So Eun Shin1, Chang Hoon Jung2, Yong Pyo Kim 1

  • 1 Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
  • 2 Department of Health Care Management, Kyung-in Women's College, Inchon, Korea

Received: April 12, 2011
Revised: May 26, 2011
Accepted: May 26, 2011
Download Citation: ||  

  • Download: PDF

Cite this article:
Shin, S.E., Jung, C.H. and Kim, Y.P. (2011). Analysis of the Measurement Difference for the PM10 Concentrations between Beta-ray Absorption and Gravimetric Methods at Gosan. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 11: 846-853.



The measured mass concentrations of particulate matter less than 10 μm in diameter (PM10) by β-ray absorption method (BAM) and gravimetric method (GMM) at Gosan, Republic of Korea have shown consistent difference. By using a gas/particle equilibrium model, positive error by the absorption of water at the filter in BAM during the measurements were quantified. The positive error occupied about 50% of the measurement difference. The contributions from the volatilization of ionic species to the difference were minor. However, this estimated water content difference could fully explain the concentration difference by the two methods. Multiple regression analysis was applied to the PM10 mass concentration to find out the major factors that affected the concentration difference. Relative humidity, dust storm event and wind direction were identified as other major factors in addition to water absorption i.e., positive error. Still these factors could not fully account for the difference. Thus, it is advised that when using the PM10 concentration at Gosan, a supersite in Northeast Asia, possible difference should be considered for the data till June 2008 by BAM.

Keywords: Water content; Gas-particle equilibrium; β-ray absorption method; Gravimetric method; Multiple regression analysis

Share this article with your colleagues 


Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

77st percentile
Powered by
   SCImago Journal & Country Rank

2022 Impact Factor: 4.0
5-Year Impact Factor: 3.4

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit
CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal that promotes submissions of high-quality research and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world. We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.