Jin-Lan Chen1, Chung-Te Lee 1, Shyh-Yuh Chang1, Charles C. K. Chou2

  • 1 Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Central University, Chungli, Taiwan, ROC
  • 2 Center for Environmental, Safety and Health Technology, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC

Received: May 31, 2001
Revised: May 31, 2001
Accepted: May 31, 2001
Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2001.06.0002  

  • Download: PDF


Cite this article:
Chen, J.L., Lee, C.T., Chang, S.Y. and Chou, C.C.K. (2001). The Elemental Contents and Fractal Dimensions of PM2.5 in Taipei City. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 1: 9-20. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2001.06.0002


 

ABSTRACT


Five sites (i.e. Sung-Shan, Wen-Lin, Gu-Ting, Wan-Hwa, and Yen-Ping) located in Taipei City were selected for simultaneously collecting PM2.5 using honeycomb denuders (Koutrakis et al., 1993). The collected filters were subsequently analyzed with a Computer Controlled Scanning Electron Microscope (CCSEM) (RJ Lee Group, Inc., PA, USA) to obtain aerosol elemental compositions. Multivariate statistics such as Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were applied to the resolved elemental compositions for source apportionment. Additionally, aerosol morphology from selected aerosols was quantitatively analyzed using fractal geometry to reveal differences among source types. The measurement results display that predominant particles are either pure carbon or contain a high proportion of carbon. For particles associated with a high percentage of carbon, 63.7% of 9595 particles were found for the first season (fall), 71.3% of 5987 for the second season (winter), and an even higher 82.9% of 9000 for the third season (spring). Cluster analysis for the total amount of aerosols collected reveals 27 source types. Among the resolved source types, 73.3% of 24579 particles were from motor vehicles, 12.4% were from soil dusts, and the remainders were from industrial process, secondary reactions, and sea spraying. In contrast, only 9 source categories were resolved using PCA method, compared to the 27 identified from cluster analysis. Although the apportioned source types of aerosol types of aerosols identified using the cluster method can be lumped together for comparison with PCA, cluster analysis indicates a higher resolution in the source apportionment procedure. A discriminant function is formulated from the resolved source types of the first two seasons to verity the source apportionment using the cluster procedure. The discriminant function analysis demonstrated that 123 out of 1535 particles were misjudged (excluding high percentage carbon particles). The calculation of fractal dimension on the morphology of 15 selected particles illustrates that particles are differentiated from each other based on kinky periphery and compact surface.


Keywords: Source apportionment; Single particles; Statistical methods; CCSEM; Fractal dimension of aerosols


Share this article with your colleagues 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter 

Aerosol and Air Quality Research has published over 2,000 peer-reviewed articles. Enter your email address to receive latest updates and research articles to your inbox every second week.

6.5
2021CiteScore
 
 
77st percentile
Powered by
Scopus
 
   SCImago Journal & Country Rank

2021 Impact Factor: 4.53
5-Year Impact Factor: 3.668

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

Aerosol and Air Quality Research partners with Publons

CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit
CLOCKSS system has permission to ingest, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit

Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) is an independently-run non-profit journal that promotes submissions of high-quality research and strives to be one of the leading aerosol and air quality open-access journals in the world. We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.