Cenyan Huang1,2,3, Lei Tong1,3, Xiaorong Dai1,3, Hang Xiao 1,3


Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Ningbo Urban Environment Observation and Research Station-NUEORS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315830, China



Received: March 15, 2018
Revised: July 31, 2018
Accepted: September 21, 2018
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.03.0096  


Cite this article:
Huang, C., Tong, L., Dai, X. and Xiao, H. (2018). Evaluation and Application of a Passive Air Sampler for Atmospheric Volatile Organic Compounds. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 18: 3047-3055. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.03.0096


HIGHLIGHTS

  • The sampler is cost-effective and pretty convenient for outdoor deployment.
  • The performance of the sampler is comparable to previous commercial samplers.
  • The calibrated sampling rates are highly close to the theoretical values.
  • The BTEX concentrations compared favorably with both active and passive values.

ABSTRACT


In this study, we propose a passive air sampler (PAS) that mainly consists of activated charcoal sorbent, a radial diffusive body, and a protective shield for the outdoor monitoring of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Due to its reusable accessories and small size, this PAS is cost-effective and highly convenient for outdoor deployment. The estimated sampling rates (SRs) for 28 VOCs were very close to the theoretical values over a 6-month field test. We evaluated the performance of the PAS with benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) and determined the method detection limits (MDLs) (0.02–0.04 µg m–3), recovery values (95.3 ± 9.8–99.8 ± 7.5%), repeatability (3.2 ± 2.2–4.6 ± 2.9%), and uncertainties (10.1 ± 3.8–12.9 ± 4.5%), which are comparable to those of previously reported samplers and meet the requirements of European Standards (EN) 13528. The deployment times for obtaining reliable time-weighted average (TWA) atmospheric concentrations of BTEX ranged from 2 days to a minimum of 3 months according to corresponding background concentrations in the ambient air. Moreover, the atmospheric concentrations of BTEX measured by the sampler in this study compared favorably with values from both active and passive sampling methods, with R2 ≥ 0.97 (p < 0.0001). Finally, a 12-month field test was performed after evaluating the sampler, and the results showed apparent seasonal variations of atmospheric VOC concentrations, which were dominated by the sampling location and wind direction.


Keywords: Volatile organic compounds; VOCs; BTEX; Passive sampler; PAS; Sampling rate; Deployment time.

 



Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827


SCImago Journal & Country Rank