Yan Zhang1, Lingxiao Yang 1,2, Ying Gao1, Jianmin Chen1,2, Yanyan Li1, Pan Jiang1, Junmei Zhang1, Hao Yu3, Wenxing Wang1


Environment Research Institute, Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong 266237, China
Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Climate Change, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210093, China
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong 266237, China



Received: June 10, 2019
Revised: September 1, 2019
Accepted: September 6, 2019
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.12.0462 

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:
Zhang, Y., Yang, L., Gao, Y., Chen, J., Li, Y., Jiang, P., Zhang, J., Yu, H. and Wang, W. (2019). Comparative Study of PAHs in PM1 and PM2.5 at a Background Site in the North China Plain. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 19: 2281-2293. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.12.0462


Highlights

  • The ∑PAH concentrations and cancer risks were the highest under biomass burning condition.
  • Diesel combustion played more significant role to the emission of PAHs in PM1.
  • Wood burning played more significant role to the emission of PM2.5-bound PAHs.
  • PAHs in polluted conditions were more significantly influenced by short-distance transport.

ABSTRACT


Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are carcinogenic and mutagenic. They bounded in atmospheric fine (PM2.5) and submicron (PM1) particles severely affect human health. To characterize 18 PAHs at a background site (Mount Tai) in the heavily polluted North China Plain (NCP), PM1 and PM2.5 samples were collected in the autumn of 2014. The sampling periods were classified into clean conditions and polluted conditions according to PM2.5 concentration. Biomass burning condition was selected from polluted conditions to clarify the impact of biomass burning to PAHs concentrations. The concentrations of ∑18 PAHs were 14.5 and 24.5 ng m–3 and the contents were 515 and 607 µg g–1 in PM1 and PM2.5, respectively. Three-ring PAHs were the primary contributors to the total PAHs. The major PAHs sources at Mount Tai were pyrogenic and traffic emission. Diesel combustion played more significant role to the emission of PM1-bound PAHs, while wood burning source was more obvious for PM2.5-bound PAHs. PAHs concentrations and cancer risks were the highest during biomass burning condition compared with those during polluted and clean conditions. The lifetime accumulated cancer risk of PM1-bound PAHs was considered to be acceptable, whereas it elevated to “potential risk” (10−6) for adults (30–70 years old) exposed to PM2.5-bound PAHs. The Concentration-weighted trajectory (CWT) model indicated long-distance transport from Northwest China was the major source of PM1-bound PAHs under the clean conditions. Compare with clean conditions, PAHs were more strongly influenced by short-distance transported air masses from the South of Shandong Province under the polluted conditions.


Keywords: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; Biomass burning; Health risk assessment; Source identification; CWT model.

 



Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Sign up to AAQR Newsletter

Sign up to receive latest research, letters to the editors, and review articles, delivered to your inbox every second week!