Cheng-Hsiu Yu, Chih-Hung Huang, Chung-Sung Tan This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

  • Department of Chemical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan

Received: May 15, 2012
Revised: August 6, 2012
Accepted: August 6, 2012
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.05.0132  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:


Yu, C.H., Huang, C.H. and Tan, C.S. (2012). A Review of CO2 Capture by Absorption and Adsorption. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 12: 745-769. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.05.0132


 

ABSTRACT


Global warming resulting from the emission of greenhouse gases, especially CO2, has become a widespread concern in the recent years. Though various CO2 capture technologies have been proposed, chemical absorption and adsorption are currently believed to be the most suitable ones for post-combustion power plants. The operation of the chemical absorption process is reviewed in this work, together with the use of absorbents, such as the ionic liquid, alkanolamines and their blended aqueous solutions. The major concerns for this technology, including CO2 capture efficiency, absorption rate, energy required in regeneration, and volume of absorber, are addressed. For adsorption, in addition to physical adsorbents, various mesoporous solid adsorbents impregnated with polyamines and grafted with aminosilanes are reviewed in this work. The major concerns for selection of adsorbent, including cost, adsorption rate, CO2 adsorption capacity, and thermal stability, are compared and discussed. More effective and less energy-consuming regeneration techniques for CO2-loaded adsorbents are also proposed. Future works for both absorption and adsorption are suggested.


Keywords: CO2 capture; Absorption; Rotating packed bed; Adsorption; Amine-based adsorbents


Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827


SCImago Journal & Country Rank