Articles online

Comparative Study of PAHs in PM1 and PM2.5 at a Background Site in the North China Plain

Category: Air Pollution and Health Effects

Volume: 19 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2281-2293
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2018.12.0462

Export Citation:  RIS | BibTeX

To cite this article:
Zhang, Y., Yang, L., Gao, Y., Chen, J., Li, Y., Jiang, P., Zhang, J., Yu, H. and Wang, W. (2019). Comparative Study of PAHs in PM1 and PM2.5 at a Background Site in the North China Plain. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 19: 2281-2293. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2018.12.0462.

Yan Zhang1, Lingxiao Yang 1,2, Ying Gao1, Jianmin Chen1,2, Yanyan Li1, Pan Jiang1, Junmei Zhang1, Hao Yu3, Wenxing Wang1

  • 1 Environment Research Institute, Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong 266237, China
  • 2 Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Climate Change, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210093, China
  • 3 School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong 266237, China


  • The ∑PAH concentrations and cancer risks were the highest under biomass burning condition.
  • Diesel combustion played more significant role to the emission of PAHs in PM1.
  • Wood burning played more significant role to the emission of PM2.5-bound PAHs.
  • PAHs in polluted conditions were more significantly influenced by short-distance transport.


Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are carcinogenic and mutagenic. They bounded in atmospheric fine (PM2.5) and submicron (PM1) particles severely affect human health. To characterize 18 PAHs at a background site (Mount Tai) in the heavily polluted North China Plain (NCP), PM1 and PM2.5 samples were collected in the autumn of 2014. The sampling periods were classified into clean conditions and polluted conditions according to PM2.5 concentration. Biomass burning condition was selected from polluted conditions to clarify the impact of biomass burning to PAHs concentrations. The concentrations of ∑18 PAHs were 14.5 and 24.5 ng m–3 and the contents were 515 and 607 µg g–1 in PM1 and PM2.5, respectively. Three-ring PAHs were the primary contributors to the total PAHs. The major PAHs sources at Mount Tai were pyrogenic and traffic emission. Diesel combustion played more significant role to the emission of PM1-bound PAHs, while wood burning source was more obvious for PM2.5-bound PAHs. PAHs concentrations and cancer risks were the highest during biomass burning condition compared with those during polluted and clean conditions. The lifetime accumulated cancer risk of PM1-bound PAHs was considered to be acceptable, whereas it elevated to “potential risk” (10−6) for adults (30–70 years old) exposed to PM2.5-bound PAHs. The Concentration-weighted trajectory (CWT) model indicated long-distance transport from Northwest China was the major source of PM1-bound PAHs under the clean conditions. Compare with clean conditions, PAHs were more strongly influenced by short-distance transported air masses from the South of Shandong Province under the polluted conditions.


Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon Biomass burning Health risk assessment Source identification CWT model

Related Article

Seasonal Variations in PM2.5-induced Oxidative Stress and Up-Regulation of Pro-inflammatory Mediators

Juan Li, Yingying Liu, Zhen An, Wen Li, Xiang Zeng, Huijun Li, Jing Jiang, Jie Song, Weidong Wu
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.06.0288

Characteristics of Volatile Organic Compounds during Different Pollution Periods in Winter in Yuncheng, a Typical City in North China

Qianzhuo Gao, Yulong Yan , Rumei Li, Yang Xu, Yueyuan Niu, Chenglong Liu, Kai Xie, Zeiwei Chang, Dongmei Hu, Zhiyong Li, Lin Peng

Infants’ Neurodevelopmental Effects of PM2.5 and Persistent Organohalogen Pollutants Exposure in Southern Taiwan

Cheng-Chih Kao, Chih-Cheng Chen , Japheth L. Avelino, Mariene-syne P. Cortez, Lemmuel L. Tayo, Yi-Hsien Lin, Ming-Hsieh Tsai, Chu-Wen Lin, Yi-Chyun Hsu, Lien-Te Hsieh, Chieh Lin, Lin-Chi Wang, Kwong-Leung J. Yu, How-Ran Chao

Nanofiber Filter Performance Improvement: Nanofiber Layer Uniformity and Branched Nanofiber

Seong Chan Kim , Seungkoo Kang, Handol Lee, Dong-Bin Kwak, Qisheng Ou, Chenxing Pei, David Y.H. Pui
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.07.0343