreased to 65% under the coexistence of H2O and SO2 and could not recover to the original value after eliminating the SO2+H2O feeding as shown in Fig. 9, which demonstrated that there was a synergistic inhibition effect between H2O and SO2, and massive sulfate species and deposition were formed and blocked the active sites.

Fig. 9. The effect of SO2 and H2O on the SCR activities of Mn@ZIF-8. Reaction conditions: [NH3] = 500 ppm, [NO] = 500 ppm, [SO2] = 500 ppm, [O2] = 5%, [H2O] = 3%, N2 = balance and total flowrate = 100 mL min–1, T = 350°C.Fig. 9. The effect of SO2 and H2O on the SCR activities of Mn@ZIF-8. Reaction conditions: [NH3] = 500 ppm, [NO] = 500 ppm, [SO2] = 500 ppm, [O2] = 5%, [H2O] = 3%, N2 = balance and total flowrate = 100 mL min1, T = 350°C.


The XRD patterns and SEM image demonstrated that the Mn@ZIF-8 was synthesized successfully, and the Mn species were highly dispersed on ZIF-8. The Mn 2p XPS spectra proved that the Mn2+ and Mn3+ coexisted on the catalysts and played an important role in redox process.

The prepared Mn@ZIF-8 showed an over 90% NO conversion at the temperatures ranging from 225–400°C, the excellent catalytic activity may attributed to the huge specific surface area of ZIF-8, as the variation trend of the surface area was in accordance with the SCR activities. Besides, the activity and stability for Mn@ZIF-8 was proved to be ideal after 12 h. Furthermore, the Mn@ZIF-8 exhibited strong tolerance against SO2, which may be ascribed to the porous structure of ZIF-8. It is noteworthy that the catalytic activity of Mn@ZIF-8 was inhibited considerably in the presence of H2O and SO2. As a whole, this study demonstrated that the ZIF-8 is a kind of promising support and the use of Mn@ZIF-8 as a novel catalyst for SCR reaction is feasible.


There are no conflicts to declare.


We would like to extend our sincere appreciation to the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22078176).


  1. Atribak, I., López-Suárez, F.E., Bueno-López, A., García-García, A. (2011). New insights into the performance of ceria-zirconia mixed oxides as soot combustion catalysts. Identification of the role of "active oxygen" production. Catal. Today 176, 404–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.11.023

  2. Banerjee, R., Phan, A., Wang, B., Knobler, C., Furukawa, H., O'Keeffe, M. (2008). High-throughput synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and application to CO2 capture. Science 319, 939–943. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1152516

  3. Becerra, M.E., Arias, N.P., Giraldo, O.H., Suárez, F.E.L., Gómez, M.J.I., López, A.B. (2011). Soot combustion manganese catalysts prepared by thermal decomposition of KMnO4. Appl. Catal., B 102, 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.12.006

  4. Brandenberger, S., Kröcher, O., Tissler, A. (2008). The state of the art in selective catalytic reduction of NOx by ammonia using metal-exchanged zeolite catalysts. Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 50, 492–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940802480122

  5. Busca, G., Lietti, L., Ramis, G., Berti, F. (2008). Chemical and mechanistic aspects of the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by ammonia over oxide catalysts: A review. Appl. Catal. B. 50, 492–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(98)00040-X

  6. Chen, H., Wei, Z., Kollar, M., Gao, F., Wang, Y., Szanyi, J. (2016). No oxidation on zeolite supported cu catalysts: formation and reactivity of surface nitrates. Catal. Today. 267, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2015.11.039

  7. Cheng, L., Men, Y., Wang, J., Wang, H., An, W., Wang, Y. (2017). Crystal facet-dependent reactivity of α-Mn2O3 microcrystalline catalyst for soot combustion. Appl. Catal., B 204, 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.041

  8. Delahay, G., Valade, D., Guzmán-Vargas, A., Coq, B. (2005). Selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia on Fe-ZSM-5 catalysts prepared by different methods. Appl. Catal., B 55, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.07.009

  9. Du, X., Li, C., Zhao, L., Zhang, J., Lei, G., Sheng, J. (2018). Promotional removal of HCHO from simulated flue gas over Mn-Fe oxides modified activated coke. Appl. Catal., B 232, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.034

  10. Forzatti, P. (2001). Present status and perspectives in de-NOx SCR catalysis. Appl. Catal., A 222, 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-860x(01)00832-8

  11. Gao, F., Mei, D., Wang, Y., Szanyi, J., Peden, C. (2017). Selective catalytic reduction over Cu/SSZ-13: Linking homo- and heterogeneous catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 4935–4942. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b01128

  12. Gee, J.A., Chung, J., Nair, S., Sholl, D.S. (2013). Adsorption and diffusion of small alcohols in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks ZIF-8 and ZIF-90. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 3169–3176. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp312489w

  13. Guo, X., Li, J., Zhou, R. (2016). Catalytic performance of manganese doped CuO-CeO2 catalysts for selective oxidation of CO in hydrogen-rich gas. Fuel 163, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.09.043

  14. Han, J., Wang, D., Du, Y., Xi, S., Hong, J., Yin S., Chen, Z., Zhou., T.H. (2015) Metal-organic framework immobilized cobalt oxide nanoparticles for efficient photocatalytic water oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 20607–20613. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta04675k

  15. Huang, J., Tong, Z., Yan, H., Zhang, J. (2008). Selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 at low temperatures over iron and manganese oxides supported on mesoporous silica. Appl. Catal., B 78, 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.09.031

  16. Huang, X., Lin, Y., Zhang, J., Chen X. (2010). Ligand-directed strategy for zeolite-type metal-organic frameworks: Zinc(II) imidazolates with unusual zeolitic topologies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 1557–1559. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200503778

  17. Küsgens, P., Rose, M., Senkovska, I., Fröde, H., Henschel, A., Siegle, S. (2009). Characterization of metal-organic frameworks by water adsorption. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 120, 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.11.020

  18. Lee, J., Farha, O., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K., Hupp, J. (2009). ChemInform abstract: Metal—organic framework materials as catalysts. ChemInform 40 https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.200933268

  19. Li, C., Tang, X., Yi, H., Wang, L., Cui, X., Chu, C. (2017). Rational design of template-free MnOx-CeO2 hollow nanotube as De-NOx catalyst at low temperature. Appl. Surf. Sci. 428, 924–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.131

  20. Li, D., Yang, G., Li, P., Wang, J., Zhang, P. (2016). Promotion of formaldehyde oxidation over Ag catalyst by Fe doped MnOx support at room temperature. Cataly. Today. 277, 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.02.040

  21. Li, L., Yan, N., Zan, Q., Qiao, S., Yang, S., Guo, Y. (2010). Catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury over the modified catalyst Mn/α-Al2O3 at lower temperatures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 426–31. https://doi.org10.1021/es9021206

  22. Liu, S., Wu, X., Duan, W., Min, L., Lee, H.R. (2012). Combined promoting effects of platinum and MnOx-CeO2 supported on alumina on NOx-assisted soot oxidation: thermal stability and sulfur resistance. Chem. Eng. J. 203, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.090

  23. Lu, Q., Meng, J., Pang, D., Zhang, C., Feng, O. (2015). Reaction and characterization of Co and Ce doped Mn/TiO2 catalysts for low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3. Catal. Lett. 2145, 1500–1509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-015-1556-x

  24. Min, K., Park, E.D., Ji, M.K., Yie, J.E. (2007). Manganese oxide catalysts for NOx reduction with NH3 at low temperatures. Appl. Catal., A 327, 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2007.05.024

  25. Nguyen, L., Ky, L., Phan, N. (2012). A zeolite imidazolate framework ZIF-8 catalyst for friedel-crafts acylation. Chin. J. Catal. 33, 688–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(11)60368-9

  26. Niu, Y., Tong, S., Hui, S., Zhang, X., Shui, W. (2016). Synergistic removal of NO and N2O in low-temperature SCR process with MnOx/Ti based catalyst doped with Ce and V. Fuel 185, 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.122

  27. Park, K.S., Ni, Z., Côté, A.P., Choi, J.Y., Huang, R., Uribe-Romo, F.J., Chae, H.K., O’Keeffe, M., Yaghi, O.M. (2006). Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. PNAS 103, 10186–10191. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602439103

  28. Park, K.H., Sang, M., Kim, S., Dong, W. (2013). Reversibility of Mn valence state in MnOx/TiO2 catalysts for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction for no with NH3. Catal. Lett. 143, 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-012-0952-8

  29. Peng, S., Guo, R.T., Liu, S.M., Wang, S.X., Li, M.Y. (2016). The enhanced performance of MnOx catalyst for NH3-SCR reaction by the modification with Eu. Appl. Catal., A 531, 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2016.10.027

  30. Qi, G., Yang, R.T. (2003a). A superior catalyst for low-temperature NO reduction with NH3. Cheminform 34, 848–849. https://doi.org/10.1039/b212725c

  31. Qi, G., Yang, R.T. (2003b). Performance and kinetics study for low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3 over MnOx-CeO2 catalyst. J. Catal. 217, 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9517(03)00081-2

  32. Qi, G., Yang, R., Chang, R. (2004). MnOx-CeO2 mixed oxides prepared by co-precipitation for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 at low temperatures. Appl. Catal., B 51, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.01.023

  33. Qi, G., Yang, R.T., Thompson, L. (2004). Catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with hydrogen and carbon monoxide in the presence of excess oxygen by Pd supported on pillared clays. Appl. Catal., A 259, 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2003.09.040

  34. Shen, Z., Hu, F.Y., Li, J. (2016). Hierarchical core-shell Al2O3@Pd-CoAlO microspheres for low-temperature toluene combustion. ACS Catal. 6, 3433–3441. https://doi.org/3433-3441.10.1021/acscatal.6b00144

  35. Singoredjo, L., Korver, R., Kapteijn, F., Moulijn, J. (2010). Alumina supported manganese oxides for the low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia. Appl. Catal. B 24, 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.199311017

  36. Sun, C., Liu, H., Chen, W., Chen, D., Yu, S., Liu, A. (2018). Insights into the Sm/Zr co-doping effects on N2 selectivity and SO2 resistance of a MnOx-TiO2 catalyst for the NH3-SCR reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 347, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.029

  37. Tran, U.P.N., Le, K.K.N., Phan, N.T.S. (2011). Expanding applications of metal-organic frameworks: zeolite imidazolate framework ZIF-8 as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for the knoevenagel reaction. ACS Catal. 1, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs1000625

  38. Twigg, M.V. (2007). Progress and future challenges in controlling automotive exhaust gas emissions. Appl. Catal., B 70, 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.02.029

  39. Venna, S.R., Jasinski, J.B., Carreon, M.A. (2010). Structural evolution of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 18030. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja109268m

  40. Wang, P., Sun, H., Quan, X., Chen, S. (2016). Enhanced catalytic activity over Mil-100(Fe) loaded ceria catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 at low temperature. J. Hazard. Mater. 301, 512–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.024

  41. Wang, X., Zheng, Y., Lin, J. (2013). Highly dispersed Mn-Ce mixed oxides supported on carbon nanotubes for low-temperature no reduction with NH3. Catal. Commun. 37, 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2013.03.035

  42. Wei, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, R. (2018). Rare earth salt of 12-tungstophosphoric acid supported on iron oxide as a catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NOx. Fuel Process. Technol. 178, 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.06.001

  43. Wu, Z., Jiang, B., Liu, Y., Zhao, W., Guan, B. (2007). Experimental study on a low-temperature SCR catalyst based on MnOx/TiO2 prepared by sol-gel method. J. Hazard. Mater. 145, 488–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.11.045

  44. Yang, S., Qi, F., Xiong, S., Hao, D., Li, J. (2016). MnOx supported on Fe-Ti spinel: A novel Mn based low temperature SCR catalyst with a high N2 selectivity. Appl. Catal., B 181, 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.08.023

  45. Yi, L., Zheng, L., Mnichowicz, B., Harinath, A., Li, H., Bahrami, B. (2016). Chemical deactivation of commercial vanadium SCR catalysts in diesel emission control application. Chem. Eng. J. 287, 680–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.043

  46. Yu, J., Guo F., Wang, Y., Zhu, J., Liu, Y., Su, F., Gao, S., Xu, G. (2010). Sulfur poisoning resistant mesoporous Mn-base catalyst for low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3. Appl. Catal., B 95, 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.12.023

  47. Zhang, L., Shi, L., Huang, L., Zhang, J., Ga, R., Zhang, D. (2014). Rational design of high-performance DeNOx catalysts based on MnxCo3-xO4 nanocages derived from metal-organic frameworks. ACS Catal. 4, 1753−1763. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs401185c

  48. Zhang, S., Zhao, Y., Yang, J., Zhang, J., Zheng, C. (2018). Fe-modified MnOx/TiO2 as the SCR catalyst for simultaneous removal of NO and mercury from coal combustion flue gas. Chem. Eng. J. 348, 618–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.037

  49. Zhang, W., Shi, Y., Li, C., Zhao, Q., Li, X. (2016). Synthesis of bimetallic MOFs MIL-100(Fe-Mn) as an efficient catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. Catal. Lett. 146, 1956–1964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-016-1840-4

  50. Zhang, X., Shen, B., Zhang, X., Wang, F., Chi, G., Si, M. (2017). A comparative study of manganese-cerium doped metal-organic frameworks prepared via impregnation and in situ methods in the selective catalytic reduction of NO. RSC Adv. 7, 5928–5936. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra25413f

  51. Zhao, L., Li, C., Li, S.,Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, T., Zeng, G. (2016). Simultaneous removal of elemental mercury and NO in simulated flue gas over V2O5/ZrO2-CeO2 catalyst. Appl. Catal., B 198, 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.079

Share this article with your colleagues 


Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

77st percentile
Powered by
   SCImago Journal & Country Rank

2022 Impact Factor: 4.0
5-Year Impact Factor: 3.4

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit
CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal that promotes submissions of high-quality research and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world. We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.