Special Issue on COVID-19 Aerosol Drivers, Impacts and Mitigation (VIII)

Chenxing Pei1#, Qisheng Ou1#, Seong Chan Kim1, Sheng-Chieh Chen2, David Y.H. Pui This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1,3

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
2 Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA
3 School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China

# These authors contributed equally to this work.


Received: July 20, 2020
Revised: August 28, 2020
Accepted: August 28, 2020

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.07.0423  

  • Download: PDF

Cite this article:

Pei, C., Ou, Q., Kim, S.C., Chen, S.C. and Pui, D.Y.H. (2020). Alternative Face Masks Made of Common Materials for General Public: Fractional Filtration Efficiency and Breathability Perspective. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 20: 2581–2591. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.07.0423


  • Common materials were tested to screen better DIY mask candidates.
  • Filter media with electrostatic charges is recommended due to high figure of merit.
  • multiple-layer household fabrics and sterilization wraps are acceptable materials.
  • The outcome of this study can also suggest protections during air pollution episodes.


As COVID-19 pandemic has caused more than 24 million confirmed cases globally (as of August 28th, 2020), it is critical to slow down the spreading of SARS-CoV-2 to protect the healthcare system from overload. Wearing a respirator or a mask has been proven as an effective method to protect both the wearer and others, but commercially available respirators and masks should be reserved for healthcare workers under a currently desperate shortage. The use of alternative materials becomes an option for the general public to make the do-it-yourself (DIY) masks, with their efficacy seldom reported. In this study, we tested commercial respirators and masks, furnace filters, vacuum cleaner filters, and common household materials. We evaluated the materials’ fractional filtration efficiency and breathing resistance, which are primary factors affecting respiratory protection. To compare the efficiency-resistance tradeoff, the figure of merit of each tested common material was also calculated. Filter media with electrostatic charges (electret) is recommended due to its high efficiency with low flow resistance; multiple-layer household fabrics and sterilization wraps are acceptable materials; a coffee filter is inadvisable due to its low efficiency. The outcome of this study can not only offer guidance for the general public under the current pandemic but also suggest the appropriate alternative respiratory protection materials under heavy air pollution episodes.

Keywords: Respirator; Mask; Common material; Fractional efficiency; Breathability.


  1. 3M (2020, March 23). Coronavirus and important things to know about airborne particles. [Website Link]

  2. Anfinrud, P., Stadnytskyi, V., Bax, C.E. and Bax, A. (2020). Visualizing speech-generated oral fluid droplets with laser light scattering. N. Engl. J. Med. 382: 2061–2063.

  3. ASHRAE (2017). ASHRAE Standard 52.2-2017 - Method of testing general ventilation air-cleaning devices for removal efficiency by particle size, Atlanta, GA.

  4. ASTM International (2017). F2299/F2299M - 03(2017), Standard test method for determining the initial efficiency of materials used in medical face masks to penetration by particulates using latex spheres. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. [Publisher Site]

  5. ASTM International (2019). ASTM F2101 - 19, Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (BFE) of Medical Face Mask Materials, Using a Biological Aerosol of Staphylococcus aureus. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. [Publisher Site]

  6. Bae, S., Kim, M.C., Kim, J.Y., Cha, H.H., Lim, J.S., Jung, J., Kim, M.J., Oh, D.K., Lee, M.K., Choi, S.H., Sung, M., Hong, S.B., Chung, J.W. and Kim, S.H. (2020). Effectiveness of surgical and cotton masks in blocking SARS–CoV-2: A controlled comparison in 4 patients. Ann. Intern. Med. 173: W22–W23. [Publisher Site]

  7. Bourouiba, L., Dehandschoewercker, E. and Bush, J.W.M. (2014). Violent expiratory events: On coughing and sneezing. J. Fluid Mech. 745: 537–563. [Publisher Site]

  8. Bourouiba, L. (2020). Turbulent gas clouds and respiratory pathogen emissions: Potential implications for reducing transmission of COVID-19. JAMA 323: 1837–1838. [Publisher Site]

  9. Brown, R.C. (1993). Air filtration: An integrated approach to the theory and applications of fibrous filters. Elsevier Science.

  10. CDC (2020a). Clinical questions about COVID-19: Questions and answers. [Website Link]

  11. CDC (2020b). How to make masks. [Website Link]

  12. CDC (2020c). Use of masks to help slow the spread of COVID-19. [Website Link]

  13. Cooper, D.W., Hinds, W.C., Price, J.M., Weker, R. and Yee, H.S. (1983). Common materials for emergency respiratory protection: Leakage tests with a manikin. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 44: 720–726. [Publisher Site]

  14. Davies, A., Thompson, K.A., Giri, K., Kafatos, G., Walker, J. and Bennett, A. (2013). Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: Would they protect in an influenza pandemic? Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 7: 413–418. [Publisher Site]

  15. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2003). Surgical masks—premarket notification [510 (k)] submissions. Guidance for Industry and FDA. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. [Website Link]

  16. Gralton, J., Tovey, E., McLaws, M.L. and Rawlinson, W.D. (2011). The role of particle size in aerosolised pathogen transmission: A review. J. Infect. 62: 1–13. [Publisher Site]

  17. Greenhalgh, T., Schmid, M.B., Czypionka, T., Bassler, D. and Gruer, L. (2020). Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis. BMJ 369: m1435. [Publisher Site]

  18. Halyard (2020). Can I use halyard sterilization wrap for DIY masks? [Website Link]

  19. Howard, J., Huang, A., Li, Z., Tufekci, Z., Zdimal, V., van der Westhuizen, H.M., von Delft, A., Price, A., Fridman, L., Tang, L.H., Tang, V., Watson, G.L., Bax, C.E., Shaikh, R., Questier, F., Hernandez, D., Chu, L.F., Ramirez, C.M. and Rimoin, A.W. (2020). Face masks against COVID-19: An evidence review. Preprints 2020: 2020040203. [Publisher Site]

  20. Johnson, D.F., Druce, J.D., Birch, C. and Grayson, M.L. (2009). A quantitative assessment of the efficacy of surgical and N95 masks to filter influenza virus in patients with acute influenza infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49: 275–277. [Publisher Site]

  21. Konda, A., Prakash, A., Moss, G.A., Schmoldt, M., Grant, G.D. and Guha, S. (2020). Aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks. ACS Nano 14: 6339–6347. [Publisher Site]

  22. Lai, A.C., Poon, C.K. and Cheung, A.C. (2012). Effectiveness of facemasks to reduce exposure hazards for airborne infections among general populations. J. R. Soc. Interface 9: 938–948. [Publisher Site]

  23. Leung, C.C., Lam, T.H. and Cheng, K.K. (2020a). Mass masking in the COVID-19 epidemic: People need guidance. Lancet 395: 945. [Publisher Site]

  24. Leung, N.H.L., Chu, D.K.W., Shiu, E.Y.C., Chan, K.H., McDevitt, J.J., Hau, B.J.P., Yen, H.L., Li, Y., Ip, D.K.M., Peiris, J.S.M., Seto, W.H., Leung, G.M., Milton, D.K. and Cowling, B.J. (2020b). Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat. Med. 26: 676–680. [Publisher Site]

  25. Liao, L., Xiao, W., Zhao, M., Yu, X., Wang, H., Wang, Q., Chu, S. and Cui, Y. (2020). Can N95 respirators be reused after disinfection? And for how many times? ACS Nano 14: 6348–6356. [Publisher Site]

  26. Littler Mendelson (2020). Facing your face mask duties – A List of statewide orders. [Website Link]

  27. MacIntyre, C.R., Seale, H., Dung, T.C., Hien, N.T., Nga, P.T., Chughtai, A.A., Rahman, B., Dwyer, D.E. and Wang, Q. (2015). A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open 5: e006577. [Publisher Site]

  28. Morawska, L. (2006). Droplet fate in indoor environments, or can we prevent the spread of infection? Indoor Air 16: 335–347. [Publisher Site]

  29. Morawska, L., Johnson, G.R., Ristovski, Z.D., Hargreaves, M., Mengersen, K., Corbett, S., Chao, C.Y.H., Li, Y. and Katoshevski, D. (2009). Size distribution and sites of origin of droplets expelled from the human respiratory tract during expiratory activities. J. Aerosol Sci. 40: 256–269. [Publisher Site]

  30. Morawska, L. and Cao, J. (2020). Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the reality. Environ. Int. 139: 105730. [Publisher Site]

  31. Morawska, L. and Milton, D.K. (2020). It is time to address airborne transmission of covid-19. Clin. Infect. Dis. [Publisher Site]

  32. Mueller, A.V., Eden, M.J., Oakes, J.J., Bellini, C. and Fernandez, L.A. (2020). Quantitative method for comparative assessment of particle filtration efficiency of fabric masks as alternatives to standard surgical masks for PPE. medRxiv 2020.04.17.20069567. [Publisher Site]

  33. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) (2020). Rapid expert consultation on the effectiveness of fabric masks for the COVID-19 Pandemic (April 8, 2020). The National Academies Press.

  34. National Health Commission (2020). Guidelines for wearing masks for public. [Website Link]

  35. National Health Commission and National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2020). Diagnosis and treatment protocol for novel coronavirus pneumonia (Trial Version 7). Chin. Med. J. 133: 1087–1095. [Publisher Site]

  36. Office of the Federal Register (1995). Approval of respiratory protective devices. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 84, Title 42.

  37. Ou, Q., Maricq, M.M. and Pui, D.Y.H. (2017). Evaluation of metallic filter media for sub-micrometer soot particle removal at elevated temperature. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 51: 1303–1312. [Publisher Site]

  38. Ou, Q., Pei, C., Kim, S.C., Abell, E. and Pui, D.Y.H. (2020). Evaluation of decontamination methods for commercial and alternative respirator and mask materials – view from filtration aspect. J. Aerosol Sci. 150: 105609. [Publisher Site]

  39. Prather, K.A., Wang, C.C. and Schooley, R.T. (2020). Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Science 368: 1422–1424. [Publisher Site]

  40. Rengasamy, S., Eimer, B. and Shaffer, R.E. (2010). Simple respiratory protection—evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20–1000 nm size particles. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 54: 789–798. [Publisher Site]

  41. RIDGID (2020). Ridgid’s important notice. [Website Link]

  42. Scharfman, B.E., Techet, A.H., Bush, J.W.M. and Bourouiba, L. (2016). Visualization of sneeze ejecta: Steps of fluid fragmentation leading to respiratory droplets. Exp. Fluids 57: 24. [Publisher Site]

  43. Spurny, K.R. (1986). On the filtration of fibrous aerosols. Sci. Total Environ. 52: 189–199. [Publisher Site]

  44. van der Sande, M., Teunis, P. and Sabel, R. (2008). Professional and home-made face masks reduce exposure to respiratory infections among the general population. PLoS One 3: e2618. [Publisher Site]

  45. Wang, Q. and Yu, C. (2020). The role of masks and respirator protection against SARS-CoV-2. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 41: 746–747. [Publisher Site]

  46. World Health Organization (WHO) (2020a). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: When and how to use masks. [Website Link]

  47. World Health Organization (WHO) (2020b). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. [Website Link]

  48. Yang, C. (2012). Aerosol filtration application using fibrous media—An industrial perspective. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 20: 1–9. [Publisher Site]

  49. Zhao, M., Liao, L., Xiao, W., Yu, X., Wang, H., Wang, Q., Lin, Y.L., Kilinc-Balci, F.S., Price, A., Chu, L., Chu, M.C., Chu, S. and Cui, Y. (2020). Household materials selection for homemade cloth face coverings and their filtration efficiency enhancement with triboelectric charging. Nano Lett. 20: 5544–5552. [Publisher Site]

  50. Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., Zhao, X., Huang, B., Shi, W., Lu, R., Niu, P., Zhan, F., Ma, X., Wang, D., Xu, W., Wu, G., Gao, G.F., Tan, W. and China Novel Coronavirus Investigating Research Team (2020). A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 382: 727–733. [Publisher Site]

  51. Zuo, Z., Kuehn, T.H. and Pui, D.Y.H. (2013). Performance evaluation of filtering facepiece respirators using virus aerosols. Am. J. Infect. Control 41: 80–82. [Publisher Site]

Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 20 :2581 -2591 . https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.07.0423  

Don't forget to share this article 


Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal, promotes submissions of high-quality research, and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world.