OPEN ACCESS

Articles online

Favourable and Unfavourable Scenarii of Radiative Fog Formation Defined by Ground-Based and Satellite Observation Data

Category: Others

Article In Press
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.01.0044
PDF | RIS | BibTeX

Thierry Elias 1, Dominique Jolivet1, Marie Mazoyer2, Jean-Charles Dupont3

  • 1 HYGEOS, 165 avenue de Bretagne, 59000 Lille, France
  • 2 Météo France/CNRS-CNRM/GAME, Toulouse, France
  • 3 Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Ecole Polytechnique, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 91128 Palaiseau, France

Highlights

a decision tree for formation of radiative cooling fog is generated.
12 months of ground-based and satellite data were collected.
fog formation probability is increased by a factor 10 by 6 predictors.
the formation probability reached 40% for 5 automn developed fogs.


Abstract

An innovative set of six observed predictors of fog formation by radiative cooling is proposed, which describes: 1) one of the main processes of fog formation that is the water uptake by aerosols at surface level; 2) the fog development along the vertical up to 30 meters, as well as the cloud cover; and 3) the temporal evolution of the parameters describing the water uptake by aerosols and the cloud cover. The visibility is used as a signal of atmospheric and surface processes affecting the water uptake by aerosols. The vertical fog development is described by the vertical thermal gradient along a 30-m meteorological mast. The cloud cover is described using a ceilometer for low and middle clouds above the instrument, and satellite data for clouds in a pixel and in a larger 9 × 9-pixel region around the site. The set of predictors can be observed in operational conditions, such as on airport fields. Data acquired at the SIRTA platform (Paris, France) during two autumns and two winters were analysed, and the cloud cover classification derived from the SEVIRI instrument on the METEOSAT Second Generation satellite by the EUMETSAT/NWCSAF program was also utilized. The training data set was acquired in November 2011 while the validation data set extended over 12 months.

All situations were discriminated between favourable and unfavourable scenarii of radiative cooling fog formation, with a factor of 10 in probability. 246 moderate visibility events (with visibility between 5 and 10 km) were observed under a clear sky in 12 months at SIRTA. While developed fog formed according to one scenario, thin fog formed according to six scenarii. On the contrary to thin fog, developed fog did not form when cirrus clouds were observed above moderate visibility situations. The fog formation probability varied from 12 to 43%, and even reached 100% for one thin fog. As the training data set was acquired in autumn, the predictor set seems more appropriate to nowcast fog in humid autumn conditions, when the fog formation probability was multiplied by ~2. The predictive set could be enriched by predictors proposed in literature, and tests suggest that relative humidity would improve the fog formation probability in winter. Five predictors identify 65 of the 217 no-fog events counted in 12 months, with ~3 h anticipation time. If visibility decreased below 5 km, 88 additional no-fog events were identified. In this case, the formation probability was 35% for developed fog, and 24–60% for thin fog, but with an anticipation time reduced to ~1.5 h. Only one fog, which represents 3% of the fog events, would be missed with such a predictive scheme.

Keywords

Fog Ground-based Satellite Observation Visibility Formation Probability


Related Article

Determination of Fog-Droplet Deposition Velocity from a Simple Weighing Method

Jackie Tav , Olivier Masson, Frédéric Burnet, Pascal Paulat, Thierry Bourrianne, Sébastien Conil, Laurent Pourcelot
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.11.0519
PDF

Nano- and Submicron Particles Emission during Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW) of Steel: Differences between Automatic and Manual Process

Elena Baracchini, Carlotta Bianco, Matteo Crosera, Francesca Larese Filon, Elena Belluso, Silvana Capella, Giovanni Maina, Gianpiero Adami
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.07.0226
PDF
;