Shenshen Li1,2, Liangfu Chen1, Meng Fan1, Jinhua Tao1, Zhongting Wang3, Chao Yu1, Yidan Si1, Husi Letu1, Yang Liu 2

  • 1 State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
  • 2 Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
  • 3 Satellite Environment Center, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100094, China

Received: March 19, 2015
Revised: May 31, 2016
Accepted: May 31, 2016
Download Citation: ||  

  • Download: PDF

Cite this article:
Li, S., Chen, L., Fan, M., Tao, J., Wang, Z., Yu, C., Si, Y., Letu, H. and Liu, Y. (2016). Estimation of GEOS-Chem and GOCART Simulated Aerosol Profiles Using CALIPSO Observations over the Contiguous United States. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 16: 3256-3265.


  • GEOS-Chem and GOCART aerosol profiles are evaluated by CALIPSO data.

  • Both models underestimate aerosol extinction coefficients in eastern US.

  • The discrepancies are attributed to model configuration and emission inventories.

  • Aggregation to annual level can significantly improve the agreement.



Model-simulated aerosol profiles can significantly improve a satellite’s capability to estimate ground-level particle concentrations, but are difficult to validate due to the sparse network of ground-based lidars. We quantitatively evaluated aerosol vertical profiles simulated by the Global 3-D Atmospheric Chemical Transport model (GEOS-Chem) and the Goddard Chemistry Aerosol Radiation and Transport model (GOCART) over the contiguous United States using the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO). Model-simulated and satellite-retrieved Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) are first validated with the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) data. The large discrepancies between satellite and model are due to underestimation of GEOS-Chem AOD in the West and GOCART AOD in the East, along with overestimation of CALIPSO AOD during winter and in the West. Model-simulated Aerosol Extinction Coefficients (AEC) at three layers are evaluated against CALIPSO. Aggregating the data from daily and 2 × 2.5 degree model resolutions to a national or annual scale can significantly improve the correlation coefficient and regression slope. Both GEOS-Chem and GOCART underestimate AEC in the lower troposphere in the East, and in the free troposphere in the West than CALIPSO. We attribute these differences to the coarse horizontal resolution, missing aerosol components, and inappropriate emission inventory of the models. Additionally, the low signal-to-noise ratio and cloud and bright surface reflectance interfere with the satellite’s measurements.

Keywords: AOD; AEC profiles; GEOS-Chem; GOCART; CALIPSO

Share this article with your colleagues 


Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

79st percentile
Powered by
   SCImago Journal & Country Rank

2023 Impact Factor: 2.5
5-Year Impact Factor: 2.8

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit
CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal that promotes submissions of high-quality research and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world. We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.