Rumei Li1,2, Yulong Yan  1, Lin Peng1, Yinghui Li1, Zhuocheng Liu1, Zhanchun Fan3, Huanfeng Li3, Yang Xu1,2, Cheng Wang1,2, Dongmei Hu1, Zhiyong Li4

1 MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental System Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
2 School for Energy, Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
3 Shanxi Ecological Environment Monitoring Center, Taiyuan 030027, China
4 School of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 07100, China


 

Received: April 11, 2020
Revised: June 11, 2020
Accepted: June 16, 2020

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.04.0145  


Cite this article:

Li, R., Yan, Y., Peng, L., Li, Y., Liu, Z., Fan, Z., Li, H., Xu, Y., Wang, C., Hu, D., Li, Z. (2021). Segment-based Volatile Organic Compound Emission Characteristics from Different Types of Coking Plants in China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 21, 200145. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.04.0145


HIGHLIGHTS 

  • Typical VOCs source profiles of major coking plants in China were established.
  • Segments-based VOCs source profiles during coking processes was different.
  • VOCs emission factors of non-recovery coking process was 96 g Mg1 coke.
  • VOCs from oven leaks in mechanical coking plant had a higher reactivity.
  • Phasing out non-recovery coking plant would help reducing VOCs emission.
 

ABSTRACT


The source profiles, emission factors, and chemical reactivity of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) generated by two typical coking plants, one employing a non-recovery process and the other, a mechanical process, in Shanxi Province, a major coking hub in China, were determined for different segments of coke production during normal operations. The primary components in the stack flue gas were ethylene, 1-butene, benzene, acetylene, and 2,2-dimethylbutane for the non-recovery plant and styrene, benzene, and ethylene for the mechanical plant. The fugitive emissions were also monitored at the mechanical plant, and the most abundant species leaking from the oven were benzene, toluene, ethane, m-xylene, and ethylene, whereas those leaking from byproducts were benzene, propane, ethane, ethylene, n-pentane, n-butane, isobutene, 1-butene, toluene, and propylene. The stack flue gas at the non-recovery and mechanical coking plants exhibited VOC emission factors of 96 g Mg–1-coke and 0.4 g Mg–1-coke, respectively; thus, VOCs released by the former merit greater concern. Since the highest ozone formation potential (OFP) was observed for the stack flue gas at the non-recovery plant (80.26 mg m–3), followed by fugitive oven emissions at the mechanical plant (7.22 mg m–3), controlling these VOCs will significantly reduce their conversion into ozone. Overall, replacing non-recovery coking plants with mechanical coking plants will decrease VOC emissions and improve the ambient air quality in China.


Keywords: Volatile organic compounds, Source profiles, Emission factors, Coking plant, Coking segments



REFERENCES


  1. Carter, W.P.L. (2010). SAPRC atmospheric chemical mechanisms and VOC reactivity scales. [Website Link]

  2. Chang, C.C., Wang, J.L., Liu, S.C., Candice Lung, S.C. (2006). Assessment of vehicular and non-vehicular contributions to hydrocarbons using exclusive vehicular indicators. Atmos. Environ. 40, 6349–6361. [Publisher Site]

  3. China Coking Industry Association (CCIA) (2019). Forty years of development of coking industry reform and opening up in China. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 1, 100001. [Publisher Site]

  4. Dong, J., Li, F., Xie, K. (2012). Study on the source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) during coal pyrolysis by PY–GC–MS. J. Hazard. Mater. 243, 80–85. [Publisher Site]

  5. European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) (2016). EMEP/EEA Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.

  6. He, Q.S. (2006). Preliminary estimation of particulate matter and volatile organic compounds during coking process in China: Characteristics, emission factors and emission amounts. Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou. (in Chinese)

  7. He, Q., Yan, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, Y. (2015). Coke workers' exposure to volatile organic compounds in northern China: A case study in Shanxi Province. Environ. Monit. Assess. 187, 359. [Publisher Site]

  8. Jia, J., Huang, C., Chen C., Chen M., Wang H., Shao M., Dong Y., Dai P., Xie, S., Lu, J., Huang H. (2009). Emission characterization and ambient chemical reactivity of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from coking processes. Acta Sci. Circumst. 29, 905–912. (in Chinese)

  9. Li, C.Q. (2009). Characterization of air pollutants emitted from coking production. Southwest University, Chongqing. (in Chinese)

  10. Li, G., Wei, W., Shao, X., Nie, L., Wang, H., Yan, X., Zhang, R. (2018). A comprehensive classification method for VOC emission sources to tackle air pollution based on VOC species reactivity and emission amounts. J. Environ. Sci. 67, 78–88. [Publisher Site]

  11. Liu, X., Peng, L., Bai, H., Mu, L., Song, C. (2014). Occurrence and particle-size distributions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air of coking plant. Environ. Geochem. Health 36, 531–542. [Publisher Site]

  12. Massoud, R., Shihadeh, A.L., Roumié, M., Youness, M., Gerard, J., Saliba, N., Zaarour, R., Abboud, M., Farah, W., Saliba, N.A. (2011). Intraurban variability of PM10 and PM2.5 in an Eastern Mediterranean city. Atmos. Res. 101, 893–901. [Publisher Site]

  13. Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China (MIIT) (2019). Notice of the enterprise list complying with, altering and revoking the coking industry access notice names. Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China.

  14. Mu, L., Peng, L., Liu, X., Bai, H., Song, C., Wang, Y., Li, Z. (2012). Emission characteristics of heavy metals and their behavior during coking processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 6425–6430. [Publisher Site]

  15. Mu, L., Peng, L., Liu, X., Song, C., Bai, H., Zhang, J., Hu, D., He, Q., Li, F. (2014). Characteristics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their gas/particle partitioning from fugitive emissions in coke plants. Atmos. Environ. 83, 202–210. [Publisher Site]

  16. National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (NAEI) (2018). [Website Link]

  17. National Bureau of Statistics of China (2018). Statistical Yearbook of China 2018. National Bureau of Statistics of China, Beijing.

  18. Richter, H., Howard, J.B. (2000). Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their growth to soot-a review of chemical reaction pathways. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 26, 565–608. [Publisher Site]

  19. Shen, L., Xiang, P., Liang, S., Chen, W., Wang, M., Lu, S., Wang, Z. (2018). Sources profiles of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) measured in a typical industrial process in Wuhan, Central China. Atmosphere 9, 297. [Publisher Site]

  20. Shi, J., Deng, H., Bai, Z., Kong, S., Wang, X., Hao, J., Han, X., Ning, P. (2015). Emission and profile characteristic of volatile organic compounds emitted from coke production, iron smelt, heating station and power plant in Liaoning Province, China. Sci. Total Environ. 515–516, 101–108. [Publisher Site]

  21. Tsai, J.H., Lin, K.H., Chen, C.Y., Lai, N., Ma, S.Y., Chiang, H.L. (2008). Volatile organic compound constituents from an integrated iron and steel facility. J. Hazard. Mater. 157, 569–578. [Publisher Site]

  22. United Nations (2019). UN comtrade database. [Website Link]

  23. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2008). AP-42: Compilation of Air Emissions Factors, fifth Ed. United States Environmental Protection Agency, USA.

  24. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2016). SPECIATE, v. 4.5 Ed. United States Environmental Protection Agency, USA.

  25. Wang, B., Shao, M., Lu, S.H., Yuan, B., Zhao, Y., Wang, M., Zhang, S.Q., Wu, D. (2010). Variation of ambient non-methane hydrocarbons in Beijing city in summer 2008. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 5911–5923. [Publisher Site]

  26. Wang, H., Qiao, Y., Chen, C., Lu, J., Dai, H., Qiao, L., Lou, S., Huang, C., Li, L., Jing, S., Wu, J.P. (2014). Source profiles and chemical reactivity of volatile organic compounds from solvent use in Shanghai, China. Aerosol. Air. Qual. Res. 14, 301–310. [Publisher Site]

  27. Wu, R.,, Xie, S. (2017). Spatial Distribution of Ozone Formation in China Derived from Emissions of Speciated Volatile Organic Compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 2574–2583. [Publisher Site]

  28. Yan, Y., Peng, L., Cheng, N., Bai, H., Mu, L. (2015). Health risk assessment of toxic VOCs species for the coal fire well drillers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 22, 15132–15144. [Publisher Site]

  29. Yan, Y., Yang, C., Peng, L., Li, R., Bai, H. (2016). Emission characteristics of volatile organic compounds from coal-, coal gangue-, and biomass-fired power plants in China. Atmos. Environ. 143, 261–269. [Publisher Site]

  30. Yan, Y.L., Peng, L., Li, R.M., Li, Y.H., Li, L.J., Bai, H.L. (2017). Concentration, ozone formation potential and source analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in a thermal power station centralized area: A study in Shuozhou, China. Environ. Pollut. 223, 295–304. [Publisher Site]

  31. Yang, W., Zhang, Q., Wang, J., Zhou, C., Zhang, Y., Pan, Z. (2018). Emission characteristics and ozone formation potentials of VOCs from gasoline passenger cars at different driving modes. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 9, 804–813. [Publisher Site]

  32. Zhang, Q., Wu, L., Fang, X., Liu, M., Zhang, J., Shao, M., Lu, S., Mao, H. (2018). Emission factors of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) based on the detailed vehicle classification in a tunnel study. Sci. Total Environ. 624, 878–886. [Publisher Site]

  33. Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, Z., Lü. S., Huang, Z., Li, L. (2015). Sources of C2-C4 alkenes, the most important ozone nonmethane hydrocarbon precursors in the Pearl River Delta region. Sci. Total Environ. 502, 236–245. [Publisher Site]

  34. Zhong, Z., Sha, Q., Zheng, J., Yuan, Z., Gao, Z., Ou, J., Zheng, Z., Li, C., Huang, Z. (2017). Sector-based VOCs emission factors and source profiles for the surface coating industry in the Pearl River Delta region of China. Sci. Total Environ. 583, 19–28. [Publisher Site]

  35. Zhong, Z., Zheng, J., Zhu, M., Huang, Z., Zhang, Z., Jia, G., Wang, X., Bian, Y., Wang, Y., Li, N. (2018). Recent developments of anthropogenic air pollutant emission inventories in Guangdong province, China. Sci. Total Environ. 627, 1080–1092. [Publisher Site] 

Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 21 :200145 -. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.04.0145  


Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal, promotes submissions of high-quality research, and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world.