Fani Drougka1, Eleni Liakakou 2, Arezina Sakka1, Dimitriοs Mitsos1, Nikolaos Zacharias1, Nikolaos Mihalopoulos2,3, Evangelos Gerasopoulos2

  • Department of History, Archaeology & Cultural Resources Management, University of the Peloponnese, 24100 Kalamata, Greece
  • Institute for Environmental Research and Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, 15236 Athens, Greece
  • Environmental Chemical Processes Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Crete, 71003 Crete, Greece

Received: July 24, 2019
Revised: November 9, 2019
Accepted: January 18, 2020
Download Citation: || 

Cite this article:

Drougka, F., Liakakou, E., Sakka, A., Mitsos, D., Zacharias, N., Mihalopoulos, N. and Gerasopoulos, E. (2020). Indoor Air Quality Assessment at the Library of the National Observatory of Athens, Greece. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 20: 889-903.


  • The library indoor air quality is driven by the ambient conditions.
  • Temperature above the limits was observed, contributing to the decay of the books.
  • The daily gradients of microclimatic conditions in the library exceed the limits.
  • Random air condition operation isn’t proposed due to sharp temperature fluctuations.
  • Indoor air pollutants follow the ambient variability.


Controlling environmental factors, such as microclimatic conditions (temperature and relative humidity) and the levels of indoor pollutants within a museum, crucially affects the hosted exhibits and artworks. To evaluate the air quality of the library hosted by the Museum of Geoastrophysics of the National Observatory of Athens, a monitoring campaign was performed during the summer-time period (August 2016). The findings were compared against scientifically accepted standards and recommended conditions for repositories and paperwork exhibition areas. The temperature and the relative humidity proved to be the most crucial threat to the book collection, with the measured levels of temperature during the campaign being out of the recommended limit values. Both parameters presented also diurnal fluctuations which are not recommended. Synergistically, these inappropriate and uncontrolled conditions contribute to book deterioration on a long-term basis, leading to color and mechanical damage of the fibers and mold development. Furthermore, the library exhibited insufficient protection against pollutants. Despite the moderate infiltration, pollutants such as SO2, NO2 and O3 occurred in higher levels than the acceptable ones, which can also lead to embrittlement and discoloration of the paper and weakening or powdered surface to the leather covers of the books.



Keywords: Microclimatic conditions; Air pollution; Indoor air quality; Books; Organic materials.


It is well known that human activity has contributed to progressive deterioration of environmental conditions. Excessive air pollution in many cities especially those linked with aerosols (e.g., black carbon), acidic compounds (e.g., sulfur dioxide [SO2], nitrogen oxides [NOx], nitric acid [HNO3]) and oxidants (e.g., ozone [O3]) affected historic and modern materials and significant damages have been observed in historical and cultural structures and monuments. Climate change accelerates the degradation due to increased temperature (T) or other extreme events such as flooding. The outdoor atmospheric conditions can also affect the indoor ones and consequently impact on degradation of collections exposed in museums. Indeed, indoor air quality (IAQ) at museums and historical buildings is considered in general as major issue of concern for cultural heritage preservation (Ankersmit and Stappers, 2017). The exposure of artworks and materials to inappropriate temperature and relative humidity (RH) levels, as well as to gaseous and particulate pollutants emitted from either indoor or outdoor sources contributes to their decay. Under low air pollution conditions, direct effects on materials are rather limited, while in the case of long-term exposure to a heavily polluted environment, more serious effects, such as surface alteration, color change or even weakening of the material may occur (Brown et al., 2002; Andreopoulou-Magkou and Mariolopoulos, 2005; Zorpas and Skouroupatis, 2016). Simultaneously, the impact of the touristic activities on indoor cultural heritage areas should not be neglected (Worobiec et al., 2008). The indoor-outdoor interactions in general impact on the air quality of the storage or exposition areas. In this context, monitoring and controlling the indoor microclimatic conditions and the level of pollutants is of major significance and is priority for the conservation and preservation strategies implemented during exhibitions or materials storage.

Temperature and relative humidity are the most crucial risk factors for libraries and archival collections as they are potential catalysts of aging processes and their increase to extremely high levels favors the growth of insects (Adcock, 1998; Henderson, 2013), especially in leather (Vujčić et al., 2017). An increase in T by 10°C, or even by 5°C for unstable materials, could accelerate the chemical decay reactions’ rate even by a factor of 2 (Henderson, 2013). In general terms discoloration, fading and blackening could occur due to high temperatures. Hydroscopic archival collections (organic materials such as paper, leather and parchment) can readily absorb moisture from the environment resulting in the expansion of the material. Furthermore, according to Sterflinger (2010), high RH levels (above 55%) favor the development of mold and additional biological damages by microorganisms. In contrast, when the levels of relative humidity decrease, organic materials lose moisture content and tend to shrink. The previously described expansion and contraction of hydroscopic materials due to fluctuations of temperature and relative humidity can also lead to mechanical damage of the objects.

The presence of air pollutants in exhibition areas or storage rooms and under uncontrolled micro-environmental conditions could further determine the fate of book collections, mainly due to acidic hydrolysis processes (Daniel et al., 1990; Daniels, 1996; De Feber et al., 1998; Pavlogeorgatos, 2003; Tétreault, 2003). Paper and leather are among the materials seriously affected due to their sensitivity to acidic compounds. By considering the endogenous decay factors of vulnerable materials, such as the cellulose macromolecular or production properties of the paper (Dirksen, 1997; Adcock, 1998; Andreopoulou-Magkou and Mariolopoulos, 2005; Area and Cheradame, 2011), the long-term exposure to risk conditions are of great importance for such artworks or exhibits. Blades et al. (2000) mention that SO2 can cause embrittlement and discoloration of the paper and a weakening or powdered surface of the leather covers of books known as “red rot” when in combination with a presence of high RH and oxygen levels (Dirksen, 1997; Andreopoulou-Magkou and Mariolopoulos, 2005; Kite and Thomson, 2006). Specifically, SO2 can be absorbed onto cellulosic materials, such as paper, where it catalytically hydrolyzes to H2SO4·H2SO3 and H2SO4 (ASHRAE, 2015). Moreover, SO2 could react with leather, breaking down its molecular structure and weakening the material. As a result, it contributes to producing a powdery surface, which is easily abraded. Ozone, as a strong oxidant, causes fading of dyes and pigments and induces attack on organic materials (Ryhl-Svendsen, 2006). NOx and O3 in humid environments enhance the SO2 uptake (Johansson and Lennholm, 2000; Johansson et al., 2000), catalyzing thus the hydrolysis reactions. Additionally, acidic or alkaline particulate matter (PM) favors the discoloration processes through deposition (Grau-Bové et al., 2016).

The current study, undertaken during August 2016, focuses on the IAQ at the library of the Museum of Geoastrophysics ( of the National Observatory of Athens (NOA). The museum is situated close to the center of Athens; therefore, the area is influenced by typical urban pollutants. Apart from local urban emissions (e.g., traffic), the Attica Basin is subjected to long-range transport and accepts burdens of contaminants of different origin (e.g., Gerasopoulos et al., 2009; Paraskevopoulou et al., 2015; Athanasopoulou et al., 2017; Fourtziou et al., 2017; Gratsea et al., 2017). Furthermore, the occurrence of heat waves (Founda and Giannakopoulos, 2009; Founda, 2011) should be taken into consideration, due to their synergy with indoor heating/cooling practices and interaction with emission sources and pollutants’ fate in the atmosphere as well. Despite the possible effects of the ambient conditions on the indoor environment, neither measurements nor installation of permanent monitoring equipment had been considered up to now for the library.

Our work aims to monitor and evaluate, for the first time, the temperature, relative humidity and air pollutant levels in the library room, to enable understanding of indoor-outdoor interactions with respect to natural and artificial ventilation of the building, and finally, to assist the museum authorities in undertaking tailored measures for the preservation of the exhibits. Also, in an effort to assess the risk related to the impact of IAQ on the library’s book collection, we compared our findings with already published reference or limit values and other available tools for evaluation of the micro-environmental conditions impact on cultural heritage (CH) artifacts.


Description of the Museum Location and the Library

The Attica Basin, which includes Athens, is the most urbanized area in Greece, with 35% of the population of the country residing in the area using 52% of the private vehicles in the country (Hellenic Statistical Authority, 2014, favoring the accumulation of pollutants, either local or transported. The Museum of Geoastrophysics of NOA is situated in the historical center of the city of Athens at the top of the Hill of the Nymphs, in close vicinity to the Hill of the Acropolis (Fig. 1) and a relatively short distance (0.5–2 km) from the traffic-congested streets of the commercial center of Athens. The museum building is more than 170 years old, made of stone and hosts the library on the ground floor, where rare books, journals and other important manuscripts, even from the 16th century, are kept. The library is isolated from the rest of the museum and 1–3 staff members, including maintenance personnel, work in the room occasionally, but not simultaneously. There are no materials covering the floor of the room, the top portion of the walls that are close to the ceiling is decorated with paintings and on the roof there is a metallic remnant of an old opening mechanism used for sky observations. Closed windows, no lighting and occasionally operated air-conditioning system (for cooling or heating during meetings or guided tours) are the regular maintenance conditions. The windows are rarely opened for short periods, during working hours, to provide ventilation. 

Fig. 1. The location and internal aspect of the NOA library in Athens, Greece.Fig. 1. The location and internal aspect of the NOA library in Athens, Greece.

The building has been renovated since its inception in 1842 up to 2008, when it was converted into a museum, without interventions in the construction materials (stones). Despite the building renovation (e.g., roof restoration in 2008 and new shutters and wall painting in 2014), the books are kept under uncontrolled thermo-hydrometric conditions, without heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) system. Dust is deposited on the exposed books, whereas fragility, discoloration, red rot in the leather cover pages, tide lines on the pages suggesting water migration, foxing and mold are further observed on some of them. The aforementioned degradation status makes thus necessary the investigation of the decay environmental factors to minimize the material destruction. Books are usually composed of various organic materials of plant and animal origin, resulting in a complex matrix that should optimally be preserved by taking into account the individual requirements of each component. Nevertheless, the book collection of the library can be considered uniform and the risk assessment is focused on paper (pages) and leather (covers), which are the main exposed materials. Other materials found in the library, such as wooden furniture (bookcases, desks, window frames and shutters) and the roof (paint and metal from a ceiling-opening mechanism) are not a part of this study with respect to their preservation, and thus possible implications on them will not be further investigated.

Description of the Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Plan and Measurements

The monitoring was conducted from 4 to 31 August 2016 (26 days) and the period was suitable for the evaluation in terms of atmospheric conditions. During August the regionally originated components (Theodosi et al., 2018; Stavroulas et al., 2019) dominate as a consequence of the summer atmospheric circulation which is quite stable with N/NE air masses accounting for 80% of the conditions. Moreover, due to the intensive photochemistry in summer and in absence of precipitation, the concentrations of the secondary pollutants (HNO3, O3, aerosols, etc.) could influence the quality of library collections in case of infiltration. They reach their maximum levels and consequently the impact is expected to be enhanced, considering also the high temperatures that could accelerate the decay processes.

For most of the period, the indoor equipment was operated without ventilation or cooling in order to study the targeted parameters’ variability under regular conditions encountered in the library as presented above (henceforth referred to as “background period”). On the 11th, 16th and 18th of August (2016), the air conditioner was operated for a period of 12 hours (8:00 a.m.–8:00 p.m.) in order to investigate the system performance and the variations under cooling conditions (henceforth referred to as “air-conditioned period”). On the 22nd, 24th and 26th of August (2016), ventilation took place by opening the windows from 9:00 a.m.–10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m.–2:00 p.m. (henceforth referred to as “natural ventilation period”). Each of the aforementioned sub-periods is accordingly identified in Tables S1 and S2 as BG, AC and V respectively. Despite the fact that during the measurements period the library was isolated for the purposes of our study, the selection of the test time frames was based on the working hours of the library personnel and the usual presence of visitors in the greater area of the observatory, when routine operation and organized daily tours could increase the possibility to open the windows or operate the cooling device. Apart from examining the library room as a whole, a glass-covered showcase table was selected for temperature and relative humidity control monitoring as it contains the most vulnerable publications (from the 16th century).

A Rotronic MP101A-T7-W4W thermo-hygrometer, adjusted to an automated data-logger system, and a Tiny Tag TGP-4500 logger, were operated for the monitoring of relative humidity and temperature in the library and the showcase, respectively, collecting data at 5-minute intervals. The precision of the thermo-hygrometer was ±1% RH and ±0.3°C, while for the showcase logger the respective characteristics are ±3% RH and ±0.4°C at 20–40°C. Horiba Analyzers (360 Series) were used to monitor carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide and ozone (CO, NOx = NO + NO2, SO2 and O3, respectively) at 30-minute resolution. The detection limits of the analyzers are 50 ppb for CO and 0.50 ppb for the rest of equipment as provided by the manufacturer. Eight indoor particulate matter samples of less than 10-µm diameter (PM10) were collected on quartz filters by means of a Partisol 2000 FRM sampler with a detection limit of 1.1 µg m–3. The filters were pre- and post-weighed in the weighing room of the Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratory of NOA, with a 6-digit Mettler Toledo MX-5 balance (of 1-µg precision) operating under controlled conditions of temperature and humidity (20 ± 3°C and 40 ± 5% RH), for the determination of their mass concentration (Paraskevopoulou et al., 2014). The filters were afterwards analyzed by ion chromatography (ionic composition determination) and by a thermal optical transmission technique for organic and elemental carbon content (OC and EC respectively) at the Atmospheric Chemical Processes Laboratory of the Chemistry Department of the University of Crete (Novakov et al., 2005; Cavalli et al., 2010; Bougiatioti et al., 2013; Paraskevopoulou et al., 2014). The detection limit of the analysis was 0.26 and 0.05 µg C cm2 for OC and EC, whereas for the anions and cations ranges at 20 ppb and 10 ppb respectively. The reported concentrations were corrected for blanks. All of the equipment was calibrated and inter-compared prior to and/or after the measurements in order to ensure the quality of the results. The ambient meteorological and pollutant data that were used for this study are routinely collected at the Thissio Meteorological and Air Pollution Stations located at the central premises of NOA, situated 200 m and 10 m respectively from the museum.


Temperature and Relative Humidity

In Fig. 2, the outdoor, indoor and showcase measurements of temperature and relative humidity are presented. The air-conditioned periods and the natural ventilation periods are marked with red frames and purple lines respectively. Each of these time slots was studied separately and the results of a basic statistical analysis are provided in Tables S1 and S2. The outdoor Τ during the campaign ranged between 21.7°C and 36.7°C, with the exception of the period of 13–16 August, when the average temperature was approximately 3°C lower, under the influence of strong northern winds (N, NE, NW direction). During the background period, the average indoor Τ was constantly higher by 2.4°C compared to relevant outdoor conditions. As shown in Fig. 2(a), on a diurnal basis the outdoor Τ was at a maximum at noon and was almost always higher compared to the indoor maximum values for the specific time frame. Nevertheless, the higher amplitude of the outdoor temperature variability resulted in constantly lower outdoor average levels. The stone walls of the library have high thermal inertia which means that during day the material accumulates the heat and later when the temperature drops, it balances the conditions leveling out the indoor variations. The temperature variability in the library and the showcase was similar, with lower levels of T by 1.1°C encountered in the showcase. During the air-conditioned period, the temperature in the library and the showcase decreased significantly compared to the outdoor conditions and reached even less than 25°C. According to Fig. 2(b), the indoor RH presented less variability compared to the outdoor levels, with observed significant difference in the showcase, which seemed to be independent from outdoor or indoor changes. The average background RH in the showcase was slightly higher than in the library (39% versus 36%), still reflecting an insignificant difference between the macro- and micro-environment of the library. The building hosting the library is old (middle of 19th century), made by stone, without interventions on the insulation material of the envelope and located in an open area enabling the direct impact of the current environmental conditions. Nevertheless, the structural features of the building (i.e., thick stone walls) maintain the RH at low levels and the hygric inertia ensures moisture balance by limiting relative humidity variations. The low RH variability in the library and the showcase, as well as the consequent smoothening of the short-term fluctuations could be attributed to the buffering capacity of the paper (Kupczak et al., 2018). 

Fig. 2. Variability of (a) temperature and (b) relative humidity for outdoor conditions, the library and the showcase. Red frames and purple lines represent the air-conditioned and natural ventilation periods respectively. The 5-minute values are depicted.Fig. 2. Variability of (a) temperature and (b) relative humidity for outdoor conditions, the library and the showcase. Red frames and purple lines represent the air-conditioned and natural ventilation periods respectively. The 5-minute values are depicted.

To better investigate the T and RH variability during the air-conditioned and natural ventilation periods, each case is magnified in Figs. 3 and 4 respectively. In Fig. 3(a), it is clearly depicted that during the air-conditioned periods (within the red frames) the temperature in the library decreases rapidly, in less than 1 hour, and it remains around 24°C as long as the air-conditioning system is in use. On the 11th of August, a sudden increase in T around noon is attributed to a short interruption of the air-conditioning system operation, with a lesser effect on the showcase’s temperature. At noon, the average deviation of the indoor conditions relative to the library and the showcase was in the order of 9–12°C and 8–12°C respectively, reflecting similar cooling capability of the air-conditioning system on both the library and the showcase. After the end of the AC period, the inner temperature recovered to outdoor conditions within an hour. It is also worth noting that while the showcase temperature is lower than in the library by 4% during background conditions, it remains slightly higher during the air-conditioned time slot by 3–5% (Table S1), demonstrating the slightly increased direct impact of the forced temperature change on the books on shelves relative to the isolated ones in the showcase. During the air-conditioned periods, the relative humidity in the library (Fig. 3(b)) remained unaffected with respect to its preceding level and higher or almost equal to the outdoor levels, while at background conditions, RH does not exceed the outdoor conditions due to its temperature dependence. In practice, the impact of the domestic air-conditioning system on the library humidity is not significant.

With respect to Fig. 3, Fig. 4 depicts each of the natural ventilation periods magnified for the case of temperature and relative humidity. The variability of the temperature (Fig. 4(a)) inside and outside the library is similar for the ventilation period, but with different rates regarding the temporal change. During the morning ventilation, indoor T was always higher by up to 2.5°C relative to outdoor. It was generally observed that the library temperature tends to decrease at the beginning of the ventilation as heat from the library is transferred out, but afterwards, the temperature is increased following the outdoor trend, but with a 30% lower rate. Midday levels are almost equal with less than a 0.5°C difference on average. Regarding RH in the library (Fig. 4(b)) for the ventilation period, there is no impact on the showcase variability as there was for the case of the air-conditioning operation. For the library, there is an insignificant RH increase at the beginning of morning ventilation due to penetration of the more humid outdoor air masses in the library and then it is gradually readjusted to almost stable levels throughout the course of ventilation. For the morning ventilation periods, indoor RH was always lower by around 7% compared to outdoor, whereas midday levels were equivalent. 

Fig. 3. Maximized plots of (a) temperature and (b) relative humidity during the air-conditioned periods depicted in red frames on 11 August, 16 August, 18 August (top to bottom) for the period of 8:00 a.m.–8:00 p.m.Fig. 3. Maximized plots of (a) temperature and (b) relative humidity during the air-conditioned periods depicted in red frames on 11 August, 16 August, 18 August (top to bottom) for the period of 8:00 a.m.–8:00 p.m.

Fig. 4. Maximized plots of (a) temperature and (b) relative humidity during the natural ventilation periods depicted in purple frames on 22 August, 24 August, 26 August (top to bottom) during 9:00 a.m.–10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m.–2:00 p.m.Fig. 4. Maximized plots of (a) temperature and (b) relative humidity during the natural ventilation periods depicted in purple frames on 22 August, 24 August, 26 August (top to bottom) during 9:00 a.m.–10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m.–2:00 p.m.

Indoor Gaseous and Particulate Pollutants

In Fig. 5, the indoor concentrations of the gaseous pollutants NO, NO2, SO2, O3 and CO are presented at 30-minute intervals, followed by the outdoor concentrations and the indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratio when simultaneous measurements were available. The air-conditioned and natural ventilation periods are also marked as done previously. Table 1 summarizes the findings of the parallel indoor-outdoor measurements, including PM10 and the I/O ratio for each period. The common variability of both indoor and outdoor pollutant concentrations for O3 and CO (Fig. 5) clearly indicates that the outdoor levels, as well as emission sources and processes, are driving the library air quality. The outdoor measurements of primary pollutants (CO) were characterized by a morning peak during the traffic rush hours (7:00–9:00 local time) and the increased evening and late night levels, driven by the boundary layer decrease (Alexiou et al., 2018). On the other hand, the photochemically produced O3 levels were elevated around noontime and influenced by the opening of the windows (as also observed by De Santis et al., 1992, for the case of the Galleria degli Uffizi in Florence). Increased levels of pollution were also observed a few days before and after the 15 August public holiday, possibly due to increased traffic (departure and return of Athens’ citizens). The relatively strong (> 5 m s–1) north winds during 13–15 and 24–28 August also resulted in lower levels of the primary pollutants due to more efficient city ventilation processes. Indoor O3 and CO was lower by 40% and 50%, respectively when compared to the outdoor levels during the background period and presented similar temporal variability. No significant changes on the pattern and the relative difference on both indoor and outdoor levels were observed during the air-conditioned periods (11th, 16th and 18th of August). On the contrary, O3 levels approach the outdoor values while windows were opened, with the relative difference of 8%, on average. In general, an I/O ratio > 1 reflects infiltration and/or additional indoor sources, while low I/O ratios correspond to low inflow (Krupińska et al., 2013). The average I/O ratio for both pollutants was < 1, indicating moderate infiltration and thus limited reactions on the material surfaces after deposition. I/O almost equal to unit (0.9) was observed for O3 during the natural ventilation period attributed to the inflow of the outdoor-originated quantities. The enhanced I/O peaks that have been rarely observed (almost 2% of the observations) correspond to calculations for periods with low O3 values (due to deposition or NO titration) which contribute to the observed high I/O peaks without significant qualitative impact on the results and the general conclusions regarding the O3 impact.  

Fig. 5. Indoor and outdoor temporal variability of gaseous pollutants followed by the I/O values when available. Red frames and purple lines represent the air-conditioned and natural ventilation periods, respectively.Fig. 5. Indoor and outdoor temporal variability of gaseous pollutants followed by the I/O values when available. Red frames and purple lines represent the air-conditioned and natural ventilation periods, respectively.

Information about the 24-hour collected PM10 filter samples is provided in Fig. 6. Similar to gaseous pollutants, the indoor levels were lower relative to outdoors and co-varied (Fig. 6(a)), with means of 19.9 µg m–3 and 26.3 µg m–3, respectively resulting in a 25% difference. The PM10 I/O ratios for the whole period were lower than 1, ranging from 0.6 to 0.9 and the similar variability indicates that the main factor determining indoor PM10 concentration is outdoor conditions, as in the case of gases. These values indicate the contribution of ambient sources in PM levels inside the library as reported elsewhere (Chianese et al., 2012). The significant indoor-outdoor differences of the 12th and 25th of August corresponds to days with mean wind speed higher than 5 m s–1, possibly denoting the slow response time of the building to the forced outdoor conditions, reflecting a kind of equilibrium between the indoor and outdoor relative to the infiltration capacity of particulates. 

Fig. 6. Indoor-outdoor relations of (a) the PM10 mass concentration of filter samples on 24-hour basis, (b) the mass closure and (c) the mean chemical composition, over the experimental period.Fig. 6. Indoor-outdoor relations of (a) the PM10 mass concentration of filter samples on 24-hour basis, (b) the mass closure and (c) the mean chemical composition, over the experimental period.

Apart from the particulate levels, the presence of specific chemical compounds in high concentrations can also be considered as a significant threat to book materials. For this reason and in addition to the main study, chemical characterization of the atmospheric aerosols collected in the library was performed and followed by a mass closure. Dust was calculated by calcium (multiplied by 8 according to Sciare et al., 2005) and particulate organic matter (POM) is equal OC multiplied by 1.8 (Stavroulas et al., 2019). The mass closure (Fig. 6(b)) was almost complete with unknown constituents of 5.4% and 5.9% for indoor and outdoor, respectively, which could be attributed to water (Theodosi et al., 2018).

The IC analysis shows that the species which seem to have similar levels both indoors and outdoors (Fig. 6(c)) are secondary species, such as sulfate (SO42–) and nitrate anions (NO3). Primary species, such as elemental carbon, sodium, magnesium, calcium and to a lesser extent the photochemically produced oxalate ions (EC, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+ expressed as dust and Ox, respectively), were found at higher levels outside, relative to the indoor library area. The most abundant species inside the museum was POM, which in addition to dust and sulfates make up for almost 80% of the total mass with relative contributions of 37.1%, 21.1% and 20.4%, respectively. Enhanced levels of organic matter were also reported in other cultural heritage indoor environments (e.g., Cappitelli et al., 2009; Mašková et al., 2015). The predominant contribution of the sulfates, for the ionic components, is in agreement with findings at indoor cultural heritage environments (Cao et al., 2011; Xiu et al., 2015; Bartl et al., 2016; Uring et al., 2018); whereas, according to publications calcium-rich particles have been determined to dominate the indoor aerosol in museums depending on the wall material (Camuffo et al., 1999, 2001) or restoration and construction works (Gysels et al., 2004), without excluding outdoor sources (Gysels et al., 2002). The same stands for outdoors despite the prevalence of dust relative to POM with 42.5% against 22.6%. Outdoor soil re-suspension enhances the dust levels but these relatively big particles do not penetrate into the library, resulting thus in lower indoor levels of dust. The contribution (maximum < 5%) of the rest of the compounds is of less importance relative to these three factors (SO42–, POM, dust). By examining their absolute indoor and outdoor levels, important differences on the resulting I/O occurred (Fig. 6(c)). Higher-than-unit I/O was observed for POM, ammonium, potassium, and chloride, while sulfates and nitrates were close to unity. Emissions of organic material and microbial activity indoors could drive the enhanced levels of POM and ammonium. On the other hand, enhanced levels of chloride and potassium levels indoors could be associated with emissions from cleaning materials and dust, respectively. The source apportionment based on inter-correlations of such a short-term dataset provides relatively limited results. The resulting correlations were weak with the exception of sodium relative to magnesium (R2 = 0.91 indoor and 0.94 outdoor) and sodium relative to chloride and magnesium indoor (R2 > 0.86). Indeed, salts such as NaCl and MgCl2 (Krupińska et al., 2013; Anaf et al., 2014) could be present indoors denoting impact of sea salt due to atmospheric transport or building and restoration materials.

Risk Assessment of Temperature and Relative Humidity on the Books Collection

The longer lifetime of paper material is achieved at low-moderate temperatures and moderate relative humidity levels (Adcock, 1998). The best practice is to regulate and stabilize the conditions, to the extent possible, as to avoid sharp fluctuations that put stress on the exposed materials. With respect to preservation, norms that introduce an optimum level or range of levels for the materials’ exposure conditions are applied, by making a compromise between the optimal choices for conservation purposes and what is considered affordable. While the lowest acceptable humidity level for long-term storage of archival and library materials is, in general, under discussion and many reference levels or norms are used, the type of the material, the manufacturing process and the preservation state of the object, determine the selection of the applied limit values (Blades et al., 2000; Brown et al., 2002; Andreopoulou-Magkou and Mariolopoulos, 2005; Kite and Thomson, 2006). The limit values of 21 ± 1°C and 50 ± 3% RH, which were introduced in 1979 (La Fontaine, 1979), are still often considered to be the reference limits to avoid book deterioration (Table 2). The classic reference values for conservation conditions, according to Thomson (1994), are a temperature set to 20°C and a relative humidity of 50%. A slight change to 18°C and 45% RH (recommended by Davis, 2006) can significantly increase the lifetime of certain types of materials. Based on the best available knowledge and the specifications for collections included in the 2015 ASHRAE Handbook (American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2015), the limit values of 50% RH and a temperature range of 15–25°C can be adopted for sensitive materials. The tolerance is a bit higher for general collections, reaching 60% RH and temperatures within 20–30°C. The International Standard ISO 11799:2003, “Information and documentation—Document storage requirements for archive and library materials,” applies to the long-term storage of archive and library materials and also points out that repositories for such materials should be kept at a cool temperature and at a relative humidity below the point where microbiological activity occurs. Despite the relative unanimity about the decay of paper under constant T and RH, there is still discussion about the mechanisms that fluctuating environmental conditions impact on the chemical and physical properties of the specific substrate. In the review of Menart et al. (2011) degradation of paper under cyclic conditions of T and/or RH (Shahani et al., 1989; Bogaard and Whitmore, 2002; Panek et al., 2004) is reported, whereas the time spent under each condition is determinant for the impact on the material (Bigourdan and Reilly, 2002). Nevertheless, mild changes in T and RH could be buffered by books stored closely together (Henderson, 2013), as in our case. 

In this study, the recommended range defined in ISO 11799:2003 are used in combination with the limitations recently published by Andretta et al. (2016) in accordance with UNI 10586:1997 (Table 2), leading to a combined range of 2–20°C and 30–60% RH, covering limitations for paper and leather. According to Fig. 2 and Table S1, temperature limits were exceeded during the background period in the library and the showcase, with values constantly above the upper limit of 20°C provided by the two aforementioned references. The minimum temperature in the library was also above the upper acceptable limit. Opposite to temperature, the indoor relative humidity fell within the proposed limits for paper preservation, but was lower than what is recommended for the preservation of the leather bindings of the books. Fig. 7 presents the 24-hour difference between the minimum and maximum of the measured indoor temperature and relative humidity (ΔT24 and ΔRH24 respectively). The air-conditioned and the natural ventilation periods are depicted within the frames in Fig. 7 and are excluded by the risk assessment as they correspond to forced conditions. Both tolerable daily changes of 1°C and 3% RH of the ISO 11799:2003 and 2°C and 5% RH according to Andretta et al. (2016) were considered. Regardless of the chosen norms, the indoor (library and showcase) gradient for temperature was above the limits during the majority of days. The RH gradient for the showcase was within the suggested limits, but exceedances were encountered almost every day for the library. 

Fig. 7. Daily gradients (max–min) for (a) temperature and (b) relative humidity during the experimental period in the library. The black frames represent the days that the air library was either air-conditioned or naturally ventilated.Fig. 7. Daily gradients (max–min) for (a) temperature and (b) relative humidity during the experimental period in the library. The black frames represent the days that the air library was either air-conditioned or naturally ventilated.

The Performance Index (PI) of the building, which expresses the percentage of time in which the microclimatic parameters of the library do not match the recommended values, is calculated in order to evaluate the indoor microclimatic quality (IMQ) (Corgnati et al., 2009). The values of both parameters, T and RH, obtained in the library and the glass-fronted showcase measured in 5-minute intervals were used in Fig. 8, where the green lines are the acceptable limits for storage according to ISO 11799:2003 (2–18°C and 30–60%) and the red lines are the acceptable limits according to Andretta et al. (2016) (14–20°C and 50–60%). In the optimal case, the pairs of T and RH should be within the colorful areas defined by these limits. Despite the fact that RH individually was in general considered acceptable, this synergistic tool highlights an important issue in our case. According to the findings, the conditions in the library and the showcase during the studied period are completely out of control, demonstrating the poor capability of the building to regulate indoor conditions without an HVAC system, thus posing a risk to the collection of books. Over time, the high temperatures that have occurred in the room and the sharp daily gradients of both temperature and relative humidity could explain the observed discoloration and fragility of the books. It is worth noting that the books are stored under the specific environmental conditions for at least ten years, providing thus an acclimatization period for the evaluation of the historical climate (BS EN 15757:2010). Nevertheless, the current status of the books could also have been affected by the storage conditions prevailing before 2008 (i.e., before the reconstruction).

Fig. 8. Performance Index (PI) for the experimental period according to temperature and relative humidity measured in (a) the library and (b) the showcase in 5-minute intervals. The green lines are the extended acceptable limits for book materials storage according to ISO 11799:2003 (2–18°C and 30–60%) and the red lines are the limits according to Andretta et al. (2016) (14–20°C and 50–60%).

Risk Assessment of Air Pollution on the Book Collection

With reference to the currently recommended levels of key gaseous pollutants for collections included in the 2015 ASHRAE Handbook for sensitive materials, the limit values for NO2 range from 0.09 to 4.89 µg m–3, for SO2 from 0.1 to 1.05 µg m–3 and O3 is less than 0.1 µg m–3. Taking into consideration the general collection guidelines, the limits are set at 3.76–18.82, 1.05–5.24 and 0.98–9.82 µg m–3 for NO2, SO2 and O3, respectively (Table 3). On the other hand, according to ISO 11799:2003, the concentration of pollutants in areas dedicated for books and archival material storage is set at higher levels even by one order of magnitude. According to Table 1, the average levels of NO2 and SO2 of 15.9 µand 4.7 µg m–3 respectively, are close to the ASHRAE guidelines for general collections but the min–max variability deviates significantly. Furthermore, our findings were within the limits of ISO 11799:2003 for SO2, but extremely higher than the acceptable limit for O3, regardless of the norms used and could be related to degradation of the leather components of the books. Concerning PM10, no reliable conclusions could be deduced since there is no reference for the specific monitored fraction. The indoor levels of the gaseous species, which are higher than the suggested levels, may have a synergistic role with the thermo-hydrometric parameters, contributing to the decay of the books and their current status.


The temperature and relative humidity, as well as the concentrations of major air pollutants (viz., NOx, O3, SO2, CO and PM10), in the library hosted by the Museum of Geoastrophysics of the National Observatory of Athens were monitored for 1 month during the summer, a period representing conditions in this city when the pollution background is highly influenced by regional emission sources and which is associated with high temperatures and secondary pollutant formation. Measurements were performed both in the library room and outdoors to determine the indoor-outdoor interactions during natural and artificial ventilation of the building. Also, to assess the risk posed by the IAQ to the library’s book collection, we compared our findings to previously published reference values and applied existing tools for evaluating the effect of micro-environmental conditions on cultural heritage artifacts.

Higher mean temperatures were encountered inside the library and the showcase than outdoors, and the similar diurnal profiles between these locations reflected the low building’s capacity to integrate environmental changes. Operating the air conditioning decreased the temperature, but the effect of opening the windows was limited. On the other hand, the relative humidity was less influenced by the outdoor conditions and remained at almost stable levels in the showcase, regardless of the cooling method. Furthermore, during the campaign, the temperature exceeded the recommended maximum limit of 20°C, whereas the relative humidity fell within the acceptable range for paper conservation. Nevertheless, the combined investigation of both parameters using the performance index (PI) of the building revealed that conditions in the library and the showcase during the study period were far from optimal and potentially damaging to the book collection. The books were also vulnerable to the intensive daily changes in temperature that occurred during normal conditions or short periods of air conditioning.

Regarding the pollutants, the day-to-day variability of the I/O ratio may indicate changes in the air penetrating the building, which depends on factors such as the outdoor wind speed and the structural characteristics of the building. Although O3 and dust infiltrated the library when the windows were open, these risk factors were considered to be minor during the library’s normal operating conditions, which are defined as having closed doors and windows with a limited human presence. The average I/O ratio for both gaseous and particulate pollutants was less than 1, indicating low infiltration and minimal deposition processes and reactions on the materials’ surfaces. However, in absolute terms, the levels of ozone inside the library greatly exceeded the applicable limit for O3, even though all of the other monitored pollutants displayed acceptable average concentrations. Nevertheless, the fluctuations in NO2 and SO2 should be taken into account, as they may be partially responsible for the observed discoloration, embrittlement and fragility of some of the books in the library.

Additionally, the atmospheric aerosols collected in the library were chemically characterized. The measured chemical species (viz., the major ions and organic and elemental carbon) and their I/O ratios can be divided into three categories: i) Primary species from both natural and anthropogenic sources, such as elemental carbon, sodium, magnesium and calcium, exhibited higher concentrations outside than inside the library (I/O < 1). ii) Secondary species related to long-range transport, such as SO42 and NO3, exhibited an I/O ratio close to unity. iii) Lastly, POM, ammonium, potassium and chloride (related to organic material, microbial activity and indoor emissions from cleaning materials and dust) exhibited an I/O ratio above unit (i.e., I/O > 1).

According to our findings, outdoor conditions strongly influenced both the chemical profiles, especially for the gaseous species, and the microclimatic parameters in the library, demonstrating the poor ability of the building to regulate the indoor environment. We also evaluated the normal ventilation practices in the library and discovered that neither operating the air conditioning nor opening the windows for short periods of time affected the relative humidity indoors, which remained almost stable regardless of the conditions. As both the library and the showcase responded to forced temperature changes, the continuous and not occasionally use of a cooling device, to minimize sharp fluctuations in the indoor temperature, is recommended. Additionally, opening the windows at noon is not recommended because of the higher outdoor temperatures and the potential transport of photochemically produced, reactive pollutants, such as O3. Instead, short periods of natural ventilation during the morning, which dissipate the heat load and increase the comfort of individuals inside the library, are preferred. At minimum, ideal improvements to the library environment include protective shelves that prevent the deposition of dust and other contaminants on the exposed books. A continuously operated air-conditioning system should also be integrated into the environment to maintain the temperature within the recommended limits, to suppress sharp variations caused by outdoor conditions and to inhibit the degradation—thermal, primarily, and chemical and biochemical, secondarily—of the paper and leather components of the books. In summary, the microclimatic conditions, which appear to be the crucial deterioration factor at the library of the Museum of Geoastrophysics of the National Observatory of Athens, should be regulated, continuously monitored in the future and synergistically investigated in order to evaluate their combined effects on the book collection. 


This study forms part of the diploma thesis of FD within the MSc course “CultTech” at the Department of History, Archaeology and Cultural Resources Management of the University of Peloponnese. The authors acknowledge the funding received by ERA-PLANET (, trans-national project SMURBS ( (Grant Agreement No. 689443), funded under the EU Horizon 2020 Framework Programme. The authors also thank the staff of the library of the Museum of Geoastrophysics of the National Observatory of Athens for their support and the Environmental Chemical Processes Laboratory in the Chemistry Department of the University of Crete for the chemical analysis of the filter samples.


The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Adcock, E.P. (1998). IFLA principles for the care and handling of library material. CLIR, Washington DR, IFLA PAC, Paris.

  2. Alexiou, D., Kokkalis, P., Papayannis, A., Rocadenbosch, F., Argyrouli, A., Tsaknakis, G., Tzanis, C.G., Makoto, A., Vassilis, A., Balis, D., Behrendt, A., Comeron, A., Gibert, F., Landulfo, E., McCormick, M.P., Senff, C., Veselovskii, I. and Wandinger, U. (2018). Planetary boundary layer height variability over athens, greece, based on the synergy of raman lidar and radiosonde data: Application of the kalman filter and other techniques (2011-2016). EPJ Web Conf. 176: 06007. [Publisher Site]

  3. Anaf, W., Bencs, L., Van Grieken, R., Janssens, K. and De Wael, K. (2014). Indoor particulate matter in four Belgian heritage sites: Case studies on the deposition of dark-colored and hygroscopic particles. Sci. Total Environ. 506–507: 361–368[Publisher Site]

  4. Andreopoulou-Magkou, E. and Mariolopoulos, T. (2005). Leather: Structure, technology, deterioration, conservation, analyses, Published by ION, Athens.

  5. Andretta, M., Coppola, F. and Seccia, L. (2016). Investigation on the interaction between the outdoor environment and the indoor microclimate of a historical library. J. Cult. Heritage 17: 75–86[Publisher Site]

  6. Ankersmit, B. and Stappers, M. (2017). Managing indoor climate risks in museums, Springer, Switzerland. [Publisher Site]

  7. Area, M.C. and Cheradame, H. (2011). Paper aging and degradation: Recent findings and research methods. BioRes 6: 5307–5337. [Publisher Site]

  8. ASHRAE Handbook (2015). Heating, ventilating and air-conditioning applications. SI Edition, Atlanta.

  9. Athanasopoulou, E., Speyer, O., Brunner, D., Vogel, H., Vogel, B., Mihalopoulos, N. and Gerasopoulos, E. (2017). Changes in domestic heating fuel use in Greece: Effects on atmospheric chemistry and radiation, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17: 10597–10618. [Publisher Site]

  10. Bartl, B., Mašková, L., Paulusová, H., Smolík, J., Bartlová, L. and Vodička, P. (2016). The effect of dust particles on cellulose degradation. Stud. Conserv. 61: 203–208. [Publisher Site]

  11. Bigourdan, J.L. and Reilly, J.M. (2002). Effects of fluctuating environments on paper materials- stability and practical significance for preservation. La conservation à l’ère du numérique: actes des quatrièmes journées internationales d’études de l’ARSAG, 27-30 May 2002, Paris, France, pp. 180–92.

  12. Blades, N., Oreszczyn, T., Bordass, W. and Cassar, M. (2000). Guidelines on efficient pollution control in heritage buildings, Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries.

  13. Bogaard, J. and Whitmore, P.M. (2002). Explorations of the role of humidity fluctuations in the deterioration of paper. Works of Art on Paper Books, Documents and Photographs: Techniques and Conservation. Contributions to the Baltimore congress, London, UK. 2-6 September 2002, pp. 11–15. [Publisher Site]

  14. Bougiatioti, A., Zarmpas, P., Koulouri, E., Antoniou, M., Theodosi,C., Kouvarakis, G., Saarikoski, S., Mäkelä, T., Hillamo, R. and Mihalopoulos, N. (2013). Organic, elemental and water-soluble organic carbon in size segregated aerosols, in the marine boundary layer of the Eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Environ. 64: 251–262. [Publisher Site]

  15. Brown, S., Cole, I., Daniel, V. King, S. and Pearson, C. (2002). Guidelines for environmental control in cultural institution. Heritage Collections Council. Canberra, Australia.

  16. BS EN 15757:2010 (2010). Conservation of cultural property. Specifications for temperature and relative humidity to limit climate-induced mechanical damage in organic hygroscopic materials. British-Adopted European Standard.

  17. Camuffo, D., Brimblecombe, P., Van Grieken, R., Busse, J.H., Giovanni Sturaro, G., Valentino, A., Bernardi, A., Blades, N., Shooter D., De Bock, D., Gysels, K., Wieser, M. and Kim, O. (1999). Indoor air quality at the Correr Museum, Venice, Italy. Sci. Total Environ. 236: 135–152. [Publisher Site]

  18. Camuffo, D., Van Grieken, R., Busse, H.J., Sturaro, G., Valentino, A., Bernardi, A., Blades, N., Shooter, D., Gysels, K., Deutsch, F., Wieser, M., Kim, O. and Ulrych, U. (2001). Environmental monitoring in four European museums. Atmos. Environ. 35: 127–140. [Publisher Site]

  19. Cao, J., Li, H., Chow, J.C., Watson, J.G., Lee, S., Rong, B., Dong, J. and Ho, K. (2011). Chemical composition of indoor and outdoor atmospheric particles at Emperor Qin's Terra-cotta Museum, Xi’an, China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 11: 70–79. [Publisher Site]

  20. Cappitelli, F., Fermo, P., Vecchi, R., Piazzalunga, P., Valli, G., Zanardini, E. and Sorlini, C. (2009). Chemical–physical and microbiological measurements for indoor air quality assessment at the Ca'Granda Historical Archive, Milan (Italy). Water Air Soil Pollut. 201: 109–120. [Publisher Site]

  21. Cavalli, F., Viana, M., Yttri, K.E., Genberg, J. and Putaud, J.P. (2010). Toward a standardised thermal-optical protocol for measuring at-mospheric organic and elemental carbon: The EUSAAR protocol. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 3: 79–89. [Publisher Site]

  22. Chianese, E., Riccio, A., Duro, I., Trifuoggi, M., Iovino, P., Capasso, S. and Barone, G. (2012). Measurements for indoor air quality assessment at the Capodimonte Museum in Naples (Italy). Int. J. Environ. Res. 6: 509–518. [Publisher Site]

  23. Corgnati, S.P., Fabi, V. and Filippi, M. (2009). A methodology for microclimatic quality evaluation in museums: Application to a temporary exhibit. Build. Environ. 44: 1253–1260. [Publisher Site]

  24. Daniel, F., Flieder, F. and Leclerc, F. (1990). The effects of pollution on deacidified paper. Restaurator 11: 179–207. [Publisher Site]

  25. Daniels, V.D. (1996). The chemistry of paper conservation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 25: 179–186. [Publisher Site]

  26. Davis, N. (2006). Tracing the evolution of preservation environments in archives, museums, and libraries. 20th Annual Preservation Conference: Beyond the Numbers: Specifying and Achieving an Efficient Preservation Environment. National Archives, Washington, D.C., March 16, 2006. [Publisher Site]

  27. De Feber, M., Havermans, J. and Cornelissen, E. (1998). The positive effects of air purification in the Dutch State Archives part 1: Experimental set up and air quality. Restaurator 19: 212–222. [Publisher Site]

  28. De Santis, F., Di Palo, V. and Allegrini, I. (1992). Determination of some atmospheric pollutants inside a museum: relationship with the concentration outside. Sci. Total Environ. 127: 211–223. [Publisher Site]

  29. Dirksen, V. (1997). The degredation and conservation of leather. J. Conserv. Mus. Stud. 3: 6–10. [Publisher Site]

  30. Founda, D. and Giannakopoulos, C. (2009). The exceptionally hot summer of 2007 in Athens, Greece—A typical summer in the future climate?. Global Planet Change 67: 227–236. [Publisher Site]

  31. Founda, D. (2011). Evolution of the air temperature in Athens and evidence of climatic change: A review. Adv. Build. Energy Res. 5: 7–41. [Publisher Site]

  32. Fourtziou, L., Liakakou, E., Stavroulas, I., Theodosi, C., Zarmpas, P., Psiloglou, B., Sciare, J., Maggos, T., Bairachtari, K., Bougiatioti, A., Gerasopoulos, E., Sarda-Estève, R., Bonnaire, N. and Mihalopoulos, N. (2017). Multi-tracer approach to characterize domestic wood burning in Athens (Greece) during wintertime. Atmos. Environ. 148: 89–101. [Publisher Site]

  33. Gerasopoulos, E., Kokkalis, P., Amiridis, V., Liakakou, E., Perez, C., Haustein, K., Eleftheratos, K., Andreae, M.O., Andreae, T.W. and Zerefos, C.S. (2009). Dust specific extinction cross-sections over the Eastern Mediterranean using the BSC-DREAM model and sun photometer data: The case of urban environments. Ann. Geophys. 27: 2903–2912. [Publisher Site]

  34. Gratsea, M., Liakakou, E., Mihalopoulos, N., Adamopoulos, A., Tsilibari, E. and Gerasopoulos, E. (2017). The combined effect of reduced fossil fuel consumption and increasing biomass combustion on Athens’ air quality, as inferred from long term CO measurements. Sci. Total Environ. 592: 115–123. [Publisher Site]

  35. Grau‑Bové, J., Budič, B., Kralj Cigić, I., Thickett, D., Signorello, S. and Strlič, M. (2016). The effect of particulate matter on paper degradation. Herit. Sci. 4:2. [Publisher Site]

  36. Gysels, K., Deutsch, F. and Van Grieken, R. (2002). Characterisation of particulate matter in the Royal Museum of Fine Arts, Antwerp, Belgium. Atmos. Environ. 36: 4103–4113. [Publisher Site]

  37. Gysels, K., Delalieux, F., Deutsch, F., Van Grieken, R., Camuffo, D., Bernardi, A., Sturaro, G., Busse, H.J. and Wieser, M. (2004). Indoor environment and conservation in the Royal Museum of Fine Arts, Antwerp, Belgium. J. Cult. Heritage 5: 221–230. [Publisher Site]

  38. Hellenic Statistical Authority (2014). 2011 population and housing census. Hellenic Republic, Piraeus, Greece.

  39. Henderson, J. (2013). Managing the library and archive environment. British Library Preservation Advisory Centre, London, first publication on 2007, ISO 11799:2003. (2003). Information and documentation — Document storage requirements for archive and library materials. International Organization for Standardization.

  40. Johansson, A. and Lennholm, H. (2000). Influences of SO2 and O3 on the ageing of paper investigated by in situ diffuse reflectance FTIR and time-resolved trace gas analysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 161: 163–169. [Publisher Site]

  41. Johansson, A., Kolseth, P. and Lindqvist, O. (2000). Uptake of air pollutants by paper. Restaurator 21: 117–137. [Publisher Site]

  42. Kite, M. and Thomson, R. (2006). Conservation of leather and related materials. Elsevier. [Publisher Site]

  43. Krupińska, B., Van Grieken, R. and De Wael, K. (2013). Air quality monitoring in a museum for preventive conservation: Results of a three-year study in the Plantin-Moretus Museum in Antwerp, Belgium. Microchem. J. 110: 350–360. [Publisher Site]

  44. Kupczak, A., Bratasz, L., Kryściak-Czerwenka, J. and Kozłowski, R. (2018). Moisture sorption and diffusion in historical cellulose-basedmaterials. Cellulose 25: 2873–2884. [Publisher Site]

  45. La Fontaine, R.H. (1979). Environmental norms for Canadian museums, art galleries, and archives. CCI Technical Bulletin 5, Canadian Conservation Institute, Ottawa.

  46. Mašková, L., Smolík, J. and Vodička, P. (2015). Characterisation of particulate matter in different types of archives. Atmos. Environ. 107: 217–224. [Publisher Site]

  47. Menart, E., De Bruin, G. and Strlič, M. (2011). Dose-response functions for historic paper. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 96: 2029–2039. [Publisher Site]

  48. Novakov, T., Menon, S., Kirchstetter, T. W., Koch, D. and Hansen, J.E. (2005). Aerosol organic carbon to black carbon ratios: Analysis of published data and implications for climate forcing, J. Geophys. Res. 110: D21205. [Publisher Site]

  49. Panek, J., Fellers, C. and Haraldsson, T. (2004). Principles of evaluation for the creep of paperboard in constant and cyclic humidity. Nord. Pulp. Pap. Res. J. 19: 155–163. [Publisher Site]

  50. Paraskevopoulou, D., Liakakou, E., Gerasopoulos, E., Theodosi, C. and Mihalopoulos, N. (2014). Long-term characterization of organic and elemental carbon in the PM2.5 fraction: The case of Athens, Greece. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14: 13313–13325. [Publisher Site]

  51. Paraskevopoulou, D., Liakakou, E., Gerasopoulos, E. and Mihalopoulos, N. (2015). Sources of atmospheric aerosol from long-term measurements (5 years) of chemical composition in Athens, Greece. Sci. Total Environ. 527–528: 165–178. [Publisher Site]

  52. Pavlogeorgatos, G. (2003). Environmental parameters in museums. Build. Environ. 38: 1457–1462. [Publisher Site]

  53. Ryhl-Svendsen, M. (2006). Indoor air pollution in museums: A review of prediction models and control strategies. Rev. Conserv. 7: 27–41. [Publisher Site]

  54. Sciare, J., Oikonomou, K., Cachier, H., Mihalopoulos, N., Andreae, M.O., Maenhaut, W. and Sarda-Esteve, R. (2005). Aerosol mass closure and reconstruction of the light scattering coefficient over the Eastern Mediterranean Sea during the MINOS campaign. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5: 2253–2265. [Publisher Site]

  55. Shahani, C.J., Hengemihle, F.H. and Weberg, N. (1989). The effect of variations in relative humidity on the accelerated aging of paper. In Historic Textile and Paper Materials II, Zeronian, S.H. and Needles, H.L. (Eds.), American Chemical Society, pp. 63–80. [Publisher Site]

  56. Stavroulas, I., Bougiatioti, A., Paraskevopoulou, D., Grivas, G., Liakakou, E., Gerasopoulos, E. and Mihalopoulos, M. (2019). Sources and processes that control the submicron organic aerosol in an urban Mediterranean environment (Athens) using high temporal resolution chemical composition measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19: 901–919. [Publisher Site]

  57. Sterflinger, K. (2010). Fungi: Their role in deterioration of cultural heritage. Fungal Biol. Rev. 24: 47–55. [Publisher Site]

  58. Tétreault, J. (2003). Airborne pollutants in museums, galleries and archives: Risk assessment, control strategies and preservation management. Canadian Conservation Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

  59. Theodosi, C., Tsagkaraki, M., Zarmpas, P., Grivas, G., Liakakou, E., Paraskevopoulou, D., Lianou, M., Gerasopoulos, E. and Mihalopoulos, N. (2018). Multi-year chemical composition of the fine-aerosol fraction in Athens, Greece, with emphasis on the contribution of residential heating in wintertime. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18: 14371–14391. [Publisher Site]

  60. Thomson, G. (1994). The museum environment (conservation and museology), 2nd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann in association with The International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, c1986, Oxford, U.K.

  61. UNI 10586:1997. Documentation. Climatic conditions to document storage of graphic documents and characteristics of lodging. Italian Standard.

  62. Uring, P., Chabas, A., De Reyer, D., Gentaz, L.,Triquet, S., Mirande-Bret, C. and Alfaro, S. (2018). The Bayeux embrodiery: A dust deposition assessment. Herit. Sci. 6: 23. [Publisher Site]

  63. Vujčić, I., Masic, S., Medić, M., Putić, S. and Dramicanin, M.D. (2017). Gamma irradiation of leather gloves in terms of cultural heritage preservation. XXV Int. Conference "ECOLOGICAL TRUTH" ECO-IST'17, Vrnjacka Banja, Serbia, pp. 531–535.

  64. Worobiec, A., Samek, L., Karaszkiewicz, P., Kontozova-Deutsch, V., Stefaniak, E.A., Van Meel, K., Krata, A., Bencs, L. and Van Grieken, R. (2008). A seasonal study of atmospheric conditions influenced by the intensive tourist flow in the Royal Museum of Wavel Castle in Cracow, Poland. Microchem. J. 90: 99–106. [Publisher Site]

  65. Xiu, G., Wu, X., Wang, L., Chen, Y., Yu, Y., Xu, F. and Wu, L. (2015). Characterization of particulate matter, ions and OC/EC in a museum in Shanghai, China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 15: 1240–1250. [Publisher Site]

  66. Zorpas, A.A. and Skouroupatis, A. (2016). Indoor air quality evaluation of two museums in a subtropical climate conditions. Sustainable Cities Soc. 20: 52–60. [Publisher Site]

Latest Articles

Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Enter your email below to receive latest published articles in your field.