Yuan-Dong Huang 1, Ren-Wei Hou1, Ze-Yu Liu1, Ye Song1, Peng-Yi Cui1, Chang-Nyung Kim2


School of Environment and Architecture, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
College of Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 449-701, Korea



Received: December 15, 2018
Revised: December 21, 2018
Accepted: January 1, 2019
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.09.0344  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:
Huang, Y.D., Hou, R.W., Liu, Z.Y., Song, Y., Cui, P.Y. and Kim, C.N. (2019). Effects of Wind Direction on the Airflow and Pollutant Dispersion inside a Long Street Canyon. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 19: 1152-1171. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.09.0344


HIGHLIGHTS

  • Effects of wind direction on flow and dispersion in a long canyon are assessed.
  • Parallel and perpendicular winds as well as five oblique winds are considered.
  • Variations of ACH for the canyon with the wind direction are revealed.
  • The favorable and unfavorable wind directions for dispersion are identified

ABSTRACT


This study investigates the effects of wind direction on the airflow and pollutant dispersion inside a long street canyon using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). A 3D CFD model for predicting the flow and dispersion in a canyon is first developed using the FLUENT code and then validated against wind tunnel experiments. Then, the airflow and traffic pollutant dispersion in an isolated canyon with a street-length-to-building-height ratio of 10 are numerically simulated for seven wind directions (α = 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90°, where α is the angle between the approaching flow and street axis). The results demonstrate that the mean (ACH) and turbulent (ACHʹ) air exchange rates (ACHs) for the canyon are close when α = 0°, 15°, 30°, 45° and 60°, whereas the magnitude of ACHʹ is significantly greater than that of ACH when α = 75° and 90°. Additionally, the ACH reaches its maximum and minimum values when α = 30° and 90°, respectively. The computed velocity and concentration fields clearly reveal the variation in the in-canyon flow pattern and pollutant distributions on the canyon walls and footpaths due to the wind direction. Evaluating the maximum, minimum and average concentrations on the canyon walls and footpaths for each of the seven wind directions, we determine: On the leeward-oriented wall, the wall-averaged concentration increases greatly with α, and the values of the wall-maximum are highest when α = 75° and lowest when α = 0°. By contrast, on the windward-oriented wall, both the wall-averaged and wall-maximum concentrations are highest when α = 0°. Finally, at the human respiration height, the highest concentration on the footpath next to the leeward-oriented wall occurs when α = 75°, whereas the highest concentration on the footpath close to the windward-oriented wall is observed when α = 0°.


Keywords: Wind direction; Airflow; Pollutant dispersion; Street canyon; CFD.

 



Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal, promotes submissions of high-quality research, and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world.