C. Asbach 1, H. Fissan1,2, H. Kaminski1, T.A.J. Kuhlbusch1,2, D.Y.H. Pui3, H. Shin3,4, H.G. Horn5, T. Hase6

  • 1 Institute of Energy and Environmental Technology (IUTA) e.V., 47229 Duisburg, Germany
  • 2 Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CeNIDE), 47057 Duisburg, Germany
  • 3 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
  • 4 now at: KOTEC, Bukgu, Ulsan 68337, Korea
  • 5 TSI GmbH, 52068 Aachen, Germany
  • 6 TSI Inc., Shoreview, MN 55126, USA

Received: May 5, 2011
Revised: July 7, 2011
Accepted: July 7, 2011
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2011.05.0057  

  • Download: PDF

Cite this article:
Asbach, C., Fissan, H., Kaminski, H., Kuhlbusch, T., Pui, D., Shin, H., Horn, H. and Hase, T. (2011). A Low Pressure Drop Preseparator for Elimination of Particles Larger than 450 nm. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 11: 487-496. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2011.05.0057



Measurement techniques which allow the detection of airborne nanoparticles are of great interest for e.g. exposure monitoring and quality control during nanoparticle production. An increasing number of commercial devices use a unipolar diffusion charger to charge the particles and determine the nanoparticle concentration and sometimes size. The analysis however may be biased by the presence of large particles. We therefore developed a preseparator that removes particles larger than 450 nm, i.e the minimum in the range of particle lung deposition curves, but only causes a low pressure drop. The preseparator uses a total flow rate of 2.5 L/min and consists of two stages. The first stage is a virtual impactor that removes particles larger than approximately 1 µm with a minor flow of 1 L/min. Particles above 450 nm are removed from the remaining 1.5 L/min in the cyclone of the second stage. The combination of a cyclone with a virtual impactor was shown to reduce the pressure drop of the preseparator from 8.1 to 5.6 kPa compared with a cyclone alone and improve the sharpness of the separation curve for cut-off diameters around 450 nm. Furthermore the virtual impactor extends the cleaning intervals of the preseparator, because large particles are no longer deposited in the cyclone. Eventually the preseparator was tested with an opposed flow diffusion charger and it was shown that particle charging is not affected by the pressure drop.

Keywords: Cyclone; Virtual impactor; Nanoparticle; Diffusion charger

Share this article with your colleagues 


Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

77st percentile
Powered by
   SCImago Journal & Country Rank

2022 Impact Factor: 4.0
5-Year Impact Factor: 3.4

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit
CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal that promotes submissions of high-quality research and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world. We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.