Jason A. Kaminsky1, Emily A.L.M. Gaskin2, Masanori Matsuda3, Antonio H. Miguel4

  • 1 Graduate School of Business, Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Yang and Yamzaki Environment and Energy Building-4210, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
  • 2 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Fagatele Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Executive Office Building, Utulei, Pago Pago, American Samoa, 96799, USA
  • 3 Toyota Motor Corporation, Operation Department Vehicle Logistics Division, 4-7-1 Meieki, Nakamura-ku,Nagoya 450-8711 , Japan
  • 4 Haagen-Smit Laboratory, California Air Resources Board, 9528 Telstar Ave., El Monte, CA 91731, USA

Received: December 29, 2016
Revised: August 31, 2009
Accepted: August 31, 2009
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2008.09.0041  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:
Kaminsky, J.A., Gaskin, E.A., Matsuda, M. and Miguel, A.H. (2009). In-Cabin Commuter Exposure to Ultrafine Particles on Commuter Roads in and around Hong Kong’s Tseung Kwan O Tunnel. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 9: 353-357. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2008.09.0041


 

ABSTRACT


Over half a million cars pass through Hong Kong’s tunnels every day. Commuters, taxi drivers, and other drivers who pass through these tunnels may be exposed to high levels of particulate matter and toxic gases present in the air. There is limited data on in-cabin exposure to pollutants, especially while the vehicle is driving through a tunnel under different cabin ventilation conditions. This study reports in-cabin measurements of fine particles (FP, dp < 2.5 μm) -- which includes nanoparticles and ultrafine particles (UFP, dp < 100 nm) -- in a 1998 Nissan Sunny EX passenger car while driving through Hong Kong’s Tseung Kwan O Tunnel. The vehicle tested did not contain a particle filtration system or an activated carbon filter, and was fueled with unleaded gasoline. The measurements were taken using a water-based condensation particle counter (WCPC) under different conditions consistent with driver behavior. The particle count readings were generally highest with the windows closed and air conditioning on. On average, these readings were more than three times higher than readings with the windows closed and the air conditioning off, and 68% higher than readings with the windows open and the air conditioning off. In-cabin particle concentrations inside the tunnel were up to twenty-one times higher than in-cabin particle concentrations outside the tunnel under comparable traffic conditions. The highest in-cabin particle count concentration reading, 1.94 million particles/cm3, was taken with the windows closed and air conditioning on while the test car was passing a double-decker diesel bus.


Keywords: Hong Kong; Ultrafine particles; In-cabin commuter exposure; Water-based particle counter; Tseung Kwan O Tunnel; Roadway measurements; Nano-particles


Don't forget to share this article 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827


SCImago Journal & Country Rank