Hsi-Hsien Yang , Kuei-Ting Lee, Yueh-Shu Hsieh, Shao-Wei Luo, Min-Shan Li

  • Department of Environmental Engineering and Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Wufeng, Taichung 413, Taiwan

Received: August 26, 2014
Revised: September 14, 2014
Accepted: October 3, 2014
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.08.0178  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:
Yang, H.H., Lee, K.T., Hsieh, Y.S., Luo, S.W. and Li, M.S. (2014). Filterable and Condensable Fine Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 14: 2010-2016. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.08.0178


HIGHLIGHTS

  • Filterable and condensable PM2.5 from 5 stationary sources were measured.
  • The inorganic fraction dominates in condensable PM.
  • Emission of condensable PM2.5 is higher than filterable PM2.5.

 

ABSTRACT


PM2.5 emissions from stationary sources contain a filterable and condensable portion. In this study, USEPA Method 201A/202 are used to measure filterable and condensable PM2.5 emissions from 5 stationary sources (power plants, boilers, brick manufacturing plant, incinerators and arc furnaces). The average filterable PM2.5 concentrations for power plant, boiler, brick manufacturing plant, incinerator and arc furnace are 0.75, 16.9, 8.67, 0.15 and 2.12 mg/Nm3, respectively. The amount of PM2.5 residue on the exit tube of cyclone and front half of the filter holder is significantly higher when the filterable PM2.5 concentrations are low. It is necessary to collect both filter and the residue particulates to avoid underestimation of PM2.5 emissions. The condensable PM accounts for 61.2%, 73.5%, 44.2%, 52.8% and 51.2% of total PM2.5 for power plant, boiler, brick manufacturing plant, incinerator and arc furnace plant, respectively. The real PM2.5 contribution to the atmosphere would be underestimated if condensable PM is not included. The condensable PM fraction increases as the exhaust temperature rises. The inorganic fraction accounts for 89.0%, 69.4%, 72.3%, 89.8% and 72.8% of condensable PM, respectively, for power plant, boiler, brick manufacturing plant, incinerator and arc furnace. The inorganic fraction is dominant in the condensable PM, which might be due to the high content of SO4.


Keywords: Stationary sources; Filterable PM2.5; Condensable PM2.5; Fine particulate; Dry impinger method


Share this article with your colleagues 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

7.3
2022CiteScore
 
 
77st percentile
Powered by
Scopus
 
   SCImago Journal & Country Rank

2022 Impact Factor: 4.0
5-Year Impact Factor: 3.4

The Future Environment and Role of Multiple Air Pollutants

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit
CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal that promotes submissions of high-quality research and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world. We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.