Articles online

On the Performance Parameters of PM2.5 and PM1 Size Separators for Ambient Aerosol Monitoring

Category: Aerosol Physics and Instrumentation

Volume: 19 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2173-2184
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.03.0103

Export Citation:  RIS | BibTeX

To cite this article:
Li, X., Ruan, B., Hopke, P.K. and Mehmood, T. (2019). On the Performance Parameters of PM2.5 and PM1 Size Separators for Ambient Aerosol Monitoring. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 19: 2173-2184. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.03.0103.

Xinghua Li 1, Bing Ruan1, Philip K. Hopke2,3, Tariq Mehmood1

  • 1 School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
  • 2 Center for Air Resources Engineering and Science, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA
  • 3 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA


  • Performance of size separator was investigated based on measured urban PSDs.
  • D50 and σg for the PM1 size separator are proposed to be 1.0 ± 0.02 µm and ≤ 1.2.
  • D50 = 2.5 ± 0.2 µm and σg ≤ 1.3 for the PM2.5 size separator suit for urban condition.


The performance of particle size separators that are characterized by their cutpoint (d50) and the steepness of their penetration curves (σg) is a critical feature of measurement methods for ambient PM2.5 and PM1 monitoring. The parameters d50 and σg for PM2.5 size separators are regulated in the official measurement methods of many countries and regions. However, those parameters for PM1 size separators have not been previously specified. The interaction of particle size distributions (PSDs) and the particle size separator performance characteristics has significant influence on the PM sampling results. Atmospheric PSDs for each of the four seasons covering a range of particulate pollution concentrations were measured in urban Beijing. The relative differences (RD) between estimated PM2.5/PM1 sampler concentrations and actual concentrations associated with the interaction between performance characteristics of size separator and actually measured urban PSDs, as well as for three idealized ambient PSDs, have been systematically investigated. For the PM2.5 size separator, when tolerance of cutpoint is 2.5 ± 0.2 µm and σg is no greater than 1.3, RD values for most typical urban atmospheric aerosol conditions were within the permissible error range (± 5%). For the PM1 size separator, when tolerance of cutpoint and sharpness is 1.00 ± 0.02 µm and σg no greater than 1.2, respectively, the RD values for typical urban atmospheric aerosol conditions are within the permissible range. Those parameters could also meet the requirements for sampling of the idealized ambient aerosol distribution.


PM2.5 PM1 Size separator Cutpoint Sharpness Particle size distribution

Related Article

Seasonal Variations in PM2.5-induced Oxidative Stress and Up-regulation of Pro-inflammatory Mediators

Juan Li, Yingying Liu, Zhen An, Wen Li, Xiang Zeng, Huijun Li, Jing Jiang, Jie Song, Weidong Wu
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.06.0288

Infants’ Neurodevelopmental Effects of PM2.5 and Persistent Organohalogen Pollutants Exposure in Southern Taiwan

Cheng-Chih Kao, Chih-Cheng Chen , Japheth L. Avelino, Mariene-syne P. Cortez, Lemmuel L. Tayo, Yi-Hsien Lin, Ming-Hsieh Tsai, Chu-Wen Lin, Yi-Chyun Hsu, Lien-Te Hsieh, Chieh Lin, Lin-Chi Wang, Kwong-Leung J. Yu, How-Ran Chao

Influence of Dilution System and Electrical Low Pressure Impactor Performance on Particulate Emission Measurements from a Medium-scale Biomass Boiler

Jordi F.P. Cornette , Thibault Coppieters, Dominique Desagher, Jurgen Annendijck, Hélène Lepaumier, Nathalie Faniel, Igor Dyakov, Julien Blondeau, Svend Bram

Estimation of Surface Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) Mass Concentrations from Ceilometer Backscattered Profiles

Avinash N. Parde, Sachin D. Ghude , Prakash Pithani, Narendra G. Dhangar, Sandip Nivdange, Gopal Krishna, D.M. Lal, R. Jenamani, Pankaj Singh, Chinmay Jena, Ramakrishna Karumuri, P.D. Safai, D.M. Chate
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.08.0371