OPEN ACCESS

Articles online

Statistical Comparison of Regional-Scale Tropospheric Aerosol Extinction Coefficient across China Based on CALIPSO Data

Category: Optical/Radiative Properties and Remote Sensing

Article In Press
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.10.0385
PDF | Supplemental material | RIS | BibTeX

Yujun Qiu 1, Leiming Zhang2, Yongsheng Chen3

  • 1 School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
  • 2 Air Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, ON M3H 5T4, Canada
  • 3 Department of Atmospheric Science, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada

Highlights

Regional annual average EC varied by a factor of < 3.7 in the low troposphere.
Regional seasonal average EC varied by several ten-percent.
Light-polluted condition occurred by 5.5–42.1% in the low troposphere.
Heavy-polluted condition occurred by 1.3–9.8%.


Abstract

Two years of CALIPSO level 2 version 2 data were analyzed to obtain regional distributions of vertical profiles of the aerosol extinction coefficient (AEC) across China. 10 typical geographical regions were selected for comparison, which cover various aerosol pollution levels, climate zones, and underlying surfaces. The whole troposphere was split into two-layers: the Lower- and the Upper-layer—separated by the maximum boundary layer height—which represent the boundary layer and the upper tropospheric layer, respectively. The annual average of the column-average AEC in the 10 regions ranged from 0.066 to 0.243 km–1 in the Lower-layer and from 0.022 to 0.059 km–1 in the Upper-layer. The regional AEC in the Lower-layer was the highest in central and eastern China, followed by that in the Sichuan Basin, the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, the capital economic circle, the Pearl River Delta, the desert region, the Tibetan Plateau, northeast China, the northwest semi-arid plateau, and, finally, the East China Sea. The seasonal AEC in the Lower-layer was the highest during spring in the desert and marine regions, during the summer on the Tibetan Plateau, and during autumn or winter in the other regions. The regional and seasonal patterns of AEC in the Lower-layer agreed to a large extent with known regional distributions of surface-layer PM2.5 distributions and dominant seasonal emission sources in their respective regions. Regional and seasonal patterns in the Upper-layer were slightly different from those in the Lower-layer due to different transport pathways of aerosol pollution in different regions. The proportion of occurrence under different pollution conditions and the number of polluted days were also estimated separately for the Lower- and the Upper-layer, based on AEC vertical profiles for each region.

Keywords

Tropospheric aerosol Aerosol pollution Aerosol column average Occurrence frequency


Related Article

Impacts of Aerosols on the Retreat of the Sierra Nevada Glaciers in California

Hesham El-Askary , Jingjing Li, Wenzhao Li, Thomas Piechota, Tommy Ta, Ariane Jong, Xinyi Zhang, Tiantian Yang
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2018.03.0089
PDF

Effects of Wintertime Polluted Aerosol on Clouds over the Yangtze River Delta: Case Study

Chen Xu, Junyan Duan, Yanyu Wang, Mei Li, Tiantao Cheng , Hua Wang , Hailin Zhu, Xin Xie, Yuehui Liu, Yan Ling, Xiang Li, Lingdong Kong, Qianshan He, Hongli Wang, Renjian Zhang

A Comparative Analysis of Aerosol Microphysical, Optical and Radiative Properties during the Spring Festival Holiday over Beijing and Surrounding Regions

Yu Zheng, Huizheng Che , Xiangao Xia, Yaqiang Wang, Hujia Zhao, Hong Wang, Victor Estell├ęs, Linchang An, Ke Gui, Tianze Sun, Boshi Kang, Deguang Zhang, Chunyang Zhao, Chong Liu, Zhuozhi Shu, Yongliang Sun, Bingbo Huang, Rongfan Chai, Tianliang Zhao, Xiaoye Zhang
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.10.0396
PDF

Analysis of Aerosol Optical Properties due to a Haze Episode in the Himalayan Foothills: Implications for Climate Forcing

Khan Alam , Rehana Khan, Armin Sorooshian, Thomas Blaschke, Samina Bibi, Humera Bibi
Article In Press
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.06.0222
PDF
;