John G. Watson , Judith C. Chow, L.-W. Antony Chen

  • Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV, 89512-1095, USA

Received: May 1, 2005
Revised: May 1, 2005
Accepted: May 1, 2005
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2005.06.0006 

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:
Watson, J.G., Chow, J.C. and Chen, L.W.A. (2005). Summary of Organic and Elemental Carbon/Black Carbon Analysis Methods and Intercomparisons. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 5: 65-102. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2005.06.0006


 

ABSTRACT


Many different thermal, optical, and thermal/optical carbon analysis methods for organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC) or black carbon (BC) have been applied throughout the world to evaluate visibility and the Earth’s radiation balance. Dozens of intermethod and interlaboratory comparison studies have been conducted. Several of these studies are catalogued and summarized here. BC or EC concentrations are found to differ by up to a factor of 7 among different methods; factor of 2 differences are common. Differences between methods are not consistent among comparison studies, with some methods showing higher BC for one set of samples and lower BC for other sets relative to a common benchmark. The absorption efficiency relating light absorption (babs) to EC that is derived from collocated optical and chemical measurements can vary by a factor of 10, depending on the collocated babs and EC measurement methods. Future intermethod and interlaboratory comparisons must include components that seek to understand the causes of these differences.


Keywords: Black carbon; Elemental carbon; Aerosol; Organic carbon, thermal/optical analysis; Water-soluble organics; Light scattering/absorption efficiency


Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

Latest coronavirus research from Aerosol and Air Quality Research

2018 Impact Factor: 2.735

5-Year Impact Factor: 2.827


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Sign up to AAQR Newsletter

Sign up to receive latest research, letters to the editors, and review articles, delivered to your inbox every second week!