M. Alonso , F.J. Alguacil

  • National Center for Metallurgical Research (CSIC), Avenida Gregorio del Amo, 8. 28040 Madrid, Spain

Received: November 30, 2008
Revised: November 30, 2008
Accepted: November 30, 2008
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2008.07.0029  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:
Alonso, M. and Alguacil, F. (2008). Particle Size Distribution Modification During and After Electrical Charging: Comparison between a Corona Ionizer and a Radioactive Neutralizer. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 8: 366-380. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2008.07.0029


 

ABSTRACT


This article presents the results of an experimental investigation carried out to examine the changes of the size distribution of ultrafine particles that take place in aerosol electrical chargers. Two types of commercially available chargers have been studied: an unipolar corona discharge ionizer, and a bipolar radioactive neutralizer. Particle diffusion losses to the walls modify the size distribution in both chargers to approximately the same extent. Additionally, particles can grow by Brownian coagulation in the radioactive neutralizer if the aerosol particle number concentration is above about 107/cm3. In contrast, the extremely small volume of the corona ionizer used in the experiments, 2 cm3, prevents coagulation even when the aerosol concentration is very high. For particle number concentration above 107/cm3 aerosol coagulation takes place downstream of any of these two chargers. The experimental results have been compared with those obtained by numerical integration of the population balance equations including charging, coagulation and diffusion losses. In spite that the coagulation rate between charged particles of opposite polarity is one to two orders of magnitude larger than the corresponding rate for uncharged particles, the numerical calculations have shown that the expected electrostatic enhancement of coagulation is negligible, probably because the fraction of charged particles in the radioactive neutralizer is too low for the particle size range studied.


Keywords: Aerosol charging; Coagulation; Nanoparticle measurement


Share this article with your colleagues 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

7.3
2022CiteScore
 
 
77st percentile
Powered by
Scopus
 
   SCImago Journal & Country Rank

2022 Impact Factor: 4.0
5-Year Impact Factor: 3.4

The Future Environment and Role of Multiple Air Pollutants

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit
CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal that promotes submissions of high-quality research and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world. We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.