Heming Bai1,2, Zhi Zheng3, Yuanpeng Zhang1,4, He Huang5, Li Wang  4,1,2

1 Research Center for Intelligent Information Technology, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
2 Nantong Research Institute for Advanced Communication Technologies, Nantong 226019, China
3 Department of Surveying Engineering, Heilongjiang Institute of Technology, Harbin 150050, China
4 Department of Medical Informatics, Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
5 School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China


Received: May 23, 2020
Revised: August 28, 2020
Accepted: October 9, 2020

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.05.0257  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:

Bai, H., Zheng, Z., Zhang, Y., Huang, H. and Wang, L. (2020). Comparison of Satellite-based PM2.5 Estimation from Aerosol Optical Depth and Top-of-atmosphere Reflectance. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.05.0257


HIGHLIGHTS

  • The diurnal cycle of PM2.5 was analyzed by using Himawari-8 satellite observations.
  • PM2.5 estimates from AOD-based and reflectance-based approaches differ noticeably.
  • Reflectance-based approach can provide the relatively robust PM2.5 estimates.
  • Almost all population lives in non-attainment areas in Yangtze River Delta, China.
 

ABSTRACT 


Aerosol optical depth (AOD) and top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance are two useful sources of satellite data for estimating surface PM2.5 concentrations. Comparison of PM2.5 estimates between these two approaches remains to be explored. In this study, satellite observations of TOA reflectance and AOD from the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) onboard the Himawari-8 geostationary satellite in 2016 over Yangtze River Delta (YRD) and meteorological data are used to estimate hourly PM2.5 based on four different machine learning algorithms (i.e., random forest, extreme gradient boosting, gradient boosting regression, and support vector regression). For both reflectance-based and AOD-based approaches, our cross validated results show that random forest algorithm achieves the best performance, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.75 and root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 18.71 μg m-3 for the former and R2 = 0.65 and RMSE = 15.69 μg m-3 for the later. Additionally, we find a large discrepancy in PM2.5 estimates between reflectance-based and AOD-based approaches in terms of annual mean and their spatial distribution, which is mainly due to the sampling difference, especially over northern YRD in winter. Overall, reflectance-based approach can provide robust PM2.5 estimates for both annual mean values and probability density function of hourly PM2.5. Our results further show that almost all population lives in non-attainment areas in YRD using annual mean PM2.5 from reflectance-based approach. This study suggests that reflectance-based approach is a valuable way for providing robust PM2.5 estimates and further for constraining health impact assessments.


Keywords: PM2.5; TOA reflectance; Satellite remote sensing; Machine learning.




Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.