Articles online

Physiological Responses to Acute Airborne Particle Exposure during Maximal Aerobic Power

Category: Air Pollution and Health Effects

Volume: 16 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1922-1930
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2015.04.0208

Export Citation:  RIS | BibTeX

Giorgio Buonanno 1,2, Luca Stabile1, Daniela Lecce3, Angelo Rodio3, Fernanda C. Fuoco1

  • 1 Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, via G. di Biasio 43, 03043 Cassino (FR), Italy
  • 2 Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
  • 3 Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health - University of Cassino and Southern Lazio - Via Sant'Angelo in TH snc - Campus Folcara, 03043 Cassino (FR), Italy


We measured physiological effects of airborne particle exposure in athletes.
Intensity exercise close to maximal aerobic capacity was considered.
Particles were generated through incense-burning indoor phenomena.
Statistically significant differences were found between high and low scenarios.
No differences were measured in terms of exhaled nitric oxide.


The effect of the exposure to airborne particles on the physical performances achieved by athletes was investigated. Respiratory and cardiovascular parameters of nine subjects (volunteers, regularly performing physical activity) were measured during their high-intensity exercise performed indoor on a cycle ergometer. A steady-state concentration of airborne particles was generated through incense burning.

Two different particle exposure scenarios were tested: low (no source in operation) and high exposure (particle generation from incense burning phenomena). Alveolar-deposited surface area doses received by subjects during low and high exposure tests were measured equal to 22.7 ± 8.58 and 1.18 ± 0.22 × 103 mm2, respectively.

Oxygen uptake at the peak of the physical activity resulted statistically higher during high exposure tests, whereas lower peak heart rate values were measured for such scenario.

In terms of mechanical efficiency, a higher peak metabolic power was recognized for subjects performing tests in high exposure conditions: results were statistically different (about 1%) with respect to low exposure tests. On the other hand, measurements of exhaled nitric oxide (parameter associated to airway inflammations) performed during the tests showed no significant differences between the two exposure scenarios.


Air pollution Physical exercise Airborne particle exposure Oxygen consumption Exhaled nitric oxide

Related Article

Consistency of Urban Background Black Carbon Concentration Measurements by Portable AE51 and Reference AE22 Aethalometers: Effect of Corrections for Filter Loading

Nicola Masey, Eliani Ezani, Jonathan Gillespie, Fiona Sutherland, Chun Lin, Scott Hamilton, Mathew R. Heal, Iain J. Beverland
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.03.0145

Global Research Trends in Health Effects of Volatile Organic Compounds during the Last 16 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis

Shumin Cheng, Jiale Zhang, Yujing Wang, Daqing Zhang, Guopeng Teng, Guo-Ping Chang-Chien, Qianli Huang , Yu-Bo Zhang , Ping Yan

Seasonal Variation, Source Apportionment and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in PM2.5 in Ningbo, China

Yue Wu, Beibei Lu, Xinlei Zhu, Aihong Wang, Meng Yang, Shaohua Gu, Xiaoxia Wang, Pengbo Leng, Kristina M. Zierold, Xiaohai Li, Ke Kerri Tang, Lanyun Fang, Ruixue Huang, Guozhang Xu , Lv Chen
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2018.12.0452