Articles online

Emissions Study and Estimation of Carbon Dioxide Production from Jatropha Curcas Oil Biodiesel

Category: Air Pollution and Health Effects

Volume: 16 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1222-1233
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2015.07.0479

Export Citation:  RIS | BibTeX

Yo-Ping Greg Wu , Ya-Fen Lin, Shu-Han Chang

  • Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National Ilan University, I-lan 26047, Taiwan


Biodiesel was produced from Jatropha curcas oil.
Composition analysis on Jatropha biodiesel.
Emissions tests from Jatropha biodiesel, Diesel, and mackerel biodiesel.
Emisssion of CO2 from the fuels in this study was estimated.


The goal of this study was to analyse the combustion characteristics and emissions of Jatropha curcas biodiesel (JCB) when run in a diesel engine. Jatropha curcas oil was used to produce Jatropha curcas biodiesel (JCB) through a transesterification process. The major fuel properties of JCB, including the acid value, kinematic viscosity, flash point, gross heating value, and iodine value, were determined and compared with that of soybean biodiesel (SBM), sunflower seed biodiesel (SFM), mackerel fish oil biodiesel (MB), and premium diesel (D). JCB had a higher density, acid value, kinematic viscosity, iodine value and flash point, but a lower gross heating value, than D. JCB was then used to analyze combustion characteristics, CO, CO2, NO, NOx, SO2, and particulate matter (PM), under varied engine speeds and varied engine loads. The experimental results show CO2 concentration increased with increasing engine loads for all fuels. Engine trials on D exhibited better combustion efficiency at lower engine loads (0 kW–4 kW) but engine trials on JCB exhibited better combustion efficiency for higher engine loads (5 kW– 8 kW). JCB emitted more NO and NOx on a loaded engine. Engine trials on JCB emitted higher PM concentration when the engine was not loaded, while engine trials on MB produced higher PM concentration when the engine was loaded. The estimated CO2 emissions for JCB, MB, and D are 9221.3, 9617.2, and 10185.0 g (gal fuel)–1, respectively.


Jatropha curcas biodiesel Biodiesel emisssions CO2 emission

Related Article

Source Identification on High PM2.5 Days Using SEM/EDS, XRF, Raman, and Windblown Dust Modeling

Jeff Wagner , Zhong-Min Wang, Sutapa Ghosal, Stephen Wall
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.05.0276

Analysis of PAHs Associated with PM10 and PM2.5 from Different Districts in Nanjing

Xiansheng Liu, J├╝rgen Schnelle-Kreis, Brigitte Schloter-Hai, Lili Ma , Pengfei Tai, Xin Cao, Cencen Yu, Thomas Adam, Ralf Zimmermann

Traffic Condition and Emission Factor from Diesel Vehicles within the Kathmandu Valley

Enna Mool, Prakash V. Bhave, Nita Khanal, Rejina M. Byanju, Sagar Adhikari, Bhupendra Das, Siva P. Puppala

Comparative Study of PAHs in PM1 and PM2.5 at a Background Site in the North China Plain

Yan Zhang, Lingxiao Yang , Ying Gao, Jianmin Chen, Yanyan Li, Pan Jiang, Junmei Zhang, Hao Yu, Wenxing Wang