Mariana Dezzutti 1, Guillermo Berri1, Laura Venegas2


Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, B1900FWA La Plata, Argentinaa
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - Facultad Regional Avellaneda, B1870AAU Avellaneda, Buenos Aires, Argentina



Received: November 4, 2017
Revised: January 30, 2018
Accepted: January 30, 2018
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.11.0489  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:
Dezzutti, M., Berri, G. and Venegas, L. (2018). Intercomparison of Atmospheric Dispersion Models Applied to an Urban Street Canyon of Irregular Geometry. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 18: 820-828. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.11.0489


HIGHLIGHTS

  • Intercomparison of air pollution dispersion models for urban canyons.
  • Urban street canyon of irregular geometry.
  • Model calculations validated with NOx concentration measurements.
  • Simple parametric dispersion model SEUS provides the best results.

ABSTRACT


The NOx concentrations measured at the sampling site of Cordoba Avenue, Buenos Aires City, characterised by an irregular geometry on both sides of the street, are used to intercompare results of five urban street canyon dispersion models, STREET, OSPM, AEOLIUSF, STREET-BOX and SEUS. Three different wind directions with respect to the street axis are considered, i.e., leeward, windward and parallel. Additionally, two wind speed classes are considered, above and below 2 m s–1. In order to evaluate the models performance, observed and calculated concentrations are compared using different statistical measures, i.e., mean values, bias, mean square error and fractional error. In general, all models estimate better leeward conditions and wind speeds above 2 m s–1, with SEUS providing the overall best result.


Keywords: Atmospheric dispersion models; Intercomparison of results; Urban street canyon with irregular geometry.

 



Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Sign up to AAQR Newsletter

Sign up to receive latest research, letters to the editors, and review articles, delivered to your inbox every second week!