OPEN ACCESS

Articles online

Can ΔPM2.5/ΔCO and ΔNOy/ΔCO Enhancement Ratios Be Used to Characterize the Influence of Wildfire Smoke in Urban Areas?

Category: Urban Air Quality

Volume: 17 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2413-2423
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.02.0069
PDF | Supplemental material | RIS | BibTeX

James R. Laing1, Daniel A. Jaffe 1,2, Abbigale P. Slavens1, Wenting Li1, Wenxi Wang1

  • 1 School of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, University of Washington Bothell, Bothell, WA 98011-8246, USA
  • 2 Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1640, USA

Highlights

Wildfire events identified in Western US cities using ΔPM2.5/ΔCO Enhancement Ratios.
EPA Air Quality System sites need to upgrade outdated CO instruments.
ΔNOy/ΔCO enhancement ratios unable to identify wildfire events due to high NOy background.


Abstract

 In this study we investigate the use of ΔPM2.5/ΔCO and ΔNOy/ΔCO normalized enhancement ratios (NERs) in identifying wildfire (WF) smoke events in urban areas. Nine urban ambient monitoring sites with adequate CO, PM2.5, and/or NOy measurements were selected for this study. We investigated if WF events could be distinguished from general urban emissions by comparing NERs for wildfires with NERs calculated using yearly ambient data, which we call the ambient enhancement ratios (AERs). The PM2.5/CO and NOy/CO AERs represent typical urban concentrations and can provide insight into the dominant emission sources of the city. All 25 WF events were distinguished because they had ΔPM2.5/ΔCO NERs that were significantly greater than the PM2.5/CO AER for each site. The ΔPM2.5/ΔCO NERs for the WF events ranged from 0.057–0.228 µg m–3 ppbv–1. In contrast, we were only able to calculate useful ΔNOy/ΔCO NERs (correlations with R2 > 0.65) for 4 of 17 events (only 17 of 25 events had NOy data). For these 4 events, ΔNOy/ΔCO NERs ranged from 0.044–0.075 ppbv ppbv–1, not all of which were significantly different from the NOy/CO AERs at the site. We conclude that ΔPM2.5/ΔCO NERs are a very useful tool for identifying WF events, but that the high and variable NOy concentrations in urban areas present problems when trying to use ΔNOy/ΔCO NERs.

Keywords

Wildfire Normalized Enhancement Ratio Urban AQS PM2.5 CO NOy


Related Article

Vertical Ozone Concentration Profiles in the Arabian Gulf Region during Summer and Winter: Sensitivity of WRF-Chem to Planetary Boundary Layer Schemes

Christos Fountoukis , Mohammed A. Ayoub, Luis Ackermann, Daniel Perez-Astudillo, Dunia Bachour, Ivan Gladich, Ross D. Hoehn

On the Morphology and Composition of Particulate Matter in an Urban Environment

Bahadar Bahadar Zeb, Khan Khan Alam , Armin Armin Sorooshian, Thomas Blaschke, Ifthikhar Ahmad, Imran Shahid
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.09.0340
PDF

Concentration of Ultrafine Particles near Roadways in An Urban Area in Chicago, Illinois

Sheng Xiang, Zhice Hu, Wenjuan Zhai, Dongqi Wen, Kenneth E. Noll
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.09.0347
PDF

Spatial Characterization of Black Carbon Mass Concentration in the Atmosphere of a Southeast Asian Megacity: An Air Quality Case Study for Metro Manila, Philippines

Honey Dawn Alas , Thomas Müller, Wolfram Birmili, Simonas Kecorius, Maria Obiminda Cambaliza, James Bernard B. Simpas, Mylene Cayetano, Kay Weinhold, Edgar Vallar, Maria Cecilia Galvez, Alfred Wiedensohler
;