Jen-Hsiung Tsai1, Shui-Jen Chen This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1, Sheng-Lun Lin2,3, Zheng-You Xu1, Kuo-Lin Huang1, Chih-Chung Lin1 

1 Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan
2 School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
3 Center for Environmental Toxin and Emerging-contaminant Research, Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung 83347, Taiwan


Received: November 16, 2020
Revised: February 4, 2021
Accepted: February 5, 2021

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.200632  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:

Tsai, J.H., Chen, S.J., Lin, S.L., Xu, Z.Y., Huang, K.L., Lin, C.C. (2021). Chemical Characterization of Water-soluble Ions and Metals in Particulate Matter Generated by a Portable Two-stroke Gasoline Engine. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 21, 200632. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.200632


HIGHLIGHTS

  • Chemical characterization of a portable two-stroke gasoline engine was studied.
  • The dominant water-soluble ion species on the PM were Ca2+, Na+, and SO42–.
  • The A/C ratios increased with the engine load but were all less than 0.5.
  • The major metals among the 21 analyzed metals were Ca, Na, K, Al, Fe, Mg, and Zn.
 

ABSTRACT


To examine the characteristics of water-soluble ions and metals on the particulate matter (PM) in the exhausts, a P2SGE (portable two-stroke gasoline engine) was fueled by unleaded gasoline #92 blended with different two-stroke engine oil brands (CPC Super Low Smoke Two-Stork Engine Oil (SLS), CPC Low Smoke Two-Stroke Engine Oil (LS), and MERCURY STAR (MS)) and operated under idling, mid-load (1.5 kW), and high-load (1.9 kW), respectively. Experimental results reveal that the PM mass concentrations in the exhausts were in the order MS (avg. 1,934 mg Nm–3) > SLS (avg. 1,543 mg Nm–3) > LS (avg. 1,167 mg Nm–3) in all test conditions. The mass concentrations and emission factors (EFs) of PM decreased as the P2SGE load increased by adding each tested lubricant. Based on fuel consumption, EFs of ΣIons were the lowest when utilizing the LS additive (avg. 89.7 mg L-fuel–1), followed by the MS and SLS (165 and 168 mg L-fuel–1, in average, respectively); whereas the lowest levels of ΣMetals were observed by using MS additive (avg. 61.3 mg L–1), followed by using the LS (avg. 83.8 mg L–1) and SLS (avg. 85.2 mg L–1). The soluble ions on the PM were mostly Na+, Ca2+, NO3, and SO42– among eight tested species, which accounted for only 0.05–0.19% (avg. 0.1%) of PM mass. The 21 analyzed metal components represented only 0.05% of the mass of the PM, and were dominated by Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca, Fe, and Zn, which represented 98.7% by mass of ΣMetals. Our finding for portable engine emission has been rarely considered in the literature but it is unneglectable for labors who are usually exposed to the ions and metals. Further health risk assessment research is suggested to include temporarily real-life exposures with high pollutant levels.


Keywords: Portable two-stroke gasoline engine, Particulate matter, Water-soluble ions, Metals, Environmental pollution


1 INTRODUCTION


The internal combustion engine (ICE) is one of the greatest inventions in history. It has a high thermal efficiency and high power output and enables vehicles to travel at high speed (with good maneuverability). Since the mid-19th century, ICEs have been used around the world. Almost all motor vehicles, agricultural machinery, engineering machinery, and even power generation equipment, use internal combustion engines to generate power. The working principle of the ICE is that burning fossil fuels (including gasoline, diesel, kerosene, and natural gas) inside the machine releases chemical energy, which is converted to mechanical kinetic energy. This process can provide huge amounts of energy for various activities, but it generates many harmful air pollutants (such as fine particulate matter (PM2.5), traditional pollutants, organic/inorganic component species, and even toxic compounds) (Lin et al., 2008; Tsai et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2020). Furthermore, when the high-temperature exhaust from an ICE have been discharged into the lower-temperature atmosphere, the low-volatility substances (such as H2SO4) therein may undergo gas-to-particle conversion (nucleation and coagulation reactions); thus, many ultrafine particles with aerodynamic diameters of 10–50 nm are generated (Schneider et al., 2005; Beddows and Harrison, 2008), harming human health, affecting the environment, and contributing to climate change (Ramanathan and Carmichael, 2008; Hao et al., 2010; Ramana et al., 2010).

Generally, the particulate pollutants emitted by gasoline engines consist of mainly: (1) carbon particles after combustion, (2) solvable organic fraction (SOF), mainly from incompletely burned engine oil or fuel, and (3) combustion oxides, including sulfates, nitrates, and phosphates. A study by Sodeman et al. (2005) also revealed that the water-soluble ions on the PM in the exhaust might be contributed by lubricating oil. Vehicle exhaust particles have been proven to harm human health and affect the environment, such as entering a human body through breathing, polluting various environmental media with toxic substances, affecting visibility, and even accelerating global climate change (Maricq, 2007). Once those gasoline-engine exhausts containing water-soluble ions enter the human lungs through respiration, they will readily dissolve in the body fluids on the surface of the trachea due to their hydrophilicity, and thereby cause inflammation or toxicological reactions. Our earlier work showed that the particle-induced cytotoxicity [as CEC (cumene-hydroperoxide equivalent concentration)] correlated more significantly with NO3, SO42–, NH4+, and Cl, while the contents of sulfate ion (SO42–) and nitrate ion (NO3) were positively correlated with the cytotoxicity of PM10 in the atmosphere (Chen et al., 2006). Therefore, the water-soluble ions on the PM that is emitted from two-stroke gasoline engines must be studied to reduce the hazard to operators of exposure to such emissions.

The metal content of the PM in exhausts has always been a critical issue in relation to air pollution (Lin et al., 2005, 2020). Several works have suggested that the main metallic elements in lubricating oil are Ca, Zn, and Mg, while the primary non-metallic elements are P and B (Hu et al., 2009; Liati et al., 2015). Most of the Fe, Ni, Cu, Cr, and Sb on PM in exhausts come from the wear and tear of engine parts (Lim et al., 2007; Sappok et al., 2012). These trace metals are mainly associated with the compositions of lubricating oils, fossil fuels, additives, and detergents. Consequently, a higher metal content of the fuel corresponds to a higher metal content in the exhaust (Wang et al., 2016). Although the non-road two-stroke gasoline engine emits fewer trace metals, metallic elements are usually tricky to decompose and accumulate in the human body and result in various toxic effects harmful to human health. A study by Chen and Lippmann (2009) found that Ni, V, Pb, and Zn were positively associated with acute cardiac function changes and high short-term mortality. Järup and Åkesson (2009) pointed out that Cd might raise the incidence of kidney disease and was detrimental to bone growth, whereas prolonged exposure to high levels of Cd even directly damaged bones. Furthermore, epidemiological and toxicological research reports have confirmed that metallic elements on PM may contribute to carcinogenesis (Lippmann et al., 2006; Kawata et al., 2007; Calvo et al., 2013).

Studies have noted that ultrafine particles that are derived from traffic sources can cause serious oxidative pressure in human cell tissues and cause DNA damage (Bräuner et al., 2007; Møller et al., 2008). The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO) announced as long ago as 1989 that "gasoline engine exhaust" is a level 2 human carcinogenic factor (possibly carcinogenic to humans, Group 2B). Although many countries have set relevant emission standards for the exhausts of on-road gasoline-powered equipment (o-RGE, such as motorcycles, four-wheeled vehicles, and buses, and trucks), the emission of air pollutants from non-road gasoline-powered equipment (n-RGE, such as brush cutters, sprayers, and leaf blowers) has attracted relatively little concern. People have long been accustomed to the use of all kinds of equipment that is powered by gasoline engines to perform various economic or non-economic activities to improve work efficiency and to reduce human labor. In particular, emissions from n-RGE that is used in agricultural activities may pollute crops and fruits, increasing the risk associated with their ingestion. Therefore, attention should be paid to the potential risks to human health and the environment of emissions from n-RGE. In order to examine the emission characteristics of P2SGE, a small commonly used sprayer (KAWAGOE, C12E) was used herein as a testing engine. To prepare fuels for testing, unleaded gasoline #92 was used as the base oil and blended (4 vol.% two-cycle engine oil + 96 vol.% gasoline) with one of three two-cycle engine oil brands: CPC Super Low Smoke Two-Stroke Engine Oil (CPC-SLS), CPC Low Smoke Two-Stroke Engine Oil (CPC-LS), and MERCURY STAR Two-Stroke Engine Oil (MS). The three lubricants used in this study were the lubricating oils that are commonly available in Taiwan and are relatively inexpensive. The characteristics of water-soluble ions and metal components on PM were measured at various engine loads.

 
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS

 
2.1 Instruments and Sampling Methods

The tested small portable gasoline-powered sprayer (KAWAGOE, Model: C12E) was equipped with a single-cylinder, naturally aspirated, and air-cooled two-stroke gasoline engine (Model: G45H; manufactured by Chaang Cherng Co., Ltd., TAIWAN). The fuel oil mixing ratio (gasoline: two-stroke engine oil), set by its manufacturer, was 25: 1; the cylinder displacement was 41.5 c.c.; and the maximum horsepower was 2.2 ps.

The base oil, unleaded gasoline #92, was purchased from the CPC (Chinese Petroleum Corporation) in Taiwan. Table 1 presents the physicochemical properties of two-stroke engine oils (SLS, LS, and MS) used in this study.

Table 1. The physicochemical properties of two-stroke engine oils.

The flue sampling equipment that was used in this study was consistent with US EPA Method 5. Before sampling was begun, an S type Pitot tube was used to measure the flow velocity of the exhaust gas from the engine. After calculating the flow rate, a constant-flow sampling system that was equipped with a 47 mm dia. quartz fiber filter (Pallflex Tissuqartz 2500QAT-UP) was installed downstream of the P2SGE’s exhaust to gather the particle-phase samples. PM emissions were tested at P2SGE rotation speeds of 3,800 rpm (idling), 5,000 rpm, and 7,000 rpm with three fuels. For each combination of parameters, the experiment was performed three times (each sampling time = 15 min). Sampling data were collected after the engine had been run for at least 10 min. Fig. 1 shows the schematic diagram of the experimental system.

Fig. 1. Scheme of the sampling system and the P2SGE.
Fig. 1. Scheme of the sampling system and the P2SGE.

The quartz filters were pretreated before sampling by heating them in a muffle furnace in air for 2.5 h at 900°C. The filters were dried for 24 h in a desiccator at 25 ± 1°C and a relative humidity of 40 ± 5% before and after each sampling. They were then weighed on an electronic seven-digit balance (UMX2, Mettler Toledo) with a resolution of 0.1 µg.

 
2.2 Water-soluble Ion Analysis

Before water-soluble ions were analyzed, collected particles were extracted for 120 minutes from quarter sections of each quartz filter in an ultrasonic bath using 10 mL of n-hexane. Then, 10 mL of deionized water (specific resistance ≥ 18.3 MΩm) was added and ultrasonic extraction was conducted for another 120 minutes. Next, the n-hexane was removed by purging with ultra-pure nitrogen. Finally, each extraction solution was filtered using a C18 pretreatment column and a cellulose acetate filter in that order, and then stored in a plastic vial in a refrigerator at 4°C before chemical analysis by ion chromatography (IC) (DIONEX ICS-3000).

The method detection limits were as follows; Na+, 0.038 ppm; K+, 0.041 ppm; NH4+, 0.076 ppm; Mg2+, 0.027 ppm; Ca2+, 0.077 ppm; Cl, 0.046 ppm; NO3, 0.060 ppm, and, SO42–, 0.021 ppm. The recovery efficiencies of these ions were 92.3–114.3% based on the IC measurements. Both field and laboratory blank samples were prepared and analyzed for each sampling and analysis. All data were corrected using filter blanks.

 
2.3 Metal Analysis

Before the particle-bound metals had been chemically analyzed, extraction was performed on one-quarter of each quartz filter for 120 minutes using an ultrasonic bath of 20 mL 10% (v/v) HNO3 solution. Then, each sample was heated to 85°C for 30 minutes for digestion. The digested solution was diluted to a volume of 25 mL using ultra-pure water (specific resistance ≥ 18.3 MWcm) to identify 21 metals (Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Sr, Mo, Cd, Sn, Sb, Ba, and Pb) by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Agilent, 7500 series). Calibration was conducted using multi-element (metal) standards (certified reference materials (CRMs); Spex, Metuchen, USA) in a 1% (v/v) HNO3 solution. Every tenth sample was spiked using the liquid standards that contained known amounts of the metal elements that were analyzed. The CRMs were also used as quality control standards.

In the analyses of elements from ICP-MS measurements, the method detection limits for Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Sr, Mo, Cd, Sn, Sb, Ba, and Pb were 6.12, 5.22, 3.16, 19.3, 24.3, 0.36, 0.04, 0.14, 0.03, 2.22, 0.03, 0.31, 5.27, 0.31, 0.20, 0.99, 0.02, 3.15, 0.12, 0.51, and 0.06 ppb, respectively. The recovery efficiencies of 21 metals were 91.2–108.4%. Both field and laboratory blank samples were prepared and analyzed for each sampling and analysis. All data were corrected using filter blanks.

 
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


 
3.1 PM Concentrations and Emission Factors in the Exhaust

Fig. 2 presents the mass concentrations and emission factors (based on fuel consumption (EFFC) and output energy (EFOE)) of PM in the exhausts emitted from P2SGE that was operated at idling (0 kW), mid-load (~1.5 kW), and high-load (~1.9 kW) with 4 vol.% of SLS, LS, or MS as the additive in 92-gasoline. Experimental results show that the mass concentration of the PM from P2SGE was the lowest when LS was used (947–1,331 mg Nm–3, with an average of 1,167 mg Nm–3), followed by SLS (1,020–1,913 mg Nm–3, with an average of 1,543 mg Nm–3) and MS (1,289–2,405 mg Nm–3, with an average of 1,934 mg Nm–3) at all engine loads. Accordingly, the PM concentration decreased as the P2SGE load increased regardless of the lubricant used (as shown in Fig. 2(a)). Moreover, this trend was also observed for EFFC and EFOE (as shown in Figs. 2(b) and 2(c)). This phenomenon may be related to the sampling temperature was higher at the high-load (85–90°C) than at idling (40–45°C) and mid-load (50–55°C), and thus the P2SGE had a better combustion efficiency when operated at high-load and helped to inhibit PM formation.

Fig. 2. Mass concentrations (a) and emission factors ((b) and (c)) of PM from a P2SGE by using SLS, LS, and MS operated at various loads.Fig. 2. Mass concentrations (a) and emission factors ((b) and (c)) of PM from a P2SGE by using SLS, LS, and MS operated at various loads.

Adding SLS or LS reduced the PM concentration below that obtained when MS was added at a given engine load; adding LS reduced the PM concentration (38.2%) by almost twice as much as adding SLS (20.1%), perhaps because higher flash point of MS (136°C) (as shown in Table 1) leads to less complete combustion and higher PM emission than with the other two lubricant oils, which have lower flash points (LS = 98°C and SLS = 94°C), at the same engine load (Tsai et al., 2020). Generally, the flash point of oil is the lowest temperature of oil at which the application of defined test flames leads the vapors above the surface to ignition and the release of vapors at this temperature is not sufficiently rapid to sustain combustion (Ljubas et al., 2010). Once the flash point of two-stroke engine oil was getting higher, it was less likely to be burned entirely (in order to protect the engine cylinder) and remained in the exhausts during the combustion process, resulting in more significant amounts of emission (as displayed in Fig. 3). On the other hand, although the flash points of SLS and LS were similar, the PM emissions of using these two fuels differed by about 30%, which was possibly associated with their different viscosities. As is well known, the higher the viscosity of the oil, the less favorable it is to be atomized, eventually leading to more PM generation during the combustion process.

Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of particulate matter and unburned lubricating oil in gasoline engine exhaust.Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of particulate matter and unburned lubricating oil in gasoline engine exhaust.

 
3.2 Concentrations and Emission Factors of PM-bound Water-soluble Ions

The mass concentrations of ΣIons (sum of 8 ions, namely Na+, NH4+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cl, NO3, and SO42–) on PM from the P2SGE’s exhausts by using 4 vol.% of SLS, LS, or MS as the additive in 92-gasoline were 1,213–2,115 (average 1,627 µg Nm–3), 660–1,047 (average 858 µg Nm–3), and 1,359–1,850 µg Nm–3 (average 1,614 µg Nm–3), respectively (Table 2). Additionally, based on fuel consumption, emission factors of ΣIons were the lowest when utilizing the LS additive (average 89.7 mg L-fuel–1), followed by the MS and SLS (165 and 168 mg L-fuel–1, in average, respectively) (Fig. 4). Similarly, based on output energy, the order of ΣIons magnitude was also LS (average 30.4 mg kWh–1) < MS (average 55.7 mg kWh–1) < SLS (average 57.7 mg kWh–1). The dominant water-soluble ions among eight considered (Na+, NH4+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cl, NO3, and SO42–) on PM that emitted from the P2SGE that was fueled with different lubricants and operated at various loads were Ca2+, Na+, and SO42–, with 20.5%, 31.4%, and 13.6%, in average, respectively, as displayed in Fig. 5. Our results are consistent with the findings of the preceding study by Yang et al. (2019), who found that Ca2+ and SO42- dominated the PM2.5-bound ions (K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cl, NO3, and SO42–). Related studies have demonstrated that Na+ and Ca2+ are generated by the incomplete combustion of lubricant oils (Jaiprakash and Habib, 2017), while NO3 and SO42– were generated mainly by an atmospheric photochemical reaction of compounds in fossil fuel emissions (NOx and SOx) (Chiang et al., 2012; Alves et al., 2015). Moreover, Hao et al. (2019) identified that the primary water-soluble ion species on PM2.5 were NO3, Cl, Na+, and Ca2+ from light-duty diesel vehicles, NO3, Ca2+, SO42–, and Na+ from heavy-duty diesel vehicles, and NO3, Ca2+, Na+, and Cl from light-duty gasoline vehicles. In another related study conducted by Yu et al. (2020), they reported that the primary water-soluble ions on PM2.5 in the exhausts from non-road construction equipment (including excavators, bulldozers, wheel loaders, stackers, road rollers, graders, and rotary drills) were NO3, SO42–, NH4+, and Ca2+, regardless of operational load.

Table 2. Mass concentrations of particle-bound water-soluble ions and A/C ratios.

Fig. 4. Emission factors of water-soluble ions on PM from a P2SGE by using SLS, LS, and MS operated at various loads.Fig. 4. Emission factors of water-soluble ions on PM from a P2SGE by using SLS, LS, and MS operated at various loads.

Fig. 5. Contents of water-soluble ions on PM from a P2SGE by using (a) SLS, (b) LS, and (c) MS operated at various loads.Fig. 5. Contents of water-soluble ions on PM from a P2SGE by using (a) SLS, (b) LS, and (c) MS operated at various loads.

Our analysis demonstrated that the A/C (summation of equivalent concentrations of anions to that of cations) ratio increased with the engine load but were all less than 0.5 as presented in Table 2. Nevertheless, the A/C ratios that were calculated from the data in several previous gasoline exhausts studies were all less than 0.2 (Table 3), supporting our finding. This phenomenon may be related to the fact that lubricant oil usually contains a certain amount of CaCO3 which could maintain the lubrication of a piston during engine operation (Eastwood, 2008; Raza et al., 2018). The CaCO3 is a typical alkaline additive for preventing the deterioration of lubricant oil by oxidation and extending operational lifetime. Moreover, to prevent wear and tear on the two-stroke engine, inevitably some unburned lubricant oil-droplets might be present in the exhausts (as shown in Fig. 3). At this situation, the unburned lubricant oil-droplets would be collected on the PM samples that were obtained by the filtering method. Furthermore, a mixture of deionized water and n-hexane was used herein to extract the water-soluble ions on PM, which might also cause the extraction of CaCO3 in the unburned oil-droplets. Thus, the Ca2+ content was increased and became one of the major ions on the PM, whereas CO32– was not analyzed in this study, leading to lower A/C ratios.

Table 3. Summary of the relative gasoline engine researches. 


3.3 Concentrations and Emission Factors of PM-bound Metals

Table 4 and Fig. 6 illustrate the mass concentrations and EFs of 21 PM-bound metals (Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Sr, Mo, Cd, Sn, Sb, Ba, and Pb) from the exhaust of the P2SGE with 4 vol.% of LS, MS, and SLS lubricants in 92-gasoline. The results showed that the three metallic elements of As, Mo, and Sn were not detected in all test conditions. On average, the mass concentrations of ΣMetals on PM from the P2SGE’s exhausts by using 4 vol.% of SLS, LS, or MS as the additive in 92-gasoline were 677–923 (average 824 µg Nm–3), 690–800 (average 810 µg Nm–3), and 576–687 µg Nm–3 (average 603 µg Nm–3), respectively. In terms of emission factors, the lowest levels of ΣMetals in the exhausts were observed by using 4% MS additive (average 61.3 mg L–1), followed by LS (average 83.8 mg L–1) and SLS (average 85.2 mg L–1). According to the mass concentration or emission factor data, the amount of each metallic element from the P2SGE almost decreased with increasing loading no matter what kinds of lubricants were used.

Table 4. Mass concentrations of particle-bound metals from a P2SGE by using SLS, LS, and MS operated at various loads.

Fig. 6. Emission factors of metals on PM from a P2SGE by using SLS, LS, and MS operated at various loads.Fig. 6. Emission factors of metals on PM from a P2SGE by using SLS, LS, and MS operated at various loads.

The metallic components were divided (based on their average levels in ΣMetals) into three groups — major metals (Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca, Fe, and Zn, ≥ ~1%), sub-major metals (Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Sr, Ba, and Pb, ~1 to 0.1%), and minor metals (Ti, V, As, Mo, Cd, Sn, and Sb, < 0.1%). According to Fig. 7, the major metals represented 96.5–99.4% by mass of ΣMetals, while the sub-major and minor metals accounted for only 0.47–3.44% and 0.04–0.14%, respectively. Previous studies have identified the major PM-bound metals in gasoline engine exhaust as Ca, Fe, Al, and Zn (Cheung et al., 2010; Hao et al., 2019); Yang et al. (2019) identified the major metal components on PM2.5 as Na, Ca, Fe, Zn, and Al. These observations were consistent with those herein, supporting our finding of the main metal components on PM from the P2SGE.

Fig. 7. Fractions of (a) major, (b) submajor, and (c) minor metals from a P2SGE by using SLS, LS, and MS operated at various loads.Fig. 7. Fractions of (a) major, (b) submajor, and (c) minor metals from a P2SGE by using SLS, LS, and MS operated at various loads.

In addition, the most abundant metals by mass were Ca, Na, K, and Al, which accounted for 93.8% by mass of ΣMetals when 4-vol% SLS was added to the fuel in the P2SGE at various loads, as reported in Table 4. The dominant four metals were Ca, Mg, Na, and K (79.9% by mass of ΣMetals) and Ca, Na, K, and Al (85.3% by mass of ΣMetals) when LS and MS were used, respectively. Consequently, the dominant metals among the 21 analyzed metals in PM were Ca, Na, K, Al, Fe, Mg, and Zn. Those dominant metals together accounted for 98.7% by mass of ΣMetals. At first glance, Fe and Zn (only about 4% each) had relatively low contents among seven primary metals. However, previous researches have confirmed that extended exposure to Fe may cause the generation of free radicals in cells and result in respiratory diseases (Kadiiska et al., 1997), whereas prolonged exposure to Zn leads to acute heart diseases (Chen and Lippmann, 2009). Therefore, it is necessary to regulate the limits of the hazardous metal contents in P2SGE exhausts to reduce the risk of inhaling such harmful ingredients for P2SGE operators (such as farmers).

 
4 CONCLUSIONS


Portable two-stroke gasoline engines (P2SGEs), commonly fueled by lubricant oil-gasoline mixtures, may emit more pollutants than regular gasoline engines in on-road vehicles because they are not equipped with exhaust gas control devices and typically lack maintenance. This study explored the concentrations of chemical components and metallic elements in PM emissions from the exhaust of a P2SGE. The results showed that the PM mass concentrations in the exhausts were in the order MS (average 1,934 mg Nm–3) > SLS (average 1,543 mg Nm–3) > LS (average 1,167 mg Nm–3) in all test conditions. The mass concentrations and EFs of PM using #92-gasoline with 4% engine oil (either SLS or LS or MS has been added) decreased as the engine load increased. Adding SLS or LS to gasoline reduced the PM emission levels by 38.2% or 20.1%, respectively, below that achieved by adding MS. Based on fuel consumption, emission factors of ΣIons were the lowest when utilizing the LS additive (average 89.7 mg L-fuel–1), followed by the MS and SLS (165 and 168 mg L-fuel–1, in average, respectively). The dominant water-soluble ion species on the PM were Ca2+ (20.5%), Na+ (31.4%), and SO42– (13.6%). The ratios of the sum of equivalent concentrations of anions to that of cations (A/C) increased with the increase of engine load, although all the A/C ratios were lower than 0.5. In terms of emission factors, the lowest levels of ΣMetals in the exhausts were observed by using MS additive (average 61.3 mg L–1), followed by LS (average 83.8 mg L–1) and SLS (average 85.2 mg L–1). Despite the difference in blended fuels, the dominant metallic elements on PM were Ca, Na, K, Al, Fe, Mg, and Zn (over 90% from ΣMetals) at all tested conditions. The subdominant metals (Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Sr, Ba, and Pb) accounted for 0.5–3.5% of the PM by mass, while the trace metals (Ti, V, As, Mo, Cd, Sn, and Sb) accounted for only 0.1% PM mass.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan, for financially supporting this research under contract MOST 107-2221-E-020-001.


REFERENCES


  1. Alves, C.A., Barbosa, C., Rocha, S., Calvo, A., Nunes, T., Cerqueira, M., Pio, C., Karanasiou, A., Querol, X. (2015). Elements and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in exhaust particles emitted by light-duty vehicles. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 11526–11542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4394-x

  2. Beddows, D.C.S., Harrison, R.M. (2008). Comparison of average particle number emission factors for heavy and light duty vehicles derived from rolling chassis dynamometer and field studies. Atmos. Environ. 42, 7954–7966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.021

  3. Bräuner, E.V., Forchhammer, L., Møller, P., Simonsen, J., Glasius, M., Wåhlin, P., Raaschou-Nielsen, O., Loft, S. (2007). Exposure to ultrafine particles from ambient air and oxidative stress-induced DNA damage. Environ. Health Perspect. 115, 1177–1182. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9984

  4. Calvo, A.I., Alves, C., Castro, A., Pont, V., Vicente, A.M., Fraile, R. (2013). Research on aerosol sources and chemical composition: Past, current and emerging issues. Atmos. Res. 120–121, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.09.021

  5. Chen, L.C., Lippmann, M. (2009). Effects of metals within ambient air particulate matter (PM) on human health. Inhalation Toxicol. 21, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958370802105405

  6. Chen, S.J., Cheng, S.Y., Shue, M.F., Huang, K.L., Tsai, P.J., Lin, C.C. (2006). The cytotoxicities induced by PM10 and particle-bound water-soluble species. Sci. Total Environ. 354, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.11.012

  7. Cheung, K.L., Ntziachristos, L., Tzamkiozis, T., Schauer, J.J., Samaras, Z., Moore, K.F., Sioutas, C. (2010). Emissions of particulate trace elements, metals and organic species from gasoline, diesel, and biodiesel passenger vehicles and their relation to oxidative potential. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 44, 500–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003758294

  8. Chiang, H.L., Lai, Y.M., Chang, S.Y. (2012). Pollutant constituents of exhaust emitted from light-duty diesel vehicles. Atmos. Environ. 47, 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.045

  9. Eastwood, P. (2008). Particulate emissions from vehicles. John Wiley & Sons.

  10. Hao, Y., Gao, C., Deng, S., Yuan, M., Song, W., Lu, Z., Qiu, Z. (2019). Chemical characterization of PM2.5 emitted from motor vehicles powered by diesel, gasoline, natural gas and methanol fuel. Sci. Total Environ. 674, 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.410

  11. Hu, S., Herner, J.D., Shafer, M., Robertson, W., Schauer, J.J., Dwyer, H., Collins, J., Huai, T., Ayala, A. (2009). Metals emitted from heavy-duty diesel vehicles equipped with advanced PM and NOx emission controls. Atmos. Environ. 43, 2950–2959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.052

  12. Jaiprakash, Habib, G. (2017). Chemical and optical properties of PM2.5 from on-road operation of light duty vehicles in Delhi city. Sci. Total Environ. 586, 900–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.070

  13. Järup, L., Akesson, A. (2009). Current status of cadmium as an environmental health problem. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 238, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2009.04.020

  14. Kadiiska, M.B., Mason, R.P., Dreher, K.L., Costa, D.L., Ghio, A.J. (1997). In vivo evidence of free radical formation in the rat lung after exposure to an emission source air pollution particle. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 10, 1104–1108. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx970049r

  15. Kawata, K., Yokoo, H., Shimazaki, R., Okabe, S. (2007). Classification of heavy-metal toxicity by human DNA microarray analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 3769–3774. https://doi.org/10.1021/es062717d

  16. Liati, A., Pandurangi, S.S., Boulouchos, K., Schreiber, D., Dasilva, Y.A.R. (2015). Metal nanoparticles in diesel exhaust derived by in-cylinder melting of detached engine fragments. Atmos. Environ. 101, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.014

  17. Lim, M.C.H., Ayoko, G.A., Morawska, L., Ristovski, Z.D., Jayaratne, E.R. (2007). The effects of fuel characteristics and engine operating conditions on the elemental composition of emissions from heavy duty diesel buses. Fuel 86, 1831–1839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.11.025

  18. Lin, C.C., Chen, S.J., Huang, K.L., Hwang, W.I., Chang-Chien, G.P., Lin, W.Y. (2005). Characteristics of metals in nano/ultrafine/fine/coarse particles collected beside a heavily trafficked road. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 8113–8122. https://doi.org/10.1021/es048182a

  19. Lin, C.C., Chen, S.J., Huang, K.L., Lee, W.J., Lin, W.Y., Tsai, J.H., Chaung, H.C. (2008). PAHs, PAH-induced carcinogenic potency, and particle-extract-induced cytotoxicity of traffic-related nano/ultrafine particles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 4229–4235. https://doi.org/10.1021/es703107w

  20. Lin, Y.C., Li, Y.C., Amesho, K.T.T., Shangdiar, S., Chou, F.C., Cheng, P.C. (2020). Chemical characterization of PM2.5 emissions and atmospheric metallic element concentrations in PM2.5 emitted from mobile source gasoline-fueled vehicles. Sci. Total Environ. 739, 139942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139942

  21. Lippmann, M., Ito, K., Hwang, J.S., Maciejczyk, P., Chen, L.C. (2006). Cardiovascular effects of nickel in ambient air. Environ. Health Perspect. 114, 1662–1669. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9150

  22. Ljubas, D., Krpan, H., Matanović, I. (2010). Influence of engine oils dilution by fuels on their viscosity, flash point and fire point. Nafta 61, 73–79. https://hrcak.srce.hr/49121

  23. Maricq, M.M. (2007). Chemical characterization of particulate emissions from diesel engines: A review. J. Aerosol Sci. 38, 1079–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.08.001

  24. Møller, P., Folkmann, J.K., Bräuner, E., Forchhammer, L., Danielsen, P.H., Risom, L., Loft, S. (2008). Air pollution, oxidative damage to DNA, and carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett. 266, 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.030

  25. Ramana, M.V., Ramanathan, V., Feng, Y., Yoon, S.C., Kim, S.W., Carmichael, G.R., Schauer, J.J. (2010). Warming influenced by the ratio of black carbon to sulphate and the black-carbon source. Nat. Geosci. 3, 542–545. https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO918

  26. Ramanathan, V., Carmichael, G. (2008). Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nat. Geosci. 1, 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo156

  27. Raza, M., Chen, L., Leach, F., Ding, S. (2018). A review of particulate number (PN) emissions from gasoline direct injection (GDI) engines and their control techniques. Energies 11, 1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061417

  28. Sappok, A., Kamp, C., Wong, V. (2012). Sensitivity analysis of ash packing and distribution in diesel particulate filters to transient changes in exhaust conditions. SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 5, 733–750. https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-1093

  29. Schneider, J., Hock, N., Weimer, S., Borrmann, S., Kirchner, U., Vogt, R., Scheer, V. (2005). Nucleation particles in diesel exhaust: Composition inferred from in situ mass spectrometric analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 6153–6161. https://doi.org/10.1021/es049427m

  30. Sodeman, D.A., Toner, S.M., Prather, K.A. (2005). Determination of single particle mass spectral signatures from light-duty vehicle emissions. Environ. Sci Technol. 39, 4569–4580. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0489947

  31. Tsai, J.H., Chen, Y.R., Chen, S.J., Lin, S.L., Huang, K.L., Lin, C.C., Chiu, J.Y. (2020). Characteristics of emissions from a portable two-stroke gasoline engine. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 20, 630–642. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.12.0650

  32. Tsai, J.H., Yao, Y.C., Huang, P.H., Chiang, H.L. (2018). Fuel economy and volatile organic compound exhaust emission for motorcycles with various running mileages. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 18, 3056–3067. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.07.0264

  33. Wang, Y., Liu, H., Lee, C.F.F. (2016). Particulate matter emission characteristics of diesel engines with biodiesel or biodiesel blending: A review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 64, 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.062

  34. Yang, H.H., Dhital, N.B., Wang, L.C., Hsieh, Y.S., Lee, K.T., Hsu, Y.T., Huang, S.C. (2019). Chemical characterization of fine particulate matter in gasoline and diesel vehicle exhaust. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 19, 1439–1449. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.04.0191

  35. Yu, F., Li, C., Liu, J., Liao, S., Zhu, M., Xie, Y., Sha, Q., Huang, Z., Zheng, J. (2020). Characterization of particulate smoke and the potential chemical fingerprint of non-road construction equipment exhaust emission in China. Sci. Total Environ. 723, 137967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137967


Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal, promotes submissions of high-quality research, and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world.