OPEN ACCESS

Articles online

Low Molecular Weight Monocarboxylic Acids in PM2.5 and PM10: Quantification, Seasonal Variation and Source Apportionment

Category: PM2.5, Atmospheric Aerosols and Urban Air Quality

Volume: 17 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 485-498
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.05.0183
PDF | Supplemental material | RIS | BibTeX

Nidhi Verma, Aparna Satsangi, Anita Lakhani, K. Maharaj Kumari

  • Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Dayalbagh, Agra 282110, India

Highlights

Monocarboxylic acids along with carbonaceous and major ions were analysed.
High concentrations of both acetic and formic acid were observed in winter.
F/A > 1 which indicates primary emissions are dominant.
CH3COOH is mainly from primary sources while HCOOH is from secondary sources.


Abstract

PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols from a semi-urban site of Agra (27°10′N, 78°05′E) in North-Central India were analyzed for carbonaceous aerosols (Organic and Elemental carbon), low molecular weight monocarboxylic acids (Acetic and Formic acid) along with inorganic ions (Cl, NO3, SO42–, K+ and Ca2+) during April 2014 to August 2015. The average PM2.5 and PM10 mass concentrations were 86.3 ± 71.3 and 169.7 ± 100.5 µg m–3, respectively; about 45% of PM2.5 and 67% of PM10 samples were above NAAQ (National Ambient Air Quality) standards. The average organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) concentrations were 18.2 ± 12.3 and 6.7 ± 4.5 µg m–3, respectively in PM2.5 and 25.2 ± 14.1 and 8.1 ± 5.9 µg m–3 respectively in PM10. The average concentration of acetic acid (AA) in PM2.5 and PM10 were 330 ± 211 and 392 ± 224 ng m–3 respectively. The average concentration of formic acid (FA) in PM2.5 and PM10 were 348 ± 193 and 336 ± 175 ng m–3 respectively. Formic acid concentration was higher in PM2.5 than PM10 but the difference is not statistically significant. Both AA and FA showed similar seasonal variation: winter > post-monsoon > summer > monsoon. Low temperature and high relative humidity in winter season favours gas to particle conversion resulting in high concentrations. The average FA to AA (F/A) ratio was 0.69 indicating dominance of primary sources at the study site. Correlation analysis of AA and FA with major ions (Cl, NO3, SO42–, K+ and Ca2+), EC, secondary organic carbon and trace gases (O3 and CO) was performed to identify their primary or secondary origin. The results of correlation analysis suggest that AA is mainly contributed by primary sources while FA originates from secondary sources.

Keywords

Carboxylic acid PM2.5 PM10 Primary sources Secondary sources


Related Article

Trends of PM2.5 and Chemical Composition in Beijing, 2000–2015

Jianlei Lang , Yanyun Zhang, Ying Zhou, Shuiyuan Cheng, Dongsheng Chen, Xiurui Guo, Sha Chen, Xiaoxin Li, Xiaofan Xing, Haiyan Wang
Volume: 17 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 412-425
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.07.0307
PDF | Supplemental material

A Study of Characteristics and Origins of Haze Pollution in Zhengzhou, China, Based on Observations and Hybrid Receptor Models

Si Wang, Shaocai Yu , Pengfei Li, Liqiang Wang, Khalid Mehmood, Weiping Liu, Renchang Yan, Xianjue Zheng
Volume: 17 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 513-528
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.06.0238
PDF

Development of an Automated System (PPWD/PILS) for Studying PM2.5 Water-Soluble Ions and Precursor Gases: Field Measurements in Two Cities, Taiwan

Ziyi Li, Yingshu Liu, Yujie Lin, Sneha Gautam, Hui-Chuan Kuo, Chuen-Jinn Tsai , Huajun Yeh, Wei Huang, Shih-Wei Li, Guo-Jei Wu
Volume: 17 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 426-443
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.10.0440
PDF | Supplemental material
;