Adewale M. Taiwo

  • Division of Environmental Health & Risk Management, School of Geography, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

Received: September 23, 2015
Revised: January 5, 2016
Accepted: February 28, 2016
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.09.0537  


Cite this article:
Taiwo, A.M (2016). Source Apportionment of Urban Background Particulate Matter in Birmingham, United Kingdom Using a Mass Closure Model. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 16: 1244-1252. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.09.0537


HIGHLIGHTS

  • Urban background air quality was studied.
  • Mass closure model was applied for source apportionment.
  • Sources identified were secondary, sea salt, mineral and carbonaceous species.
  • Dominating source to the PM pollution was carbonaceous species.

 

ABSTRACT


Particulate matter (PM) collected during the summer period of 2011 at the urban background of Elms Road Observatory Site (EROS) in Birmingham, United Kingdom was studied and apportioned using the mass closure model. Particulate matter samples were analysed for Cu, Zn, Fe, Ni, Mn, Cl, NO3, SO42–, PO43–, C2O42–, Na+, NH4+, K+, Ca2+, OC and EC using the standard procedures. Results showed mean mass concentrations of 5.42 ± 1.7 µg m–3 for PM2.5 and 5.41 ± 0.27 µg m–3 for PM10–2.5. Organic carbon (OC, 26%) formed the major component of PM2.5 followed by sulphate (25%) and ammonium (12%). In the coarse PM fraction, ammonium, chloride and OC constituted 17, 15 and 14%, respectively of mass concentration. Metal concentrations in both PM fractions were less than 2% of the observed mass. The mass closure model applied to apportion PM2.5 and PM10–2.5 chemical species was able to identify four components namely: carbonaceous (45 and 19%, respectively), sea salt (7 and 25%), secondary aerosol (48 and 13%) and minerals (13 and 12%). The mass closure model was unable to explain all the chemical components in the coarse PM category leaving the unidentified mass as 31%. On the other hand, the model overestimated the mass of PM2.5 by 14%. The study showed secondary aerosol and carbonaceous species as the dominating sources of PM pollution in the study area.


Keywords: Particulate matter; Urban background; Mass closure model; Emission sources


Share this article with your colleagues 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

7.3
2022CiteScore
 
 
77st percentile
Powered by
Scopus
 
   SCImago Journal & Country Rank

2022 Impact Factor: 4.0
5-Year Impact Factor: 3.4

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit
CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal that promotes submissions of high-quality research and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world. We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.