Christelle Barbet1,2, Laurent Deguillaume1,2, Nadine Chaumerliac 1,2, Maud Leriche3,4, Evelyn Freney1,2, Aurélie Colomb1,2, Karine Sellegri1,2, Luc Patryl5, Patrick Armand5

  • 1 Université Clermont Auvergne, Université Blaise Pascal, OPGC, Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique, 4 av. Blaise Pascal TSA 60026 CS 60026 63178 Aubière Cedex, France
  • 2 CNRS, LaMP/OPGC, UMR6016, 4 av. Blaise Pascal TSA 60026 CS 60026 63178 Aubière Cedex, France
  • 3 Université de Toulouse, UPS, Laboratoire d’Aérologie, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
  • 4 CNRS, LA, UMR5560, 31400 Toulouse, France
  • 5 CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France

Received: May 15, 2015
Revised: September 25, 2015
Accepted: November 5, 2015
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.05.0342  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:
Barbet, C., Deguillaume, L., Chaumerliac, N., Leriche, M., Freney, E., Colomb, A., Sellegri, K., Patryl, L. and Armand, P. (2016). Evaluation of Aerosol Chemical Composition Simulations by the WRF-Chem Model at the Puy de Dôme Station (France). Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 16: 909-917. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.05.0342


HIGHLIGHTS

  • Unexpected high concentrations of OA in summer 2010 at the puy de Dôme station.
  • Capability of WRF-Chem model vs. REMOTE model to retrieve high SOA formation episode over a mountain site.
  • Diurnal cycle of SOA formation sensitive to oxidation processes of organic compounds.

 

ABSTRACT


The high altitude Puy de Dôme (PUY) research station, located at 1465 m a.s.l. in central France, hosts many instruments allowing continuous measurements and intensive campaigns to measure meteorological parameters, gas-phase species, aerosol and cloud properties. Aerosol chemical composition measurements provided by a compact Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (cToF-AMS) are used to evaluate the WRF-Chem model and more precisely its ability to simulate organic aerosol (OA) for a particular event in summer 2010. Using the Volatility Basis Set approach (VBS), dedicated to the formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA), the WRF-Chem model strongly underestimates the high concentration levels of OA observed at the PUY station: 12.5 µg m–3 were observed and only 2.6 µg m–3 were simulated. By means of several measurements of gas-phase volatile organic compounds (VOCs), the robustness of both emissions and SOA formation processes in the WRF-Chem model was tested. The underestimation of the OA mass concentration appears to be mainly due to a misrepresentation of the oxidation rate of the organic condensable vapours (OCVs) and the SOA yields of both anthropogenic and biogenic VOCs in the VBS parameterization.


Keywords: Organic aerosol; Chemistry/Transport model; Emission inventory; Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation


Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827


SCImago Journal & Country Rank