OPEN ACCESS

Articles online

A Cascade Air Sampler with Multi-nozzle Inertial Filters for PM0.1

Category: Aerosol Physics and Instrumentation

Volume: 19 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1666-1677
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.02.0066
PDF

Export Citation:  RIS | BibTeX

To cite this article:
Kumsanlas, N., Piriyakarnsakul, S., Sok, P., Hongtieab, S., Ikemori, F., Szymanski, W.W., Hata, M., Otani, Y. and Furuuchi, M. (2019). A Cascade Air Sampler with Multi-nozzle Inertial Filters for PM0.1. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 19: 1666-1677. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.02.0066.

Nuttapon Kumsanlas1, Suthida Piriyakarnsakul2, Pisith Sok1, Surapa Hongtieab2, Fumikazu Ikemori3, Wladyslaw Witold Szymanski4, Mitsuhiko Hata2, Yoshio Otani5, Masami Furuuchi 2,6

  • 1 Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 920-1162, Japan
  • 2 Faculty of Geoscience and Civil Engineering, Institute of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan
  • 3 Nagoya City Institute for Environmental Sciences, Minami-ku, Nagoya 457-0841, Japan
  • 4 Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • 5 Faculty of Frontier Engineering, Institute of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan
  • 6 Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yat, Songkhla 90112, Thailand

Highlights

  • We developed a 3-nozzle inertial filter unit for the chemical analysis of PM0.1-0.5.
  • Separation performance of 1-and 3-nozzle IF units were consistent.
  • The PM and TC masses collected on IFs in the 1-and 3-nozzle units were equivalent.
  • The 3-nozzle unit had a slightly less pressure drop than the 1-nozzle unit.
  • The 3-nozzle unit resulted in a more uniform deposition of PM0.1 on the backup filter.

Abstract

We applied a 3-nozzle geometry to the inertial filter unit of a previously developed cascade air sampler, which originally consisted of a 4-stage (PM10/2.5/1/0.5) impactor, and an inertial filter unit embedded in a single circular nozzle (for PM0.1), and compared its performance against that of a single-nozzle inertial filter unit. The multi-nozzle design enabled the collection of multiple samples and the analysis of multi-chemical particle components in the size range of 0.1–0.5 µm. The total carbon was analyzed to determine the uniformity of the PM0.1 collected on a filter downstream from the inertial filter unit in both samplers, and the differences between the individual nozzles of the 3-nozzle unit as well as those between the 1- and 3-nozzle units were identified based on the chemical composition. After adjusting the quantity of the fibers in each inertial filter (one per nozzle) of the 3-nozzle sampler with care on the fiber packing uniformity , the 3-nozzle and 1-nozzle units exhibited similar separation performance, with approximately a 5% lower pressure drop for the former. The differences in the collected particle mass and the total carbon between the individual nozzles of the multi-nozzle unit and between the single- and multi-nozzle units were found to be less than 10%. However, the 3-nozzle unit uniformly collected particles regardless of the loaded particle mass, whereas its 1-nozzle counterpart exhibited non-uniform collection with higher loads. These data, together with the lower pressure drop, show that the multi-nozzle design has practical applicability, thus opening possibilities for chemically analyzing PM0.1.

Keywords

Nanoparticles Separation performance Multi-component analysis, Webbed metal fibers Uniform deposition


Related Article

Development and Validation of a Novel Particle Source for Nano-sized Test Aerosols

Christian Monsé , Christian Monz, Burkhard Stahlmecke, Birger Jettkant, Jürgen Bünger, Thomas Brüning, Volker Neumann, Dirk Dahmann

Influence of the Dilution System and Electrical Low Pressure Impactor Performance on Particulate Emission Measurements from a Medium-scale Biomass Boiler

Jordi F.P. Cornette , Thibault Coppieters, Dominique Desagher, Jurgen Annendijck, Hélène Lepaumier, Nathalie Faniel, Igor Dyakov, Julien Blondeau, Svend Bram

Estimation of Surface Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) Mass Concentrations from Ceilometer Backscattered Profiles

Avinash N. Parde, Sachin D. Ghude , Prakash Pithani, Narendra G. Dhangar, Sandip Nivdange, Gopal Krishna, D.M. Lal, R. Jenamani, Pankaj Singh, Chinmay Jena, Ramakrishna Karumuri, P.D. Safai, D.M. Chate
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.08.0371
PDF
;