Zhenyu Xing1, Junjun Deng1, Chao Mu1, Yang Wang2, Ke Du 3

  • 1 Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
  • 2 Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China
  • 3 Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, 2500 University Drive NW, University of Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada

Received: June 19, 2014
Revised: August 9, 2014
Accepted: August 19, 2014
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.06.0121  


Cite this article:
Xing, Z., Deng, J., Mu, C., Wang, Y. and Du, K. (2014). Seasonal Variation of Mass Absorption Efficiency of Elemental Carbon in the Four Major Emission Areas in China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 14: 1897-1905. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.06.0121


HIGHLIGHTS

  • MAEEC shows great seasonal variability in BTH area, YRD, SB and PRD.
  • Source-specific EC has significant impact on seasonal variations of MAEEC.
  • Spatial-temporal variations of MAEEC may cause underestimation of DRFEC.

 

ABSTRACT


As an important site-specific optical parameter widely used in climate models, the mass absorption efficiency (MAE) of elemental carbon (EC), varies dramatically with the source types and governs the direct radiative forcing (DRF) estimation. In this study, the MAE of EC for ambient samples collected from four major emission areas in China, i.e., Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area (BTH), Yangtze River Delta area (YRD), Sichuan Basin area (SB), and Pearl River Delta area (PRD), as well as emissions from burning of residential honeycomb briquette, firewood and rice straw were investigated by using a filter-based method. The annual mean MAEEC over the four major emission areas is 7.51 m2/g.MAEEC in BTH and YRD during summer appears significantly higher than MAEEC in other seasons, while seasonal variations of MAEEC in SB and PRD suggest MAEEC in summer and autumn is higher than that in winter and spring. MAEEC for samples from fossil fuels burning and biomass open-burning is 2.10 times higher than that from residential biofuel burning, which could be one of the reasons for the higher MAEEC values during the seasons heavily affected by fossil fuels burning and biomass open-burning (i.e., summer and autumn) than winter for the four locations. Difference between the measured and AeroCom median value of MAEEC may cause underestimation of DRFEC over the studied area by a factor of 0.13. Spatial and temporal variations of MAEEC would also result in underestimations of DRFEC to different degrees varying with seasons and areas.


Keywords: Elemental carbon; Mass absorption efficiency; Seasonal variability; Direct radiative forcing

Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.