Seyed Hamed Mirhoseini1, Mahnaz Nikaeen 2, Kazuo Satoh3, Koichi Makimur3

  • 1 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
  • 2 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  • 3 Teikyo University Institute of Medical Mycology, Tokyo, Japan

Received: October 6, 2015
Revised: December 13, 2015
Accepted: January 19, 2016
Download Citation: ||  

  • Download: PDF

Cite this article:
Mirhoseini, S.H., Nikaeen, M., Satoh, K. and Makimur, K. (2016). Assessment of Airborne Particles in Indoor Environments: Applicability of Particle Counting for Prediction of Bioaerosol Concentrations. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 16: 1903-1910.


  • The highest bacterial levels were observed in residence apartments.
  • Fungal levels were found to be generally lower than those of airborne bacteria.
  • Andersen biosampler yields more representative results of bioaerosol concentrations.
  • Particle counting could not take the place of bioaerosol measurements.



Indoor bioaerosols have recently received considerable interest because of their impact on health. In this study, concentrations of bioaerosols in relation to airborne particulate matter in various indoor environments were investigated. The comparative performance of two common biosamplers, including the single-stage Andersen impactor and the all-glass impinger (AGI) for bioaerosol sampling, was also evaluated. The average levels of airborne bacteria and fungi sampled by Andersen were 516 and 176 colony forming units (CFU) m–3 and by AGI were 163 and 151 CFU m–3, respectively. The highest bacterial levels were measured in residence apartments. The most predominant bacteria were belonged to Staphylococcus sp. and Arthrobacter sp. The Andersen impactor appeared to yield fungal concentrations that were comparable to the results obtained using the AGI biosampler. Meanwhile, Andersen impactor counts for bacteria were significantly higher than those obtained by AGI. Particle count data generated by the optical particle counter indicated that 95% of airborne particles were < 1 µm in diameter. Statistical analysis revealed a significant correlation between particle counts of PM1 and concentrations of culturable airborne bacteria measured with the both bioaerosol samplers.

Based on these results, the Andersen impactor performed much better than the AGI for sampling airborne bioaerosols in low-contaminated indoor environments. Accurate measurement of microbial concentrations in indoor environments should be performed by bioaerosol monitoring; however, combining particle counting with bioaerosol sampling could provide prompt information about rapid variations of air quality.

Keywords: Bioaerosol; Indoor; Andersen impactor; Impinger; Particle counting

Don't forget to share this article 


Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Sign up to AAQR Newsletter

Sign up to receive latest research, letters to the editors, and review articles, delivered to your inbox every second week!