Xuan Yang1, Yishu Qiao1, Xiangyang Han1, Bingcheng Liu This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1,2, Kinjal J. Shah3, Pen-Chi Chiang4

1 Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China
Institute of Climate & Energy Sustainable Development, Qingdao 266061, China
3 College of Urban Construction, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
Carbon Cycle Research Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10672, Taiwan


Received: July 24, 2020
Revised: September 14, 2020
Accepted: September 15, 2020

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.07.0436  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:

Yang, X., Qiao, Y., Yu, H., Han, X., Liu, B., Shah, K.J. and Chiang, P.C. (2020). Sensitivity Analysis of Carbonate Looping Process Using Twin Fluidized Bed Model. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.07.0436


HIGHLIGHTS

  • A carbonate looping using twin fluidized bed was established.
  • A 350MWth coal-fired power plant was used as an upstream plant.
  • High CO2 capture rate (above 90%) was achieved.
  • The optimization parameters were obtained through sensitivity analysis.

 

 

ABSTRACT


CO2 as the major greenhouse gas plays an important role in environmental problems. Therefore, it is reasonable to find an effective technology for mitigating large CO2 emissions. Carbonating looping is an efficient post-combustion CO2 capture technology using limestone sorbent, which is more energy-saving than traditional technologies. In our research, a carbonate looping process model had been developed using ASPEN PLUS software. In detail, the sensitivity analysis of main parameters were adopted. The simulation results indicated that the CO2 capture rate of the whole process can achieve above 90% and CO2 concentration in the decarbonated flue gas was less than 4% under the carbonation temperature, the calcination temperature, the F0/FCO2 and the gas-solid separation were 630°C, 900°C, 0.04, 1.0, separately. This work gave an potential example for the retrofitting current coal-fired power plant combined with carbonate looping process.


Keywords: CO2 capture; Carbonate looping; Process model; Twin Fluidized bed; Sensitivity analysis.



REFERENCES


  1. Abad, A., Adánez, J., García-Labiano, F., de Diego, L. F., Gayán, P. and Celaya, J. (2007). Mapping of the range of operational conditions for Cu-, Fe-, and Ni-based oxygen carriers in chemical-looping combustion. Chem. Eng. Sci. 62: 533–549. [Publisher Site]

  2. Alam, S., Kumar, J.P., Rani, K.Y. and Sumana, C. (2020). Comparative assessment of performances of different oxygen carriers in a chemical looping combustion coupled intensifified reforming process through simulation study. J. Cleaner Prod. 262: 121–146. [Publisher Site]

  3. Alonso, M., Rodriguez, N., Gonzalez, B., Grasa, G., Murillo, R. and Abanades, J.C. (2010). Carbon dioxide capture from combustion flue gases with a calcium oxide chemical loop. Experimental results and process development. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 4: 167–173. [Publisher Site]

  4. Alonso, M., Arias, B., Fernandez, J.R., Bughin, O. and Abanades, C. (2018). Measuring attrition properties of calcium looping materials in a 30kW pilot plant. Powder Technol. 336: 273–281. [Publisher Site]

  5. Atsonios, K., Zeneli, M., Nikolopoulos, N., Grammelis, P. and Kakaras, E. (2015). Calcium looping process simulation based on an advanced thermodynamic model combined with CFD analysis. Fuel 153: 370–381. [Publisher Site]

  6. Charitos, A., Hawthorne, C., Bidwe, A.R., Sivalingam, S., Schuster, A., Spliethoff, H. and Scheffknecht, G. (2010). Parametric investigation of the calcium looping process for CO2 capture in a 10 kWth dual fluidized bed. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 4: 776–784. [Publisher Site]

  7. Cheng, L., Ji, D., He, J., Li, L., Du, L., Cui, Y., Zhang, H., Zhou, L., Li, Z., Zhou, Y., Miao, S., Gong, Z. and Wang, Y. (2019). Characteristics of air pollutants and greenhouse gases at a regional background station in southwestern China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 19: 1007–1023. [Publisher Site]

  8. Diego, M.E., Arias, B. and Abanades, J.C. (2017). Evolution of the CO2 carrying capacity of CaO particles in a large calcium looping pilot plant. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 62: 69–75. [Publisher Site]

  9. Hilz, J., Haaf, M., Helbig, M., Lindqvist, N., Strohle, J. and Epple, B. (2019). Scale-up of the carbonate looping process to a 20 MWth pilot plant based on long-term pilot tests. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 88: 332–341. [Publisher Site]

  10. Hoeftberger, D. and Karl, J. (2016). The indirectly heated carbonate looping process for CO2 capture - A concept with heat pipe heat exchanger. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 138: 042211. [Publisher Site]

  11. Huang, Y., Su, W., Wang, R. and Zhao, T. (2019). Removal of typical industrial gaseous pollutants: From carbon, zeolite, and metal-organic frameworks to molecularly imprinted adsorbents. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 19: 2130–2150. [Publisher Site]

  12. Jia, L., Hughes, R., Lu, D., Anthony, E. and Lau, I. (2007). Attrition of calcining limestones in circulating fluidized-bed systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46: 5199–5209. [Publisher Site]

  13. Jiang, Q., Wang, F. and Sun, Y. (2019). Analysis of chemical composition, source and processing characteristics of submicron aerosol during the summer in Beijing, China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 19: 1450–1462. [Publisher Site]

  14. Lasheras, A., Strohle, J., Galloy, A. and Epple, B. (2011). Carbonate looping process simulation using 1D fludized bed model for the carbonator. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 5: 686–693. [Publisher Site]

  15. Leion, H., Mattisson, T. and Lyngfelt, A. (2008). Solid fuels in chemical-looping combustion. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 2: 180–193. [Publisher Site]

  16. Li, L., Zhao, N., Wei, W. and Sun, Y.H. (2013). A review of research progress on CO2 capture, storage, and utilization in Chinese Academy of Sciences. Fuel 108: 112–130. [Publisher Site]

  17. Liang, Z. (Henry), Rongwong, W., Liu, H., Fu, K., Gao, H., Cao, F., Zhang, R., Sema, T., Henni, A., Sumon, K., Nath, D., Gelowitz, D., Srisang, W., Saiwan, C., Benamor, A., Al-Marri, M., Shi, H., Supap, T., Chan, C., … Tontiwachwuthikul, P. (2015). Recent progress and new development in post-combustion carbon-capture technology with amine based solvents. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 40: 26–54. [Publisher Site]

  18. Liu, B., Yang, X., Wang, T., Zhang, M. and Chiang, P.C. (2019a). CO2 separation by using a three-stage membrane process. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 19: 2917–2928. [Publisher Site]

  19. Liu, B., Zhang, M., Yang, X. and Ting, W. (2019b). Simulation and energy analysis of CO2 capture from CO2-EOR extraction gas using cryogenic fractionation. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 103: 67–74. [Publisher Site]

  20. Liu, B., Yang, X., Chiang, P.C. and Ting, W. (2020). Energy consumption analysis of cryogenic-membrane hybrid process for CO2 capture from CO2-EOR extraction gas. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 20: 820–832. [Publisher Site]

  21. Martinez, I., Arias, B., Grasa, G.S. and Abanades, J.C. (2018). CO2 capture in existing power plants using second generation Ca-looping systems firing biomass in the calciner. J. Cleaner Prod. 187: 638–649. [Publisher Site]

  22. Oh, S.Y., Binns, M., Cho, H. and Kim, J.K. (2016). Energy minimization of MEA-based CO2 capture process. Appl. Energy 169: 353–362. [Publisher Site]

  23. Pan, S.Y., Shah, K.J., Chen, Y.H., Wang, M.H. and Chiang, P.C. (2017). Deployment of accelerated carbonation using alkaline solid wastes for carbon mineralization and utilization toward a circular economy. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 5: 6429–6437. [Publisher Site]

  24. Porter, R.T.J., Fairweather, M., Pourkashanian, M. and Woolley, R.M. (2015). The range and level of impurities in CO2 streams from different carbon capture sources. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 36: 161–174. [Publisher Site]

  25. Reitz, M., Junk, M., Strohle, J. and Epple, B. (2016). Design and operation of a 300kWth indirectly heated carbonate looping pilot plant. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 54: 272–281. [Publisher Site]

  26. Romano, M. (2009). Coal-fired power plant with calcium oxide carbonation for postcombustion CO2 capture. Energy Procedia 1: 1099–1106. [Publisher Site]

  27. Safarian, S., Unnthorsson, R. and Richter, C. (2020). Effect of coronavirus disease 2019 on CO2 emission in the world. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 20: 1197–1203. [Publisher Site]

  28. Safdarnejad, S.M., Hedengren, J.D. and Baxter, L.L. (2016). Dynamic optimization of a hybrid system of energy-storing cryogenic carbon capture and a baseline power generation unit. Appl. Energy 172: 66–79. [Publisher Site]

  29. Shah, K.J. and Imae, T. (2016). Analytical investigation of specific adsorption kinetics of CO2 gas on dendrimer loaded in organoclays. Chem. Eng. J. 283: 1366–1373. [Publisher Site]

  30. Shimizu, T., Hirama, T., Hosoda, H., Kitano, K., Inagaki, M. and Tejima, K. (1999). A twin fluid-bed reactor for removal of CO2 from combustion processes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 77: 62–68. [Publisher Site]

  31. Solares, R.A.A. and Wood, J. (2020). A parametric study of process design and cycle configurations for pre-combustion PSA applied to NGCC power plants. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 160: 141–153. [Publisher Site]

  32. Strohle, J., Junk, M., Kremer, J., Galloy, A. and Epple, B. (2014). Carbonate looping experiments in a 1MWth pilot and model validation. Fuel 127: 13–22. [Publisher Site]

  33. Symonds, R.T., Lu, D.Y., Hughes, R.W., Anthony, E.J. and Macchi, A. (2009). CO2 Capture from simulated syngas via cyclic carbonation/calcination for a naturally occurring limestone: Pilot-plant testing. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48: 8431–8440. [Publisher Site]

  34. Symonds, R.T., Lu, D.Y., Macchi, A., Hughes, R.W. and Anthony, E.J. (2017). The effect of HCl and steam om cyclic CO2 capture performance in calcium looping systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2017. [Publisher Site]

  35. Tritippayanon, R., Piemjaiswang, R., Piumsomboon, P. and Chalermsinsuwan, B. (2019) Computational fluid dynamics of sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide capture using mixed feeding of calcium carbonate/calcium oxide in an industrial scale circulating fluidized bed boiler. Appl. Energy 250: 493–502. [Publisher Site]

  36. Yang, X., Li, Z., Liu, Y., Xing, Y., Wei, J., Yang, B., Zhang, C., Yang, R.T. and Tsai, C.J. (2019). Research progress of gaseous polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons purification by adsorption. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 19: 911–924. [Publisher Site]

  37. Yuan, L.C., Pfotenhauer, J.M. and Qiu, L.M. (2014). A preliminary investigation of cryogenic CO2 capture utilizing a reverse Brayton Cycle. AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1573, No. 1, pp. 1107–1114). American Institute of Physics.

  38. Zhang, L.Y., Shen, Q., Wang, M.Q., Sun, N., Wei, W., Lei, Y. and Wang, Y.J. (2019). Driving factors and predictions of CO2 emission in China's coal chemical industry. J. Cleaner Prod. 210: 1131–1140. [Publisher Site]

  39. Zhang, W., Li, Y., Duan, L., Ma, X., Wang, Z. and Liu, C. (2016). Attrition behavior of calcium-based waste during CO2 capture cycles using calcium looping in a fluidized bed reactor. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 109: 806–815. [Publisher Site]

  40. Zhao, X., Ji, G., Liu, W., He, X., Anthony, E.J. and Zhao, M. (2018). Mesoporous MgO promoted with NaNO3/NaNO2 for rapid and high-capacity CO2 capture at moderate temperatures. Chem. Eng. J. 332: 216–226. [Publisher Site]


Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.