Articles online

Spatial and Temporal Variations of PM2.5 in North Carolina

Category: Aerosol and Atmospheric Chemistry

Volume: 19 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 698-710
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2018.03.0111

Export Citation:  RIS | BibTeX

Bin Cheng, Lingjuan Wang-Li

  • Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA


  • Higher PM2.5 in central NC urban areas; significant reduction of PM2.5 in 2005–2014.
  • PM2.5 were significantly higher in summer and lower in winter only in 2005–2011.
  • Inorganic PM2.5 were dominant part of PM2.5 in 2005–2011 but not in 2012–2014.
  • Inverse seasonal variation for NO3 and SO42– mass fractions.
  • This study provides insights to link the ambient PM2.5 to various sources.


Studies have indicated that the adverse effects on human health and the decrease in visibility caused by fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exhibit spatial heterogeneity. Moreover, the environmental effects produced by different chemical compositions of PM2.5 vary on a regional scale. Therefore, understanding the spatiotemporal variations and chemical compositions of PM2.5 is necessary for assessing the regional impacts. Secondary inorganic PM2.5 (iPM2.5) is formed through chemical reactions between the base gas NH3 and acidic gas pollutants (e.g., NO2 or SO2). The major components of iPM2.5 include NH4+, SO42–, and NO3. To fully comprehend the regional impacts of PM2.5, this research quantifies the spatiotemporal variations of iPM2.5 with the aim of evaluating the contributions from iPM2.5 to PM2.5 in North Carolina (NC). The concentrations (at 34 sites) and chemical components (at 7 sites) of PM2.5 from 2005 to 2014 were extracted from the EPA’s AirData, with the highest concentrations measured in the urban areas of central NC. Notably, PM2.5 concentrations have been significantly reduced over the past 10 years, with a concurrent decreasing trend in iPM2.5. Seasonal variation analysis indicates that PM2.5 concentrations were higher in summer and lower in winter; however, significant variation occurred only between 2005 and 2011. Although iPM2.5 formed the largest mass fraction of PM2.5 for 2005–2011, organic carbon matter (OCM) contributed the dominant share for 2012–2014. Significant seasonal variations in the iPM2.5 mass fractions were also observed, with NO3 and SO42– exhibiting inverse variations. This study links the ambient PM2.5 to various sources by revealing the spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 and their associated chemical compositions in NC, thereby enabling the development of effective control and mitigation strategies.


Chemical compositions Inorganic PM2.5 Spatiotemporal variations

Related Article

Characterization and Spatial Source Apportionments of Ambient PM10 and PM2.5 during the Heating Period in Tian’jin, China

Baoshuang Liu, Xiaoyun Sun, Jiaying Zhang, Xiaohui Bi , Yafei Li, Liwei Li, Haiyan Dong, Zhimei Xiao, Yufen Zhang, Yinchang Feng
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.06.0281

Characterization and Source Analysis of Water-soluble Ions in Atmospheric Particles in Jinzhong, China

Ling Mu , Lirong Zheng, Meisheng Liang , Mei Tian, Xuemei Li, Danhua Jing