Seung-Myung Park1,2, In-Ho Song1, Jong Sung Park1, Jun Oh1,2, Kwang Joo Moon1, Hye Jung Shin1, Jun Young Ahn1, Min-Do Lee1, Jeonghwan Kim2, Gangwoong Lee 2


Air Quality Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research, Seo, Incheon 22689, Korea
Department of Environmental Science, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin, Gyeonggi 17035, Korea



Received: October 4, 2017
Revised: January 20, 2018
Accepted: January 20, 2018
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.10.0369  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:
Park, S.M., Song, I.H., Park, J.S., Oh, J., Moon, K.J., Shin, H.J., Ahn, J.Y., Lee, M.D., Kim, J. and Lee, G. (2018). Variation of PM2.5 Chemical Compositions and their Contributions to Light Extinction in Seoul. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 18: 2220-2229. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.10.0369


HIGHLIGHTS

  • One-year measurement of aerosol chemical and optical properties was made in Seoul.
  • Aerosol light scattering and absorption extinction were 132.2 Mm–1 and 57.5 Mm–1.
  • The most dominant species for light extinction were OM and EC.
  • Current IMPROVE scheme underestimated aerosol light extinction by 30%.
  • Underestimation was mainly attributed to fresh OM and EC in urban conditions.

ABSTRACT


The objective of this study was to determine comprehensive chemical components in PM2.5 from March 2011 till February 2012 in Seoul, South Korea, and their contributions to light extinction. Major chemical components in the aerosol were: ammonium sulfate, 30.3%; ammonium nitrate, 25.2%; organic matter, 21.3%; crustal mass, 16.9%; element carbon, 6.1%; and trace metals, 0.2%. PM2.5 mass concentrations and light extinction were mostly correlated in their diurnal and monthly variations, which indicates that the aerosol mass is the key variable in light extinction in Seoul. However, the aerosol size and composition (of PM2.5) also played significant roles in light extinction. We applied the IMPROVE algorithm to quantify the contributions of observed chemical components to light extinction. It was found that the IMPROVE formula tended to underestimate light extinction by up to 30% in urban conditions where large sources of organic matter (OM) and element carbon (EC) existed unless some revision was made before the light extinction calculations. The IMPROVE algorithm was further optimized for the observed light extinction for OM and EC. The revised light extinction efficiencies of OM and EC in Seoul increased by about 1.5–3 times of those in the original IMPROVE algorithm. The optimized IMPROVE scheme in this study reproduced the observed light extinction more accurately in Seoul. Overall, 41% of the contribution from OM and EC to light extinction in Seoul was close to 50% of the contribution from nitrate and sulfate, although the mass of the former contribution was only half of the latter.


Keywords: PM2.5; Visibility; Light extinction; OM; EC.

 



Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal, promotes submissions of high-quality research, and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world.