Jason A. Kaminsky1, Emily A.L.M. Gaskin2, Masanori Matsuda3, Antonio H. Miguel4

  • 1 Graduate School of Business, Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Yang and Yamzaki Environment and Energy Building-4210, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
  • 2 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Fagatele Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Executive Office Building, Utulei, Pago Pago, American Samoa, 96799, USA
  • 3 Toyota Motor Corporation, Operation Department Vehicle Logistics Division, 4-7-1 Meieki, Nakamura-ku,Nagoya 450-8711 , Japan
  • 4 Haagen-Smit Laboratory, California Air Resources Board, 9528 Telstar Ave., El Monte, CA 91731, USA

Received: December 29, 2016
Revised: August 31, 2009
Accepted: August 31, 2009
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2008.09.0041  

  • Download: PDF

Cite this article:
Kaminsky, J.A., Gaskin, E.A., Matsuda, M. and Miguel, A.H. (2009). In-Cabin Commuter Exposure to Ultrafine Particles on Commuter Roads in and around Hong Kong’s Tseung Kwan O Tunnel. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 9: 353-357. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2008.09.0041



Over half a million cars pass through Hong Kong’s tunnels every day. Commuters, taxi drivers, and other drivers who pass through these tunnels may be exposed to high levels of particulate matter and toxic gases present in the air. There is limited data on in-cabin exposure to pollutants, especially while the vehicle is driving through a tunnel under different cabin ventilation conditions. This study reports in-cabin measurements of fine particles (FP, dp < 2.5 μm) -- which includes nanoparticles and ultrafine particles (UFP, dp < 100 nm) -- in a 1998 Nissan Sunny EX passenger car while driving through Hong Kong’s Tseung Kwan O Tunnel. The vehicle tested did not contain a particle filtration system or an activated carbon filter, and was fueled with unleaded gasoline. The measurements were taken using a water-based condensation particle counter (WCPC) under different conditions consistent with driver behavior. The particle count readings were generally highest with the windows closed and air conditioning on. On average, these readings were more than three times higher than readings with the windows closed and the air conditioning off, and 68% higher than readings with the windows open and the air conditioning off. In-cabin particle concentrations inside the tunnel were up to twenty-one times higher than in-cabin particle concentrations outside the tunnel under comparable traffic conditions. The highest in-cabin particle count concentration reading, 1.94 million particles/cm3, was taken with the windows closed and air conditioning on while the test car was passing a double-decker diesel bus.

Keywords: Hong Kong; Ultrafine particles; In-cabin commuter exposure; Water-based particle counter; Tseung Kwan O Tunnel; Roadway measurements; Nano-particles

Share this article with your colleagues 


Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

79st percentile
Powered by
   SCImago Journal & Country Rank

2023 Impact Factor: 2.5
5-Year Impact Factor: 2.8

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit
CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal that promotes submissions of high-quality research and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world. We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.