James R. Laing1, Daniel A. Jaffe 1,2, Abbigale P. Slavens1, Wenting Li1, Wenxi Wang1

  • 1 School of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, University of Washington Bothell, Bothell, WA 98011-8246, USA
  • 2 Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1640, USA

Received: February 13, 2017
Revised: July 24, 2017
Accepted: August 25, 2017
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.02.0069 


Cite this article:
Laing, J.R., Jaffe, D.A., Slavens, A.P., Li, W. and Wang, W. (2017). Can ΔPM2.5/ΔCO and ΔNOy/ΔCO Enhancement Ratios Be Used to Characterize the Influence of Wildfire Smoke in Urban Areas?. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 17: 2413-2423. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.02.0069


HIGHLIGHTS

  • Wildfire events identified in Western US cities using ΔPM2.5/ΔCO Enhancement Ratios.
  • EPA Air Quality System sites need to upgrade outdated CO instruments.
  • ΔNOy/ΔCO enhancement ratios unable to identify wildfire events due to high NOy background.

 

ABSTRACT


 In this study we investigate the use of ΔPM2.5/ΔCO and ΔNOy/ΔCO normalized enhancement ratios (NERs) in identifying wildfire (WF) smoke events in urban areas. Nine urban ambient monitoring sites with adequate CO, PM2.5, and/or NOy measurements were selected for this study. We investigated if WF events could be distinguished from general urban emissions by comparing NERs for wildfires with NERs calculated using yearly ambient data, which we call the ambient enhancement ratios (AERs). The PM2.5/CO and NOy/CO AERs represent typical urban concentrations and can provide insight into the dominant emission sources of the city. All 25 WF events were distinguished because they had ΔPM2.5/ΔCO NERs that were significantly greater than the PM2.5/CO AER for each site. The ΔPM2.5/ΔCO NERs for the WF events ranged from 0.057–0.228 µg m–3 ppbv–1. In contrast, we were only able to calculate useful ΔNOy/ΔCO NERs (correlations with R2 > 0.65) for 4 of 17 events (only 17 of 25 events had NOy data). For these 4 events, ΔNOy/ΔCO NERs ranged from 0.044–0.075 ppbv ppbv–1, not all of which were significantly different from the NOy/CO AERs at the site. We conclude that ΔPM2.5/ΔCO NERs are a very useful tool for identifying WF events, but that the high and variable NOy concentrations in urban areas present problems when trying to use ΔNOy/ΔCO NERs.


Keywords: PM2.5; CO; NOy; Wildfire; Normalized Enhancement Ratio; Urban AQS


Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Enter your email below to receive latest published articles in your field.