Ye Jiang , Xuechong Wang, Zhimin Xing, Changzhong Bao, Guitao Liang

  • College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China

Received: August 30, 2016
Revised: January 1, 2017
Accepted: January 5, 2017
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.08.0352  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:
Jiang, Y., Wang, X., Xing, Z., Bao, C. and Liang, G. (2017). Preparation and Characterization of CeO2-MoO3/TiO2 Catalysts for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 17: 2726-2734. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.08.0352


HIGHLIGHTS

  • The CeO2-MoO3/TiO2 catalyst were prepared by three methods.
  • The catalyst prepared by a single step sol-gel method showed the best activity.
  • The reasons contributing to its superior deNOx performance were proposed.

 

ABSTRACT


CeO2-MoO3/TiO2 catalysts were prepared by three methods: a single step sol-gel (SG), impregnation (IM) and coprecipitation (CP) method. These catalysts were investigated for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO with NH3. The results indicate that the catalyst prepared by the SG method possessed the widest temperature window (about 250–475°C), best SCR activity below 450°C and resistance against 10% H2O and 1000 ppm SO2 at a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 90,000 h–1. According to the results of BET, XRD, XPS, H2-TPR and TEM, it is found that larger BET surface area, more highly dispersed active species of Ce and Mo, presence of more Ce3+ and chemisorbed oxygen, synergistic effect among ceria, molybdenum and titania, and better redox ability can contribute to the better deNOx performance of the CeO2-MoO3/TiO2 catalyst prepared by the SG method, compared with those by the IM and CP methods.


Keywords: NO removal; NH3; Selective catalytic reduction (SCR); CeO2-MoO3/TiO2; Preparation methods


Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827


SCImago Journal & Country Rank