Yang Zhang1,2, Chenghang Zheng 1, Shaojun Liu1, Ruiyang Qu1, Yonglong Yang2, Haitao Zhao1, Zhengda Yang1,3, Yue Zhu2, Xiang Gao1


State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Huadian Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310030, China
College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China


Received: September 1, 2020
Revised: November 11, 2020
Accepted: November 16, 2020
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.09.0425  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:
Zhang, Y., Zheng, C., Liu, S., Qu, R., Yang, Y., Zhao, H., Yang, Z., Zhu, Y. and Gao, X. (2019). An Investigation of SO3 Control Routes in Ultra-low Emission Coal-fired Power Plants. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 19: 2908-2916. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.09.0425


Highlights

  • Compliance to various SO3 emission limits of 148 CFPPs were investigated and assessed.
  • SO3 removal of four ULE CFPPs were investigated through whole-process field tests.
  • SO3 removal efficiencies range between 27% and 94% adopting different control routes.
  • 14%, 44%, and 64% of 148 CFPPs met the 5, 10, and 20 mg m–3 SO3 limits, respectively.
  • SO3 control strategies were proposed from the perspective of whole-process control.
 

ABSTRACT


With the implementation of ultra-low emission systems in coal-fired power plants in China, the emission of sulfur trioxide (SO3) has become an important issue in pollution control. However, systematic research and evaluation of SO3 control routes based on the existing ultra-low emission systems are still lacking. We assigned 148 coal-fired power plants to four categories based on their ultra-low emission control routes and selected a representative power plant from each category for comprehensive field testing. The results indicated great variability in the synergistic SO3 removal capability of different air pollution control devices and routes, resulting in removal efficiencies that ranged from 27% to 94%. Control Route 1, which lacked both a low-low temperature electrostatic precipitator (LLTESP) and a wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP), exhibited the lowest removal efficiency. The two routes equipped with either an LLTESP or a WESP (Control Routes 2 and 3) reduced the SO3 concentration in the flue gas produced by medium-sulfur-coal combustion to below 10 mg m–3, whereas Control Route 4, which utilized both an LLTESP and a WESP, reduced the SO3 concentration to below 5 mg m–3. Furthermore, sampling the emissions of the 148 power plants revealed that only 14% of the power plants complied with the 5 mg m–3 standard for SO3, although 44% and 64% of them complied with the 10 mg m–3 and the 20 mg m–3 standard, respectively. Our study evaluated the control routes within the context of the whole process, which can guide subsequent research and engineering practices.


Keywords: Coal-fired power plants; Ultra-low emission; SO3 emission; Control route; Synergistic removal




Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal, promotes submissions of high-quality research, and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world.